For a long time I have been conducting interior reflections on the young generation in Poland (at this point I mean the whole). On the 1 hand, my PESEL speaks in me, which says that we grow generations of weak, soft, which are like these snowflakes, dependent on the wind. However, specified a setting of the case may be harmful to the young generation, who on the 1 hand are brought up in prosperity (golden age, as any say), but on the another hand is exposed from an early age to the operation of this full demoliberic device with anticulture at the head and breaking of the rules. And we, earlier years, were not exposed to specified activities. There were another problems.
I was motivated by my friend Róża Judycka, with her text: The impact of the political movement on the social activities of young people, published on Narodowcy.net portal on 19.08.201224. I've read this text respective times, it's alternatively pessimistic, but it's more crucial than that. The young request us, the old request us. And it is to us, the 1980s and early 1990s, that I direct these words (of course the beginning of PESEL is simply a simplification for the purposes of the text). If we're going to hand over the chopstick to the generation relay It'll be us. Fighting for the YoungOh, my God!
Political activity is crucial in our environment, due to the fact that we want to build large Poland and 1 day the national environment will receive a mandate to exercise power (I hope so), and we must be prepared for that. However, this cannot be an explanation for pushing formal-ideal work to the background. Without building structures and acquiring a young generation for Idea, all our efforts will go astray.
The title The conflict of the Young I would see on respective planes (at least). The first is an example. I realize that we have been caught up in the prose of life: family, children, work or economical activity, loans, etc., but even in this prose of life we should be an example for the younger generation. First of all, his regular life attitude, but besides his willingness to aid as much as possible. The main speech should be given by leaders of local national environment structures, but you can answer questions affecting younger colleagues by means of an evening (or night) email. After all, in this email you can give any valuable literature, you can lend a book. This email is just an example of simplification, but besides showing that sometimes so small is needed.
Our next task, possibly the most difficult, I know from myself, will be to effort to realize the younger generation. PESEL does its job, affects the perception of the world, but we were young once, we had our problems. I'd like to cut 1 thing right away, I'm not talking about keeping young people under the block or keeping them permanently for a proverbial hand. Many will say that our generations have been hiding in poorness and hard times of transformation, but we have not been exposed to this all-demoliberic attack, to an effort to destruct the foundations of our civilization. Recently, I have had specified a reflection that these kids (please don't take that word against me) have been terribly hurt by the present times and this is not their fault. They didn't plan the anticulture, they were born erstwhile the first attacks started. It is our occupation to effort to realize the problems of younger colleagues and, consequently, this attempt, to make efforts and to help.
Finally, we scope the plane of camaraderie. This is highly crucial due to the long-term existence of the national environment. Each of us, especially representatives of the young national generation, should be convinced that One behind the other, no one's afraid. We older people are investing in young people, of course, and this does not mean stopping setting different requirements and tasks. It is besides up to us to control and destruct any negative effects of action in the organization, e.g. to carry on with superiority or dudehood. That's the kind of thing I might have in a western corporation, but not in a national camp. We should brand it, and as an option, we should translate and indicate appropriate attitudes and behaviour. The example comes from above or from elders.
If each of us asks himself if he wants to build Great Poland (everywhere possible), and the answer will be yes, this Fighting for the Young is 1 of the most crucial stages. It begs to paraphrase the words of Chancellor Jan Zamoyski: such will be the large Poland as her youth raised. So let us be good older friends and colleagues and help. It's not about petting, it's not about permanent holding hands, it's about being a light and a compass on a rough sea.
Author: Chronicler
