As I wrote, I went to the Imladris Convention recently, where I had lectures. To be honest, the genesis here was the following: at the time of the recording there was a refusal of the consent of Trzaskowski to the independency March and an alternate appeared: either a journey to Warsaw to fight with the Polish Free, or a diversion on the spot, in Krakow. I chose a diversion due to the fact that I did not know if I could go to Warsaw. Additionally, there was an thought for TrekSfera, an yearly Star Trek fan meeting. Star Trek fan gathering is OK basically. Here's the effect, I present my presentation:
]]>https://youtu.be/fYCZRslM0j4?si=withJMI5w01SKIbcCob]]>
This is an extended version of the presentation from this Treksphere, supplemented after and recorded from zero. Before I come to the conclusion, I will present a reflection on Inclusion:
The dictionary of the Polish language gives the definition:
inclusive “connecting or covering a whole; also: intended for all”
The dictionary defines:
a manner of conduct which opposes the creation of closed social groups whose existence is simply a manifestation of discrimination against people based on their origin, gender, sexual orientation or skin colour.
The definition of SJP emphasizes holisticity, which leads to interesting conclusions: in order to be inclusive, my views must fit, otherwise they will be partial alternatively than complete. If I don't fit in the formula, we've got lime and not Inclusion. We've got a pocket. The USS Phoenix podcast is inclusive, due to the fact that on all subject, me and Q have different opinions, a holistic spectrum of views we present,
The Wiki dictionary discriminates against all another aspects that it does not give. 4 give and the species recognition does not give.
The Imladris Convention appears in the light of the above to be rather closed and isolating. Going beyond its own comfort region is hard for the mark kind conventioner. My lecture is created from the position of liberal, pluralistic, applicable and yet met with the rage of the audience. The basic thought is that the mark group does not want to see it, so the influence is insufficient and there is simply a failure. I besides explain what viewers do not want to see, what are the differences in cognitive perspectives. I am besides emphatically pointing out that I do not value these perspectives: based on logic is not better than unsupported in presentation.
Once they may have had the illusion that the mass audience had a hidden desire for a peg and as the pub production would appear, it would cry out: we wanted it, we needed it, we wanted more. It is now apparent that the crow did not find designation among the audience.
It was besides painful to collide with perception: that they could be seen as aggressors and aggressive. As a threat. specified accents as the man demanding Rowling's scanning are of the deepest concern, Well, we'll see who's gonna turn who in the end.
All in all, with this inclusion, it's no exaggeration, since I don't fit in, it's gone. another aspects, including affirmative ones, will inactive be. They make besides small coffee stream. In general, I've infiltrated the secret like Kloss Abwera.
Podcast USS Phoenix:
]]>https://www.youtube.com/@startrekpl]]>
Dictionaries:
]]>https://sjp.pwn.pl/sjp/inclusive;3281554]]>
]]>https://pl.wiktionary.org/wiki/inclusive]]>Common
