Author:Konrad Handes –chart
for:https://chart.neon24.net/post/178936, agreement-ue-mercosur-do-to-end-European-agricultural
__________________
The European Commission has sold farmers for expanding the climate agenda, electrical cars and billions directed to the pockets of global food-producing corporations.
There are fewer global projects that would infuriate farmers and environmentalists at the same time (in any case, those from the erstwhile stage, erstwhile it was even more crucial to defend nature and not climate). The creators of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the South American economical Union MERCOSUR, however, succeeded. Well, it's only taken 25 years to negociate a deal, so possibly it's just a substance of time that's seldom seen in the work of Eurocrats...
Objective: global industrial agri-food production
However, seriously, the EU-MERCOSUR agreement should be viewed more broadly, not only as part of the full plan globalisation of agri-food production, eliminating the past of local agriculture. It is besides an crucial step towards extending the climate agenda to those regions of the world, which rightly see it as a trap for zero growth, taking distant countries erstwhile called developing countries any chance to catch up with leading planet economies. And a small consolation for Brazil or Argentina may be that concepts specified as the national economy, GDP per capita by country, or the average level of income and consumption of a given society are becoming as anachronistic as household farms. The stratification of the economical geography of the planet is already clearly inferior to class stratification, lost in the global supply chain so become not so many states and nations as simply workers and individual professional groups. In this case – in fact first of all, individual farmers.
The Bible of Climateism
It is worth noting that the erstwhile phase of talks over the agreement, in 2019, was torpedoed by the European side, under the pretext of the Brazilian presidential administration's approval Jaira Bolsonaro To burn the Amazon jungle. On the 1 hand, the climatic dimension of the full task was highlighted, and on the another hand, the areas of interest of globalists were clearly highlighted, again – to exclude from national governments. This time announcing the success of the talks with MERCOSUR – European Commission Ursuli von der Leyen It besides exposed the climate theme, of course in the speech of the triumph of the EU's ideology.
The success of the Eurocrats is the conclusion of invocations to Paris Agreement, the bible of climatism and announcements of flogging with the bassals of reducing emissions. In this case, it's more than a ritual spell, it's a mechanics for regulating the growth policy of South American signatories, especially Argentina. Javier Mileiwho announced that the model Donald Trump He'd be happy to spare his country the Parisian attractions. There is so a stick, or threat of suspension of the contract, beneficial primarily for Argentina as a leading beef maker – but there is besides a carrot, in the form of a balance mechanism, acting in the event of a suspension of the contract by either party. In practice, this means that, even if free trade is hampered by EU regulations, specified as anti-defestration rules or emanation standards, compensation will be due to the affected countries. In a word, European taxpayers will pay NAWET if food produced on Amazonian fires is not yet allowed on the EU market.
Who cares about the environment?
And yet the environmentalists protest, any most likely due to the fact that it was not included in the compensation scheme, while those more sincere in seeing how the Amazon defence or environmental protection were instrumentally used. This will be subjected to extended exploitation, both in the framework of industrial activity, especially mining and agricultural activities.
Industrial sponsors anyway deal they have achieved a gradual simplification of customs barriers mainly on cars, of course electrical first. At the same time, it has been ensured that Brazil will not impose export duties on the natural materials needed for the hi-tech industry, which inactive remains in Europe (especially in Germany). This is crucial in a situation where China started to licence exports of gallium and germanium last year, and Under Trump's presidency, the global trade war West-China seems inevitable. The agreement with MERCOSUREM is so intended, at least in part, to re-securitise completely unattainable for specified a clash of Eurocrats.
It won't be cheaper or healthier
These provisions of the Treaty recognise the European Commission as its success, but of course those who consider the beginning of the European agricultural marketplace to be a disproportionate price or even the failure of EU negotiators are wrong. Nothing like that, it's besides a planned success, The EC does not, of course, represent European farmers, nor national countries, but the interests of global capital, including the 1 invested in global food production companies. They will benefit from imports into Europe of South American agri-food products, not average farmers from Argentina or Brazil. Unlimited EU standards (especially those calculated to extinguish production within the EU) Food from South America will increase the effect that we already feel after entering the Union of cereals and rape from Ukraine. Now the same awaits the beef, sugar, ethanol and pork and poultry market. As European, in peculiar Spanish, French, Irish, Italian or Walloon agricultural organisations rightly raise, not only in the absence of standards artificially inflating the costs of European agricultural production, but besides in wellness issues specified as the speeding up of animal production on hormones and the abuse of pesticides (which, under the agreement, will be imported from Europe where they are eliminated from usage in agriculture).
And no, let us have no illusions— It will not be cheaper than this, as it did not drown bread in Poland just due to the fact that we were flooded with Ukrainian grain. For the point is no longer that we can do better, this phase of capitalism has passed forever. We have adequate to last due to the fact that even our reproduction is no longer needed or recommended. The difference in price will be taken for us by individual else, according to the rule of endless accumulation and countering the declining trend of the profit rate.
Europe: a continent without agriculture?
Transitional clauses, which would initially increase beef imports by little than 50 percent, and not double the fact that as a consequence EU part of Europe is to become a continent without agriculture, just as it is steeply deindustrialised. These opponents are not European or South American farmers, nor is there a direct conflict of interest between a Vietnamese individual and a erstwhile English, Spanish or Polish individual who has lost his occupation in moving production to the global south. This is not a problem of interstate competition and global relations for a long time. The fight of global capital with the remainder of humanity is crucial to the current phase of capitalism. Even though a large part of it does not yet see its own place in this conflict and does not see the outline of the top civilizational transformation of our times, specified as deal how EU-MERCOSUR are only weak reflections.
Konrad Hand
________________________
Zionist, world-wide, financier builds us a NWO at the approval of the Roman Curia
.
At the same time, deliberate set-aside in Europe !!!
.
.
.
"American" banking corporations, which already own the vast majority of farms in the US (force farmers – tenants to usage chemistry widely, besides under the threat of rifles Oh, my God!), destruct the Amazonia forests into arable fields erstwhile at the same time the EU destroys European agriculture – especially in east Europe* Oh, my God * – No more food self-sufficiency !!!.
Commercial companies belonging to these “American” banking corporations will supply Europeans with food and dictate prices, not excluded that and consumption. And it will surely not be organic food, but within the so-called. "Sustainable Development"whose goal is depopulation. Sustainable development in turn has the support of the Roman Curia (encyclical ‘Laudato si’ pontifica Francis). Well, built by NWO Zionists (this building is besides supported by the Roman Curia and personally supported by JPII) requires many sacrifices from Europeans – food production is already becoming unprofitable. Of course, the conditions of profitability are dictated by banking corporations.
Governments following orders from this Zionist, global, financial, mafia are able to make all production unprofitable – it is only a question of setting the taxation strategy and the prices of energy carriers (so e.g. in IIIRP/Polin mining is liquidated). manufacture and agriculture are besides being destroyed in the US.
—
Degenerated Zionist planet financiers are besides fewer and incapable to control the increasing population, hence projects "Sustainable Development", "Climate protection" guaranteeing the depopulation as a goal to make a fresh York City concentration camp for Europeans and the remainder of the world, after all, we have been seeing a dynamic collapse in the natural growth of the white people of the West since 1970/80; in erstwhile socialist countries since 1990, and thus immediately after their systemic transformation (?).
Bank corporations force government taxation systems to prosecute the policy objectives of Zionist owners of these corporations. No central bank of the Western states (and not just the West) is subject to the legal jurisdiction of its state, is independent of it and subordinate to a global Zionist financier. The State, its government and parliament, which are deprived of the right to implement their own monetary policy, cannot carry out the actual economical policy of their country – So there can be no development – proof: e.g. inflation, for which the authorities and their citizens excluded from the implementation of monetary policy cannot be responsible.
____________
* Oh, my God * The conditions for accession to the EU for b. socialist countries were very strict besides in the area of agriculture, which the old EU states do not yet meet (e.g. any standards of cleanliness and hygiene of animal husbandry and production).
Dariusz Kosiur
