Over the years of school, 1 thing got into my head. Well, “fascism” (the word nazim is utilized in erstwhile demols after 1989) was to be the final phase of capitalism.
SOccialism, and the long-term communism, were to embody the improvement of society.
As children, we saw the difference – 6 million victims of the Auschwitz concentration camp (currently KZ Auschwitz) on the 1 hand, and the return of ancient Piast lands plus planet peace.
Each of us could respond without hesitation that fascism was the highest degree of degeneration of the alleged capitalist state.
Fortunately, the commune was doing its best to make us increasingly uncertainty the above.
Ba, she even taught that fascism (the word Nazism as besides akin to socialism was not applied) and... communism was twin-like, at least in terms of the state model.
If you do not believe, find the book of prof. Michał Sczaniecki who died in 1977 Common past of State and Law. At many universities, it has been an academic textbook and since 1974! To this day, I remember how in the state of war we compared the description of the fascist state (today we would say Nazi) to the communist state (example of the USSR).
OThe event which shocked Poland (the execution of an almost born child!) perfectly fits into the ideology of Nazism.
Eugenics... But not the 1 that breeders around the planet usage to refine, for example, cows so that they give more milk.
Thanks to alleged liberals (which are actually ideological washings of orthodox Marxists), we have a return to eugenics known in the 3rd Reich.
But whoever thinks that everything started with Hitler (in power) is wrong. And it's highly incorrect to quote a modern classic.
The impetus for the improvement of German eugenics was, of course, Darwin and his theory. But it was in Germany that Darwinism was defined as social.
The large German student of the End of the 19th Century Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel (the creator of the words ECOLOGY) considered it destructive to humanity both medicine and all kinds of philanthropy (not excluding this state).
Such ailments as tuberculosis, evils, syphilis, and many types of intellectual illness are transmitted to a large degree through inheritance and passed on to their children or even to their descendants. The longer sick parents with the aid of medicine proceed their sick existence, the more many the offspring will be sentenced to incurable suffering, and the more individuals in subsequent generations will be, as a consequence of this artificial “medical breeding”, burdened by parents with chronic hereditary disabilities.
The thought of Haeckel was sustained by another father of left-wing eugenics, Wilhelm Schallmayer. In his opinion, the most crucial thing for you (and Civilization) is to deal with cripples, mentally or physically sick people, due to the fact that not only do they make a fiscal burden, it is still, multiplying, degeneration of Race.
“...all that contributes to defending the weak accelerates the degeneration of the white race, drawing it to the level of Australian natives. This applies to both physical and intellectual degeneration, due to the fact that both are racially determined. The task of the state is to encourage and support healthy, strong individuals to procreate and at the same time to prevent the reproduction of low-value elements, especially due to the fact that mentally sick people – as Schallmayer was convinced – are more sexually stimulated and leave more offspring, and it is the offspring of the inherited, i.e. besides the sick. Therefore, as he argued, medical care, sanatoriums and shelters are harmful to the race and to the state. If specified weak and diseased or handicapped people lived in societies without medical care or social assistance, they would gotta die, and the nations civilized by ill-conceived humanitarianism and solitarism would sustain these sick people alive and let them to multiply, which in his opinion must inevitably lead to the degeneration of the race (nation).’
(G. Mosse, The crisis of German ideology. The intellectual pedigree of the 3rd Reich, Reader, Warsaw 1972, p. 135. )
Another creator of German eugenics, called increasingly left-wing, is Alfred Ploetz, founder of the alleged racial hygiene movement.
For Good to the Nation He demanded that, after the birth of the child, a peculiar medical console should decide whether or not to be left alive.
Let us remind you, Ploetz's ideas arose over a century ago. present you don't gotta wait until the baby is born.
Prenatal tests can kill them well before, even in the womb.
And if you add to this left-wing stories about "cell cluster"... For decades, it has been known that dehumanization of the victim facilitates all crimes.
Therefore, they do not surprise protests in defence of this alleged "right of women".
We simply lost (luckily not all!!!) the ability to separate between homicide and medical treatment, in 95% of cases ending with little ailments than after the removal of the appendix.
In truth, killing a man, made by, for example, firearms, is even easier. At least a fewer minutes after the shot can hurt your ears.
Here, however, the left is simply a sacred outrage against the right to hold arms by society.
TAt the same time, her older sister Euthanasia enters Europe more and more clearly behind Abortion.
After all, it is easy to imagine a future in which the specially selected 3 activists will encourage the euthanasia of people who for any reason have become expendable (age, illness, long-term unemployment, etc.).
Yes, they may even argue patrioticly:
- I'm sorry. How much longer will you live, Mr. Dolnik? At least 15 years. Of this, statistically, you'll spend 4 years in a hospital, six months on average in a hospice... About 2 to 3 million as nothing. Plus a pension, about half a million dollars, and assuming you get the lowest... Sir, you'll cost more in full than 2 companies of the army with supplies. And for six months! And what is the situation in the planet you see...
The “fathers” of the sisters of Euthanasia and Abortion argued the same.
ALe Left at the minute erstwhile she saw that the mastery of the planet militarily (it was practically impossible to dream of it in the Kremlin) she abandoned her militaristic ideology. This, however, does not mean that there has besides been abandoned the swarms of demolition developed over the millenniums of Civilization and the creation of the fresh large World. but alternatively of the road set by Trotsky and Lenin, they were struck according to Gramsci's guidelines.
Abortion and her older sister Euthanasia were no longer meant to build the strength of the State (the little sick and crippled the more money for tanks), but abruptly they were shown as a... manifesto of individual freedom.
A real liberated female can do whatever she wants with her body. Thus, it is free to decide to remove the ‘cell clump’.
Nothing that nasciturus (a individual conceived but not yet born) is simply a subject of many laws (e.g., it can inherit, provided that he is born alive).
According to the militant leftist to remove the child, the reason may be besides tight an apartment, a desire to prosecute a career in corporations, a reluctance to rise another person, etc.
For my I am most important.
According to the word "my belly is my business."
This is what the leftist fight against Civilization is all about today.
The overthrow of fundamental values, frequently shaped by millennia...
They want to teardrop down the planet in the hope of the emergence of any indeterminate neo-Marxist utopia.
Perhaps it is to be like years ago that the “oppositionists” were dreamed of by Kuroni and Modzelewski.
Their celebrated letter open to lot in 1965, you were in fact proposing that the russian Union from a period of alleged large purgatory might be considered a free and democratic country.
This, however, does not hinder the modern “liberals” of both masters to take on pedestals fighting against the commune for... freedom.
Perhaps another kind of utopia. There are no shortages of patterns in literature. We have visions of Orwell or Huxley. Even in our Lem (Eden) can be searched for.
Above all, however, we have works by Gramsci and others.
ZWithout emotion, killing an unwanted kid just before birth can shock you.
In China, however, “abortions” do not upset anyone even the day before birth.
There, however, they do so in the name of the state's conduct.
In Poland or more, in Europe, it is simply a manifestation against spiritual heritage. Yes, they are in countries where you can go behind bars even behind silent prayer close the abortion clinic. And this is not about China, but about... Britain.
The Socialists of all ointments united against the nations.
Therefore, it is not amazing to emergence compromise 13 December and its continuing existence despite apparent software differences.
What they truly want is 1 thing.
Tradition must be destroyed.
And they're not hiding it.
At the alleged parade in June 2019 (Paris) they officially proclaimed that they were there to destruct our society.
ABortion and her sister Euthanasia are expected to accelerate the redevelopment of society.
Atomization of society, indifference to the harm of the weakest (both unborn and aged or only chronically ill) are qualities desired by those hiding in the shadow of the puppet lords. Bye.
Fear of what happens erstwhile they come out.
17.04 2025
photo of pixabay
