Paris is on fire. Not for the first time and most likely not for the last time. Contrary to appearances, the consequence of French opposition may affect us as well.
Liberation possible in Europe
If we agree that European political systems are already so preserved that the "general direction" of their elites can only change under the force of the nations in these countries; and that this is simply a condition for a geopolitical change, i.e. the departure of any part of Europe from the well-known "Dashington consensus" – we must support those French women and men who have been bravely facing armed troops for days.
There are presently only 3 countries in Western Europe whose economic, military or geopolitical possible could affect the full region. They are polite Germans who, raised in a culture of respect for the law, are incapable to build up their strength to make abrupt changes, and the summit of their opposition is anti-covid marches or the anniversary of execution Rose of Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht. No threat to establishment. It is the British where the London City works in full steam, but any mass opposition movement has been pacified in times of government Margaret Thatcher And to this day, Windsor's subjects have not truly regained their erstwhile viability. And yet it's the French, where the tradition of the revolution is inactive alive, and the meaning of the three-colour flag is besides deep to be taken over by the regime. Emmanuel Macron.
If the "national revolution" had won elsewhere: in Italy, Poland, the Netherlands or Scandinavia, we could presume with a large deal of probability that under the motto "the fight for human rights" it would have been swept from the ground in a fewer years at most. Apart from the “great three”, no European Union associate State has the possible to defend itself if it decides to break out of the Anglo-Saxon plan status quo.
Fight for Peace
The French regularly take to the streets. The political scene there was seized by technocrats and global finance. Emmanuel Macron and his likes, in the presidential strategy they are able to reproduce their power without much effort all fewer years. A pair of opposition in the election goes to the whistle, due to the fact that the rival of “enlightened absolutism” is always individual besides “controversial” for the French street to vote for it, even against the system.
However, this does not reduce the possible for opposition on this street. The Revolutionary Left Pact helped mainstream Just for a second. In the function of avant-garde she was replaced by Yellow Vests – an ideologically eclectic movement, but representing the working class as a whole. The interior movement of the French periphery, defining the enemy in the center. Capable of hundreds of thousands coming to this center in search of stolen resources.
And now acting in defence of democracy and parliamentary. most likely involuntary. It's a coincidence, but it's symbolic. Macron resigns from the Parliament's question of opinion and authoritarian method introduces a reactionary pension reform. Democracy is not defended by Washington or Brussels, but by average Frenchmen from Marseille, Lyon or Bordeaux. The price is paid advanced due to the fact that police don't spare force to break another specified decision to dust. And all of this happens in conditions erstwhile the countries of Europe, committed to defending Anglo-Saxon domination in the world, lay powerful money to sustain the war in Ukraine. It was only a substance of time before these costs began to shift to the working people, and this is what happened in France. Even if unconsciously – the French fight for the end of the war. They don't want to carry her weight. They are the only ones who ask “in the name of what?”
French onus over the Vistula?
Imagine, then, that Yellow Vests break the system's gates and take a fresh government. They halt Macron's reforms and announce desinterest Ukraine. No deliveries, no incitement. "France first". It is hard to presume that the US Army will undertake a hard operation to overthrow specified a French government by military method.
I don't think the CIA would have done that either. Yellow vests are a mass and folk movement, so they have more immunity than staff "political orders", where it is adequate to decide the individual to change the face of a given formation.
I'm certain it wouldn't have spread. The full propaganda agenda would then focus on France. And that would force this "renewed" Paris to export the revolution at least in the region. Not due to the fact that it's any kind of perfect warrant, but for safety reasons. The more establishment He would feel the anger of nations under his own windows, the little resources he could spend on muddying in France.
Now let's go back to Poland. Let us evidence honestly: until the avant-garde of the multipolar planet is Russia, no 1 in Poland will kidnap it. Nonconformists, capable of going beyond the framework of narrow rusophobia, are not adequate and regularly cut their wings. But what if France became the point of reference? Could the eye.press inactive request that professors be expelled for "pro-French" sympathy? Would PiSowski's barks effectively replace a "Russian onuca" with a "French baguette"? How about Stanislaw Żaryn would he tweet about “replicating Parisian narrative”? Well, that would sound stupid. The full Polish romanticist tradition, utilized for more than 30 years to keep us in a state of consciousness incapable to escape the function of the Anglo-Saxon resource, is based on historical French sympathy. It was from there that we were expected to look for hope in national uprisings, where we had our emigration, where we cried in Poland. The government over the Republic of Poland would thus lose its ability to play on the feeling of inferiority towards the West forced on Poles. Aux armies, citoyens!
Tomasz Jankowski