The last kid abduction performed by the preposterous Monica Hornej-Cieślak, supported by Agata Bzdyń, in the function of Agnieszka Gozdyr and others, requires a broader reflection. due to the fact that you're snarling at her (right!) and we're missing the nuances. We have children and organization violence, Kamilka's case, ice cream for a belt in Pszczyna, 2 beers. And I start by summing up:
In the patriarchate, these ladies would be wise to their husbands who would gotta live with them. What are you gonna do? You can't explain. Reality would not require these women to grasp things unflattering for them. They'd be on their way to happiness from here. Well, at least at any party, they'd be able to eat their mouths off. The demolition of the society they are making here is simply a marginal matter.
The Patriarchate persisted due to the fact that it is simply a pro-female system. The biggest enemy of 1 female is the another woman, and you can see that. The fool took the children from whom? The another woman. So did the ice cream store get to who? Another woman. That's how it's gonna roll.
The point is, I don't know what to put my hands into first. I see there's an education run going on about the Blue Card. That it's not a sentence. Only divorce tactics. This is simply a affirmative accent. It is besides right to believe that a spokesperson should have children. But the real reason is, then there'll be hooks on him if he starts besides far. The paparans will evidence a fewer things, and we'll be done with the rum. due to the fact that that's how they're disconnected from reality. Next: a tweet appeared on the X in which directions were given in which you should admit the absurd. Commenting on Pszczyna, she became known as a pathological liar. The full of Poland saw a letter:
]]>https://x.com/chrzenikx/status/210356364106492603]]>
Where he gets his ice cream by the belt. In Polsat, however, she explains that she protected against hate. In any twisted Talmudic way, it can be explained: that community hatred is 1 female (another) whose boy did not get a free ice cream. She ratted out to a preposterous female and wrote a letter to halt the ice cream for the stripe. Lying is besides inept.
The worst thing, however, is that of an expert. They are called herstories. As you read in the advanced Obcades of poorness that women are not listened to, that you have an explanation here. They tell specified nonsense and then cry. At the same time, we have the privilege of women visible due to the fact that they are treated more mildly than men who plant catacombs. After all, this is any horror and denial of any civilization and sense, logic, reason. It's better to have 2 beers than no beers, due to the fact that if you don't have one, it means you're an alcoholic who needs to drink all alcohol that comes home right away. It's so horrendum, it can't fit.
On Facebook, any lawyer points out that it can't be that they're making an intervention without any reason, hoping there's something. organization force will be devoted to a separate entry and now a fistful of links:
]]>https://x.com/FreedomO/status/213368241422934328?s=20]]>
]]>https://x.com/PiotrKusznieruk/status/210290330530586514?s=20]]>
]]>https://pch24.pl/news/lukasz-warzecha-lex-kamlek-mean-how-injury...]]>
