"There is no nation more kind-hearted, but there is no nation more gullible than Germany. No lie can be invented sufficiently clearly, Germany believes it...”
Napoleon Bonaparte
Two months ago in my text for “Polish Thought” First, our country! I wrote that social discontent in Germany grows overnight. In December of that year, the scales of bitterness, in the Reichsbürger environment, spilled.
A coup was planned and the establishment of the monarch at the head of the 4th Reich, which was to be like the Empire – the Reich. At least that's what the German media say. The coup / coup was thwarted by police.
German Reich – Prussian-German Empire
The Prussian-German Empire established in 1871 remained in many respects an authoritarian state of military character. The Constitution of the Reich of 16 April 1871, developed mostly by Otto Bismarck, granted far-reaching prerogatives to monarchy executive power. The military, abroad policy and imperial administration were mostly removed from Parliament's influence, and above all, the establishment of the government depended solely on the emperor's trust – until the last phase of planet War I – alternatively than the majority in parliament.
At the centre of the Constitution, which was originally conceived as a paper establishing the confederation of princes, was the national Council representing individual states, which formally held far-reaching powers in the area of executive, legislative and judicial authority.
However, the democratically legitimized Reichstag besides had crucial competences. The most crucial task of Parliament – along with the Bundesrat – was to pass all the laws, including yearly budget projects. Without its approval, no bill entered into force. She had the right to self-implement draft laws, request from the Reich Chancellor information about government policy, set her own agenda. In the constitutional practice of Reichstag, he undoubtedly gained more prestige and influence over time, became the most crucial symbol of the political nation, and influenced society differently.
The controversial question in historical research, however, is how much was there a chance to decision after 1871 to a parliamentary monarchy in which the emperor would have small influence on the affairs of the state. Besides, another questions stay unanswered. Were the years between 1871 and 1918 "years of the terming of democracy", the creation of a democratic political culture? Has there been "silent parliamentaryisation", or has the democratisation of society without a comprehensive parliamentary political strategy yet supported the authoritarian state? The characteristic of this dynamic and full of tension of the era is that even 150 years after the establishment of the empire there are many perspectives, each painting its own image of the empire...
4th Reich and fresh ruler – Heinrich XIII
Heinrich XIII, Duke of Reuß, is born on December 4, 1951 in Büdingen, a real property entrepreneur and associate of the Reuß household who came out as an activist of the Reich Citizens' Movement. It is considered to be the central form of an alleged right-wing terrorist group, the Patriotic Union, which is said to have been preparing a violent overthrow of the political strategy in Germany.
His views are the claim that the Rothschild household and the Masons financed wars and revolutions in the past to destruct the monarchy. He has since become a popular figure on the phase of conspiracy ideology, as he negates the legality of the national Republic of Germany and its courts. His speeches during public speeches were, according to journalists, Christian Fuchs, Astrid Geisler, Holger Stark and Martin Steinhagen from Zeit Online, "set up by anti-Semitic, anti-democratic and conspiratorial statements". According to him, planet War I was carried out in order to “Moving forward the spread of the judaic population”.
In the spring of 2021, Reuß ordered the suspension of calls for the Reuß State Election Commission in Bad Lobenstein to open electoral lists on Verweser – historically a individual who represents the absent monarch in his state affairs, wearing the coat of arms of the home of Reuß. He was convinced that he had rights acquired prior to 1918 by “the charm and origin” which allowed him to find the structures of administration. Reuß was besides convinced that he was entitled to specified Verweser.
In August 2022, Reuß was active in the Bad Lobenstein scandal. Thomas Weigelt, the mayor of the city, who does not belong to the organization but is known as a supporter of the Reichsbürger movement, invited him to the party. A writer from “Ostthüringer Zeitung” asked why “the Reich supporters” were invited to the authoritative event. During the next party, the mayor physically attacked the writer to prevent him from filming. A reporter was injured and had to be treated in a hospital. The mayor was later removed from office.
The incidental sparked a nationwide sensation
Federal Minister for the Interior Nancy Faeser She criticized the violent attack on a journalist. "Without free and critical media there is no democracy" – stated, while demanding a full investigation into the incident. 2 days after the assassination, the spokesperson for the Reuß House, Heinrich XIV Reuß (born 1955), he besides publically distanced himself from Heinrich XIII's activities, who had left the household ellipse on his own request 14 years ago. He was a man. ‘partly confused’who possessed "misconceptions on conspiracy theories".
On December 7, 2022, following the disclosure of Reichsbürger's plot, Heinrich XIV Reuß told MDR Thuringen that his distant relative, with whom he had no individual contact for any time, was a 30-year-old modern entrepreneur who radicalized over disappointments.
Heinrich XIII Duke of Reuß and 24 others were arrested on the morning of December 7, 2022 as part of a large-scale manhunt in eleven German national states involving about 3,000 officers, as well as in 2 cases abroad, in connection with an alleged coup. The national lawyer General considered that Reuß, who was reportedly the head of the organization's "advisory" as well as Rüdiger von Pescatore, which is considered to be the leader of the military arm, are in a position to fishy their engagement in the creation of a terrorist organisation as a leader, within the meaning of § 129a(4) of the national Criminal Code. The arrest warrant was confirmed by an investigating justice of the national ultimate Court and Prince Reuß has been in temporary custody always since.
Prince Reuß drew attention in the spring of 2022 to the State Office for the Protection of the Constitution of Hesse. The national prosecutor's office considers him to be the central figure of a group that called itself the Patriotic Union and reportedly was preparing a coup. After its success, it was planned to install Reuß as regent of Germany.
In detail, the group planned to storm the Reichstag building and break the power of state institutions. The national government was about to be arrested. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, a shadow office has already been completed, in which a justice and politician became the minister of justice Birgit Malsack-Winkemann (AfD).
In addition to his flat in the Frankfurt-based Westend district, the peculiar forces besides searched the Waidmannsheil hunting lodge. Here, according to investigators, he was to prepare ‘Bullet facility with autonomous power to power and water’. His partner was besides arrested. Vitalia B. a Russian citizen who is suspected of making contact on his behalf with the embassy of the Russian Federation. A full of 22 suspected members and 3 suspected supporters of the group were arrested, and 27 others are being investigated. national Minister for Justice Marco Buschmann described the police operation in Germany, Italy and Austria as ‘anti-terrorist operation’.
Reichsbürger (Reich Citizens)
Reichsbürgerbewegung – The Reich Citizens Movement is simply a general and universal word for a very heterogeneous organizational and ideologically ideologically diverse scene composed mainly of individuals. They combine that they deny the existence of the national Republic of Germany as a legitimate and sovereign state and fundamentally reject its representatives and the full German legal system. Ideologies proclaimed by alleged citizens of the Reich frequently include rejection of democracy, ideological elements of monarchism, right-wing extremism, historical revisionism, and in any cases besides anti-Semitism, esoteric or right-wing ezoteris, or denial of the Holocaust. They combine their attitude of rejecting open and pluralistic society, refusing, among others, to pay taxes and fines or to comply with court orders and administrative decisions.
"Classical" citizens of the Reich claim that alternatively of the national Republic there is inactive the German Reich, according to their ideology, within the limits of the German Empire, or within the limits of 1937. This German Reich is represented as an organization by the Provisional Reich Government. The authorities specify the full scene as ‘reich citizens’.
The Reichsbürger scene appeared in the 1980s, and has become increasingly visible since 2010, with individual participants besides engaging in aggressive militants since 2013.
Federal Office for Constitution Protection (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, BfV) estimates that the Reichsbürger scene members are over 20,000. Of these, about 1,000 are considered right-wing extremists (as of June 15, 2021).
In 2018, the BfV, the state constitutional protection authorities and the national Criminal Police Office estimated that from 2015 to mid-2017 the "citizens of the Reich" committed more than 10 500 crimes.
The point of view of the Reich Citizens Movement usually bet that the German Reich inactive exists, as the Weimar Reich Constitution of 1919 was never abolished. The national Republic was not identical to the German Reich as a state, but was illegal under global and constitutional law; and de jure It didn't exist. Plus Wilhelm II he was forced to leave Germany, but the crown of Prussia never folded.
Only the German Reich, as an organization, inactive exists in a valid manner. Various representatives of this scene are of the opinion that it has a government in the form of the "temporary government of the Reich", most of the self-created by them, which does not yet have actual state power, but legally conducts government and authoritative affairs for Germany. However, the rights, courts and taxes imposed by the national Republic were illegal. The national Republic of Germany is not a state, but a company founded by the Allies in 1945 as BRD GmbH.
The actual claims are based on legal discussions and political interests arising from the business and subsequent division of Germany After the unconditional surrender of the Wehrmacht, the Allies first jointly assumed power over Germany. Then, in 1949, both the Basic Law of the national Republic of Germany and the Constitution of the German Democratic Republic were adopted.
Both countries claimed to represent only ‘Germany’ and that they treated the citizens of the another country as their citizens. The national Republic thus established that this (spatially partially identical) German Reich inactive exists. The establishment of an identity in the global law of the national Republic of Germany, formed as a West German component state, with the Reich excludes the simultaneous establishment of the German Reich, as an entity of global law distinct from the national Republic. Since the existence of the GDR contradicted this continued existence, the national Republic did not recognise it until the signing of the Basic Treaty in 1972. On the another hand, the GDR initially viewed itself as identical to the German Reich, but later advocated her fall and saw herself as only her legal successor.
Since the accession of the GDR to the national Republic of Germany and the (re-)re-)establishment of full sovereignty, the united Germany, the enlarged national Republic, are in global law full identical (intently identical) to the German Reich, besides with respect to its spatial scope.
One of the most crucial arguments for these groups is the 1973 national Constitutional Court ruling
In the context of this decision, the court outlined what problems under global law arose after the end of planet War II as a consequence of the division of Germany with respect to the German State (‘as a whole’).
References to the judgment
"The Basic Act – not only the thesis of the doctrine of global law and the doctrine of constitutional law – assumes that the German Reich survived the fall in 1945 and did not die with either surrender or the exercise of abroad state power in Germany by the Allied business powers or later" – follows the preamble ruling, Article 16, Article 23, Article 116 and Article 146 of the Basic Act. This besides corresponds to the settled case law of the national Constitutional Court, to which the legislature is adhering.
The German Reich inactive exists (BVerfGE 2, 266 [277]; 3, 288 [319 f.]; 5, 85 [126]; 6, 309 [336, 363]), it inactive has legal capacity, but is itself incapable to act as an full state for deficiency of organisation, in peculiar for the deficiency of institutionalised bodies.
With the emergence of the national Republic of Germany, there was no fresh West German state, but there was a reorganisation of parts of Germany.
The national Republic of Germany is so not ‘Legal successor’ to the German Reich’.
The various “governments of the Reich” considered themselves, according to the national Constitutional Court, to be missing bodies and claimed that by their existence they were doing, or had already made the German Reich capable of re-acting on the basis of what they considered to be the inactive applicable Weimar Constitution. Furthermore, they based their claim on the uncovering that the national Republic is not the legal successor to the German Reich. Accordingly, according to the ‘governments of the Reich’, he is neither entitled to act on behalf of the German Reich.
It is worth noting that the last conviction of the quoted passage goes a small further and it sounds in its entirety (see besides the 1987 national Constitutional Court ruling, act No. 2 BvR 373/83 = BVerfGE 77, 137 et seq.): ‘The national Republic of Germany is so not a 'legal successor' of the German Reich, but as a State identical to the State of the German Reich, but in relation to its spatial scope 'partly identical', so that in this respect identity does not claim to be exclusive’.
Another argument for any Reichsbürger is that they mention to Article 146 of the Basic Act as follows: "This Basic Act, which applies to the full German people after the completion of the process of creating the unity and freedom of Germany, expires on the date of entry into force of the Constitution, which was freely adopted by the German people".
Thus, we are talking about the complete unification of Germany – the Nation and the Earth.
Germany – private company
The national Republic of Germany is not a State, but a civilian – legal organisation from which it can be withdrawn, or which has no sovereign powers vis-à-vis the “citizens of the Reich”.
citing UN Resolution A/RES/56/83 , the alleged "self-governments" in peculiar effort to establish their own state sovereignty by means of a transnational legal standard, but thus misjudge the content of that UN resolution. The wording of the provision referred to is set out in Article 9 of the Resolution: ‘The conduct of a individual or a group of persons shall be considered to be an act of a State within the meaning of global law if, in the absence of, or as a consequence of omission of, the authorities of the State, that individual or group of persons carries out, in the absence of, or absence of, a State body de facto sovereign powers and circumstances require the exercise of those powers."
However, this paper is simply a resolution of the Assembly. specified a resolution is simply a advice even for UN associate States, i.e. it is not legally binding and does not constitute a legal basis due to the fundamental deficiency of legal power. In fact, the UN resolution does not grant self-government at all, but describes the work of those in power quasi- State in an area where there is no state power.
By their reference, Reichsbürger assumes that the national Republic does not be (no longer exists), or that it does not have a valid government and administration.
Furthermore, Reichsbürger argues that the national Republic of Germany exists but is not a State but a limited liability company (BRD GmbH, i.e. the company, and its citizens are only its ‘person’, as evidenced by the existence of an identity card already). The only proof of being a German citizen is the German citizenship paper – Staatsangehörigkeitsausweis.
They besides mention to the Finance Agency GmbH, which is based in Frankfurt am Main, owned by the national Republic of Germany. In their view, the national Republic has no sovereign authority, the national Chancellors are simply any kind of executive directors, and, above all, they can resign from membership of this GmbH at any time.
In addition, they mention to the SHAEF Act – which treats the Allied business law, which, to their knowledge, were not abolished.
Nationality of the Reich
“We Wilhelm, by the grace of God, the German Emperor, the King of Prussia, etc., decree on behalf of the German Empire, after the consent of the Bundesrat and the Reichstag, the following: § 1. The German is simply a individual who holds the nationality of a national state (§§ 3 to 32) or direct imperial citizenship (§§ 3 to 32). 2. The nationality of the Reich (§§ 3 to 35). § 4.1. By birth the rightful kid of the German acquires the nationality of the father, the illegitimate kid of the German acquires the nationality of the mother”.
This provision is up to date, applicable in the German Citizenship Act – Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetz (StAG).
The citizens of the Reich keep that erstwhile applying for a German citizenship paper Staatsangehörigkeitsausweis, in its possession, they are outside the legal area of the RFN. The law doesn't apply to them.
In addition, immediately after receiving this document, they appear to the German national Office (Bundesverwaltungsamt) after a copy of the registry of decisions in civilian matters — EStA registry (Auskunft aus dem registry Entscheidungen in Staatsangehörigkeitsangelegenheiten – registry EStA ).
In their opinion, only a individual with German citizenship is full German – a German citizen aka A German citizen. This is besides in accordance with Article 116 of the Basic Act for the national Republic of Germany, which they reject. Its Article 116 reads: 1. A German within the meaning of this Basic Act is, subject to another legal provisions, a individual who holds German citizenship or who has been accepted as a exile or displaced German nationality or as his spouse or descendant in the territory of the German Reich of 31 December 1937.2. erstwhile German citizens who, from January 30, 1933 to May 8, 1945, were deprived of citizenship for political, racial or spiritual reasons, and their descendants are again naturalized upon request. They are believed not to have been expatted if they lived in Germany after 8 May 1945 and did not express a different intention.”.
"The storm" on Reichstag without consequences?
The structures of the public include:
– NSU;
– Die Rechte (political party);
– Vaterländischer Hilfsdienst (VDH);
– Bismarcks Erben.
The storm on the Reichstag in the summertime of 2020 sparked large outrage to the public. The police have investigated over 300 cases. But the conviction rate was very low and usually has small to do with the underlying events.
On August 29, the “right extremists” and “conspiracy theorists”, as the media find it interesting, stormed the Reichstag stairs. The Berlin police and the prosecution are presently investigating 40 people involved.
Irene Mihalic, national politician for the Green organization parliamentary group in the Bundestag, said“ It is good that at least any of these people have been identified and criminal proceedings are under way. I hope there will be convictions." However, the investigator ‘should not be limited to individual suspects’ She added. "We request to look at possible networks. I hope that the deliberations will bring any insights".
The Green politician warned that it is besides essential to presume that the attack on the Capitol in Washington by supporters of the voted president of the United States Donald Trump last week was ‘model’ for “all those who carry out subversive plans besides in Germany. (...) It was only a foretaste of what 1 might anticipate there.”.
On 29 August 2020, protesters on the outskirts of the city as part of a demonstration against the restrictions of Covid19 entered the stairway of the Reichstag building and reached the entrance. The police managed to push them away. The storm caused general panic and criticism, especially the Berlin police, which had not stopped the storm from beginning.
After the assault on the Capitol president of the Bundestag Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU) reported that Berlin police had organized to strengthen their forces around the Reichstag building.
Vice-President of the Bundestag Petra Pau (Left Party) however, she said that she is inactive against the police cordon, as Members would gotta live with uncomfortable opinions in the immediate neighbourhood.
Vice-President of the Bundestag Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) said "Berliner Zeitung": "What happened at the Capitol is impossible in the Reichstag. We have a lockdown system. All entrances to the German Bundestag are closed with a circuit. The windows are bulletproof. It works very fast. Nobody enters and nobody leaves”.
Prosecutor's Office clears 70% of cases
The Berlin Public Prosecutor's Office informs that of the 82 cases brought, the majority, namely 55, has been released, mainly due to insufficient suspicions (39 cases), or the impossibility of uncovering a fishy (14 cases), in another cases due to partial remission or temporary obstacles (two cases). 17 proceedings were not completed, 5 penalties were made and 1 indictment was inactive pending in court, and another case was referred to another prosecutor.
In only 3 cases, a conviction was issued; in 2 for violating peace under § 125 of the national Criminal Code and in 1 for utilizing the symbols of non-constitutional and terrorist organizations, under § 86a.
Hanover – the desert or the media show?
The programme of the Leibniza Theatre in Hannover hosts Christmas performances: Charles Dickens Christmas Tale is Swinging Christmas. At this time of year, men and women besides come to the private theatre in Hanover to hear completely different stories; stories about princes and noble families, about 1871 and the German Empire.
About 30 people gathered in the back of the theatre to perceive Erhard Goll (acquaintment of name with my totally random) with Solingen on the subject The legal road to the Constitution in 1871. The introduction began at 14, a deposit of 10 euros, included coffee, tea, water and cookies. The gathering was announced through a regional chat called "Electoral Commissions". Cars arrived from Hesse, Wolfenbüttel, Wittmund, Flensburg.
A akin meeting, on 13 December, in the same place, was spontaneous. Opportunity: a statewide raid on over 50 activists of the alleged Patriotic Union, besides called the fresh German Army, a group of Citizens who reportedly planned a coup on Day X.
Police have arrested the 71-year-old real property dealer Heinrich XIII Reuß as the ringleader and in countless manhunts has seized 93 illegal weapons and gold bars worth six million euros. 1 of the wanted ones was greeted in Hannover with a applause: Matthes Haug. He besides reportedly belongs to a group centered around Prince Reuß.
Just a week after the raid, the theatre director, Joachim Hieke, welcome to the podium physics from Baden-Württemberg. The celebrated ideologist of the Reich sit next to him Hans-Joachim Müller and co-talker Hieke – Björn Auen. Hieke is impressed: he has been beginning to this scene in his home for 2 years. Recordings from the event are distributed to the Telegram groups utilizing an audio file.
At 6 a.m., police broke down his door, the frame was broken, Haug reported, author of the book Das deutsche Reich – von 1871 bis heute. He was arrested as a supporter of terrorism. “From time to time I meet Prince Reuss” said Haug, for example, in the prince's hunting palace in Thuringia. In Hannover, not only does Haug know the “princes”, but Müller of Leipzig. From the phase he told about his acquaintance with the alleged leader of the Patriotic Union.
Müller, Haug and others claim in Hannover that in 1871 people were truly free. They praise Bismarck and the Constitution of the German Reich. For them, Germany is an unloved administrative unit that needs to be removed, while the German Reich is inactive napping. “This is simply a immense chance if we emergence where we were in 1871, a unique chance for Germany“ Haug said.
The national Office for Constitution Protection estimates that there are about 23,000 heterogeneous, ideological scenes across the country Reichu. In Lower Saxony, the State Constitution Protection Office estimates that about 900 people are active in the movement. Müller has a chance to be 1 of the stars of this confusing, barely manageable but late reinforced scene. In 2020, he spread anti-Semitic American conspiracy ideology QAnon.
His YouTube videos have been watched more than 10 million times so far. It has its channels on the Telegram. In a shared video with Martin Kohlmann, the far-right head of Free Saxony, rapped about establishing his own kingdom in this national country. In Hannover, Müller speaks with a voice of dignity; he speaks and speaks, enjoying the function of a well-read, authoritative east German. He emphasizes that he is simply a teacher. Hieke proudly reports that he has known Müller for 2 years. "Let's make another country" - You got it.
Hieke, a cultural worker, is known in Hannover as an opponent of state measures against coronavirus. Everyone on the podium on 13 December rapidly agreed that the thwarted knock was only affirmative propaganda for them. "The Wake-up Program for German Sleeping Sheep".
Reuß would only gotta regain his 2 principalities in order to have an empire, as Müller said. “Prince Reuß told me that if I did not have a state nation, then the Russians would expel me.”. Reuß, as a future regent, has reportedly already made contact with the Russian government.
Ideologists of the Reich met. Golla promoted German-Russian friendship. It's more than just the German Reich. The media filming in front of the Leibniza Theatre was just disturbing. Questions aren't even allowed. Hieke did not respond to the request for comment.
AfD and Reichsbürger
In addition to erstwhile and active soldiers and police officers, 3 erstwhile and current AfD members are arrested.
That is why not only the rules on discipline and weapons are tightened up, but besides the AfD ban – for example by the SPD Home Minister in Thuringia Georg Maierwho called for specified a procedure.
One of the group's suspected members, erstwhile MP AfD and Berlin justice Birgit Malsack-Winkemann, inactive had a pass to the Bundestag until recently. The group seemingly planned to storm parliament with 2 twelve armed men and cuff MPs. The cognition of a 58-year-old would be an asset here. As a sports shooter, it is reportedly legally owning 2 weapons.
The Bundestag is about to tighten safety measures now. First of all, it is planned to amend the Rules of Procedure as explained in the parliamentary committee liable for this by the Head of the Bundestag Administration. Among another things, Members' and administrative staff are to check all 2 years. It is besides planned to check what can be found about erstwhile MPs in police databases. From now on, they would be called easier access.
Innuendos
AfD politicians identified the Patriotic Union with its partially elder members as ‘combo pensioners’, they reduced the threat from the group, or described extended raids involving 3,000 police officers as a ‘inscension’.
In east Thuringia, it is peculiarly clear that the links between Reichsbürger and AfD are not surprising. On the contrary, in many places they are part of the AfD movement. Haußner had already praised Reuß's appearance at the East Thuringian Patriots' organization in October 2021. As Germany, it is essential to turn distant from the BRD state simulation – he stated and besides thanked any AfD members in the audience, as shown by the video on the Telegram channel "Freeies Thüringen". This, as well as Haußner's Monday appearance, drew attention to the local investigative narrative, which insists on the links of AfD, Reichsbürger, Free Saxons and Thuringia, as well as the militant neo-Nazis in the context of raids.
Political consultant Johannes Hillje, who late published a book on the communication strategy and identity of AfD, is not amazed by the party's connections. He said "taz": ‘Reichsbürger belong to the enlarged AfD prefield. Not as an institutionalized partner, specified as the Junge alternate Youth Organization or the Erasmus Foundation, but in all case they are a resonance chamber". The terms “Great Reset”, “corrupted elites” are ubiquitous in demonstrations, in which AfD besides participates. "They play a akin keyboard of conspiracy ideological concepts" – he says.
At a press conference on the coup, AfD stated that the data they operate on the media were not entirely true. The organization will be filing for a committee of enquiry on this matter.
Ministry of Interior NRW: Putin sponsors Reich Citizens
Head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) Mr Kayser He warned against the ties of Russian peculiar services to Reichsbürger in Germany. "Russia has an interest in destabilising German society. To this end, they besides usage Reichsbürger, who in their extremist worldview are intentionally reinforced by the Russian government.” – said in an interview with “Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger”.
On the phase of citizens of the Reich are dominated by “pro-Russian narratives”. Russia is frequently seen as the victim of a global conspiracy that forces the president of Russia Vladimir Putin to argue alleged plans to grow NATO in Ukraine. "It is actual that the German MFA issued 40 Russian diplomats in the spring, thereby besides weakening intelligence, but we presume that various types of influential activities will proceed to be carried out" – said the Kayser newspaper.
AfD Delegatement?
After the raid on Reichsbürger is to be prepared an AfD ban. The Minister of the Interior of Thuringia informed about this. "The organization clearly meets the criteria to be banned" – maintains.
Minister for the Interior of Thuringia Georg Maier (SPD) treated the raid on the citizens of the Reich as an chance to call for the preparation of the illegalisation of the AfD. The organization that according to the polls is the strongest opposition force is "clearly anti-constitutional and barely conceals its desire to destruct the free democratic constitutional order".
By refusing to ban the activities of the National Democratic organization of Germany (NPD), the national Constitutional Court stated, among another things, that there must be the legitimacy of specified a decision. This means that the organization must be able to accomplish its objectives. specified information should now be collected about the opposition organization to subsequently ban its activities in Karlsruhe (the seat of the German Constitutional Court - Bundesverfasungsgericht).
AfD supported FDP Prime Minister candidate
In Thuringia, this organization had chosen an FDP candidate as Prime Minister with the Liberals and the CDU for almost 3 years. Thomas Kemmerich. After the intervention of the then Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) this has been ‘inverted’ as requested. Since then, the power has been exercised by a red-red-green number cabinet led by a leftist politician Bodo Ramelovto be tolerated by the CDU.
The fresh elections promised by the government were not held. The Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Thuringia qualified the government coalition there as "safe dam for right-wing extremism‘. Since July, members of the AfD, who for example are hunters or sports shooters with a weapon permit, have confiscated weapons...
Unfortunately, specified anti-democratic actions towards terrorist and anti-systemist left-wing organisations (vide Antifa) have no place. This indicates precisely how the German political and legal strategy is ticking in the national Republic of Germany, but besides Germany?
Recent events in Germany indicate that indeed the country is not well:
– 2013 – the NSU trial was criminal proceedings against 5 people accused of participating in acts of the right-wing extremist terrorist group The Nationalsozialistischer Untergrund (NSU), including 9 immigrant murders, 1 police killing, 2 explosive attacks and 15 robberies, and a full of 43 attempted homicides;
2020. The Reichstag storm;
- 2022. Planned (created by media?) coup involving Heinrich XIII.
Demoliberism and Corpocipism, which were to be a warrant of prosperity and peace, and their stableness begins to be questionable. In the event of a fresh incidental in Germany, Russia and the president of this country are presented by all means as "guilty to all."
Instead of looking for those guilty of this state of affairs in Russia, I think that the rulers of German politics should ask themselves first: why specified things happen and then specify – to identify the guilty (of themselves?).
So is the alternate to Germany (AfD), which is very frequently called the Putin Party, as the Chancellor said. Olaf Scholz, only because, on the issue of the conflict, Russia – Ukraine retains a different than mostly accepted anti-Russian direction.
It's truly embarrassing...
Matthäus Golla
(Germany)
Literature:
UN Resolution A/RES/56/83
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Verfassung:
Article 116, Article 146
Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung:
- „Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland“
- „Staatsbürger – Taschenbuch“
Kölner Schriften zu Recht und Staat – Band 52
‘Die Ausbürgerungilloyaler Staatsangehöriger
- Geltendes Vefrfassungsrecht, Internationaler Rechtvergleich und rechtpolitische Reformperspectiven“ Gesine Anna Eva Krohne
Schwerpointe Pflichtfach:
Schweitzer / Dederer „Staatsrecht, Völkrerecht, Europarecht“
‘Reichs- und Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetz vom 22. Juli 1913
Unter Benutzung der amtlichen Quellen“ Anton Roman
Melanie Hermann: ‘Reichsbürger’ und Souveränisten. Basiswissen und Tradengsstrategien. Hrsg.: Amadeu Antonio Stiftung. Berlin 2018, ISBN 978-3-940878-22-9
Ralf Neugebauer: “In you für einem Land leben wir eigentlich? Mit Reichsbürgerideen durch Absurdistan.”
Jan Rathje: Reichsbürger, Selbstverwalter und Souveränisten. Vom Wahn des bedrohten Deutschen. Unrast Verlag, Münster 2017, ISBN 978-3-89771-141-9.
Jan Rathje: „Reichsbürger“ – Verschwörungsideologie mit deutscher Spezifik. In: Wissen schafft Demokratie –
Jan Rathje: “Zwischen Verschwörungsmythen, Esoterik und Holocaustleugnung – die Reichsideologie”.
Andrea Röpke: „Reichsbürger“ – zu lange unbeachtet. In: Dies. (Hrsg.): 2018 Jahrbuch rechte Gewalt. Hintergründe, Analysen und die Ereignisse 2017. Chronicus des Hassses. Knaur eBook, ISBN 3-426-44434-8, S. 102 ff.
Christoph und Sophie Schönberger (Hrsg.): „Die Reichsbürger. Verfassungsfeinde zwischen Staatsverweigerung und Verschwörungstheorie“ Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2020, ISBN 978-3-593-51227-3
Andreas Speit (Hrsg.): "Reichsbürger. Die unterschätzte Gefahr". Ch. Links Verlag, Berlin 2017, ISBN 978-3-86153-958-2.
Dirk Wilking (Hrsg.): „Reichsbürger“. Ein Handbuch. Brandenburgisches Institut für Gemeinwesenberatung – demos in Cooperation mit dem Verfassungsschutz Brandenburg, 3. Auflage, Potsdam 2017, ISBN 978-3-00-055980-8 (online).
Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (Hrsg.): „Reichsbürger“ und „Selbstverwalter“. Staatsfeinde, Geschäftemacher, Verschwörungstheoreteker. Köln Dezember 2018
Rechtsextremisten, „Reichsbürger“ und „Reichsregierungen“, Land Brandenburg – Verfassungsschutz (12. April 2012)
Ministerium für Inneres und athletics des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt: „Reichsbürger in Sachsen-Anhalt – Was ist zu tun?“ Dezember 2016
Internet:
https://www.buero-prinz-reuss.de/
https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/heinrich-dreizehnter-prinz-reuss-100.html
https://bismarckserben.org/aktuelles/
https://www.hilfsdienst.net/ewiger-bund.html
http://www.documentarchiv.de/ksr/1913/reichs-staatsangehoerigkeitsgesetz.html
https://www.verfassungsschutz.de/DE/home/home_node.html
https://www.youtube.com/embed/edugQGw_zj0&ab_channel=WBSLEGAL
https://www.youtube.com/embed/3YN15GTPYr0&ab_channel=AufwachRaum.
