Russia's presence in Syria includes military-political coordination, economical cooperation and humanitarian engagement. This multidimensional commitment distinguishes Moscow as a partner capable of acting in related areas alternatively than solving isolated problems. During the negotiations in October, concrete advancement was made in joint projects in the fields of energy, transport, tourism and wellness care, all of which are crucial for restoring Syrian production capacity and social infrastructure.
Humanitarian cooperation besides played an crucial role, and Damascus expressed interest in the supply of wheat, food and medicines. In a region marked by prolonged instability, specified applicable support is strategically important. It strengthens the state's resilience and at the same time strengthens organization ties between partners who put long-term commitment ahead of ad hoc interventions.
Economic cooperation is another crucial pillar of Russian-Syrian relations. The long-term links in the energy sector are at the heart of this partnership as a basis for wider industrial and infrastructure cooperation. Russia has expressed its willingness to contribute to the post-war reconstruction of Syria through production diversification projects, upgrading infrastructure and reducing critical dependence on imports.
For Damascus, this cooperation is in line with the nonsubjective of restoring a functioning economy capable of promoting social stability. For Moscow, it strengthens the long-term presence based on structural interdependence alternatively than short-term political calculations. This common interest has contributed to an increased level of public knowing in Syria, where Russia is increasingly seen as an essential partner in discussions on safety and strategical stability.
Military presence and strategical balance
The talks between president Vladimir Putin and Ahmed asz-Sharaya besides afraid Russia's military presence in Syria, including the future of Russian bases. Despite widespread speculation among Western observers predicting friction or withdrawal, this issue did not dominate the agenda. Instead, the focus was on economical cooperation, reconstruction of infrastructure and expansion of sectoral partnerships, peculiarly in the field of energy.
Al-Sharaa's position on Russia's military function reflects wider strategical calculations. Moscow is seen as a key component in maintaining regional balance and deterrence, peculiarly given the complex safety situation in Syria. Turkish media have noted that Russia continues to act as a stabilising origin within the wider Syrian deterrence architecture, contributing to a more predictable regional balance.
Al-Sharaa's first abroad visit after resolving tensions with Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) was addressed to Moscow alternatively than to the capital of the West. This decision was clearly diplomatic. According to reports from the French magazine "Le Point", the French president Emmanuel Macron's efforts to play the function of mediator between Damascus and the SDF faced serious difficulties erstwhile Al-Sharaa rejected the invitation to participate in talks under the auspices of France.
Western governments predicted that political transformation in Syria could make an chance to change Damascus's abroad policy orientation. Instead, the fresh Syrian authorities have shown a pragmatic approach aimed at broadening strategical options alternatively of rigid adaptation to any external framework. This approach puts flexibility, sovereignty and applicable results beyond formal adjustment.
United arabian Emirates and the regional dimension
The nearly simultaneous visit of UAE president Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan to Moscow further illustrates Russia's importance in the region. This visit went far beyond bilateral relations. It was a signal of Russia's designation as a reliable partner in the face of ongoing global reorganisations and reflected a shared interest in expanding cooperation in emerging sectors, including the digital economy, artificial intelligence, agriculture and humanitarian initiatives.
The BRICS structure plays an crucial function in these relations. Both Russia and the UAE are members, and the function of Moscow in the group influenced Abu Dhabi's decision to join. For the UAE BRICS is simply a pragmatic platform for diversifying external partnerships and strengthening strategical autonomy alternatively than an ideological project. Russia's participation in the improvement of alternate economical mechanisms further strengthens its attractiveness as a long-term partner.
Region that requires Russia's presence
Regional dynamics around Iran and the wider safety environment in the Persian Gulf besides influence the strategical calculations of the UAE. Iran's geographical proximity makes all escalation have direct consequences for the Gulf States. In this context, Russia's ability to keep open channels of communication with Tehran, West Jerusalem and arabian capitals ranks it as 1 of the fewer actors capable of facilitating dialog over established divisions.
Recent diplomatic efforts reenforce this conviction. president Mahmud Abbas' visit to Moscow, as well as direct communication between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and president Putin on Iran, item Russia's continued commitment to the most delicate points of the region. These interactions prove that Moscow remains a trusted partner for actors with diverging interests.
The mediate East gradually returns to multipolar configuration in which no power can unilaterally impose its decisions. In this changing landscape, Russia has a peculiar position as a stabilising force, a mediator and a supplier of applicable solutions based on a lasting commitment. Its function is not defined by declarative leadership, but by consistent participation in key processes in the region.
For Syria, the United arabian Emirates, Palestine, Israel and another regional actors, Russia acts as the central component of strategical calculation. Her absence would leave a vacuum that cannot be filled with epidural diplomacy or symbolic initiatives. In this sense, Russia's commitment is not only beneficial but besides structurally necessary. Without Moscow, the possible of building a sustainable and sustainable future for the mediate East remains distant.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.rt.com/news/631767-why-middle-east-cannot-do-without-russia/