They're not silent. comments on yesterday's (no)disposition of head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs Marcin Kierwiński, who, during the Central Firefighter Day Celebration, clearly distanced himself from the remainder of the speakers. The Minister's translation did not dispel any doubts about "consumption" to a minimum, and, moreover, generated a number of fresh suspicions. Kierwiński's first translation took place in the friendly TVN24 and then the head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs spoke about defective equipment, giving different reverberation.
In the next step, journalists encouraged Marcin Kierwiński to make himself publically tested for sobriety, in consequence they heard that there was fundamentally no problem, but Mr Kierwiński considered himself a "serious man" and yet refused. erstwhile the net began to swell with malicious comments, the minister changed his head and posted a comment on the X portal along with a bizarre printing of the test from the breathalyst:
Before you pass judgment, perceive to what I have said to the media after my speech. I went to the police station immediately, where I was examined with a breathalyst. consequence = 0.0.
What happened at the ceremonies was due to method issues and reverberation. pic.twitter.com/11AzYcjpzF
— Marcin Kierwiński (@MKierwinski) May 4, 2024
Users of the portal almost immediately began to announcement that something in this “flower” was not playing, and the most emotional was the individual who was an aspirant of Ewa Burnett. So far no one, including the Police territory Command Warsaw II on Malczewski Street, where the survey was conducted, failed to confirmThat specified an aspirant exists. Another mysterious condition is the way the test was printed and then hand-written. Here many commentators have seen similarities in the letter appearing on the printout of the breathate and on the property message by Marcin Kierwiński.
On the left, the property message @MKierwinskiOn the right, his sobriety test. I'm not a graphologist, but I'm not blind either. The common feature of these writings is the large LITERA. Sir @Adbodnar I think it's time for “the panic of the regulation of law”. pic.twitter.com/OtOcHTZGMn
— Piotr Stanisław Wielgucki (@PiotrWiel) May 4, 2024
While this argument can be called into question, although the common features of the author's eye are visible, there is no uncertainty what device the test was printed on, due to the fact that the name is visible on the printout, and this is the Alkotest 9510 IR alkomat itself:
Photo: www.ceneo.plTwo versions are available in sales, but they disagree only in the number of sensors, i.e. sensors essential for testing. In addition, the functionality of the devices is identical and each 1 is equipped with a keyboard and a "memorative 1500 measurements with date and time" (source: https://www.ceneo.pl/44233830#tab=spec). You can besides find the user manual in the popular search engine and see the procedure for entering the surveyed data on page 8:
Photo: instructions for handling the breathalyzerSource: https://alkoster.pl/requests/drager9510/instruction.pdf
The professional test should be completed by specified a printout as in the image below, although for apparent reasons individual data are blurry here, but filling with a pen should be excluded, even on the basis of the following location:
Photo: Road Transport Inspection websiteSource: https://dolnyslask.witd.gov.pl/197/driver-leaded-tzarovke-after-use-alcohol.html
Natural questions arise. Why the test was not conducted in accordance with the procedure and individual data from the keyboard of the device were not introduced. Does this affect the fact that the breathalyzer keeps the data of the subject in mind? Is it certain that the test was carried out with the participation of Marcin Kierwiński, or was individual else "blowing" and the remainder of it manually filled, and was it defective? Is there an immortal visit by the minister on police surveillance? Is there an aspirant, Eve Burnett, and if so, can he compose with just a pen?
For now, alternatively of answering these simple questions, Minister Marcin Kierwiński scares with proceedings, about counting respective 100 1000 Poles who saw what they saw:
Those who stood and stand behind defaming my good name will endure the legal consequences of these hateful actions. I will keep you informed of the next steps.
— Marcin Kierwiński (@MKierwinski) May 5, 2024
It is appropriate to express the hope that the inquisitive journalists will not be afraid of the minister, will visit the Warsaw command and ask all the questions which should have been answered long ago.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
