Ethics, morality, law in Western democracies

.

Example IIIRP/Polin.

In the photograph were min. of justice, Z.Ziobro before the Sejm committee.

.

The charge of breaking the law is imposed on the erstwhile minister presently ruling, but I am not going to analyse whether Z.Ziobro is guilty or innocent, due to the fact that that is not the essence of the problem I'm not curious in Ziembro.

Consider a much more crucial issue. Z. Ziobro and the PiS government team, of which he was an officer and the present-day government PO (KO) team, trying to bring the erstwhile minister to justice with the aid of a parliament committee, functioned and functioned in the same country, with an identical, unchanging strategy of law, with the same individual composition of the "dimension of justice", i.e. prosecutors and courts, i.e. people in black robes called togs, which are to give them the dignity and authority of the "righteous" and most likely only these robes constitute their attributes. And 1 and the other, PiS and PO, functioned and functioned at the same, unchanged content of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, in which there is simply a record:

Article 173. ‘The courts and courts are a separate and independent authority from another authorities.’

So, how is it possible that what was not a crime during the PiS rule, during the PO (KO) rule, is already a crime? Has the law changed or possibly the Constitution?

Here I will remind you that in the parliamentary and presidential elections the attendance was about 75%, the votes spread almost halfway between the PiS and the PO – it will shortly be revealed why this reminder is important.

Who will warrant that after the next elections that will bring the Law and Justice to power, what the PO (KO) government considers present as a crime, this crime will cease again? And how does the electorate, the PiS voters and the PO voters – ? – and any and others are “made into a barbuko” by their chosen ones. Yeah, but there's inactive a way to deal with that, due to the fact that that's the nature of politics in Western democracies, promises without cover, false and lying – it's a permanent program. But what about the "dimension of justice", that is, the people in black robes who according to the Constitution of Poland areseparate and independent authority “What does it mean, where do they come from, so separate and independent, and who controls and chooses them.” ? It turns out that they are above the law and can justice as they want and so judge, different in akin matters, but besides in the deficiency of love for the chosen people, or as their powerholders demand, or those who pay them and not excluded, that besides “under the table.”

Ethics, morality, law – are empty clichés in Western democracies, and why? No 1 can explain this better than the EU's highest authority, no one. Ursula von der Leyen, let's hear this:

.

.

And what does this persona non grata say by most Europeans? It proclaims the very truth, which even if you do not want, if you do not agree to it, you must accept, due to the fact that this is the reality of Western democracy in the EU:

‘Europe is the values of the Talmud ..." – Ursula von tells us, etc.

Right? I'm already giving examples. Russia aggressively attacked Ukraine in order to defend the Russians surviving there from the liquidation, for which the army of the Jewish-Bander government of Ukraine was preparing. Due to this aggression, economical sanctions have been imposed on Russia, Russian athletes cannot represent their country in sports competitions. besides Russian pianists performing in the Chopin Competition cannot execute in colours of Russia.

Zionist Israel, which in Palestine commits unprecedented genocide in the past of history, has not been sanctioned by the EU since 1947, its athletes can execute in Israeli colours and the pianists in the Chopin Competition under the Zionist Israel flag.

We so have a dual moral code in the EU: relationship and impunity offered to judaic Zionists, and to non-Jews hostility and racism.

Dariusz Kosiur