My Catholic colleague's dilemmas, which are not mine, inspire to think
Koszalin, April 23rd of the Year 2025.
We live in a hard time. If you ignore it, it'll only hurt. There is the alleged Malayas list. It's supposedly from the 12th century. Without considering whether it is an authentic paper or a false message from the late 16th century, this list closes on the last pope, 112 from Celestine II elected in 1143. Who is, was or will be the last on the list?
Proponents of the legality of the election of the pope, who accepted the name Francis I, will want to keep that this is about him. And let us look closely at the function of this man in the Catholic Church. Pope Benedict XVI lived and abruptly felt that he was tired and wanted to retire. Deserved or unearned, but retired. Accepting the function of the successor of the Apostle Peter as the stone on which the Church is built is simply a large burden. The only way to get free of this burden is to die. If another pope is elected during the life of the Pope, he may be either an anti-Pope, or schismomatist, or his function in the Church is different from that officially proclaimed as Pope. Who is individual who, in the course of the monarch's life, has ruled by removing the ruler from power? For no substance what this or this monarch himself claims, the pope acts as a crowned individual in the Vatican State and the Catholic Church. The Pope in the individual of Benedict XVI was removed from power as a consequence of a conclave conducted during his lifetime. Even the conclave has no power over the Pope, who lives, cannot deprive him of Papacy. However, the legal force utilized in this case could effectively deprive him of this papal power.
The surviving Pope was stripped of his power by handing her over to the regent – as the alleged Pope Franciszek I was. The alleged pope assumed all papal duties and exercised authority against the fact that the monarch of the Catholic Church lived. Francis I was so regent in the Vatican and usurped the function of the Pope in spite of what not only the tradition of the Church had sanctified, but what follows straight from the teachings of Christ. Only death removes from the head of the legally chosen pope his power.
In the past of the Church, there have been cases of resignation of papal power. The popes were forced by various evil things over the almost 2 1000 years of church tradition. In the calculations, let us not forget that Christ lived at least 30 years since his birth in year zero, and given the mistake in the calculation of this year from the mediate Ages, even over forty years. And the date of calculating the past of the Church must be adopted from the day of the establishment of Peter by the stone on which Christ will build the Church. 2 1000 years of tradition will pass between 2033 and 2041. However, this does not change the fact that the Pope, in accordance with the law of the Church, ceased to be Pope at the time of his death.
This tradition was violated in 2013 by choosing a fresh pope during the life of his predecessor. Benedict XVI remained conscious for the remainder of his days. He was physically efficient. Removing him from papal authority was so unlawful. It is possible to justify the hierarchy of the Church that, in the face of Benedict XVI's implacable will, they had to adopt a solution to preserve the full Church, which would keep peace and order in the Church. However, we have no evidence that it was Benedict XVI's will and not an indeterminate necessity forced on him. We don't want to speculate about it.
The started regency ran from March 13, 2013. He died on April 21 of that year. And that's where his regency ends. The usurper's right to power is not a ruler. Francis I was a usurper. I know I'm gonna get quite a few accusations. However, by examining this situation simply, in the Spirit of the Catholic Church, I cannot find any another explanation for the situation. And since as regent and usurper he was not pope but simply papal, he cannot be included in Malachi's list. So he was not the last of this list to be Peter the Roman.
Who will be foretold by Peter the Roman, The city of 7 hills will be destroyed and a terrible justice will justice its people. That's the question. That's why I'm talking about tough times. If my reasoning is false, then the justice already judges the people.
Godspeed
Andrzej Marek Hendzel
