Tadeusz Klementewicz, prof. of Social Sciences and Politologist in the article "Armouring a recipe for the crisis of the European economy" in the Review, he writes about "European puppets of all-powerful global oligarchs who have taken up work" to adopt the ReARM Europe plan. In his opinion, the reason for this plan lies in what has been said for a long time – "it is intended to be a refuge from the recession and at the same time a prescription to replace obsolete manufacturing sectors with a weaponry". This concludes the conclusion – "Only the planets regret".
Sources in Natovian expansion
This kind of provision fell in the professor's opinion with the approval to extend NATO to the east, and thus breaking the promise given to Gorbachev that NATO would not decision east by an inch. There was a deficiency of realism, resulting in increases in energy prices and, as a result, increases in energy prices for households and a recession in various industries. European economies have lost and the United States has become the beneficiary. In addition, there is an effort to usage the fear of Russia's atomic arsenal, which would besides be an excuse to spend more on a protective umbrella from America. In the end, the usage of the U.S. strategy, according to prof. Klementewicz, can lead to American ICT, arms, mining, or speculative funds seeking profits on their own, including those from Europe who have shares in arms companies. So alternatively of making cars, they'll be producing tanks. Similarly, tanks will begin to be produced in Goerlitz, where bunk wagons for railways were manufactured.
It's not just butter anymore.
The Hitleric “armata alternatively of butter” strategy will so be complemented by cars. The author writes that "in this situation, Volkswagen, Renault or Fiat will now replace key arms corporations specified as Rheinmetall (Germany), Thales (France), Leonardo (Italy), BAE Systems (UK) and Indra (Spain)". And it all began in February 2022. In 2024 Rheinmetall had orders in his portfolio for 55 euros, while Thales or Leonardo six times increased their value since 2022. Thus, prof. Klementewicz concludes that the "ReARM Europe" plan "is a refuge before the recession and a prescription to replace obsolete manufacturing sectors with weapons". The prelude to the announcement by Ursula von der Leyen of EUR 800 billion of expenditure on reinforcements had to be what Tadeusz Klementewicz writes about. In 2024, a strategy for the improvement of the arms manufacture was adopted, which provides that by 2030 at least 50% of the weapons of the European Union countries will be procured on site. And joint purchases will increase from 18 percent to 40 percent. That is why this debt of EUR 800 billion is to be mentioned. Trump so says on the 1 hand that he is in favour of peace, and on the another he declares that he is not curious in the war in Ukraine, as a consequence Europe should, if it wants to proceed supporting this country. But this means an increase in spending which will consequence in orders according to the author of the article going to US arms companies specified as Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin or Raytheon.
End of Ordliberalism
Such a change in the strategy to decision forward before the recession means that Europe will no longer adhere to the iron regulation of the 3% budget deficit. Now you will gotta let the reins go, so as the author wrote "The limits of public spending were only inflation." And that means that "there are no arbitrary criteria for the size of the budget deficit". Apart from the fact that taxpayers will pay for everything, the prof. says that the planet will besides be the payer. Oil will drive planes, tanks, submarines, aircraft carriers. And there will be uncommon metals. They are liable for even solar-powered drones. large diesel engines are even utilized to extract specified natural materials. So, as we see for those who are in favour of continuing to prolong the war, and at the same time who care about the planet, which they believe "burns" does not conflict with the fact that it is precisely all modern armored weapons that are driven by millions of tons of oil. He rightly cites Prof. Kolodki's postulate, which proposed a simplification of 1% of the global gross product in arms. That would save $1 trillion a year. And that would mean, in his opinion, a war against corporations, shareholders, manager and owners of billion-dollar holdings. And Poland, in the professor's opinion, besides has more urgent expenses specified as wellness care, education or investigation and development. So there is something to focus on, choosing life alternatively of death.
Bartłomiej Doborzyński (Polish Barometer)
