The Newborn Savior was greeted by wise men (i.e. those who learned the fact through honest intellectual labor) and the simple ones (i.e. those who learned the fact through sincere intellectual humility). He was not greeted by the ignorant (i.e. those who in their laziness do not care for the truth) or by the "intelligent" (i.e. those who in their pride only care about the appearance of truth). In another words, he was greeted by those who trusted that the fact would set them free, but they did not welcome him who wanted to be liberated from the fact or convinced that they would liberate the truth. This state continues to this day – with only the difference that the erstwhile must no longer have any doubts, while the second have no excuses.
* * Oh, * *
How do you separate the first from the forgery? The first is “one, holy, universal and apostolic”, while the forgery is “ecumenical”, “dialogue”, “inclusive” and “synodical”. The ability to separate 1 from the another is crucial, as the counterfeit has developed boldly in the space occupied by the original, so they are now badly mixed – like wheat and tares.
However, the wheat is separated from the tares more clearly, the more the second becomes boldly exuberant, seemingly dominant and arrogantly unceremonial, the ground for not taking this exuberance, arrogance and apparent dominance as a manifestation of provident prosperity or developmental vigor.
On the contrary, it is all the more crucial to realise in this context that 1 sees the manifestations of the accelerated fall of masks and the giving up of care for appearances, the culmination of which will be a situation where among the tares there will be no 1 who does not full consciously want to stand on his side. In the meantime, it remains to act to guarantee that specified persons are in the final account as small as possible.
* * Oh, * *
It is continuing to separate tares from wheat, i.e. victims of infantile narcissism, which would have wanted the Church to be a clucky-charitative social club, from those who are aware that the Church, which is the only origin of the saving sacraments, is peculiarly eaten by agents of a sulphuric loser who knows that his time is very short. Hence, the erstwhile simply flaunt themselves in a hypocritical, self-satisfied outrage, frequently completed with a tromtadracan escape, while the second argue the circumstantial figures and phenomena destroying the Church from within, maintaining close prayer and sacramental discipline. May it be as much as possible to join the others or to stay among them, for they are, speaking without any exaggeration, the eventual salt of the earth.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
