AUTHOR: TYLER DURDEN
Peter Hansler, author Book Voice From Russia
Introduction
W Germany is dominated by the Orwell conditions in its interior policy, and Germany is led into a gap by a bunch of dilettants in economical policy. erstwhile Chancellor Scholz one more time publically criticizes and calls for further escalation against Russia, his words make no sense due to the fact that he regularly succumbs to pressure.
Germany inactive does not realize that the United States is not their friends, but in cold blood they bring a arrogant and large (former) industrialized nation to ruin in order to accomplish their own goals.
There's a pattern in this. Germany has been controlled from Washington since the end of planet War II. I firmly believe that Germany would be able to emergence up and put an end to this madness. Anglo-Saxon plans would not stand a chance without Germany.
Many people indoctrination by the media and politicians do not realize the always more tangible hazard of the outbreak of planet War III. I'm sending it back to my article."Escalation towards planet War 3 – Analysis". This danger is not fresh and is increasing steadily. inactive in February 2023 I drew attention to this dangerous trend in the article "Sleepwalkers at Work: planet War 3 most likely already started"and already then I concluded that planet War 3 had already begun in purely material terms.
In addition, there are no longer any crucial voices in German politics or in the media that could argue this madness due to the fact that they are not even published by the mainstream media or are referred to as Russia's lovers or Nazis.
It takes strength and courage to reverse events. The last time the Germans were pushed into the abyss by psychopaths, they did not find the courage and were completely destroyed. Only then did they spit in their hands, and phenomena specified as "Trümmerfrauen" led the country back to prosperity.
Inciting War
As a typical of the instigators of the war, it should be briefly noted that Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (FDP) called for 900,000 reservists to be mobilised in Germany. The reason for the call for "defence policy" are possible plans to attack Russia to the West. The flaw in this plan: There is no proof that Russia is planning an attack. It's a disaster that's based on imaginary threats.
In medicine, we talk about delusions erstwhile a doctor hears from his patient that he is afraid of being poisoned by his wife, even though the man is not married.
President Putin's answer to a journalist's question at a press conference in St. Petersburg shows that usually a thoughtful president is truly bad:
Is he completely out of his mind?
Stupid as a table?
They figured Russia wanted to attack NATO.
Is he completely out of his mind?
Does Dumm know diesel Tisch?
Who came up with this?
It's bullshit, it's complete bullshit.
It would be nonsense if it wasn't a plan to trick our own people, saying, "Help, Russia will attack soon, we must urgently arm ourselves, send weapons to Ukraine!".
In fact, it is done to preserve its imperial position and power, why it is done.
Look at NATO's possible and Russia's potential.
Have you decided we're crazy or something?
A fewer days ago NATO besides announced preparations for deploying 300,000 American soldiers on European fronts in the event of a full-scale conflict with Russia. The spiral of madness is temporing.
Comparing president Putin with Hitler, planet War II is utilized to analyse the situation, although the situation of continuous warfare shows striking similarities to the events that occurred before planet War I and sparked a war that no 1 truly wanted and plunged humanity into the apocalypse.
This war was halted from 1918 to 1939 and rekindled in Europe 21 years later. There are many indications that conflicts in Ukraine and the mediate East are an overture to a major disaster. Escalation is simply a motto – everyone in the West agrees on this; a peace conference in Switzerland, without Russia as a fighting organization and with grotesque "peace goals", serves only as a fig leaf for the aggressive West, which can say that everything was tried erstwhile a serious conflict broke out. This conference will fail, and it is intended for this. Whereas it appears that the Swiss national Council did not realise this; Formerly a neutral country behaves as naively as Germany and with the aid of Swiss media it rapidly became a despicable instigator of war under the cover of "neutrality", a word that degenerated into a meaningless label.
Lack of education and historical awareness by government
In addition, German leaders deficiency education. If you don't realize Hegemon's past and strategy, you're in a bad position due to the fact that deficiency of historical awareness leads to incorrect decisions in the present.
The main hegemone stream has not changed in the last 120 years. It is amazing that many people present believe that Germany was solely liable for planet War I. Already then, all possible effort has been made internationally to prevent Germany from focusing on peace and prosperity in the long word and with all its social strength.
Germany became besides strong economically for the then Hegemon of large Britain. For example, the construction of the Berlin-Bagdad railway line threatened the British Empire not only industrially, but besides trade routes. If you realize Heartland Mackinder's theory, which already saw the British Empire in danger in 1905, and you internalize Brzesiński and Friedman's strategy, planet War I and today's tensions will make much more sense. However, this requires a minimum of cognition and education, which the German government clearly lacks. In this subject I mention to Karl Eckstein's article "Anglo-Saxon geopolitical strategy – unchanged for 120 years". We'll go back to that.
Back to top with courage, stubbornness and discipline
The economical miracle after planet War II was an awesome accomplishment of the Germans after planet War II. Thanks to hard work and skilled economical policy, Germany has returned to the top of the world. Marshall's plan launched in 1947 surely helped, but Germany achieved its promotion primarily through its own efforts. Strong, stubborn, and skillful. Ludwig Ehrhard, the first minister of the economy after the war, was the embodiment of a legitimate policy. He had the courage to endure rationing and price control as early as 1948; the British, who nevertheless won the war – although as a junior partner of the United States – gave up the last rationing regulations only in 1954. If politics and business make the right decisions, Germany will flourish. Until a fewer years ago, Germany was the leading exporter in the world.
This is the affirmative side of this decisive march and stubbornness that was essential to catch up with the top war disaster of humanity so far.
Persistence and overconfidence lead to hell
However, with the same stubbornness the Germans besides managed to bring their own country—and many others—to the apocalypse and failed to halt it, even if all soberly reasoning observer could see—see, not guess—a disaster long before it fell.
After the large military successes culminated in the triumph over France in 1940, the command of the German Army under Adolf Hitler decided to conquer the russian Union. Many generals who survived the war and wrote their memoirs after the war, enrolled after the war as heroes and claimed that only Hitler wanted this run – they warned her and opposed her.
That's not true. The command of the German army and most of the German people—especially after the French run in 1940—were in specified a frenzy of triumph that they believed they were invincible and bitten by which they choked.
Logistics were the only ones who truly warned and rightly argued that the supply of troops would last specified a immense run for only a fewer weeks. Nearly 4 million soldiers attacked the russian Union, 3 million Germans and many Romanians, Italians and another allied units. Hitler was convinced that all they had to do was break down the door, and the full rotten structure would collapse. However, disappointment came very quickly.
The biographies of large German generals are beautified marketing pamphlets and are in no way suitable for factual analysis. Anything that didn't make the gentlemen look good was deliberately left out. For example, these gentlemen were very well informed about what was going on with Jews and another parts of the civilian population behind the front line, due to the fact that genocide required coordination between "Einsatztruppen" and militant troops. Megalomania, in which many generals did not yield to Adolf Hitler in anything, was besides prescribed in the biography.
But if you look through the war logs of military command, you will find the truth. I read the war journal. Chief of Army General Staff, Colonel Franz Halder. It reveals the truth, written straight on the day of the events in question. The author did not believe that these records would always be made public, so these records should be assessed much higher in terms of fairness than in terms of embellished biographies.
Reading this work, it may be amazing that the Chief of the General Staff clearly lacked an accurate view. He recorded fragments of information, many numbers and individual reports. I can't realize how a war can be waged on the basis of that information.
Moreover, the inconsistent nature of the overall assessment of the situation on the east front is more than astounding and confirms the impression of a deficiency of supervision that would be essential for the success of war activities on various theatres of action.
On 3 July 1941, little than 2 weeks after the start of the German offensive against Russia "Barbarossa", Halder reported that Russia would most likely end in 2 weeks, only to study a small more than a period later, on 11 August, that Russia's "colostrum" was underestimated. In the summertime of 1941, the dreams of a fast triumph had already passed, and the difficulties that the logistics had warned against had begun to materialize. In October, Germany was again assured of the victories before the "Taifun" offensive – the final attack on Moscow – and declared the defeat of the russian Union. Things have turned out differently. Only a fewer motorcycle patrols reached Chimek, the suburb of Moscow, which present lie on the MKAD bypass, a good 20 kilometres from the Kremlin.
A monument was erected."Moscow defence Monument". Will the monument bear fruit?
Moscow not only survived, but the Russians first moved on to the offensive. On December 8, 1941 Adolf Hitler released Directive No 39 and the offensive was halted.
When Wilhelm Keitel, head of the Wehrmacht Chief Command, was asked by russian prosecutor Major Iona Timofeyevich Nikitchenko during the first Nuremberg trial for war crimes, erstwhile he believes the war with Russia was lost, Keitel replied with 1 word: "Moscow".
Continuing War Despite Military Failure
German Strategy: Fight to the End
After the defeat at Moscow, the German Wehrmacht was so weakened, even in the opinion of German generals, that triumph over the russian Union was no longer possible. Nevertheless, the war lasted almost 3 and a half years. In the past textbooks, the defeat of the Wehrmacht involves later defeats: under Stalingrad (1942), Kursk (1943), Bagration (1944), and even Berlin (1945). Most of the losses suffered by both sides after 1941, but erstwhile assessing the wars in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and yet Ukraine and the Gaza Strip, it should be remembered that the Wehrmacht continued to do harm for almost 3 and a half years. These conflicts continued and continued, even though the aggressor realized that military triumph was and is impossible. Why?
There are most likely respective reasons why Germany did not cancel operations in Russia in 1941. Firstly, the Nazis' stated goal was to exterminate the Soviets they perceived as subhumans. They succeeded in killing about 15 million civilians. Secondly, the ceasefire with Stalin would be difficult, as the military reputation of the Wehrmacht would suffer, the genocide of the population would become known worldwide, and after the ceasefire, reinforced Russia would stand at the borders of the German Reich. So there were many reasons why the Nazis did not search peace with Stalin. It should be noted that Germany did not benefit from this strategy or alternatively caused its collapse.
U.S. strategy: losing militarily – winning strategically
Americans besides proceed to wage lost wars, but they accomplish strategical goals that are beneficial to their geopolitical strategy.
Since planet War II, it has been observed that the United States has besides continued armed conflicts for a long time, despite regular military failures. However, they manage to do so by keeping their own losses at a very low level, as their weapons systems have until late been well above their weak opponents, had an advantage in the air, and regularly sent 3rd parties as deputies to fire.
The reasons for this strategy are multi-layered: firstly, war is simply a immense business for the US – or alternatively for the military-industrial complex. Secondly, the main nonsubjective of these wars is to weaken strategical opponents; This can be achieved even if you are yet defeated militarily.
Since I am now in Iran and studying its history, the Iranian-Iracan War is an excellent example of this strategy in which the US managed not to even engage militarily; Iraq was utilized as an intermediary. The war lasted 8 years. Although the Iranians yet won military victory, they were completely exsanguinated financially, militarily, and in terms of the population. In this conflict, many well-educated men were killed and then lost to rebuild. The Americans succeeded in preventing Iran from forming independent from the US after the Shah in the long run and to this day, the goal has been achieved.
Is the U.S. strategy working in Ukraine?
Facts
In my opinion, NATO's military defeat in Ukraine has been a fact since September 2023. We wrote about it already last September in an article "Ukraine is militaryly over". Since then, Russian territorial conquests have steadily increased and for respective weeks the Russians have opened a fresh front from the north against Kharkiv, which led to a renewed extension of the front, even more thinning the Ukrainian forces. The Russians do not gotta launch a large offensive – and so far they have not – but alternatively exhaust Ukrainian forces on a constantly extending front line with small progress. regular losses in Ukraine are constantly expanding and have already exceeded the point where these losses were inactive to be recovered. Weapons reaching Ukraine from the West will not solve the problem – not only soldiers are missing, but above all the will of the Ukrainian people to go to die behind the US. Moreover, president Zelenski has ruled without a legal basis since May. He did not let any elections due to the fact that he would have been removed from office. This alone prevents negotiations with legalist Russians.
The facts are on the table; Whether you like them or not doesn't matter. Russia will win militarily in this conflict. Russians are united, military and civilian infrastructure functions, economy flourishes.
This time the US did not hit the mark – or did it?
The United States has failed in a fewer ways in its clash with Russia: firstly, it has not achieved its military goal, and this failure is detrimental to America's prestige as the top military power. Secondly, the sanctioning war against Russia ended in a complete failure. The West was weakened and Russia reinforced. IMF data speaks for itself. There's not even a German on the list.
The United States has not succeeded in weakening Russia. However, the US strategy is much more cynical. Let's go back to Mackinder: let's talk about George Friedman, the current boss of American geostrategy, the successor of Mackinder and Brzesiński, so to speak:
"The main interest of the United States in the last century—i.e. the First War, the Second War and the Cold War—was the relation between Germany and Russia, due to the fact that the united 2 forces would be the only force that could endanger us—and we must so make certain that this does not happen."
George FriedmanSo the point is that Germany should not ally with Russia. If it is not possible to weaken Russia as the main opponent, it is possible to prevent the alliance by transforming Germany and Russia into enemies and/or destroying Germany. present Germany is hostile to Russia and greatly weakened by this conflict. The armed conflict with Russia would most likely one more time destruct Germany. The United States is so on the "right" way – for the 3rd time after 1918 and 1945.
Return in Germany is unlikely
German people lost their way
Like 80 years ago, The Germans are lost. The soul of the people was poisoned by propaganda of media hatred, and the population is misinformed about its own economical and military situation – planet War II sends her greetings. Only after a fair conversation with Germany will he be able to decently measure the situation and exert force on a government whose members are incompetent, but they masterfully carry out their individual interests.
The rulers want to keep their position and standard of living
The government itself is completely incompetent. I don't even gotta discuss it at this point due to the fact that it's so obvious.
From an American perspective, the composition of the government is simply a good choice: Scholz, Habeck, Baerbock and whatever their name is.
Due to deficiency of education and character weakness, specified people would have no chance of getting a occupation in a free economy that would let them adequate money, flying private jets, limousine tours and accommodation in the best hostels in the world. I can't think of any company owner who would hire Mrs. Baerbock as an worker in any company in any position.
These politicians know this very well and do everything they can to proceed surviving this life. Therefore, it follows the instructions of Brussels or Washington to guarantee the safety of employment. They want to be re-elected or to receive a fresh position due to their "loyalty" towards Washington, which protects their standard of living. It is now even speculated that Mrs Baerbock could win Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels. So it can be excluded that the current government will decide to turn back – it is not allowed to do so by its own interests.
The fresh elections will not bring any changes
Consequently, neither the nation nor the present government will want nor be able to make a return. Will fresh elections change this picture?
I, too, am highly negative about this. The only political groups that could dare re-evaluate Russia are AFD and Sarah Wagenknecht's alliance. Authorities that are, are aware of this and usage all available means, with or without a legal basis to destruct the AFD and ridicule Wagenknecht.
Without going into legal analysis, the charges against the AFD are in itself absurd. AFD is accused of right-wing extremism, and its members are called Nazis. Even the German Constitution Protection Office deals with these issues. So the situation is as follows: the instigators from CDU/CSU to the Greens, or from left to right, call the AFD, which alongside the Alliance of Sara Wagenknecht is the only organization in favour of negotiations with Russia and the opposing war, the Nazis and want to ban it. The concepts are confused and the communicative seems to have been lost.
One can sense that there are people in Germany who argue the inciting of war by the government and the media and go out into the streets, but even if the AFD had achieved a superb result, it would not bring a return.
According to the latest data from Sunday election poll to the Bundestag AFD would score between 14% and 19%, depending on the poll, and Sarah Wagenknecht's alliance would score between 5% and 8%. Although these are good results compared to the 2021 election (AFD: 10.3%, just formed the Sarah Wagenknecht Alliance), it is not adequate to push the balance of forces in the Bundestag to the side of peace.
Worse still, the election is likely to win the CDU/CSU and Friedrich Merz, whom the US no longer has to buy, which took place years ago due to his Blackrock mandate, will become another national Chancellor based on today's data. More pro-American and thus more pro-war is not possible. Depending on the result of the election, there will be either a coalition with the SPD or another three-party coalition with the Greens. To prevent this, it would gotta change a lot.
Warning voices are silenced
W Germany so lacks interior forces that would lead to a return. The voices that argue this are already systematically silenced by the strategy (government and media). The similarities between the actions of the rulers present and those of the 1930s are astonishing and disturbing. From 1933, a akin approach was followed, first mildly, and then more and more fiercely towards journalists who asked questions, until the goal was to execution or concentration camp. The fact that a fewer days ago Scott Ritter. They have been refused approval to leave their own country, shows that illegal practices are already a fact in the US and will shortly become a reality besides in Germany.
Dangerous Ways to Come
Incoming financial collapse as an emergency signal
The interesting thing about this is that nobody cares about instability in the western financial markets. The situation is very akin to the interior and geopolitical situation. People think they have everything under control, although reality speaks a different language. The full strategy could collapse any day now and this day will come. specified a fall may be an emergency signal that will force a reassessment of the overall situation or lead to complete escalation.
Russian hit NATO with an emergency signal
The war on Russia has already begun, Russia has not yet reacted kinetically against NATO. Western politicians frequently bluff and draw red lines on sand, which are moved after crossing them. The West does not recognise that the Russians act differently: they are systematic, clear and not bluffing: they do things differently. The escalation of the usage of long-range weapons against targets in Russia does not like the Russians at all, and president Putin announced the consequences. These consequences will come. This may affect hitting NATO facilities outside Ukraine, including Germany; see our comments on this subject in the article "The consequences of the German Air Force's intercepted conversation mean war". Rumors about a Russian atomic attack in the West distract from this conventional danger.
It could besides be an emergency signal. The West seemingly failed to consider that NATO would not have an adequate consequence to specified an attack on Russia. If the Russians come to the conclusion that after specified a stroke there will be apathy, it will be an emergency signal. Nevertheless, this is simply a dangerous game.
Conclusion
It is clear that Germany misjudges the threat situation and its opportunities and is completely controlled by the US. The incompetent and inconsistent assessment of the situation is nothing fresh – as the comparison with Franz Halder's diary shows – and the longer Bonmôt does not repeat history, the more critical it should be assessed. Keitel's message confirms that Germany is full capable of entering the disaster with wide eyes open. In this context, the ability of Germans to escape even the top ruin is simply a mediocre consolation. The chances of Germany reaching a return on this issue are minimal.
Mass events, specified as the Olympic Games, would surely be valuable catalysts to conclude that the full could be reconsidered in a peaceful confrontation of a sporting event with "enemies". However, the Olympic Committee is aware of this and is doing everything in its power to prevent specified a result. He informed René Zittlau about it in his article "Sport is simply a continuation of diplomacy by another means".
In order to prevent global war, a war-like alarm specified as the collapse of the financial strategy or Russia's military consequence would be needed. However, it is impossible to measure whether specified events would lead to reflection or escalation.
In my opinion, however, the main work for this situation is the leading media in the West. nonsubjective reporting of events over the last 10 years would prevent specified developments in politics and among people.
The 4th power has degenerated to the rank of myth.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.zerohedge.com/
