Among the Western public there are 2 main approaches to the function of Zionist business called "Israel", its relation with the United States and, consequently, much of both factors for the situation in the mediate East.
‘Israel’ as a colony of America
The first view, peculiarly popular in left-wing intellectual circles, sees in “Israel” only quasi- The United States Colony. It is America that is so the force behind the mediate east conflicts, acting in accordance with the logic of imperialism. This does not, of course, reduce the work of the Zionist government for the crimes and wars committed, but from this position Bibi Netanjahu and others appear alternatively collaborators of the American war-industrial complex and its interests. They're more bloody tools than perpetrators. It is so American policy that becomes the main nonsubjective of the protests, and it is Washington that is expected to decision towards peace in the mediate East and to resolve the Palestinian issue in line with the officially proclaimed slogans of democracy and the protection of human rights.
USA as a Zionist colony
The second view, much more popular in America itself, in anti-system environments both right-wing and left-wing, sees the colony of Israel alternatively than vice versa in the United States. “Capitol is as occupied as Palestine” – I heard many times from my American colleagues. This is simply a completely different perspective, which requires us to focus on the immanent crime of Zionism itself, which is more than just a convenient tool, an ideology serving to cover imperialist goals. This is the very essence of the Palestinian crisis, the reason why the solution to the mediate East is beyond the scope of the global debate itself, especially with the participation of NGOs only. You couldn't solve the Nazi issue just by negotiating or just wondering if Adolf Hitler He works for large capital. The option of "nazism with a human face" or a compromise with "Nazi pragmatism" has not been considered. Nazism had to be defeated in battlefields, during the most bloody war in human history. The Nazi 3rd Reich was liquidated as a state, the Germans were denased, and the territories conquered and occupied by the Nazis were returned to their historical inhabitants. And since Zionism is simply a specific, Israeli form of Nazism, it would be utopian to believe that it could be treated differently from Nazism, or German Nazism or flagism, or Ukrainian Nazism. And as historically not all powers have equally contributed to the triumph over Nazism, so present the attitude of major global actors towards Zionism differs significantly. However, the attitude of the nations themselves, which make it clear, is much more unambiguous: Zionism has the same end as that of Nazism, under the ruins of the Reich Chancellery.
A political awakening?
Social stocks, specified as Boycott, Division, Sanctions (BDS), they have a colossal importance integrating public opinion in her opposition to Zionist crimes and their sponsors. The consequence of Western societies to genocide in Gaza, these multi-hundred 1000 peace marches in London and another cities, are the largest independent social movements in decades. It's a real awakening against war, racism and imperialism. However, we must be aware of the limitations of specified commitment.
In the West, we are dealing with a systemic crisis of liberal democracy, which is presently being extinguished as a form of political organisation of states and societies. Oligarchies, which have always dominated Western politics, are now almost openly present, and the basic assumptions of liberal democracy, specified as freedom of speech, media freedom, democratic elections of political representation, are no longer of real significance. Even the mass folk movement, specified as actions to support Palestine, is at best confronted by indifference, and at worst by active action by the authorities. In the streets of western cities, there may be multimillion-dollar protests of opposition to the genocide in Gaza, and Western governments may ignore this by providing active support to the Netanyahu regime, as the British authorities do. This confirms the sterile political assimilation of Muslims surviving in Europe. Their voice is not and cannot be heard within the current system, having applicable characteristics apartheid. From the western primary parties, all suspects of sympathy for the Palestinian origin are eliminated, censorship prevails in universities and in the media, including social media. In this situation, all opponents of Zionism, all those who support peace, in order to be heard, to gain influence and take control, must organize themselves. There are already about 28 million Muslims in the European Union and the UK. It's a possibly powerful force, as long as it doesn't let itself to be pushed to immigrant issues, divisions between old and fresh immigrants or cultural issues. It is the strength of a possible geopolitical change, which completely overestimates the Western strategy towards the mediate East, Asia and Africa.
They can go overseas.
The possible of change can be only one: Zionists came from overseas – they should go overseas. They have fresh York, Miami, California – they don't request Palestine. Unless the Anglo-Saxons do request a foothold in the mediate East, and Palestinians, regardless of nationality and religion, are only hostages of another people's geopolitical interests. All the more reason for humane business or even judaic national interest cannot be given.
Palestinian syndrome should be broken anyway.
Konrad Hand
Source: ♪ I've been anemovil. ♪