Everyone in Russia and in the planet is presently looking at what is happening in the United States with disbelief. Only a fewer experts see the importance of change in the United States, especially Alexander Yakovenko.
Yakovenko said ‘it's a revolution’ and he's absolutely right. That's what it is.
Trump Revolution
Indeed elected president Donald Trump together with a group of his closest associates, especially passionate Elon MuskThey carry out revolutionary activities. By the time Trump took office on 20 January, America and Europe had already begun to feel chills. This involves ideological and geopolitical tsunamiWhich, to tell you the truth, nobody expected. Many hoped that after his election triumph Trump – as it was during his first word – would return to more or little conventional politics, even if there were present features of his charisma and spontaneity. However, it can already be said that this will not be the case. Trump is simply a revolution. And that is why during this transitional period after the transfer of power by Joe Bidena Trump is worth seriously analyzing what is happening in America. And there's definitely something going on, and it's very important.
Deep state and the past of the American revival
First of all, we request to explain how Trump could have been chosen in an all-powerful way. deep state. This requires a more detailed look.
Deep state In the United States, it forms the nucleus of the state apparatus and closely related ideological and economical elites. The state, business and education strategy there constitute a single strategy of combined vessels alternatively than separate elements. Additionally, conventional American secret associations and clubs that erstwhile played the function of communication centers for the elite are added. This full complex was called deep state. The 2 main parties – Democrats and Republicans – are in this situation not representatives of separate ideologies, but expressors of different directions of 1 ideological-political and economical embodiment in deep state. The balance between them was intended to let only certain adjustments and general contact with society.
After planet War II, the United States went through 2 phases: the era of the Cold War with the USSR and the Socialist Camp (1947-1991) and the period of the single-polar planet (1991-2024). In the first phase they were equal competitors with the russian Union, and in the second – after a complete triumph over their opponent, they became the only planet political-ideological superpower (or even hyperpower). This. deep state, not parties or any another institution, was the subject and expressor of this unchanging quest to regulation the world.
Since the 1990s, this reign began to manifest itself in the form of left-liberal ideology. Its expression was to combine the interests of large global capital with a progressive individualistic culture. This strategy was full supported by the American Democratic organization and part of Republicans – neoconservatives. The basic thought was that we would undoubtedly face linear and continuous development, both in the American economy and in the world, as well as the global spread of liberalism and liberal values. It seemed that all countries and societies of the planet had adopted the American model – political typical democracy, capitalist marketplace economy, individualistic and cosmopolitan ideology of human rights, digital technology and Western-centric postmodern culture. Deep state it shared this ideology and acted as a guarantor of its implementation.
Samuel Huntington proposes to correct the chosen direction
Already in the early 1990s. However, there began to be voices among American intellectuals who warned against the mistake of specified reasoning in the long term. Apparently, that's what he said. Samuel Huntington, which predicted the "shock of civilization", multipolarity and crisis of western-centric civilization. He proposed to strengthen in this situation, not to blur the American identity, but besides to unite all Western societies within one, no longer global, but regional Western civilization. At the time, this seemed to be an excessive caution for a group of skeptics. Deep state has sided with optimists from the “end of history” sign specified as Huntington's adversary, Francis Fukuyama. This is where the unchanging direction of politics followed by American presidents – Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama (after which came Trump's first word not entering this sequence) and Joe Biden. Both Democrats and Republicans (younger Bush) were expressors of the same political-ideological strategy deep state: globalism, liberalism, monopolarity and hegemony.
This optimistic globalist course encountered the first problems in the early 2000s. Russia stopped blindly following the United States and began strengthening its sovereignty. This became peculiarly apparent after the Munich speech Vladimir Putin in 2007, events in Georgia in 2008, and the culmination was the reintegration of Crimea in 2014, and in peculiar the launch of peculiar Military Operations in 2022. All of this was going against globalist plans.
Self-policies have begun to lead China, especially in government Xi Jinpinga, which benefited from globalisation, at the same time being able to argue it as shortly as its logic went against their national interests and threatened to reduce their sovereignty.
In the muslim world, periodic protests against the West grew, both at the level of striving for greater independency and of rejecting the liberal values imposed on it.
In India, right-wing nationalists and traditionalists with the Prime Minister came to power Narendra Modim At the head.
Anti-colonial sentiments began to emergence in Africa, and Latin American countries began to feel more independent of the United States and the West in general.
This led to the creation of BRICS as a prototype of a multipolar global system, mostly independent of the West.
American deep state It faced a serious dilemma: whether to proceed trying to put on its own, not paying attention to the increase in the importance of opposing processes, trying to block them with news channels, dominant narratives and yet through direct censorship in the media and social networks; or to take into account these trends and search an appropriate consequence to them, modifying the essential strategy in the face of reality that no longer met the subjective assessments of a number of US analysts.
Trump and deep state
Trump's first word seemed to be an incident, a method mistake. He came to power on the wave of populism, based on those environments in the United States that were increasingly aware of the usefulness of the globalist agenda and rejected woke (Left-Liberal code with principles of hyperindividualism, politics gender, feminism, LGBT, culture of negation, promoting migration, including illegal; critical racial theory, etc.). That's erstwhile we first started talking in the United States about deep state. There was a conflict between him and the attitudes of the broad folk masses.
However, in 2016-2020 deep state it did not take Trump seriously, and he did not have time to carry out structural reforms himself. After the end of his word of office deep state It put Biden and the Democratic organization at risk, pushing its choice and exerting unprecedented force on Trump, which was considered a threat to the full globalist single-polar policy pursued with any success by Americans over respective decades. That's where Biden's run slogan came from. ‘Build Back Better’, which is “Let us build everything even better”. This meant that after the "accident" of Trump's first term, it was intended to return to a globalist liberal policy.
Everything changed between 2020 and 2024. Although supported by deep state Biden returned to his erstwhile policy, this time he had to prove that all references to the crisis of globalisation were nothing but "propaganda opponents", "the effect of Putinian and Chinese agents" and "the communicative of the interior margin". Enjoying the support of the leadership of the Democratic organization and neo-conservatives, he tried to convince that we are not facing a real crisis, there are no problems, and the reality does not increasingly conflict with the ideas and projects of liberals-globalists; but only the emphasis on ideological opponents should be strengthened – to put a strategical blow on Russia, to put an end to the regional expansion of China (the task “One Belt – 1 Trail”), to sabotage BRICS and another tendencies leading towards multipolarity, to suppress populist trends in the United States and in Europe and to free Trump (legally, politically, physically). This has become a origin of support for terrorist methods and the tightening of left-wing liberal censorship. In fact liberalism yet became a totalitarian strategy just behind Biden.
Deep state continued to support Biden and globalists in general (the most crucial representatives in Europe included Boris Johnson, Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Ursula von der Leyen). Ultra-globalist structures are besides clearly active George Soros, which not only penetrated the European institutions, but besides began to carry out intensive efforts to overthrow Modi in India, to prepare colorful revolutions in the post-Soviet area (Moldova, Georgia, Armenia) and to destruct not only hostile but besides neutral regimes in the muslim planet – Bangladesh or Syria.
This time, however, support for globalists by American deep state It was no longer unconditional. Biden had to pass the exam, that is to prove that nothing terrible is happening with globalisation, that these are only method problems that can be solved through ideological, media, economic, political and straight terrorist violence. The test results were about to be evaluated deep state.
Biden loses trust deep state
Biden failed. For many reasons. Putin's Russia did not quit and withstand unprecedented force – sanctions, struggles with the Ukrainian terrorist government supported by all Western countries, economical challenges and a abrupt simplification in exports of natural resources, cut off from advanced technologies. All of this survived and Biden failed to defeat Russia.
China besides did not back down and continued the trade war with the United States without suffering any critical losses.
Modi failed to remove as a consequence of the election campaign.
The BRICS countries met at a large summit in the area fighting the West of Russia, in Kazan. Multipolarity continued to develop.
Against all laws and norms, Israel carried out genocide in Gaza and Lebanon, thereby nullifying all globalistic rhetoric. Biden had no choice but to support him.
The most crucial thing, however, was that Trump did not quit and consolidate around himself on a large scale the Republican Party, continuing with his or even extremist populist message. In fact, a separate ideology began to appear around it. Her basic thesis was that globalisation had failed, and his crisis was not any criticism from enemies or propaganda, but a completely real state. Consequently, we must follow Samuel Huntington's way alternatively than Francis Fukuyama's, return to the politics of realism and the origin identity of the American (wider – western), ending experiments with woke And perverts. In a word, it is essential to reconstruct the ideology of the American mill setting from the early era of classical liberalism combined with protectionism and a certain amount of open nationalism. This is how the program was created MEGA – Make America large Again.
Change of priorities deep state
In view of the fact that Trump managed to defend his positions on the American ideological space, deep state did not let Democrats to remove it. Biden (e.g. due to his intellectual conviction) failed to pass his exam Build Back Better And he didn't convince anyone. And that meant that deep state considered the crisis of globalisation and the old methods of spreading it to be real.
That's why this time it allowed Trump to be chosen and surrounded by a extremist group of ideological Trumpists in specified a expressive edition as Elon Musk, J. The President, Peter Thiel, Robert Kennedy Junior, Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, Pete Hegseth, Tucker Carlsonand even Alex Jones.
But the most crucial thing is that by recognizing Trump, deep state was aware of the objectively inevitable request to change the global strategy of the United States in the sphere of ideology, geopolitics, diplomacy, etc. From now on, things will be different. Trump, Trumpism and more – populism proved not to be a method fault, a random, short episode, but a consequence of a real, deep crisis of globalism and even its dusk.
Trump's current word of office is not a distraction in a number of Democrats and Republicans with mostly the same policies supported by deep state regardless of organization election results. This is the beginning of a fresh phrase in the past of American hegemony. This is simply a profound transformation of its strategies, ideologies, forms and structures.
Trumpism as Postliberalism
Let us now look step by step at the outlines of Trumpism as an ideology. Vice president Vance is explicitly referred to as a ‘post-liberal’. This means a complete and complete break-up with leftist liberalism that has prevailed in the United States for the past decades. Deep state, which has no ideology, is seemingly ready present to carry out an experimentation with a crucial revision of liberal ideology, or possibly even a complete dismantling of it. Thus, Trumpism takes on the characteristics of a separate, independent ideology in many askers opposed to the dominant left liberalism so far.
Trumpism as an ideology is not uniform and consists of respective currents. His essence, however, is more or little clear. First, it rejects globalisation, left-wing liberalism (progressiveism) and woke.
Trumpism as a Denial of Globalism
Trumpism powerfully and openly rejects globalism, that is, reasoning on a scale of the full of humanity as a single marketplace and cultural space, in which borders between national countries are becoming more and more blurred, and these countries are gradually being liquidated, giving power to supranational institutions (as in the case of the European Union). Globalists believe that this should shortly consequence in the emergence of the planet Government, which they are explicitly talking about The Secretary-General, Bill Gates And George Soros. All inhabitants of Earth become citizens of the planet (cosmopolitans), gaining equal rights within a single economic, technological, cultural and social environment. The tools for implementing this "Great Reset" process may be the pandemic and the environmental agenda.
All this is unacceptable to Trumpism. It advocates the preservation of national states or their integration within Western civilization, in which the function of the United States is to unite the West around it. This time, however, it is not about uniting it under the banner of liberal globalist ideology, but under the patronage of Trumpism itself. This clearly resembles Samuel Huntington’s first message, which advocated Western consolidation in rivalry with another civilizations. This is broadly consistent with the "reality" in global relations, recognising national sovereignty and not demanding its abolition. Rejecting globalisation entails criticism of vaccination and green order. From this point of view, characters specified as Bill Gates or George Soros become the personification of full evil.
Trumpism as anti-woke
Equally decisively, the Trumpists are against ideology woke consisting of:
– politics gender and legalisation of perverts;
– a critical racial explanation calling for the oppressed nations to revenge on whites;
– supporting immigration, including illegal immigration;
– a culture of liberal negation and censorship;
– Postmodernism.
Instead of these values of “progressive” and anti-traditional liberals, Trumpism appeases about returning to conventional values for the United States and Western civilization. As a result, the ideology of anti-woke.
The explanation of sex diversity replaces the designation of the existence of only 2 natural sexes. Transgenders and LGBT+ are considered marginal perverts alternatively than social norms. Feminism and blind criticism of the male component and patriarchate are rejected, and thus this male component and the function of men regain their crucial importance. Nobody has to apologize for being a man anymore. That's why any people call Trumpism bro-revolution "The Revolution of Men".
Critical racial explanation replaces the rehabilitation of white civilizations. White racism, however, is only characterized by extremes of Trumpism. usually everything simply comes down to rejecting the criticism of a white man while at the same time being tolerant of non-white people. The only point is that they do not require white people to repent.
Trumpism Against Migration
Trumpism demands a crucial simplification in migration and a complete ban on illegal immigration linked to the deportation of immigrants. Trumpists request a uniform national identity: they presume that all those who go to Western societies from another civilizations and cultures are obliged to accept the conventional values of the erstwhile and cannot be left alone as liberal multiculturalism proposes. peculiarly strongly, Trumpism is against illegal immigrants and waves of migration from Latin America, as a consequence of which Latino violates cultural balance in many states, becoming a majority. In addition, his concerns are besides caused by increasing numbers of muslim communities, which categorically negate Western norms and requirements (especially that liberals did not anticipate them to be respected at all, but, on the contrary, supported minorities in all ways). Furthermore, already from an economical point of view, the Trumpists are highly negative about China and Chinese activity in the United States. Many of them request direct expropriation of Chinese from their lands and plants in America.
African-Americans do not make peculiarly negative emotions, provided they do not start to associate into aggressive political groups specified as BLM (Black Lives Matter) and recognise criminals and drug addicts as heroes (as in the case of George Floyd). If they do this, the Trumpists respond severely and decisively. The Floyd case and its "canonisation" will shortly be reviewed.
Trumpism Against Left-Liberism
Trumpists appear unequivocally and unanimously against left-liberal censorship. Under the cover of political correctness and countering extremism liberals created a branched strategy of public manipulation, in fact eliminating freedom of speech, both in mainstream media and on social platforms they controlled. Anyone who even somewhat opposed and deviated from leftist-liberal standards was immediately referred to as "the utmost right-winger", "racist", "nazist" and then subject to ostracism, deplatforming and criminal conduct that may even lead to imprisonment. Censorship gradually began to take on a full character, while Trumpism itself – alongside another currents against globalists (mainly Russia) and European populist formations and multipolar concepts – fell victim to it.
Liberal elites explicitly regarded average citizens as underdeveloped and unconscious elements of society, while democracy treated "minority" as power alternatively than "majority" governments. Everything that deviated from the left-liberal agenda was called ‘Fake news’, "putin propaganda", conspiracy theories and dangerous, utmost views requiring criminal measures. In this way, there has been a extremist narrowing of what is acceptable and voices different from dogmatism woke and ultraleft liberalism was considered unacceptable, criminal and demanding blocking. This included all the assumptions of liberal globalisation – genderism, migration, critical racial theory, vaccination, etc. In fact, liberalism has become totalitarian and highly intolerant, and under the notion of "inclusiveness", it understood only the transformation of all man into a liberal.
Trumpism has rejected all this and is demanding the return of freedom of speech, which has been gradually abolished over the last decades. He assumes that no ideology should be preferred. The basis of his own ideology is the defence of worldview freedom, regardless of what ideological currents it concerns – from utmost right to utmost left.
Trumpism Against Postmodernism
Trumpists besides reject postmodernism, which is usually associated with “progressive” currents, left-wing liberalism in culture and art. At the same time, Trumpism has not yet developed its own kind and is limited to the request to throw postmodern culture off the pedestal and calls for diversity of cultural explorations.
In general, however, the Trumpists argue postmodernism and the conventional values of active nihilism – religion, sport, family, morality, etc.
Most followers of Trumpism are not sophisticated intellectuals. Rather, they call for the relativisation of the postmodern dictatorship and a revision of the approach of recognising degenerate art as normal.
However, there are certain ideologists of Trumpism who propose to take over postmodernism at the hands of left-wing liberals and to make postmodernism as an alternative, contractually termed "right". They propose the usage of tools of irony and deconstruction in specified a way as to direct them against leftist-liberal formulas and canons, although they have been utilized against traditionalists and conservatives.
Even in Trump's erstwhile election campaign, his supporters gathered on platform 4chan, on which they released full series of ironic memes and humor of absurdity, mocking and consciously provoking utilizing them liberals. Some, specified as Curtis Yarvin is Nick Land, they went even further and put forward the concept of "The Dark Enlightenment" by proposing his antiliberal interpretation, even calling for the establishment of a monarchy in the United States.
In a sense, the postmodernist is the number 2 man in Trump's crew, who has contributed greatly to his triumph – Elon Musk, who combines conventional values and right-wing policies with a futuristic look at the future and accentuating technological development. In a akin way, Peter Thiel, 1 of the largest entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley, argues.
From Hayek to Soros and back
From the liberal point of view, the political past of humanity of fresh centuries has been a movement from classical liberalism towards its left-wing or even far-left-wing version. Classical Liberals tolerated deviations, but only at individual level – they never considered them a norm and did not sanction them legally. However, this is what the progressive liberals did, who at the same time tried, like their older colleagues, to root out all forms of collective identity, leading to absurd individualism.
This process can be traced through the example of 3 key figures for the liberal ideology of the 20th century.
Friedrich von Hayek, the creator of neoliberalism, recognized that all ideologies should be rejected indicating to man what to think and do. This was inactive an old, classical liberalism praising individual freedom and an unfettered market.
His student Karl Popper developed criticism of totalitarian ideology of Fascism and Communism, besides shifting them to Plato and George Hegel. There are already totalitarian accents in Popper. It calls liberals and supporters of liberalism "open society", while all those who think differently – "enemies of open society", even calling for their liquidation before they can harm or hinder this "open society".
Popper student George Soros takes another step further in the same direction and calls for the overthrow of all non-liberal systems, the support of radical, frequently terrorist movements that argue these systems, as well as the punishment, penalisation and elimination of opponents of "open society" in the West. Soros announced his enemies Trump, Putin, Modi, Xi Jinping, Viktor Orbán and started an active fight against them with the aid of capital speculation. He was the organizer of colorful revolutions in east Europe, in the post-missile area, in the muslim world, and even in Southeast Asia and Africa. He supported barbaric restrictions on individual freedom during the pandemic, promoting forced vaccinations and cruel persecution of all COVID age decision-makers. Thus fresh liberalism became a totalitarian, extremist and terrorist opening.
Trumpism suggests reversing the Hayek – Popper – Soros sequence. He advocates returning to sources, i.e. allowing everything, anti-totalitarian and in a sense classical liberalism of von Hayek. any Trumpists go 1 step further and call for a return to native American traditionalism before the American civilian War.
Internal conflicts of Trumpism
Our review gives any thought of the general characteristics of Trumpism. However, the camps are already gradually forming within it. To a lesser or greater extent, all Trumpists share the above - mentioned views, but they have different accents, frequently in an evocative and antagonistic way.
One crucial dividing line is what has late been described as a conflict between right-wing technocrats and right-wing traditionalists – tech right and trad right. The undisputed leader and face of right-wing technocrats is Elon Musk. It combines technological futurism (tech right), promises of man's flight to Mars, the improvement of fresh technologies with support for conservative values and active, offensive support for right-wing populism. His views are well known and the full West is looking at them now.
Even before Trump's oath, Musk began intensively promoting a fresh right-wing conservative imagination on his platform X, with the ambition of replacing Soros' imagination with it. The second was very active in creating a global leftist-liberal network, bribing politicians and overthrowing regimes, both in hostile countries and in neutral or even friendly ones. Now Elon Musk and the creator of Meta's strategy are on it. Mark Zuckerbergwho late joined the Trumpists and declared the abolition of censorship woke on their Instagram and Facebook platforms. Musk together with the creator of the PayPal system, Peter Thiel and Zuckerberg represent a camp of right-wing technocrats.
In the United States, however, there was already a group of their opponents among the Trumpists, headed by Steve Bannon, erstwhile Trump national safety advisor from his first term. Bannon and his associates began to be referred to as right-wing traditionalists (trad right).
The conflict raged against granting residence cards to legal immigrants who are supported by Musk, against whom Bannon is fierce. The second formulated the position of American nationalism, whose supporters form an essential part of Trump's electorate base, demanding that the procedure for obtaining American citizenship be hampered and proclaiming the slogan "America for Americans". Many of them supported Bannon, who reminded Musk that he had joined the Conservatives rather recently, while American nationalists have been fighting for certain values for many decades. This revealed the contradictions in the bosom of Trumpism between right-wing globalisation, futurism and technocracy – on the 1 hand, and right-wing nationalism – on the other. Their dispute late was portrayed in a harsh, humorous manner by an American comedian acting out of opposing positions woke, Sam Hyde.
Another line of division revealed itself between pro-Israeli Trumpists and anti-Israeli. As it is known, Trump himself, Vice president Vance, and United States Secretary of defence nominee Pete Hegseth are among Israel's unconditional supporters. It is rather likely that Trump's choice was due to his pro-Israeli position and his individual support by Benjamin Netanjah. Lobby judaic is highly strong in the United States.
At the same time a number of realists, specified as John Mearsheimer, Jeffrey Sachs whether the well-known non-conformist investigative writer Alex Jones categorically rejects this aspect of Trumpism and urges the United States to look at the arrangement of forces in the mediate East and conduct policies consistent with their own interests, which frequently do not coincide with Israel's interests.
At the same time, the same people around Trump may occupy different positions on these 2 axes. For example, critical of Israel, Alex Jones supports Musk, and Musk's opponent Steve Bannon is oriented towards supporting Israel.
Trumpism and Generation Theory
It's worth saying a small bit about the explanation of generations developed any time ago by William Strauss and Neil Howe. To any degree it can aid us realize the place of Trumpism in American political and social history. According to this explanation in the United States, 1 can see a pattern of successive cycles – larger (persistent about 85 years, or contractual dimension of human life) and smaller. Each large cycle (saeculum, age) consists of 4 parts called returns (turning). 4 phrases can be considered as 4 seasons. The first phrase is called ‘Ascension’ (High) and responds to the spring. The second phrase is "Awakening" (Awakening) or summer. The 3rd is “Splitting” (Unravel) which corresponds to autumn. The 4th is the crisis (Crisis) or winter. all turn lasts about 21 years. Each 1 corresponds to a certain generation. Hence the name – the explanation of generations. It is this which is referred to by terms specified as "great generation" (1900-1923), "silent generation" (1923-1943), "generation". Baby Boomers“ (1943-1963), “generation X” (1963-1984), “generation Y” (1984-2004) or “generation Z – Millenial” — 2004-2024.
In Strauss – Howe's theory, the 1940s and 1950s are treated as the first generation of the larger cycle. This is so the first word of the “great cycle” which the authors consider to be “Ascension”. This period is characterised by a advanced level of population mobilisation, social optimism, strengthening social institutions. This is simply a time of enthusiasm, optimism, solidarity and moral exultation.
Then we have a second turn – the 1960s and 1970s or "Awakening". It is an era of concentration in the interior planet – times of hippies, psychedelics and spiritual exploration. At the same time, there is simply a turn towards spiritual individualism, the process of corrosion of social solidarity begins. This is simply a period of stone music and relaxation of customs.
This was followed by an era of gradual decomposition – the 1980s and 1990s. It's a phrase called "Split." In it comes the transition from spiritual to surviving and materialistic individualism. The community is blurry, its collapse. Hippies and classical stone replaces punk (no future), techno and industrial.
Between 2000 and 2020, the last phrase is “Crise”. Its origin is simply a terrorist attack by muslim fundamentalists at the fresh York planet Trade Center on 11 September 2001. Then there is intense United States intervention in various parts of the world, pandemics and wars in Ukraine. Social tissue is completely decomposed. Optimism fades. Society is undergoing progressive degradation. It's a painful agony of an ending cycle. The power comes to completely incompetent Republicans or Democrats with an highly low intellectual level – Bush the younger, narcissistic Obama and an advanced age of aged demented Joe Biden.
Individualism transforms into legalization of perverts. That's the age. woke with her policy genderPosthumanism, dark ecology.
It turns out that there is simply a change of age for the 2024 elections, according to the explanation of generations (saeculum). Trumpism means entering the fresh Age and entering its first word – the fresh “Ascension” (High). All trends in the past century and in peculiar in the crisis phase are fading. Liberalism version woke is completely rejected.
A fresh cycle begins with fresh standards, rules and rules. Trump ends “Crise” and represents the transition to “Ascension”.
When the explanation of generations appeared, it was accepted rather favorably. However, erstwhile liberals realized how much it undermines their authority and ideology, they immediately came to their senses and threw themselves at her with furious criticism, trying to prove her unscientific character. Significantly, the disputes surrounding her discipline or her deficiency of it affected the results of the 2024 election and allowing Trump to win by deep state. most likely a certain part deep state She became acquainted with Strauss’s explanation – Howe’s and found it rather realistic. And if so, there's no reason to be amazed at the dismantling of leftist liberalism and its structures. Nor does it make sense to respect Trumpism as temporary and temporary, and then return to the erstwhile policy. I'm certain this return will never happen again, due to the fact that there's been a change in the large cycle, at least if that explanation is right. It seems beautiful convincing so far.
Geopolitics of Trumpism
Let us now decision on to another aspect of Trumpism – abroad policy. The most crucial in this area seems to be a shift distant from a global position to American centreism and American expansionism.
Trump's statements about joining Canada as the 51st state, buying Greenland, establishing control of the Panama Canal and changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America are the most striking evidence of this. All of these are evident symptoms of offensive realism in global relations, and return to doctrine James Monroe After a century of doctrinal dominance Woodrow Wilson.
Monroe's 19th century doctrine declared that the precedence of U.S. abroad policy was to reconstruct their control of the North American continent and partially over the South American continent in order to weaken or completely destruct the influence of the European powers of the Old planet on the fresh World.
Wilson's doctrine formulated after planet War I became a road map for American globalists, as it moved the point of gravity from the United States as a national state to the level of a worldwide mission to spread liberal democracy standards among all mankind and support its structures on a global scale. The United States has come to a second place in the context of this internationalist mission.
During the large Depression, the United States had no head to Wilson's doctrine, but returned to the subject after planet War II. In fresh decades, she has actually dominated. From her point of view, it didn't substance who Canada, Greenland or the Panama Canal belonged to; for everywhere there was a liberal-democratic strategy controlled by a globalist elite.
Today Trump abruptly changes his perspective. The United States is now regaining its importance as a state that demands from Canada, Denmark and Panama no longer to submit to the planet Government (which Trump is now resigning on a good cause), but to Washington, the States and Trump himself as the charismatic leader of the "Ascension" era.
The transition from Wilson's doctrine to Monroe's doctrine clearly shows a map showing 51 states (if you number Puerto Rico) along with Greenland and the Panama Canal.
Dismantling globalist regimes in Europe
The strangest and shocking thing for the West is the pace at which Trumpists, having not even settled down in power, began to implement their program in global affairs. Elon Musk on his X platform as early as December 2024 began to prosecute an active policy to remove leaders not responding to Trumpists and the United States. Previously, soros structures for globalists were involved. Musk did not waste time and began akin campaigns, only this time for anti-globalists and European populists specified as alternate to Germany and its president Alice Weidel in Germany, Nigel Farage in Britain, Marine Le Pen France. On the another hand, the Danish Government was injured, who refused to quit Greenland voluntarily and Justin Trudeau in Canada, who opposed his country to truly become the 51st state of the United States.
European globalists representing the links of the erstwhile network were shocked and began protesting the direct interference of the United States with European politics, to which they heard from Musk and the Trumpists that someway they did not protest the interferences of Soros, so they should reconcile with its fresh version, their version. If the United States is the ruler of the world, then let them be graciously subject to it, just as Obama, Biden, and Soros were subject to it. deep state.
Musk and most likely besides Thiel, Zuckerberg and another owners of global networks began to dismantle the globalist system, primarily in Europe, bring power and support to populist leaders who share the ideas and strategies of Trumpists. It was easiest to enter into this model of Hungarian Orbána, Slovakia Robert Ficy and Italy Georgia Meloni, i.e. systems that have already set conventional values and have more or little opposed globalists.
Meanwhile, in another countries, Trumpists will search to change power in various ways, frequently akin to those utilized by their predecessors – globalists. We are now observing an unprecedented run by Elon Musk of Britain against Keir Starmer, who is portrayed as an apologist and co-worker "detached immigrant gangs of Pakistani rapists in the UK". Since the attack is so severe from Washington, the British have nothing to believe. akin actions by Musk begin to lead against Macron and German liberals trying to halt a steady emergence in the popularity of right- populist Alternatives for Germany.
Europe was clearly pro-American, but now Washington is changing its ideological direction if not 180 degrees, at least 90 degrees. This radicalism is for European rulers, who have only late mastered the ability to accurately fulfil their master's wishes like trained animals in a circus, something highly painful. They are now required to immediately condemn what they served in religion and fact (or alternatively in cynicism and lying), and to curse allegiance to the fresh Trumpist ideological staff. any will, others will resist. However, the process was launched: Trumpists overthrow liberals and globalists in Europe. They work closely with Huntington's instructions. They request a consolidated West as a geopolitical and ideologically integrated civilization. They truly want to make the American Empire from a real event.
Anti-Chinese Consensus on Trumpism
Another clear line in global Trumpist politics is their opposition to China. They represent from their point of view the synthesis of what they cannot stand in leftist liberalism and globalism – left-wing ideology and internationalism. The PRC is in their eyes the embodiment of both, i.e. attitudes traditionally associated with the policies of their own American globalists.
Although, of course, modern China is simply a much more complex phenomenon, the anti-Chinese Trumpist consensus stems from the presumption that it is simply a bastion of a non-white and non-western civilization that has utilized globalisation in its interests, not only becoming an independent pole, but besides buying up part of American industry, business and land. The relocation of manufacture to Southeast Asia due to the search for cheaper labour has deprived the United States of their industrial and industrial capacity of sovereignty, making them dependent on external sources. In addition, China's separate ideology makes it imperceptible by Washington.
All blame for the Chinese phenomenon is placed on the shoulders of their own globalists, while China gains the position of their top enemy.
Russia is simply a third-rate issue compared to China and so far it is disappearing from the radar. China is the enemy of number one. The blame for global chaos is attributed to American globalists.
Proizrael's Trumpism Trend
The support of Israel and the far right of Israel is another most crucial subject of Trumpism in abroad policy. As we have seen, there is no consensus among Trumpists, among whom there is simply a certain anti-Israeli segment, but mostly the mainstream is pro-Israeli. It derives from the Protestant explanation of Judeo-Christianism that the coming of the Judean Messiah at the time of the judaic transition to Christianity, as well as from the general rejection of Islam. Trumpist Islamophobia strengthens their solidarity with Israel (and vice versa) and together creates 1 of their leading policies in the mediate East.
From this point of view, the most active anti-Israeli policy-making Shiite center of Islam appears to be the biggest evil for Trumpists. Hence, their fierce hostility to Iran, Iraqi Shiites, Yemeni and Alawites from Syria. Trumpism is definitely anti-Sicinic and in rule faithful to right-wing Zionism and far right.
Trumpism Against Latinos
The Latin issue is 1 of the most crucial in terms of home policy of the United States. Again, Samuel Huntington, who pointed out decades ago that the biggest threat to North American identity and its nucleus in the form of WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant – white Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are just waves of Latin American immigration having a completely different Catholic-Latin identity. According to Huntington, until 1 point, the Anglo-Saxons were able to dilute this ingredient in a multicultural boiler, but the mass influx of Hispanics made it impossible.
This is why the anti-immigrant phobia in the United States has a circumstantial direction and is aversion to mass migration from Latin American countries. During his first presidential term, Trump began building his large wall due to these waves of immigration.
All of this affects the attitude of the Trumpists besides towards Latin American countries, which they see as mostly left-wing and equally as a origin of immigration crime. A return to Monroe’s doctrine means that the United States intends to control the Latin American states much more closely. This leads to escalation in relations with Mexico and is besides the origin of demands to reconstruct complete control of the Panama Canal.
Forget Russia and much little Ukraine
Russia is an insignificant origin in global politics for Trumpists. They do not have ideological aprioristic rusophobia typical of globalists, though they do not have more sympathy for Russia. Among the Trumpists is simply a group of rusophiles who consider that it is part of the white Christian civilization, and further pushing it into China's embrace would be mindless and criminal. However, they are a minority. For most Trumpists, Russia simply has no meaning. Unlike China, it is not a more serious economical competition, there is no diaspora in the United States, and the conflict with Ukraine is regional, insignificant, and the work for its detonation is borne by globalists (enemy of Trumpists).
Of course, it would be good to end this conflict, but if it is not done quickly, the Trumpists will leave this problem to European globalist regimes, which will be exhausted and weakened by participation in this confrontation. The second is in turn a hand coffin.
Ukraine is no longer important, important, and the only function it can play in investigations concerning Obama's corruption and Biden's administration.
Of course, in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict the majority of Trumpists do not hold a pro-Russian position, but they besides exclude the support of Ukraine, especially on the unprecedented scale it took during Biden's time.
Passive multipolarity of Trumpism
It is now worth examining the ratio of Trumpism to multipolarity. The explanation of the multipolar planet is not acceptable to them. Trumpism is simply a fresh installment of American hegemony, but monopolarity has a completely different content and nature for it than for globalists. At the heart of the planet strategy are the United States and its conventional values, the white Christian West, rather patriarchal, but at the same time respecting individual freedom and the free market. All others can either walk the way of the West, or they can be outside the flourishing and developing zone. Inclusion is replaced by limited exclusivity. The West is simply a club that's not that easy to join.
Thus, Trumpists are not curious in another civilizations. If they stand by their own, so be it. It doesn't matter. However, if they want to join the West, they must pass a number of hard exams. Even if they succeed, they will stay societies of the lower species.
In another words, we are dealing not with active and affirmative multipolarity, but with passive and permissive consent: if you can no longer be the West, then be yourselves. Trumpists do not intend to build a multipolar world, but have nothing against it. He'll show up yet anyway. Not everyone should be the West, and those outside it can either prosecute it or accept that they will become themselves.
Intra-American Multipolarism
A very crucial feature of the ideology of Trumpism is its focus first on the interior problems of the United States. This is highlighted by slogans specified as MEGA is America first. Thus, the Trumpists collide with the phenomenon of multipolarity not so much in abroad policy as in internal. Yes, they are seeking to establish the United States' hegemony in fresh ideological conditions, but it is interior policy that is simply a precedence for them. With multipolarity as separate civilizations, Trumpism meets primarily in America itself.
The explanation of the multipolar planet assumes the existence of 7 basic civilizations: Western, Russian-Eurasian, Chinese, Indian, Islamic, African and Latin American.
They form a structure of a heptarchy in which any poles have already consolidated to the level of the State-Civilization, while others are in the embryonic phase. This is what Huntington wrote about (in addition to the Japanese-Buddhist civilization). In abroad policy, Trumpism is not much of a heptarchy. Unlike globalists, Trumpists do not treat the process of creating multipolarity and attacking BRICS as a goal in itself, although they are not clearly curious in promoting multipolarity. They besides feel heptarchy in interior politics. Her presence in this area is very clear. This is about the existence of many and very crucial diaspora in the United States itself. After rejection of standards woke You can talk freely in America about races, ethnos and spiritual identities.
The Latin diaspora, as we have already mentioned, is simply a major problem. It threatens the identity of the United States based on WASP, with intense dilution. The consequence is the demonization of everything related to Latin: cultural mafia, waves of immigrants passing through the wall, the spread of drugs through Latin American cartels, trafficking in human goods, etc. Latin America is present inside the United States and its overall image is negative and destructive. This is why the Latin American pole will be perceived as hostile, as is already seen in the example of escalation in relations with Mexico. Monroe’s doctrine of Trump’s position assumes the undisputed dominance of the United States in the fresh World, which clearly contradicts the formation of a separate pole in Latin America. Trumpists will be more or little extremist about this.
Another interior origin will be expanding cynophobia. China is the main economical and financial rival of the United States, and the presence of a strong Chinese component in the North American economy will lead to a multiple tightening of this issue. This pole of heptarchy inside and outside America will be considered by the prism of hostility.
The conventional opponent of right-wing American Conservatives is the muslim world. The unconditional support of Israel, regardless of its utmost nature, can besides be partially explained by Islamophobia. Muslim communities are widely represented in the United States itself and throughout the West. To Trumpists, they will be the enemy.
The Indian origin is completely different. There is now a immense Indian diaspora in the United States, and in any industries, especially Silicon Valley, Hindus are even a dominant group. Hindus are as close to Trump as Vivek Ramaswamy is Kash Patel. The Indian is the wife of Vice president Vance. Tulsi Gabbard, an cultural Maori native of Hawaii, converted to Hinduism. Although late the nationalist Trumpist section – especially Steve Bannon and Ann Coulter – he began to act against the emergence of Indian influence in the United States and surrounded by Trump, mostly Trumpists have a affirmative attitude towards India as a pole, both intra-American and globally. Moreover, they do not hide that they would like to replace China as a centre of inexpensive labour with India. So their attitude towards Indian civilization is alternatively positive.
The issue of Africa as specified is not very curious in Trumpists, but alternatively the pole is considered by the prism of the African American problem in the United States itself. In terms of threat, their racial consolidation is seen in opposition to the whites, which the globalists supported. Therefore, the most crucial issue is the further assimilation of the African American community and the fight against its isolation. This will besides affect the issue of orderly migration from Africa to the United States.
Russia is another component of the Heptarchy. However, unlike another civilizations, Russian presence in the United States is very limited. They are not an cultural community and are most frequently completely integrated into the American socio-cultural system, blending into the white population of this country along with representatives of another European nations. Therefore, Russia is seldom considered by Trumpists to be a separate pole, and if so, only retrospectively. At 1 time the main opponent of the United States and the full West was the russian Union. Sometimes this image is extended to modern Russia, but this negative image was so intensely exploited by globalists at the erstwhile phase that its possible was completely exhausted. From the point of view of the fresh Trumpist policy, Russia is more indifferent than the enemy, although there are both rusophobic and rusophilic currents (less widely represented).
The ratio of Trumpists to multipolarity will so be mostly defined by intra-American processes.
Ideology
So Trumpism is ideology. It has both a political and philosophical dimension and a geopolitical dimension. Gradually, it will gain increasingly expressive contours, but present it can be defined the basic features of it.
Prof. Aleksandr Dugin
