There is no uncertainty that the massaged attack on Lebanon with the usage of individual electronic equipment of members of Hezbollah, in which at least 20 people were killed and around 3,000 were injured, this is Israel's work. It began on Tuesday 17 September and lasted for 2 days, erstwhile there were further reports of individual electronics exploding. At the Wednesday ceremony of those who died the erstwhile day in the first attack, more than 9 people died and dozens were injured.
The scale and method of carrying out ongoing activities, which can not be called anything another than an act of terror, have no precedent, but specified massive attacks carried out Israel It's nothing new. Israeli The doctrine of carrying out severe attacks on civilians is known as the Dahija Doctrine, which refers to the Beirut territory attacked by Israel. fresh events show how Israel’s complete disrespect for human life is exacerbated in a shocking way.
Western Interpretations
The editors of the "New York Times" Patrick Kingsley, Euan Ward, Ronen Bergman and Michael Levenson described the attacks, indicating that Israel was the perpetrator, but they did not neglect to include in the material a clearly false Israeli PR stunt, claiming that they were targeted.
How write in ‘Times’: ‘According to the information obtained by officials from the United States and another countries on the attack, Israel hid explosives in a consignment of imported pagers produced in Taiwan to enter Lebanon. According to 2 officials, an explosive weighing only 30–60 g was placed next to the battery in the pager. another officials admitted that the pagers that Hezbollah ordered at Gold Apollo, Taiwan, were manipulated before reaching Lebanon. According to 1 official, Israel concluded that given the size of the explosive, the hazard of non-Hezbollah victims is low.”
It goes on to say that "pagers' explosions are the latest salva in the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, whose escalation launched the Hamas attack on Israel on 7 October"—which gives the origin of average military action alternatively than—obviously imprecise, deadly attacks on the civilian population. American signaler Edward Snowden, quoted on the pages mondoweiss.net, he rightly summed up their goal and the power of destruction: “Israel, utilizing all methods, has done something bold. He blew up quite a few people behind the wheel (lefting cars out of control), buying (while their children were waiting behind them in a cart by the box office) etc. All the signs of terrorism have been exhausted."
Senior political analyst Al Jazeery Marwan Bishara critically – and from the position of western audiences possibly most aptly – verified the reaction to Israel's actions: “Perhaps it would be worth proposing any simulation fun to our viewers around the planet at this point. Imagine that 2,000 Pentagon employees, the State Department and the CIA pagers detonate in the face, hand or pocket. What do you think the United States would say about that?"
"Times" notes that Israel has "for a long time been utilizing technologies to carry out secret operations against Iran and groups operating with its support", as if it were about any awesome method progress. However, to realize what Israel is doing, we request to look at its earlier mass attacks. This is not only historical but besides strategical and geographical.
From Massive Attacks to Genocide
The name Doctrine Dahiji comes from the Dahija territory of Beirut, inhabited by many families having connections with Hezbollah. During the 2006 war, Israel attacked her, comparing her to the ground. In 2008, Gadi Eisenkot, then chief of the Northern Command military (later chief of staff and centre minister), developed the aforementioned doctrine, stating, "what is waiting" for any enemy who dares to attack Israel: "What happened to the Beirut territory of Dahija in 2006, awaits all village from which shots will fall towards Israel... We will usage disproportionate forces to do large harm and damage. For us, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases.”
Israel applied this method by attacking Gaza from 2008 to 2009. The UN Goldstone study stated that he had carried out “a deliberately disproportional attack to punish, humiliate and terrorize the civilian population”, adding that “everything indicates that it was applied in practice” was Doctrine Dahija. Let us emphasise: punish, humiliate and terrorize. In this context, in particular, the last word, "terrorize", should be given a minute of reflection.
A fresh attack on Gaza has someway utilized this doctrine to carry out Large scale genocides. It is no wonder that in the DNA of the doctrine from the very beginning the logic of the “art of war” was carried out in the spirit of deliberate action against the civilian population.
Now Israel is blowing up pagers. The chances of the Western media calling his actions an act of panic are alternatively slim. With respect to this country, this is inactive considered a extremist term, due to the fact that panic is simply a political term, reserved exclusively for enemies of the West. For readers of the fresh York Times, it is only the "newest volley", which in no way reflects the character of Israel itself.
**
Jonathan Ofir – Israeli musician, conductor, blogger and author surviving in Denmark.
Article published in stock Common Dreams under Creative Commons. From English she translated Dorota Blabolil-Obrębska.
