Intelligence depends on race

Science defines the alleged “G factor”, which means the level of intelligence and cognitive ability. In the United States, measurements made on large, typical trials have invariably for decades shown that the level of intelligence mostly depends on the race of the individual being examined. It's not racism. It's pure science. The case was comprehensively described by the portal hoplophobia.info.

Intelligence depends on race? According to American research, the average discrepancy in intelligence ilorasia between black and white races, takes value d Cohen ≈ 1.00, which translates into ~15 IQ points of difference, thus 1 standard deviation in the empirical distribution of test results, while the average discrepancy between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe and North America reaches almost 30 points.

The consensus on this issue is well established and is not open to discussion. The same conclusions were drawn by working scientists specified as Rindermann, Warne), Jensen & Reynolds, Rushton, Roth, Weiss, Frisby and Beaujean, Hu, Lasker, or Fuerst.

Optimistic predictions of part of researchers regarding the gradual disappearance of interracial imbalances in intelligence (including Flynn's “Effect”) have always been premature and unjustified. In the opinion of layman 15-point advantage for the benefit of whites may seem trivial, but the statistical and above all applicable consequences of the existence of this asymmetry are in the macroscale of the United States colossal.

Knowing the percentages of circumstantial ranges, the above graphics inform us that:

• Only ~16% of American Negroes have IQ > 100 (for whites, ~50% average);
• Only ~3% of American blacks have IQ > 115 (white ~16%);
• ~65% of American blacks have IQ < 90 (white ~25%);
• ~35% of American blacks have an IQ < 80 (white ~10%), which means that they would not even pass through the recruiting sieve to the army due to the fact that they would pose a threat to themselves and others;
  
• ~16% of American blacks have IQ < 70, which suggests intellectual impairment (white ~3%);

Intelligence test designed by David Wechsler:

• 3.6% White and 18% Black have IQ < 75 (ratio ~5:1);
• 21.9% white and 59.4% black have IQ < 90 (ratio ~2:1);
• 53.8% white and 15.7% black have IQ > 100 (ratio ~1:3);
• 27.9% White and 3.8% Black have IQ > 110 (ratio ~1:7);
• 5.4% white and 0.2% black have IQ > 125 (ratio ~1:27);

For the utmost right of the tail of the decomposition, the situation is as follows:

• IQ > 120: White 11.14%, Black 1.1%, ratio ~1:10 (Asians 17.67%);
• IQ > 125: White 5.68%, Black 0.40%, ratio ~1:14 (Asians 10.36%);
• IQ > 130: White 2.59%, Black 0.13%, ratio ~1:20 (Asians 5.54%);
• IQ > 135: White 1.05%, Black 0.04%, ratio ~1:26 (Asians 2.70%);
• IQ > 140: White 0.38%, black 0.01%, ratio ~1:38 (Asians 1.19%);
• IQ > 145: White 0.12%, Black 0.00% (Asian 0.47%);
• IQ > 150: White 0.03%, Black 0.00% (Asian 0.17%);

Why are these numbers important? due to all commonly accepted and measurable variables, that is IQ offers the top prognostic possible in specified key areas of life and for specified crucial phenomena as the level of wellness awareness, the tendency to antisocial behaviour, the course of education, success in science, professional achievements, leadership talents and the ability to accumulate assets in adulthood.

As a consequence adding an intelligence component to a regular set of control variables causes many of the most gross socio-economic inequalities between white and black in the US to be drastically reduced or completely disappeared. In short, mixing the IQ into the regression puts an end to the chances of setting a categorical thesis of “systemic racism” as the alleged origin of white dominance over the Negroes.

This is simply a major, albeit seldom verbalized premise that directs the conduct of left-wing intellectuals erstwhile they ignore origin G in their works or even deny its vital function in the improvement of a given subpopulation. Their authoritative argument is, of course, that the segregation of people according to the criteria of intelligence bears the mark (pseudo) of technological racism and they due to their “enlightenment” do not intend to participate in this shameful course.

What are the effects of differences in intelligence between white and black races?

• correcting the intelligence model completely eliminates disparities in income between black and white in America;
• the matching of the intelligence model reverses (to the detriment of whites) the racial-discrimination link erstwhile employed in the sense that white men, located at the same level of IQ as blacks, experience comparatively inferior treatment in the labour market;
  
• After correction of the intelligence model (estimated utilizing the Army/AGCT general classification test) the distributions in weekly and yearly earnings between black and white residents of the confederate states during the 1940s are shrinking depending on the way missing statistic are introduced by 72-76% and 78-97% respectively;
  
• after correction of the model for intelligence (measured by battery of ASVAB or AFQT-type military qualification tests), black men evidence higher rates of university exams and receive higher graduation diplomas than their white peers;
• adding the IQ parameter to the final model prolongs the time of education of black women and men in relation to the “quantity” of education that whites receive;
• the inclusion of intelligence in the model eliminates any racial differences in intergenerational, economic, vertical social mobility;
  
• correcting the intelligence model eliminates differences in the dimension of the judgments;
• the calculation of intelligence to the model reduces the gap between black and white in relation to the comparative hazard of arrest and imprisonment;
• control of the model with intelligence and impulsiveness causes the skin colour of the repeater to cease to correlate with the likelihood of its re- arrest;
• the correction of intelligence and aggressive predispositions of convicts reveals that racial prejudices in death sentences are a statistical artifact, created by incomplete calibration of the underlying model;
  

Conclusions

Negotiating the importance ofIQ in generating and sustaining intergroup differences leads to something like collective paranoia, or collective conviction, that these mysterious, hostile forces are working behind our backs and despite constant attempts to win over all forms of discrimination and racial prejudice from social space, proceed to perpetuate inequalities in the field of education or in access to well paid professions.

This is the perfect ground for the expansion of multigenerational frustration, suspicion and hatred, which, combined with mass transfers of limited public funds to missed or inefficient aid programs, only deepens the sense of broken hopes.

Millions of dollars a year are spent on elaborate interventions or making dreams of “raising results in science”. Unfortunately, due to the racial implications of investigation on the impact of IQ and the fear that if this subject is raised, environmental ostracism will fall on them due to alleged “racism”, American politicians proceed to pretend that ideology is more crucial than facts.

But that is not all. In fact, the mixing of breeds in the USA and Europe leads to a general simplification in the IQ of humanity. As you know, stupid people are easier to rule.

We besides recommend: Another attack by an immigrant knifefighter