Dorota Wysocka-Schnepf from TVP or onetu writer Witold Juras openly advocate censorship, in peculiar the blocking of the X platform in Europe. Dr. Katarzyna Bąkowicz, UN expert on the committee of General Guardian on Russian influence, praises the practice of throwing people out of work for specified social media entries that will not like power (Polish wokeism). Although specified occurrences should be profoundly marked, they do not respond. They are not surprising, however, in the context of actions taken in the European Union and in general worldwide, to introduce a strategy of global censorship utilizing AI.
The book “Mission, misinformation, malinformation. How a global censorship strategy is created." Here I outline the problem in a more concise form.
Donald Tusk's government recognised the issue of combating alleged misinformation as 1 of the 7 priorities of the Polish half-year presidency of the EU Council from 1 January.
In turn, outgoing US president Joe Biden, who contributed to the creation of an "Industrial Complex of Censorship", initiated a series of actions to drastically reduce certain content in public space.
UN advanced Commissioner for Human Rights following Meta's January 2025 decision to end cooperation with fact-checkers in the United States, or media censors, he was outraged that "the removal of incitement to hatred and division must not be stopped."
Commissioner Volker Türk on X defended the actions taken on the global phase by various countries, among which EU representatives are leading the way, to reduce freedom of expression. He suggested that “the creation of safe spaces online” is not censorship. The deficiency of regulation promotes its belief in marginalisation of selected groups, and “allowing hatred on the Internet” in fact “reduces freedom of expression and can consequence in harm in the real world”.
Meta's chief, Mark Zuckerberg, announced in January that he would end the fact check program on his platform – but only in the US – due to the fact that fact-checkers they are politically biased and the moderation of content by them resulted in besides much censorship, which has abused users' confidence.
The global Network of Facts Verification (IFCN) – 1 of the organisations that formed the Industrial Censorship Complex – immediately reacted to this, threatening that Zuckerberg's decision might be harmful.
As Commissioner Türk has stated, he will not halt calling for "responsibility and governance in digital space, in accordance with human rights" to "protect public discourse, human dignity and build trust."
The UN Global Communications Department has confirmed that "in view of the increasing digitally-driven crisis, disinformation is actively working to combat false narratives". The unit continues to work on a code of conduct on the integrity of information based on the UN Global Principles of Information Integrity.
These principles include: trust and social resilience (to combat "MDM information"), healthy incentives for advertisers and technology companies (to ban, demolish, demolish and delete content, etc.), public authorisation (to share data), independent, free and pluralistic media (to support media presenting certain progressive and pro-globalist narratives), transparency and investigation (to facilitate access pricing for AI models to scale censorship, etc.).
See also: This is how a global censorship strategy is created. KNOW THE fact
Continue text string below...
This is how a global censorship strategy is created. KNOW THE fact – THE NEWEST BOOK OF STELMS ALREADY AVAILABLE
Combating disinformation and abroad interference are priorities of the Polish Presidency of the EU Council
One of the 7 priorities of the Polish Presidency in the EU is to guarantee "resistance to abroad interference and disinformation". Our authorities point out that "autocracy uses disinformation to break the social and political cohesion of the West, trying to interfere with democracy, stableness and safety of the European Union and its partners". Therefore, EU countries "must strengthen the resilience of democracy". This includes the ability to "recognise and destruct misinformation and abroad manipulation", but besides to carry out "long-term activities in the field of civic education, to build the intellectual resilience of societies and to prepare for crisis situations, to support and defend the independency of reliable media and to strengthen civilian society and citizens' commitment to the common good". All of this is “necessary to build resilience and inhibit polarisation and radicalisation”.
Emphasising the discrimination between "fair" and "unfair" media, Donald Tusk's government intends to strengthen coordination in order to combat "disinformation, information manipulation and to improve the EU's ability to prevent and mitigate the effects of hostile actions in cyberspace" through activity in respective entities.
"Specially important", as noted, is "to deal with crisis situations related to 3rd country interference in EU IT systems". The fight against climate misinformation was besides announced to "increase our safety in the face of climate change".
Within the General Affairs Council, the governing coalition will focus on "enhancement and protection of EU values, both internally and externally". The actions will focus on "in particular" the protection of the regulation of law, enlargement policy and interior EU reform, combating abroad interference and manipulation in the information environment, strengthening the democratic resilience of the EU and its neighbourhood, developing cooperation with the United Kingdom of large Britain and Northern Ireland and preparing negotiations for the fresh Multiannual Financial Framework".
The Tusk team, which has already committed so many violations of law in the country, promises to "stand up for the interior and external regulation of law in the EU, defending European values and waiting for the EC to present a democratic shield".
The abroad Affairs Council is to make a "strategic communication" (read EU propaganda) and will fight the alien, especially Russian interference and misinformation.
Under the Employment, Social Policy, wellness and Consumer Protection Council, the Digital Services Act will be "enhanced with an equal and anti-discrimination perspective" at EU level, including in cyberspace. By the way, the Polish authorities foresee a number of pro-gender actions, including the Declaration of the sex Equality Trio, to be signed in April 2025; the Directive on the implementation of equal treatment and conclusions on the implementation by the countries of the Beijing Platform of Action (abortion and ideology) gender) on the 30th anniversary of its adoption. There will besides be a "road map on women's rights" and a fresh EU equality strategy will be developed.
The Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council will address cybersecurity and net regulation.
On the another hand, the Environment Council under Polish leadership will search to "work out tools to combat disinformation on EU environmental and climate policies".
The Youth, Culture and athletics Education Council will not only advance inclusive education but will besides search to revise the Audiovisual Directive (AVMS Directive).
The proposed actions form part of the plan of building the “resistance of democracy” of the Biden – Harris team, which, to the discontent of the rulers, goes to the lame. The fresh U.S. president, with the aid of Musk, promised to fight censorship. He besides announced the removal of all advanced officials of the state – the question of whether he would do so – active in the creation of the "Industrial Censorship Complex", to which the investigation led and led respective committees of the American Congress.
Continuing text under the movie window...
Ukrainian Communication Group in the Polish Ministry of abroad Affairs denounces unfavorable media
Let us besides add that since January this year, the global group on combating misinformation on Ukraine (Ukrainian Communications Group) founded in June 2024 by the Americans in the Polish MFA. It combats “disinformation” on Ukraine, supports Kiev's activities in the information space, marks “the providers of the Krellian disinformation” and supports Ukrainian war propaganda, as we reported on the PCh24.pl website over six months ago.
UCG was formed on the initiative of a cell of the U.S. Department of State: Global Engagement Center. It is an office entangled in its country with a number of processes due to unacceptable censor actions and right-wing media attacks. For example, in December 2023, the fresh civilian Liberty Alliance sued the State Department for censorship of 2 right-wing media: "Daily Wire" and "The Federalist". The complainants alleged that GEC should finance and support and encourage the inclusion of selected media in the ‘blacklists’ to discredit them and deprive them of advertising revenue. Unacceptable Censorship actions affected not only the regular Wire and The Federalist, but besides the fresh York Post, Reason Magazine, Real Clear Politics and another media. Biden's office felt that they were spreading not only misinformation but unfavorable points of view for the ruling team.)
"Washington Examiner" described how GEC influenced censorship by backing organisations specified as Disinfo Cloud and Park Advisors. The second straight managed respective Global Engagement Center initiatives to combat misinformation.
Disinfo Cloud, on the another hand, utilized “more than 365 tools and technologies” to counter disinformation. A private organization funded by the State Department tested and improved tools to suppress circumstantial transfers. GEC straight encouraged social media and another corporations to usage different tools, 2 of which are even more linked to the State Department: Global Disinformation Index and NewsGuard.
Both of these organisations form black lists of "risks" or "exclusions", labeling any organisations as unreliable. They then make these lists available to major advertising associations and companies specified as Oracle and Xandr Microsoft to demonstrate, that is, deprive advertising gross of selected media.
Continuing text under the movie window...
Global censor initiatives
In spite of the change in the U.S., the world’s price force continues. In 2021, the UN adopted Resolution 76/227 of the General Assembly, in 2022 – Resolution 49/21 by the Human Rights Council, which indicated an extended scope of misinformation that could negatively affect the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as the accomplishment of sustainable improvement objectives.
The UN, citing surveys conducted in various countries, claims that more than half of net users are afraid about contact with misinformation. Young people and low - income people are especially vulnerable.
"The effects of disinformation and hatred speech on the net can be seen worldwide, including in the areas of health, climate action, democracy and elections, sex equality, safety and humanitarian aid", the UN points out. The United Nations improvement Programme Office is afraid about the "information pollution" which threatens trust, security, democracy and sustainable development.
UNESCO has cited more than 800 academic papers and NGOs to confirm these thesis, branding “disinformation” covid and vaccine opponents.
The peculiar Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in the 2022 study complained about “bigotry and hatred speech aimed at minorities, women and all alleged other, posing a threat not only to those straight attacked but besides to inclusion and social cohesion."
The UN condemns misinformation and misinformation on the war in Ukraine and misinformation and misinformation on the climate threat, which "delays urgently needed action to guarantee a dignified future." It has even been defined as "climate misinformation and misinformation", which is collectively understood as "false or misleading content, undermining the scientifically agreed grounds for human-induced climate change, its causes and effects". "The coordinated run aims at denying, minimising or diverting attention from the technological consensus of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and undermining urgent action to accomplish the objectives of the 2015 Paris Agreement. A tiny but noisy number denying climate discipline continues to reject the consensus position and a crucial presence on any digital platforms is observed. For example, in 2022 random simulations conducted by non-governmental organizations showed that Facebook's algorithm recommended content denying climate at the expense of climate sciences. On Twitter, the number of hashtag users #climatescam increased from little than 2,700 a period in the first half of 2022 to 80,000 in July and 199,000 in January 2023. The platform was besides among the highest password search results climate. In February 2022, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change first referred to climate misinformation, stating that deliberate questioning of science contributed to misconception of technological consensus, uncertainty, disregard of hazard and urgency of action and opposition“ We read.
According to the UN, misinformation and misinformation threatens democracy due to the fact that it does not let voters to make informed choices. Moreover, the dissemination of "disinformation" may undermine public assurance in electoral institutions and the electoral process itself.
In turn, ‘Speak of hatred’ is intended primarily to contact ‘marginalised and defenceless groups’, which threatens them with social, economical and political exclusion. It is the UN that is focused on regulating specified content.
Mis- and misinformation harms, according to the conventional media marketplace (receiving advertising by digital platforms, "the extinction of media" or "information waste" in any regions, causing communities to lose reliable, local sources of information).
Disinformation has a direct impact on the work of the UN, undermining operational security, efficiency and capacity to act and the accomplishment of the SDGs.
The UN points out that the fight for "integrity of information" should always be pursued, with a view to sustainable improvement objectives, their "fundamental importance for building a planet in which trust can be restored".
One way to fight for "information integration" is to usage existing government on defamation, cyber-violence and harassment in the fresh context.
Another way is to establish the principles of online platforms at regional and national level (e.g. the Digital Services Act (DSA) in the EU concerning the regulation of "illegal content", goods and services on the Internet, introduces, among others, a code of conduct on disinformation).
Another way of fighting for "information integrity" is by utilizing digital platforms of varying sizes, functions and structures to undertake a number of self-regulatory actions (guidelines, standards, codes on content deletion and moderation), utilizing more resources to control content in different languages and to finance organisations fact-checking. They should besides make "automated content moderation systems".
It points to the request to share data from around the planet to researchers about the phenomenon of misinformation and misinformation and to strengthen marginalised groups (e.g. sexual minorities, youth and women whose opinions on the removal of certain content are favoured). A United Nations Verified initiative was besides created to average content and propaganda, informing users of alleged lies before contacting them, etc.).
A large importance is attached to the demonetisation of "MDM information" and "hate speech", the creation of networks of organisations verifying facts and training in this area.
The UN besides proposed regulation of generic artificial intelligence. It has developed a UN strategy and Action Plan on hatred speech at national and global level. In February 2023, UNESCO organised an net for Trust conference. It discussed fresh global guidelines on the regulation of digital platforms, which were finalised in 2024. These guidelines are reflected in the UN Code of Conduct on the integrity of information on digital platforms.
They are in line with the UN Head of Global Digital Compact policy guidelines adopted by the States in September 2024 and are interrelated. The Code would be implemented by all associate States. It requires that, in the event of engagement in "information integrity", all parties " abstain from using, supporting or strengthening disinformation and hatred speech for any purpose, including to accomplish political, military or another strategical objectives, to incite violence, to undermine democratic processes or to attack civilians, susceptible groups, communities or individuals".
Member States should "make certain that responses to misinformation and hatred speech comply with global law (...) and are not utilized to block legitimate expression of views or opinions, including by general net closure or bans on platforms or in the media".
I compose more about it in my book.
Click HERE and see how to order a book.
The Secretary-General is expected to make a peculiar cell in the UN Secretariat to increase the consequence to misinformation and misinformation and “the hatred speech”.
The UN, like another institutions, has recognised that the fight to strengthen the "integration of information" on digital platforms is simply a "urgent precedence of the global community", and is afraid in peculiar with combating misinformation and misinformation on wellness and sex equality, conflicts, education, climate action in order to accomplish a sustainable future and "not leave anyone behind" (to itself), as stated in Agenda 2030.
For more information, see the United Nations Global Principles For Information Integration. Recommendations for Multi-stageholder Action".
Priorities of EU bodies
In a briefing on "tampering online information and the integrity of information" last September, the European Parliament pointed to censorship measures already taken in the EU, justifying their request to fight "authoritarian state and non-state actors who are working for open, democratic information ecosystems" and, in fact, to usage them to manipulate information. due to "evolutionary technologies, there may be an increased hazard that information ecosystems will work against democracy alternatively than for it".
It is noted that people are not immune to information manipulation, which makes it hard to implement global programmes in fresh years, thus "a sense of urgency is increasing to guarantee the integrity of information, both in the context of elections and beyond."
The EC plays a key function in creating a strategy of global censorship and the EU has adopted a drastic regulation as the Digital Services Act (DSA) as the only Regon. It will besides be a model solution for another countries in the planet to fight mis-, mal- and misinformation.
The EU is fighting “algorithmic authoritarianism” and the communicative that “democracy does not work”.
In 2018, the European Commission defined misinformation as ‘verifiable false or misleading information that is created, presented and disseminated in order to accomplish economical benefits or to intentionally deceive the public and that could origin public harm’.
In 2021, the European External Action Service (EEAS) coined a deadline for abroad information manipulation and information interference (FIMI). This is defined as ‘preservation that threatens or may have a negative impact on values, procedures and political processes’ and which has a ‘manipulation character’ and is ‘provided in a targeted and coordinated manner’, including ‘state or non-state entities, including their agents inside and outside their own territory’. With peculiar emphasis on the activities of Russia and China.
The FIMI concept was included in the strategical safety and Defence Compasse in 2022 and was adopted by the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA) in 2023. It is besides included in the authoritative transatlantic dictionary through the EU-US trade agreement.
The fresh word "integrity of information", which is defined as "a balanced approach to addressing the problem of information manipulation, while protecting freedom of expression".
In addition to Russia and China, Iran's disinformation campaigns (the war of Israel with Hamas) and Venezuela are targeted.
In May 2024, the FBI clearly identified Russia, Iran and China as the countries with the top American concern about the 2024 election. Attention is besides paid to Venezuela, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
European politicians are afraid about misinformation genderwhich is simply a global challenge for democracy.
The European External Action Service is leading the EU's efforts to reduce abroad misinformation. Since 2015, it has expanded its activity to counter abroad manipulation and interference. There is simply a fast informing strategy (RAS) for disinformation. EEA is working with the EC and the associate States and NATO to grow its tools to combat misinformation.
The Digital Services Act (DSA) and a number of another regulations on the Digital Single marketplace play an crucial role. The DSA is complemented by the EU Code of Conduct on Disinformation, supported by the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO). The Regulation on transparency and governance of political advertising (TTPA) and the European Act on Media Freedom (EMFA) further strengthen the regulatory framework.
Under the DSA, all intermediaries are obliged to fight illegal content, covering not only terrorist content, but also, if appropriate, where law has been adopted in a given country, alleged hatred speech and misinformation and another "harmful information".
Before June 2024, the Commission issued guidelines for VLOP and VLOSE suppliers with recommended hazard mitigation measures for "electoral integrity". In the context of elections, the Commission utilized the implementing rules of the DSA and the 2018 Code of Conduct as well as the Reinforced Code of Conduct of 2022.
Commission 2018 Action Plan to address misinformation online, led to the creation of a European Digital Media Observatory in 2020; a centre of facts verifiers, scientists and another disinformation stakeholders (mapping and coordination)
Since then, 14 EDMO centres have been launched and more are being implemented across Europe.
The Commission financed the launch of the European Network of Facts Verification Standards (EFCSN) in 2022 to comply with the European Code of Standards for Independent Facts Verification Organisations.
Action is being taken to set up a working group on the integrity of the information space, strengthen the EDMO, finalise the Code of fast consequence to Future Elections, transform the voluntary Code of Conduct into a mandatory Code of Conduct for DSA. A regulation on transparency and policy advertising (TTPA) is under way.
A regulation on political advertising was signed in March 2024. It is to be applied from October.
Currently, 1 of the most dangerous censorship solutions is the Act on Artificial Intelligence. This regulation allows automated censorship to be created. The Act is the first comprehensive law in the planet to regulate AI. It entered into force on 1 August last year and will be full applicable from 2 August 2026.
In February 2024, the Office for Artificial Intelligence and the European Council for Artificial Intelligence were established. These groups will be liable for monitoring and enforcing the Act on Artificial Intelligence. The Regulation will let faster mapping and marking of uncomfortable content (MDM information).
The European Act on Freedom of Media (EMFA) aims primarily to "enhance the integrity of the interior marketplace for media services in order to increase resilience to misinformation". It requires national authorities to require audiovisual service providers to combat misinformation and manipulation. As of February 2025, the fresh Media Services Council, etc., will operate.
These and another EU initiatives are officially designed to reduce misinformation and counter abroad interference through coordination and automation.
However, there are also examples of multilateral and global cooperation on "information integrity", e.g. the DIS/MIS OECD Information Resource Centre, co-chaired by France and the USA. In 2024, the U.S. Department of State and the EEAs launched the US-EU Joint Coordination mechanics on the integrity of information in the Western Balkans.
The US global Cyberspace and Digital Policy strategy of May 2024 besides mentions the defence of "information integrity" as a priority, highlighting TTC, OECD and G7 as key forums for cooperation.
A number of more detailed rules on the protection of "integrity of information" and "integrity of elections" are expected to take place during the current EC Head's word of office.
Ursula Von der Leyen in the political guidelines for the years 2024-2029 stressed the EU's focus on democratic rights and values and "the request to do more to defend our democracy." The EC Head proposed a fresh European Shield of Democracy to counter abroad manipulation of information and interference in elections. This shield would be designed to detect, analyse and proactively counter disinformation and manipulation of information. The EC besides wants to educate and instill society (prebunking), conducting its own ‘strategic information’, i.e. its own propaganda, informing the alleged ‘disinformation’ expected. In the USA prebunking It was in fact misinformation from the FBI (misleading the corrupt links and influences of the Biden family). An even larger network of fact verifiers is to be created, available in all languages. There are besides announcements of stricter enforcement of DSA rules to remove MDM information, identified by fact verifiers as harmful.
In her speech to Parliament on 18 July 2024, von der Leyen stated: "Tarcza will take into account the recommendations of the work of the peculiar Committees on abroad Interference to better defend our democracies." The Head of the EC has commissioned Commissioner for Democracy, Justice and the regulation of Law Michael McGrath to direct the work on the fresh European Shield for Democracy. The Irish is to cooperate with another college members to combat abroad manipulation of information and interference, and to be subject to Vice-President for Technological Sovereignty, safety and Democracy, Helena Virkkunen. It is liable for "enhancement of the resilience and functioning of our democracy, in peculiar through the fresh European Shield of Democracy, and the fight against harmful misinformation that can origin fragmentation in society and weaken our democracy." Virkkunen is to work to advance EU digital standards and standards internationally and to guarantee the EU's leading function in global digital governance.
On 8 January, the French Ministry of abroad Affairs issued a memo on "Integration of information and the resignation of META from content moderation in the US". He expressed concern over the decision of the American company and stated that "France remains vigilant and committed to ensuring that META, along with another platforms, fulfils their obligations under European law, in peculiar the Digital Services Act (DSA)". It has been pointed out that the regulation aims to "protect citizens from abroad interference and manipulation of information".
As the Ministry of Diplomacy added, "freedom of speech, a fundamental right protected in France and Europe, should not be confused with the right to virality, which would let the dissemination of false content to millions of users without any filtering or moderating".
France has expressed its support for a network of ‘fact verifications’ worldwide.
Click HERE and see how to order a book.
Another study by the U.S. Judiciary Committee on the automation of censorship
While European usurpers want to profoundly interfere with freedom of speech, protected by national constitutions and many global regulations, which means not only the right to share information, ideas, but besides to get to know the opinions and feelings of others, but besides for American legislators, judges, it is apparent that this interference should be opposed.
In December 2024, the U.S. Judicial Committee had already issued another mid-term study on the investigation of the Industrial Censure Complex. I compose more about an earlier study in a book. This time the survey afraid the national government taking control of artificial intelligence in order to suppress freedom of speech. The study of 18 December 2024 of the Committee on Justice and the Selected Subcommittee on the Armed Forces of the national Government examined the hazard that the national government's engagement in artificial intelligence (AI) and its regulation could pose to freedom of expression.
It was discovered that the Biden – Harris administration financed the improvement of tools to monitor statements based on artificial intelligence, "allowing mass censorship".
It has been shown that "executive authorities regularly abuse fresh technologies – and regulatory powers over these technologies – in order to censor protected free speech. Recently, executive power has forced and agreed with social media companies to censor real information, opinions, jokes and satire on elections, COVID-19 and another matters of public interest. This run to silence Americans is simply a frontal attack on the first amendment: as the ultimate Court stated, Public affairs speech is more than expression; it is the essence of the regulation of lawIt’s okay. ”
The AI rules “provide national government measures to monitor, suppress and yet censor views and information that the government does not like. AI, aware of the power national regulators have over their future, raced to comply with government directives, allowing even to inspect fresh AI models before making them public. Meanwhile, executive power utilized taxpayers' money to finance the improvement of AI-based censorship tools to control statements online on an unprecedented scale."
Members of the committee condemned the Partnership for the Integrity of Elections (various national agencies from fact-checkers and "pseudonacci" from "disinformation" at Stanford University, which censored "real information, jokes and political opinions" of citizens before the 2020 elections, and pointed to the immense threat posed by the influence of the national authority and a narrow group of actors cooperating with it on the training of AI models, according to any prejudices.
As usual, very interesting findings and concrete examples show why access to AI models is dangerous.
The National discipline Foundation (NSF) has allocated millions of dollars in grants to make artificial intelligence-based tools for mass monitoring and censorship of online content.
‘One of the projects financed by the NSF was to automate marking bad posts and boasted that he was helping social media platforms [e]csternalise hard Censorial responsibilityIt’s okay. ”
"The government's engagement in the improvement of artificial intelligence poses a double threat. Firstly, as warned earlier by the Commission and the peculiar Subcommittee, the AI offers government bureaucrats and intermediaries cooperating with the government the anticipation of mass monitoring and mass censorship of statements with unprecedented velocity and scale. Secondly, government censorship of AI training (...) may lead to awakening, biasing and inaccurate results generated by artificial intelligence.”
Several British AI companies were besides criticised, including Logically, which during the alleged COVID-19 pandemic monitored activists and academics criticizing blockades and vaccine passports. The company boasted of a peculiar partnership with Meta, in order to automatically suppress and description content that was considered disinformation. "At the 2021 UK local elections, Logically, the company monitored to million harmful contentIt’s okay. ”
"In at least 22 countries, social media companies were required, explicitly or indirectly, by imposing strict deadlines for removing prohibited materials, to usage automatic content moderating systems".
It has been noted that generic artificial intelligence models, which include a combination of training data and device learning algorithms, can be trained to ignore certain applicable information – not to give them to users – or censor results independently of training data by manipulating the device learning algorithm of the model. "Encoded prejudices in AI models can service as leverage multipliers for censorship". And they do.
The Commission criticised EU regulations on AI and any cooperation of the US authorities with European counterparts and another censors worldwide, condemning "importation into the US of burdensome European-style AI rules". They can let power to force AI companies to make "awakened" AI models that are in line with the demands of government censorship.
The establishment of the US AI consortium: Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) in 2024 was criticised to “unify” more than 200 companies and AI organizations with the national government. The designation of the AI Safety Institute at the National safety Memorandum was condemned as "the main contact point for the US manufacture in the US government", which is to set standards, etc.
In November 2024, a task force composed of national agencies, including the Department of Defence (DoD) and National safety (DHS), the National safety Agency (NSA) and the National wellness Institutes (NIH), was established to “co-operate in the improvement of fresh AI assessment methods and benchmarks” as part of the government’s “total approach to AI security”.
The Commission fears that "arms", "plans" and "resources" "are not truly "voluntary". In fact, these are forced attempts to force AI companies to give the government a foothold in the improvement of fresh artificial intelligence systems so that it can control the flow of information to and from AI models.” This will let to advance censorship under the pretext of combating allegedly "harmful prejudice" and "disinformation", which are unclear terms.
Biden – Harris squad has changed the AI regulatory scenery in 4 years so that the government has access to investigating fresh artificial intelligence models before making them public.
This solution was adopted in the EU under the Artificial Intelligence Act. According to the American Commission, allowing power to service as a guardian of the artificial intelligence marketplace gives an extraordinary chance to influence input and output data of AI models, expanding the hazard of censorship.
The November 2024 initiative on the establishment of the global Network of AI safety Institutes was besides criticised. The founding members are the United Kingdom, Canada and the European Commission. The Commission warned against removing 1 of the most crucial fundamental rights of citizens: freedom of expression
In a planet of increasing censorship, protecting all person's right to talk was never more important. The prelude to censorship became a alleged cancellation culture. Now we have a “centralised response” deep country” or various services that strive to keep political control at higher levels of global power.
Much faster than it seems, we are moving towards totalitarianism again, as I am writing more about in my book. The totalitarian state dulls the manifestations of self-thinking and acting. He wants to build a “paradise on the ground” on the ruins of freedom, according to his own repressive ideology.
Professors Marek Bankowicz and Wiesław Kozub-Ciembroniewicz note that totalitarian ideology “does not halt at formulating purely political indications. Mystical totalitarian ideology has many features par excellence spiritual faith. Over time, this kind of ideology has increasingly avoided reality, fleeing into a planet of fiction created by it. Totalitarianism, therefore, is always more or little an ideology, or a strategy in which ideological superreality displaces reality. The existing planet and its concepts are stifled by circumstantial fiction, while words lose their conventional meaning and get a fresh one, turning into a fresh one." In this system, only a fewer have cognition of the rules governing the order of the world, and as a fresh “elita” are predestined to lead the people, imposing the rules of conduct on the passive masses.
People believe that a fresh “caste of priests”, those who prosecute their own goals, will be able to bring about a paradise on earth. However, as Scruton rightly points out, the "elita" seeks to destruct the established order and "justifies the taking of power by itself, referring to solidarity with those who have been unfairly excluded. From now on they will inactive be excluded, only in a righteous way, for in the name of the people, and thus in the name of themselves." Eventually, everyone will learn to live a lie. That's what censorship is all about.
Agnieszka Stelmach
Click HERE and see how to order a book.
