The left hand of the 3rd Republic of Poland shot in its ft after the amendment of the Labour Code, which imposes fresh requirements in occupation advertisements. Minister of Family, Labour and Social Policy Dziemianowicz-Bąk was asked on Radio ZET to answer the question of the net user:
Why do you impose the usage of the ‘mural person’ alternatively of the mason and usage the female form of ‘minister’ yourself? Isn't that hypocrisy?
Dziemianovich-Bąk answered and admitted that as a “minister” - she was seriously violating the law erstwhile “... that is the law [...] It is an indication that at the recruitment stage, at the occupation announcement phase we should not find whether we are looking for a female or a man. It could be a bricklayer, a mason, a individual to do masonry work, it could be an worker in a masonry position. '
Thus, the Minister's law-barred problem has not been resolved by the left. due to the fact that can a “mural person” who is neither a man nor a female be a child? In addition, if an employer who intends to employment a "person to carry out masonry work", who can "be a bricklayer" – why can't he hire a "worker to be a masonry job" – according to the explanation of the law, done by the individual performing the tasks of the minister of family, work and social policy?
The problem is much wider due to the fact that surname Dziemianovich-Bąk performing the tasks of the minister of family, work and social policy is of a masculine kind, and in addition double! Not like that. Minister Henig-Kloskawhose name does not indicate that he is simply a female or a man. Or like this. Female kind skeletalwho is the apparatusist of the PSL and, in addition, the minister of energy decommissioning...
The effort to take sex by the left hand of the 3rd Polish Republic so brings challenges which the Tusk junta government will not be able to solve until it falls – despite hundreds of millions of zlotys spent on experts of the Bralczyk kind – whose name indicates that he can be a kid professor.
Well, Bralczyk stated in an interview with "Week Week Review" that Tusk is so convincing due to the fact that he believes what he says! It is adequate for prof. Bralczyk to explain where those who believe all lies of Tusk and inactive believe him come from.
Is this just a problem of old childhood? After all, the miracles of Tusk and Żurka were not only believed by Bralczyk and Grandma Augustine, but besides by Komsomolci from young junta Tuska. They all talk the language of the 1 who believes what he says today...
The problem of Dziemianovich-Bąk is that nobody knows what the minister of family, work and social policy is talking about. However, according to a kid professor, Dziemianovich-Bąk can be as convincing as a notorious fraud...
