"It was a government of betrayal and a government of reset". The deputy chief of the MON evaluates PO-PSL plans to defend Poland only from the Vistula line
"It was a government of betrayal and a government of reset. Giving half of Poland's enemies and definitely the another half will only be defended before 10 to 14 days, what does that mean? This demonstrates either the indolence or the utmost political and military inability – said Wojciech Skurkiewicz in Radio Jedynka plans to defend Poland in Wisla, approved by the PO-PSL government. In an interview with Katarzyna Gójska, deputy head of the MON besides referred to Jarosław Kaczyński's message to “Gazeta Polska”. He called it very strong, but very customs. "Polish war would be forced to surrender today, or they would die" – said the Minister of National Defence.
Yesterday, Minister of National Defence Mariusz Błaszczak published declassified passages of papers which show that Poland would be defended only from the Vistula Line for the governments of PO and PSL in the event of Russia's aggression. “What was the thought of not defending half of Poland?” Katarzyna Gójska asked in “The Signals of the Day” in PR1.
This is the reset policy that the PO-PSL government implemented. For a long time, we have been talking about a line of defence going across the Vistula River, which we did not agree with. But, of course, politicians of the full opposition have denied it many times, so present we show clearly facts that are undoubtedly very sad for the Republic, for us as Poles and most likely sad for the Civic Platform. I am certain that present there will be a frontal attack on us, on MON, on Minister Błaszczak from the "total" side – said Wojciech Skurkiewicz, Deputy Minister of National Defence. He stressed that Białystok, White Podlasie, or Rzeszów could share the destiny of Bucha, Irpina, or Hostomel.
Referring to the question, Skurkiewicz assessed that there was much more like the liquidation of units, garrisons and ammunition depots in the east of Poland. "It was more convenient to talk to Putin due to the fact that he does not like those who defend themselves under his borders who are strong," he said.
It was a government of betrayal and a government of reset. Giving half of Poland's enemies and definitely the another half will only be defended before 10 to 14 days, what does that mean? This indicates either indolence or utmost political incompetence, but besides military. Today, Poles should absolutely see how the regulation of the Civic Platform was exercised, including in the issue of national defence
said Skurkiewicz.
The Deputy Minister besides commented on a fragment of the interview with Jarosław Kaczyński for “Gazeta Polska”, which we published present on the portal Niezalezna.pl. "It looks like the Polish state is being abolished within its borders today," Kaczyński says. It's a very strong statement, but it's a very good one. If we analyse the actions of the Government of the Civic Platform and Radosław Sikorski, as Russia's aggression on Ukraine began in 2014, what did he say in Kiev? “Give up or you will die.” Don't you see the comparison by 2023, until now? And to the actions undertaken by the PO – Polish country, nation, Polish military, would be forced to surrender, or would be killed. due to the fact that these areas in the east would surely not satisfy the enemies.
“ Surrender your opposition is hopeless” – specified messages were heard by Polish soldiers in 1939 on Westerplatte, Hel, the Defence of east Routings of the Republic or the Warsaw Uprising ... What's that expected to mean? Surrender without fight and dedication to Germans or Soviets of parts of Poland. But then the Polish soldier fought not to the end he did not kneel down before invaders. The past present has come to a ellipse published Mobilization Plans related to Defence Doctrine and strategy 2011 show that the Prime Minister of Poland Mr Tusk planned to hand over half of Poland's territory to the future aggressor – Russia to the Vistula Line along with Toruń and Bydgoszcz – Putin.
"Polish defence plans from the Vistula line would mean death for the inhabitants of east Poland and full demolition of the infrastructure located there" – said General Roman Polko. The commander added that the directive was based on the elimination of military units and the weakening of the possible of the Polish Army.
In practice, as explained by B. GROM's commander, this would mean allowing Russians into Poland and leaving tiny troops on the premises that would hit the enemy and hold its movements. The goal was to hold the Russians' entry to the Vistula line. It was completely disregarded that this would mean the death of civilians surviving in these areas and the full demolition of the infrastructure there," he added and added: "It's a russian way of reasoning that doesn't truly matter. It was forgotten that the army was utilized to defend its own people, not to conduct detached games.”
The Russians would have left the burnt land behind. There's nothing left between Vistula and Bug. They did the same in Ukraine. We'd gotta take back Russian-occupied lands. "For the people of east Poland this would mean death". According to General Skrzypczak, politicians treated the army as a origin of savings. They didn't realize what the army was meant to do or what it was called for. They sought savings, and consequently liquidated their troops. These decisions were not in any sense militaryly justified
The Russians would have left the burnt land behind. There's nothing left between Vistula and Bug. We would gotta reflect the Russian-occupied lands – the gene assessed. The violinist asked about the consequences of the Russian attack on Poland, which would only halt on the Vistula line. On Sunday, the head of the MON published a spot, in which he discloses papers on Poland's defence plans on the Vistula line under the regulation of PO-PSL. We would have a second Katyn in Poland, faces, looting, kid rape, exiles to Siberia, etc... we remember from 1939 to 1950.
In June last year the head of MON Mariusz Błaszczak said “Thesis has fallen to which we have been persuaded by PO politicians and its favorable generals for years”according to which “The army should be stationed in the west of the country and, in the event of an attack on Poland, reflect the areas occupied by the enemy.” "This script would mean a replay from Ukrainian Buczy. We said from the beginning that the military must be many primarily in the east of the country and should fight for all part of Poland and for all human life in the event of a possible conflict," said the minister.
On Tuesday, the head of the MON besides spoke about the misconception of the defence on the Vistula line, the Deputy Prime Minister, referring to the announcement of the formation of another division of the Land Army, which is to operate mainly in Podlasie. His deputy Wojciech Skurkiewicz besides spoke about the request to defend the full territory. "We changed all these doctrines that, even a fewer years ago, during the regulation of our predecessors, said that we should return the east part of the country, the line of defence we set on the Vistula and we would be the invader to the east" Deputy Minister said.
Whether we have the chance to build a common defence of our country, so as to guarantee adequate defence, regardless of the defence umbrella of NATO, the EU and the strategical alliance with the US, and which is the command of the moment, will decide the state of the political class and the level of its awareness and its sense of work for the safety of Poland and future generations of Poles – writes General Leon Komornicki.
Poland, taking into account the social, geographical and historical circumstances and experience, as well as the alliance commitments (NATO and EU) should prosecute a stand-alone policy and have its own national defence strategy to guarantee that adequate defence is built and thus fulfil Article 5 of the Constitution and Article 3 of the NATO Treaty. Therefore, in addition to the common features of Poland's defence strategy with NATO's defence strategy, our defence strategy must be superior to the alliance strategy and contain features corresponding to the adequate defence capacity of our country with certain deterrence and prevention capabilities.
The strategy of defence (war), like no another field, should take into account the realities, political, economic, technological and technical, as well as the fighting equipment of the Polish Armed Forces and intellectual and defence preparation of Polish society. The defence strategy is simply a fundamental intangible (intellectual) know-how and the superior value of the state's defence possible and its defence force. Therefore, the defence strategy should take into account these realities as full as possible, taking into account the geopolitical position of Poland as a basis; the deepening processes of disintegration of the global and European safety environment, including expanding the quantity and modern weapons of the Polish Army.
So was specified a proceeding of the Polish Government for PO PSL a national betrayal ? hopefully besides this problem will be explained by the late established State Commission for the examination of Russian influences on interior safety of the Republic of Poland in 2007-2022.
"MURE FOR THE POLISH MUNDUR"
Let fascist – bandit roSSja not even dream of taking an inch of Polish land, due to the fact that their defeat of 1920 will be nothing compared to the beating that our soldiers and NATO forces will get.
Source :
https://defence24.pl/politics-...(link is external)
https://citizen journalist...(link is external)
http://pressmania.pl/polska-ar...(link is external)
https://independent.pl/polska/b...(link is external)
