A twelve years before planet War II, the largest diamond in the 20th century was found in 1 of the South African mines. In order to be able to present it properly, however, it was essential to give it a appropriate cut. Unfortunately, there was no usage in trying to find individual who wanted to do the job. Finally, an old grinder in Amsterdam advised to go with the stone to Warsaw. There, in the officin at tincture Street there was to be a workshop that would turn a diamond into a diamond without any problem.
However, erstwhile the diamond owner (clearly with appropriate guard) came to the place he hesitated. The office was highly obscurous, and the full yard just smelled poor.
They went inside. The workshop was nothing like those previously met in Amsterdam or fresh York. But erstwhile asked if they'd cut the diamond, the owner said yes without hesitation. He took the stone into his hand and called the disciple. A small, nose-catching boy came into the room. The guests were amazed to see that it was... barefoot.
Meanwhile, the owner gave him the stone and threw it briefly— Fine.
Less than an hr later, guests received a beautiful diamond.
On his way out, the owner of the most costly diamond in the planet stopped for a minute and asked the owner:
- I'm sorry. Tell me why. I went to the best in fresh York City, The Hague, and Amsterdam, but everyone refused me! And here in Warsaw, a small snotty boy did it in an hour!
The owner smiled and said:
- I'm sorry. The Szymek just didn't realize its value!
TThat's what it looks like. If anyone is aware of the possible costs they may incur, he refuses.
However, it is adequate not to be aware of the consequences of doing the work.
Here's an independent media message about another. neo-lawful bodnarist action.
A immense surprise was the Friday news of the delegation of Ewa Wrzosek to the territory Attorney's Office in Warsaw. Not long ago, Adam Bodnar removed her from the Ministry of Justice. The portal Independentna.pl met the scenes of the unexpected promotion of the political prosecutor. Wrzosek went to the economical department to reopen the investigation of the alleged "two towers", while there was not a single prosecutor willing to own his name is political conduct and to charge president Jarosław Kaczyński. In respective sources we confirmed - Wrzosek was just indicated to prosecute the leader of the opposition.
...
As established by the portal Niezalezna.pl, the management of the territory Attorney's Office in Warsaw has already decided to initiate an investigation. According to our information, even written instructions have been issued on this matter.
The problem arose erstwhile the search for a prosecutor who would undertake this task as a referee began. And here is the first surprise of "Bodnarists" – They haven't found a single willing individual who would willingly want to hold a political action name. For a simple reason - they do not want to risk, due to the fact that as lawyers they realize the illegality of this action and know that they are facing disciplinary and even criminal consequences for it in the future.
]]>https://independent.pl/polska/hell-advanced-to-investigation-w-two-wie...]]>
JI already wrote on the occasion of an earlier accident of prok. Wrzesek, erstwhile it turned out that the writings signed by her and distributed to various institutions were formed in a law firm not in any way connected with the prosecution, the prosecutor's stated for decades of his accusing career did not exceed the basic level (division). This clearly indicates that the eagle of Themida is not a mere... flightless one.
She late stated openly that her concept of "fighting democracy", namely bending or even breaking the law for political purposes of "the red team".
- I'm sorry. Unfortunately, however, I have the impression that since we are in a transitional period, it is essential to take decisive and concrete action, frequently those that will be unpopular politically, which will not pay off for the individual taking specified action, which will bring even the sharpness of the legal environment.
The ostracism of the legal community can only be caused by ostentatious violation of the law, and this is to be noticed publicly.
Nbut the funniest thing is different. According to Article 47(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the same rules shall apply to the exclusion of a justice from participation in the case of a prosecutor. Therefore, in accordance with Article 41 kpk:
§ 1. The justice shall be excluded if there is simply a condition of specified a nature that he could give emergence to reasonable uncertainty as to his impartiality in the case.
Mrs. Herzosek has not been 1 of the anonymous officers of Themida in fresh years. Wherever she could speak, she explicitly condemned the improvement of the dimensions of justice introduced by the United Right. She besides actively participated in the work of Lex Super Omnia (she was 1 of the founders).
Meanwhile, at the end of last century The Court of Appeal in Krakow stated that erstwhile a justice publically discloses his private views and they may rise doubts from the position of his impartiality, it is appropriate to exclude him from his participation in the case in order to avoid charges of biased ruling (cf. e.g. post SA in Krakow from 12.11.1998, II AKa 199/98, KZS 1998, Nr 12, item 32; post SA in Krakow from 2.9.1998, II AKo 75/98, KZS 1998, Nr 9, item 16). Of course, this is the case only if the views publically proclaimed by the justice are unfavourable for the interests of 1 of the parties, and their form and content attest to the erstwhile attitude of the talker (J. Bratoszewski, in: R.A. Stefański, S. Zabłocki, KPK. Commentary, pp. 1, 2003, p. 398).
I remind you that the same reasons apply to the dismissal of the prosecutor.
EWrzosek did not bite her tongue and has been seen for years as a prominently anti-scriptive person. To entrust specified a “investigation” to individual in the case concerning the president of the Law and Justice organization is clearly bordering at least on the political hucpa.
But the most crucial thing from the point of view of the “roast egg” is that Kaczyński hears the charge before the presidential election.
Because then it will be possible to triumph that Dr. Karol Nawrocki's triumph in the presidential election will mean the triumph of a "organized crime group".
Example Pancake neocommission, whose members, on the news that a witness brought by the police is about to appear at the door and, traditionally, will exposure the smallness of the intellectual members, members and members of the committee, lingered in panic, proves that specified an option is possible with the likelihood of close unity.
But, as Viktor Chernomyrdin said, we wanted well, and it worked out as always.
After over a year of government compromise 13 December ed 100 specifics per 100 days There's practically nothing left to expect, just another stain.
For, as we have already convinced ourselves, this authority cannot do otherwise.
3.02 2025
screen: youtube
