Left:China leader, Xi Jinping engineer and U.S. president Donald Trump (without socially useful education). You don't request to be a specialist in the analysis of alleged body language to announcement that the head of the world's top power is watching with a benevolent censure on a sabbesgoja representing the ‘mighty’ USrAel.Lovers of the correct Polish language tell us that the title word of the Asian nation is not a consequence of gross mistake or equally reprehensible malice, but a desire to be faithful to 1 of the most celebrated dialogues in our literature. I'm talking about “Wedding” by Stanisław Wyspiański, More specifically – beginning this work of conversation between Hip, embodying the peasant layer, and Journalist As an intelligence representative. This introduction reads as follows:
JUNE: What's up, ladies in politics? The Chinese are holding tight?
And my good host, I've had adequate Chinese all day.
The problem is that today, almost 125 years after the launch of “Wessel” in Kraków Urban Theatre, Chinese, or more specifically their homeland, People's Republic of China (PRC) ignore no way, bringing cognition about it only to the position of a communist pier on clay legs with possessive tendencies towards Taiwan, effectively restrained by United States of America (USA). The alleged mainstream media are doing a lot to keep their audiences convinced that the US hegemony as a "world defender for democracy" is indisputable, and its economical and military advantage over the PRC guarantees the maintenance of specified a state for many years to come.
Is that so? I could say anything in assurance that I have quite a few doubts about this, but it would be an ostrich hiding my head in the sand, due to the fact that I... I don't have it. I believe that the PRC has already economically not only caught up with the USA, but it is ahead of it, in addition, with a real possible of further expanding the distance. In order to justify this thesis, I will usage not opinions promoted powerfully "authorities" and "experts" with diplomas of professors and doctors of economics, political sciences and another sciences called social sciences, but based on reading publically available data.
Let's start by determining the current economical condition of both equivalents – let's presume it by politeness – powers. The US gross home product (GDP) last year was US$29 trillion and was higher than China's GDP by over US$10 trillion. The problem is that American public debt is 121% of GDP, or $35 trillion. Even more weight is the private debt of the US, determined at the end of the first 4th of 2024 per $38.3 trillion. We so have full liabilities 73.3 trillion dollars, i.e. – counting even after the record-breakingly low rate of PLN 3.6 per dollar (as at 18 September 2025) – PLN 263.88 trillion. Indeed, there are cosmic numbers for a state that can boast 47 of 96 winners Nobel Prizes in the field Economics... Worse yet, the U.S. did not even prevent the U.S. from giving up the dollar for gold in 1971 and replacing it with a "parity" in the form of armed forces participating in the next "peace and stableness missions" – most frequently looting and costing the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Before we proceed to the assessment of the current economical condition China is worth mentioning that with the amount of $760 billion located in US securities they are the 3rd after Japan and the UK among the largest abroad creditors of the USA. It could so be said: “He caught Turek Tatarzin, and Tatarin holds his head”. most likely that's why overseas economists are presently working on how to distribute 35-billion (still talking about dollars) US public debt among cryptocurrency holders worldwide.
To the point of China. Their public debt is 90.1 percent. GDP $16.6 trillion, and the abroad debt itself as of September 2024 was $2.51 trillion versus $9.1 trillion of U.S. abroad debt (as of June 2025).
However, although the above, the current accounts clearly support the economical possible of the PRC, it is worth remembering no little promising forecasts for the future. These include, among others, the inactive advanced growth of Chinese GDP and more than 4 times the population (1.416 million versus 347 million), which translates into a immense interior marketplace and crucial labour force resources. It won't substance here to remind you that China is the leader BRICS, i.e. groups of countries with crucial economical potential. To its founders, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa 2 years ago they joined Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia and United arabian Emiratesand at the beginning of this year Indonesia. The trade within this group takes place without billing in dollars, which is reflected in a systematic decline in its rate.
The ‘Pariste’ for Chinese yuan in the form of armed forces is besides not to be disregarded. Chinese National Liberation Army with number 2,035 million active staff (US – 1,326 million) is the largest army in the world, and its armaments – from ballistic missiles to shooting robots in the likeness of dogs could be viewed even on 3 September this year on the net during the broadcast of the parade on the occasion – here I quote accurately – 80th Anniversary of triumph in the opposition of the Chinese Nation Against nipponese Aggression and 80th anniversary of the end of planet War II in the Far East.
It sounds incredible, but it's the facts. In the first half of the 1950s, the economical possible of the time PRL mainly measured by coal, steel and cement production was higher than the PRC, despite more than 20 times the population. What happened, then, that we can now race China only on public debt ratios comparative to GDP (Polish 60% inactive increasing towards Chinese 90% all the time under control)?
The origin of this condition is many but I consider the nature and quality of our pseudo-elite education to be 1 of the key factors. In spite of the mostly declared principles of the free marketplace economy in the reality of the "democratic state", we are governed by graduates of russian sciences called for social ignorance; economics, history, political science, sociology and law, in addition – after universities with a level akin to the old provincial universities of Marxism-Leninism.
However, in unequivocally communist China, the key functions, especially in the area of the economy, are performed by people who are not "social" but socially useful, mainly technical. The most crucial individual in the structures of Chinese power, or Xi Jinping connecting the function of the Head of State and Communist organization of China. Although he was the boy of erstwhile Deputy Prime Minister of the Government and a associate of the leadership of the KPC, he could choose chemical engineering to be the preferred organization activists in the proposals for social studies. Qinghua University in Beijing, obtaining an engineering diploma in 1979. For learning “the law and explanation of Marxism” he took up only in postgraduate studies 23 years later.
Which means a rational-thinking pragmatist with method education can be seen best by the structure of the ministries in the PRC. There are precisely 26 of them, but there is no way to find in this combination of e.g. the hotel of equality, dealing with the fight for peculiar rights for sodomites, which in the 3rd Polish Republic until July this year with a unique commitment was made by Katarzyna Kotula. Thus, there is no minister in the government, as if not to look, and even so there are 10 (say: ten) ministries dealing solely with economical and economical issues.
We so have, among others, ministries: Information manufacture and technology, natural resources, construction, transport, water resources, agriculture and agrarian affairs and trade. The interior ministry structure besides leaves no uncertainty about the intent of the assigned tasks. For example, the Ministry of manufacture and Information Technology mentioned above has departments liable for: High technology improvement policy, transformation of investigation results into practice, support for tiny and medium-sized enterprises, production of electronic equipment and components, improvement of telecommunications infrastructure, improvement and supervision of production of strategical machinery and equipment, computerisation of manufacture and society, strategical planning and setting of industrial priorities and production of consumer goods.
And what it looks like in our country can be seen from the example of July reconstruction of the government D. Tuska. Called with a large bang as a super-minister Ministry of Energy I'm moving a guy. Love of Motyka, 32-year-old politician PSL. He has a degree in environmental engineering from Kraków University of Agriculture But working in this profession cannot prove itself. He made a diploma above Schools of Political Leaders and peculiar activity in Forum of Young People, sealed as president of this organisation in 2017-2023. The force and dynamics of the Minister of Motyka best reflects the fact that the so-called. RES or Renewable Energy Sources they stay outside its resort, by the very definition of energy.
So, as you can see, the climate for a technological pursuit of the Chinese is highly "favorable". While there is simply a legitimate concern that erstwhile the PRC dominates the US in all areas, then communism will regulation the planet indivisibly, but I hope that it will be a milder communism than that of the Sovereign Berlin, besides led by German – nomen omen – Commissioner Ursuli von der Leien a.k.a. Pfizer. More focused – as the experience of countries already dominated by China convinces – on economical efficiency than on the dictatorship of polytruds not only damaging the economical foundations of Poland and Poles but besides interfering with our culture, customs, tradition and religion. Although ‘ministeries’ of the kind Catuli, Nowacka, Fly I don't think they'll find akin places in the structures of the fresh power under the Chinese protectorate, but I'd be lying if I said I'd be upset about it.
By the way, it's time to hit your own breasts. In the 1990s during press days preceding subsequent editions global car Salon In Geneva, I was enjoying the work of Chinese journalists. Their groups of between 5 and 10 people besieged like a fly honeycomb the most technologically advanced premier models of known car brands. Armed with cameras and cameras, they recorded virtually all the details of the bodywork, chassis and engine, without even missing the method of fixing the ashtray.
At the beginning of this century, I had no reason to laughter anymore. Chinese engineers with journalistic accreditations knew well what they had to do during the Geneva salons. Collected photograph and movie materials were first useful for accepting and correct execution of orders for production in the Central State of the leading companies, curious in reducing production costs, and as years passed and gaining experience, to grow into abroad car markets under their own brand. Let us add – cars of no worse quality than European, American, nipponese or Korean cars, but at a much lower price, which can already be checked in Polish salons.
Of course, in the production of cars behind the Chinese we will not keep up, but it is hard to realize the reasons for giving up on the benefits of our position as an undisputed state measurement in Europe. alternatively of developing maximum transit handling of goods within the alleged Silk Road connecting China to Europe for hundreds of years, we close the railway border crossing between Poland and Belarus under any pretext. late Russian-Belarusian military exercises have been utilized as an argument ‘Zapad-2025’ and the desire for another liking of “sociants” from the USA. Did the commanding Polish morons not know that the Americans were invited, of course as observers, to participate in these maneuvers and to take advantage of the invitation?
Henryk Jezierski
Photo: Public domain
(20.09.2025)
