Europe has been facing economical problems for years, which are frequently linked to the flawed construction of the single currency – the euro. An expanding number of economists, politicians and analysts point to the request to improvement or even destruct the monetary union so that the continent can regain its economical strength again. What are the causes of the current state of the European economy? Is the common currency truly an obstacle to development?
The genesis of the single currency – political compromises
Immediately after the end of the Cold War, Europe faced fresh challenges. 1 of them was the unification of Germany, which became a fact as a consequence of a political agreement between planet powers. A key component of this agreement was the waiver of the German brand, which opened the way for the introduction of a single European currency – the euro. This was seen as a tool for economical stableness and a way to avoid the possible growth of German power internationally.
Did Germany usage the euro to build their empire?
The introduction of the euro was initially to bring benefits, especially for Germany, which, thanks to the strongest economy in Europe and the economical position of hegemon, gained a key function in the structures of the European Union. In time, however, questions arose as to whether the German European task is actually a tool for achieving national ambitions based on the dominance of Central and east Europe and plans to make a European national state under the leadership of Berlin.
In a speech in Prague in September 2022, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz openly presented his imagination of Europe as 1 state, which many analysts perceived as an effort to make a hegemonic strategy under German leadership. Faced with these aspirations, however, European economies were increasingly stagnant, and the thought of a European state itself began to meet resistance, not only from smaller countries.
Defective construction of the euro area
Despite many years of attempts to improvement the monetary union, the structural problems of the euro proceed to prevail in the debate on the future of the European economy. 1 of the main allegations is that the euro area eliminates the natural mechanics of marketplace work for national fiscal policies. Countries that have pursued debt-based fiscal policies over the years, specified as Spain, do not bear the full consequences of their actions, which weakens the motivation for reforms. The public debt of many countries, specified as Spain and Italy, has increased significantly, undermining the economical stableness of the continent.
Italy is an example of how the euro area affects national economies. The accession of this country to the Monetary Union has led to wage increases, but has worsened another key economical indicators, leading to stagnation and a deficiency of competitiveness in global markets. Italy, which was erstwhile an economically strong country, is presently facing serious problems due to the deficiency of its own monetary policy.
A Wasted Chance of economical Success
Over the years, the euro has functioned as a "capital incinerator", leading to a waste of resources and blocking an effective allocation of resources. Long-term investments in policy projects, specified as the Reconstruction Fund, which was to bring sustainable improvement to Europe, have proved to be a failure. The green transformation, in which immense amounts were invested, besides failed to deliver the expected results. Investors are increasingly little assured in EU bonds, and the hopes of a global financial marketplace being dominated by a European superstate have been dispelled.
The request to return to national currencies?
The main problem of the euro area remains the deficiency of flexibility to adapt to the circumstantial needs of different countries. National countries with their own currency can respond to interior economical problems more rapidly and efficiently. An example of Argentina, which, despite hard years of hyperinflation and crisis, is able to rise itself with wise decisions by president Javier Milei, shows that monetary independency can be a key component of success.
Europe has been a continent of competitive countries for centuries, contributing to innovation and economical progress. The introduction of the euro and its related political integration of the euro area seem to contradict this natural dynamics of development. Therefore, an expanding number of economists propose that Europe could be reborn economically if it returned to greater monetary diversity.
Conclusions: What's next for monetary union?
Europe's current economical situation requires serious reflection on the future of the euro area. Is it worth investing further in a European superstate task that does not deliver the expected results? It seems that the future of the continent may depend on the courage of politicians who decide to dismantle the monetary union or its thorough reform. In particular, countries specified as Poland, which have so far resisted joining the euro area, should strive not only to keep their monetary independency but besides to advance the thought of greater economical flexibility across Europe.
Europe has a immense possible that can only be unleashed by returning to a model of national economies based on competitiveness and diversity.
More here:
Europe's economical crisis: Is the euro an obstacle to the revival of the continent?
