Polish speech policy is given by the utmost right. By seeking the support of voters regularly threatened by the "hun raid", or immigration, the focus has been on people coming to us from Asia and Africa. Now, under the influence of Confederate rhetoric, it's time to hatred the Ukrainians.
When Rafał Trzaskowski proposed that the children of the non-working Ukrainians and Ukrainians should receive a benefit of 800+, Prime Minister Tusk replied immediately: I am at yes. The thought of driving refugees from Ukraine to work is idiotic, due to the fact that most of them came to us “for bread” before the war. The percent of people from Ukraine who do not work is negligible. However, the point is not only to hit the Ukrainians by subtracting them from their children's mouths, but besides to propose that visitors from Russia's country are lazy and surviving off benefits.
Nationalism is about this – to slander a group, so that it is easier to hurt it. Hostility to Ukrainians is meant to connect people around haters. This nationalist support was envied by erstwhile liberals more and more Brown competitors from the Confederation.
In bidding with the Confederate and PiS, who is more hostile to refugees, Donald Tusk's camp decided to suspend and in practice abolish the right to asylum in Poland. The point is that individual who escapes the inevitable death of a cruel government cannot ask us for global protection. The deficiency of this right means that Poland can now, without listening to the refugee, send him to any death, torture or prison, for example, to Afghanistan. As a result, individual who escapes muslim fundamentalists can be sent back into their hands. And the justification is that he himself, the victim of fundamentalism, is simply a possible jihadist.
This thought was condemned by all human rights organizations. However, Tusk and the company have already sacrificed on the altar of political effectiveness specified ideals as freedom and human rights. Their supporters explain to me that this is just a run to keep the Nazis out of power. In a word, let's pretend to be the far right to beat the far right. From the point of view of human rights, however, it is indifferent to who practices xenophobic and nationalistic policies: PiS, Confederation or PO. In any case, the consequence is the shrinking of the area of human rights and freedom.
Mentzen-Trzaskowski's debate showed that there are no crucial differences between the PO and Confederation programming horizon. It's not just about the reluctance to rise taxes, it's about what's missing from this conversation. It does not mention the gap in wellness finance, the housing crisis, the fragmentation, any social issue. And already the second tv debate between the candidates PiS and PO was completely curiosistic. In part of the common questions on social policy, no of the candidates erstwhile referred to any issue relating to this topic. They don't know about them? Do they not want to exposure themselves to the far right that social policy considers unnecessary?
The minute Adrian Zandberg got out of the race, social issues just disappeared. But why is it amazing that 1 of fresh Left's prominent politicians was glad to see the increase in the number of debt loans that “interest revolves.”
The political class traveled so far distant from social reality that MP PO was photographed erstwhile she handed the patient the hospice "gift" in the form of a sack of potatoes. This large motion was criticised by Mentzen himself, who seemingly left little than Trzaskovsky's people.
Tusk in the stock exchange building calling on billionaires to enrich himself is no longer a liberal, but a turboliberal or even a libertarian. Therefore, it is increasingly easier for me to imagine that the future government coalition will be concluded between the PO and the Confederation, due to the fact that the PiS is besides "populist", too "Social".
Adrian's good score shows that not everything is lost Zandberg And better and better polls together. They're the ones facing an approaching, increasingly brown wave. They talk about real social problems and point to rational solutions. Coming out of the niche, they emergence up, even though they were sentenced to failure as “detached from reality”. This gives hope that social policy and budgetary redistribution will not be replaced by philanthropy, which is symbolized by the PO MP, the millionaire's daughter, with a sack of potatoes.
Prime Minister, monkeying the far right is no good. People inactive like to vote for the original.
