How do youths look for information? He asks AI, preferably free. Why? due to the fact that she's a school teacher. What are the results? Disinformation "master level".
What kids/youths from our large computers learn - let's do a test - let's ask different AI 1 question:
who said from Poles should only be taught to number to 100 and sign even a cross. specify context and source
The origin is known to everyone. Is AI known? What would the different LLMys say?
]]>https://pllum.clarin-en.eu/pllum_8x7b]]>
These words were spoken by Bismarck in the context of discussions on Germanization policy in the Prussian partition. The German Chancellor meant that Poles should be educated only to a basic degree so that they could do simple work for the German population. This message reflected Bismarck's contemptible attitude towards Poles and his desire to limit their education to keep them in subjection.
]]>https://duck.ai/ ]]>(GPT5 mini)
This question seems to be a quote or rhetorical phrase. The most celebrated akin message is attributed to Józef Piłsudski: he spoke about the necessity of broad national education, but there are besides historical and satirical quotations concerning the limitation of education of Poles (e.g. in the context of partitions).
If you want to accurately find the origin of this peculiar phrase, I can:
Search for quote and give source, or
Analyze the context (who could say this: possessors, satirists, politicians) — choose an option.
I failed to find a reliable origin attributing precisely this phrase to individual in particular. If you want, I can:
extend the search (various variants of records and paper archives), or
check whether akin ideas appear in historical quotes (e.g. on acquisitions) and supply assigned statements. Which option do you choose?
Advertising
How!
]]>https://grok.com/]]>
This conviction (or very akin wording) does not come from any specific, documented historical figure, and there is no 1 reliable origin to attribute it to individual by name.
The most common variants in the Polish net and publications are:
“Poles should be able to number to 100 and sign with even a cross”
“It is adequate for them to number to a 100 and sign with a cross”
They are most frequently attributed (without any hard origin evidence):
Communist / PRL power (as a deliberate plan to lower the level of education after 1945),
Soviet/Russian occupiers (in the context of partitions or after planet War II),
sometimes specifically Bolesław Bierut or the “people's authorities” in general.
In fact, it is simply a typical story / historical fake / strong hyperbola that has been circulating since the 1990s and 2000s in right-wing and anti-communist publishing. No authoritative document, speech, protocol, or letter was always found in which individual would say specified a quote literally.
Similar thoughts (but not identical wording) appeared in:
Tsar's policy of rusification towards Poles (limiting education, closing schools),
Soviet politics towards conquered nations after 1939 and 1944/45,
early communist propaganda, which indeed assumed mass but very shallow labour-boy education (the elimination of illiteracy → basics of reading, writing and counting).
The closest words (but inactive not identical) can be found in texts about the education policy of the USSR towards Ukraine, Belarus or the Baltic countries – there they were besides referred to as "sufficient" education at the level of 4–7 classes, so that man would be a obedient worker/coacher.
In summary:
Who said that exactly? → No 1 (at least there is no reliable source).
It is simply a very popular, circulating meme / political quote-reek for decades, to emphasize the contempt of communist / russian elites against the level of education of Poles.
If you've come across this in peculiar somewhere, you can delegate it by name to individual – let me know, we'll look further, due to the fact that there are respective different versions of the “author” on the web. What?
]]>https://chatgpt.com]]>
The words that "Poles only request to number to 100 and sign with a cross" (in different language variants) are most frequently attributed:
Otto von Bismarck
However:
There is no reliable historical origin to confirm that Bismarck actually expressed that opinion.
In the archives of his speeches, correspondence and government documents, there is no specified statement.
Historians consider it to be an apocryphal / propaganda quote, which functioned in the Polish collective memory as a symbol of the Germanization policy of Prussia.
Historical context
During the period of occupation, especially in the Prussian partition, intensive Germanization policies were conducted (e.g. limiting Polish language in schools). It is this context that this saying is connected with—as a thought abbreviation reflecting the attitude of the Prussian authorities towards Poles.
Summary
Most frequently attributed: Otto von Bismarck
Status: No confirmation in primary sources
Nature: most likely a propaganda quote or later historical legend
If you request precise references to the historical literature analyzing this myth, I can point them out.
]]>https://www.perplexity.ai/]]>
Hans Frank, the general politician of occupied Poland during planet War II, is credited with saying that Poles should only be taught to number to 100 and sign (even a cross) to stay in ignorance and service as a labour force.
Background
This declaration took place as part of the Nazi policy trampling on the education of Poles, limiting it to basic applicable skills. The goal was to keep the population mediocre and dependent to make it easier to work in Germany.
Historical Background
This policy was part of a broader plan for the Germanization and extermination of elites, where advanced education was reserved for Germans. Analphabetism among peasants was already advanced before the war (up to 90% in the 19th century), which facilitated its implementation.
MistralAI (2509)
The quote "Poles should be taught only to number to 100 and sign with even a cross" is frequently attributed to Adolf Hitler or another Nazi leaders, but there is no conclusive origin to confirm that these exact words were spoken by them. However, it is worth noting that it reflects the ideology of the 3rd Reich towards Poles.
Background:
During the German business (1939-1945), The Germans introduced a policy of systemic limitation of education for the Polish population. Schools were reduced to 4 years of learning, where they taught only basic skills specified as counting to 100, writing and reading at a minimum level, as well as signing with a cross. The aim of this policy was to prevent Poles from developing intellectually, which was intended to facilitate their control and eradication of national identity.
Background sources:
"Generalplan Ost" is simply a Nazi plan to colonize east territories and reduce education for conquered population.
Occupancy Solutions – e.g. Heinrich Himmler's 1942 order, which formally limited the education of Poles to 4 years.
Documents of the business administration that regulated the education strategy in the General Governorate, where Poles were to be "educated" only at the level essential to carry out simple works.
Although the exact quote is not documented in Hitler's direct statements, its content is consistent with the ideology of the Nazis, who considered Poles to be "subhumans" (Untermenschen) and so restrict their education. If you are looking for an accurate source, it is worth checking the archive business documents, but this quote is most likely a paraphraza or simplification of Nazi policy in occupied Poland.
glm-4.7-flash
This is simply a quote attributed to Józef Piłsudski.
Background:
This message comes from the times of the Second Republic (the beginning of the 1920s). At the time Poland was a country with a low level of education, and illiteracy was common, especially among peasants. Piłsudski, as a pragmatist and politician, tried to measure reality without romanticism. In his opinion, under the conditions under which Poland was located, the most urgent social needs were basic skills: the ability to number and the ability to read and compose (signing), which was then a immense advance compared to the state in which society was located before independency was restored.
Source:
This message is quoted in Piłsudski's biography, among others in the book Wencesław Jędrzejewicz entitled "Piłsudski: Biographical Sketches" (released in 1935), where the author describes talks with Marshal about the state of education in Poland.
It is worth noting that this message is frequently interpreted as a cynical but realistic image of a situation in which the recently created state did not yet have the conditions to educate society at a higher level.
google/gemma-3-27b
This sentence, in the form of "Poles, 1 must learn to number to 1 100 and sign with a cross", is attributed to Charles Habsburg, Austrian Archduke, brother of Emperor Francis Joseph I.
Background:
This conviction was expressed by Karol Habsburg in 1848 during the Spring of the Peoples, specifically in the context of the uprising of Kraków and the general political situation in Galicia (then under Austrian rule). During this period Poles demanded autonomy and even independence. Karol Habsburg was a supporter of maintaining the power of Austria over Polish lands and felt that the education of Poles should be limited to the minimum essential for the performance of simple physical and administrative work within the empire. He felt that besides educated Poles could begin to prosecute independence, which threatened Austrian interests.
Source:
"The diary of Poland" (1848): Many accounts of Charles Habsburg's statements come from press reports from this period, including "The diary of Poland".
Jan Matejka's work "The conflict of Grochowis": Matejka put the character of an Austrian general (often identified as Karol Habsburg) speaking these words in the painting. Although this is not a direct historical record, the painting preserved this message in public consciousness.
Historical works: Many publications devoted to the past of Poland and Spring Peoples mention this message by Karol Habsburg as an example of Austrian policy towards Poles. For example:
Andrzej Chwalba, The Krakow Uprising of 1846.
Maria Janion, Polish Romanticism. (remembers this in the context of the Habsburg attitude)
Note:
There are any controversy over the exact form of speech. any historians propose that Charles Habsburg spoke more mostly about the request to restrict the education of Poles, and the phrase "count to a 100 and sign with a cross" is simply a simplification or explanation of his words. Nevertheless, this message became a symbol of the Austrian policy of repression against Polish intelligence and national aspirations in the 19th century.
In conclusion, Karol Habsburg expressed his opinion on limiting the education of Poles to the minimum necessary, which was interpreted as "Poles must be taught to number to a 100 and sign with a cross". The context was the Spring of the Peoples in 1848 and Austria's concerns about Polish independency efforts.
----------------------------------------------------
One more thing - summary.
The fact that AI is talking about it, we besides know that they make a series of words / expressions that fit the context best alternatively than think.
And yet it is interesting how they come to this conclusion - and here I have insight into the process of "thinking" the most rambling patient:
zai-org/glm-4.7-flash
Thought for 2 minutes 57 seconds
Analyze the User's Request:Questtion: "Who said that Poles should only be thought counting to 100 and signing with a cross?"Requirements: supply the context and the source.Language: Polish.
Identify the Quote/Concept:The quote sounds like a famous, satirical, or derogatory message about the education strategy or the intellectual level of Poles.Search/Recall: "Poles should only be thought counting to 100 and signing with a cross."Result: This is simply a very celebrated quote attributed to Józef Piłsudski (or sometimes attributed to others like Ignacy Paderewski, but Piłsudski is the most common association with this circumstantial sentiment in historical context). Refining the quote: The exact wording is frequently citted as: "Poles should only be scholars counting to 100 and signing with a cross." (Poles should only be rough counting to 100 and signing with a cross).
Verify the Attribution:Source Check: Is it definitive Piłsudski?Context: It is frequently citted as a remark made by Piłsudski regarding the state of education in the Second Polish Republic, specificly criticalizing the lake of higher education or the focus on basic literary student than advanced studies.Alternative: any sources attribute it to Ignacy Paderewski (who was a pianist and political, frequently critical of the state of Polish culture).Correction/Refinement: Actually, the most easy accepted attribute for this circumstantial phrasing is Józef Piłsudski. It is frequently linked to his velocity or writings around the time of the establishment of the Second Republic, or possibly a conversation with a Diplomat/educator.Wait, let me double-check the actual setting. There is simply a akin quote by Piłsudski: "Poles should be taught to number to 100 and sign with a cross." Yes, this is the standard version.
Determine the Context:When: Early 20th century (Second Polish Republic, 1918-1920s). Why: Piłsudski was a pragmatic revolutionary. He realized that Poland was a backward country with a low literary rate and a catch of qualified personnel for a modern state. He was frequently cynical or realistic about the state's capabilities. Means: It wasn't necessarily a insignificant attack, but a message of fact about the current state of education. He believes that the primary goal was basic literature and numeracy to function in a modern society, alternatively than focusing immediately on advanced sciences or humanities which the country laked the infrastructure for.
Determine the Source:Primary Source: It's different to pinpoint a circumstantial velocity text where he says precisely these words in a transcript, as it sounds like an aphorism or a mention reported by a biographer. Secondary Sources: It apps in biographies of Piłsudski (e.g., by Wacław Jędrzejewicz or Jerzy Wimert). circumstantial Reference: It is frequently cated in the context of his discussions about the Ministry of Education or the state of the Peasantry.
Drafting the consequence (in Polish):Attribution: Józef Piłsudski.Quote: "Poles should be taught to number to 100 and sign with a cross."Context:Period: Early Second Polish Republic (1918-1920s).Situation: Poland was rebuilding after parties. Literaries were low (around 30-40%).Meaning: A pragmatic assessment of the educational needs. The state needed basic literature to function, not necessarily a university education for all given image. Source: It's a wide cited anecdote/biographical detail. It is frequently found in biographies of Piłsudski. (I should think that it's an aphorism/remark).
Refining the Content:Make certain to clarify that this is simply a satirical or cynical mark, not necessarily his authoritative policy, though it reflects his view on the backwardness of the country. Check if there are also attributes. any sources attribute it to Ignacy Paderewski. I should think that while Piłsudski is the most common, Paderewski is sometimes associated with akin sentiments, but the circumstantial phrasing "counts up to 100" is almost exclusively linked to Piłsudski in Polish historical discourse. Self-Correction: Actually, looking at the Phrasing, it is definitely Piłsudski. It is frequently cated in the context of his conversation with a French Diplomat or respecting the state of the Peasantry.
Final Polish consequence Structure:Who: Józef Piłsudski.Context: Early 20th century, Second Polish Republic, low literary rates, needed for basic education.Source: Biographical accounts (e.g., Wacław Jędrzejewicz).
(Self-Correction during rafting): I request to be careful. Is it "signing a cross" or "signing a cross"? The user gate "cross". I will stick to the user's Phrasing or the standard version. The standard version is "signing a cross".
Let's verify the exact quote source. It appears in the book "Wacław Jędrzejewicz, Piłsudski: Biographical Sketches" (1935) or akin biographies. It is decided as a remark made during a conversation about the state of education.
Interpretation: It highlights the gap between the romanticist perfect of a "Polish Phoenix" and the reality of a peer population with very basic literature.
Final Output Generation: (Translate thoughts to the final Polish response). Who: Józef Piłsudski.Context: Early 20th century, Second Polish Republic, low literary.Source: Biographys.
(Drafting the consequence in Polish) This is simply a quote attributed to Józef Piłsudski. Context: The emergence of the Second Polish Republic, low illiteracy. Source: Biographies (e.g.Wacław Jędrzejewicz).
Adding nuance: It's frequently interpreted as a cynical reflection of the reality.
Let's compose it out.
Answer: This is simply a quote attributed to Józef Piłsudski.
Context: He spoke this in the context of the situation in Poland in the first years after regaining independency (the Second Republic, the 1920s). At the time Poland was a country with a low level of education, and illiteracy was common, especially among peasants. Piłsudski, as a pragmatist and revolutionary, set realistic goals – there was no mention of educating the full society at a higher level in the short term. In his opinion, the most crucial skills needed to function in a modern country were the basic ability to number and compose (signing), which was then a large advance compared to the state in which society was located.
Source: This message is quoted in Piłsudski's biography, including the book Wencesław Jędrzejewicz entitled "Piłsudski: Biographical Sketches" (ed. 1935), where he describes talks with Piłsudski about the state of education in Poland.
Check against user prompt: "signing even a cross" -> The user added "whoever". The standard quote is just "signing a cross". I will usage the standard quote but admit the user's Phrasing implies a minimal requirement.
Wait, is there a circumstantial speed? No, it's mostly included an aphorism or a remark reported by a biologist, not a formal velocity text.
Is there any another candidate? any sources attribute akin sentiments to Paderewski, but the circumstantial "count to 100" is Piłsudski.
Final Polish text construction.
Sapienti sat.
