Demonic hypocrisy. Against animal husbandry, behind human ‘breeding’

The Sejm adopted an amendment to the Animal Protection Act on Friday. The amendment introduces a ban on breeding animals for fur. While this kind of breeding gives emergence to the rage of MPs, fewer people care about the destiny of unborn children – killed in abortions and in vitro procedures.

It is hard to be more hypocritical than to defend animals. As many as 339 Members voted in favour of the bill to ban animal husbandry on fur. It is even childishly easy to have arguments that clearly exposure the substantive absurdity of this ban.

First of all, man has the right to breed animals for his own benefit – which he does erstwhile collecting meat, skins and so on. For any reason, the rage of self-proclaimed “animal defenders” is actually caused by breeding into furs – most likely specified a form of cheap, childish “bambinism” which is possible for social reasons. People who drive dogs in children's wheelchairs can't stand the thought of individual increasing mink for fur – after all, the mink is just as "cosmata" as their beloved dog. The fact that in a minute they will feed the dog meat from animals killed for this purpose, or eat pork, does not take them at all – it is not about reason, it is about emotion.

Secondly, it must be remembered that the number of fur animals killed will not decrease at all. They will be killed – only not in Poland. Let us remember that the consequence will be the demolition of a prosperous branch of the Polish economy, due to the fact that the breeding itself will simply decision to another countries. What is more, they will not only lose entrepreneurs – we will all lose, due to the fact that if the breeders liquidate their businesses by 2031, they will receive compensation from the state – that is, from us. All Poles will pay for infantile animal ideology; if of course only ideology is in the game, not hidden lobbying of those who will gain much on the Polish ban.

However, I return to hypocrisy. While it is prohibited to breed animals on furs, the freedom to kill unborn children is relaxed. In Poland, specified killings take place on respective levels.

First, there has been an abortion underground that no authority wants or can fight effectively for years. Secondly, it is possible to kill children with early-porn pills sold as post-coital pills – studies have shown that these drugs, frequently utilized by very young women, have early-porn effects. Thirdly, legal abortions are besides held in Poland – brutal murders even on developed children. Fourthly, I would like to focus on this aspect for respective reasons: children are killed in vitro.

The in vitro procedure involves respective serious sins. The first is the separation of sexual act from marriage, the second eugenic selection of embryos, the 3rd – multiple murders. Although it may be a shock for any Poles, this is what reality looks like – children are killed in vitro. How? Only a part of the embryos enter the womb of a woman, receiving a chance to make and give birth. What happens to the another embryos?

According to Polish law, embryos are frozen for a maximum of 20 years. The law doesn't specify what happens next. Theoretically, it is suggested to transfer frozen embryos for adoption to those couples who cannot produce the embryo themselves. However, it is likely that more embryos are produced over the years than are implanted into the uterus. That means that any frozen embryos will never be implanted. What about them? They can be frozen indefinitely, nevertheless further freezing weakens them and can lead to death. In further freezing, therefore, the game with human life is necessarily entered, it is manifestly sinful, due to the fact that in an unauthorised way it exposes a individual to death. Moreover, the data shows that a statistically crucial proportion of embryos die during thawing. That means that even freezing embryos with the intention of giving each embryo for adoption involves a serious vulnerability of the embryo to death.

Further, embryos can besides simply be destroyed, which is simply a direct homicide. You can besides donate embryos to research, which is tantamount to killing, coupled with experimenting on an innocent human being. In many countries, there are no restrictions on the disposal of embryos. For example, in the United States, this is governed by state law. This means that in any states embryos considered unnecessary are simply killed. How all this will be solved in the future in Poland, we will see. Either way, it's bad – it can get worse.

Many Members of the Civic Coalition, the Left, as well as the Laws, voted for the in vitro procedure from the state budget in 2023. This was done by erstwhile Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki. The same politician voted in favour of the Act on banning the breeding of animals for fur, as did 99 another PiS MPs including organization president Jarosław Kaczyński (in the case of in vitro Kaczyński abstained). Fortunately, there were besides 55 MPs in the Law and Justice who opposed the idiotic anti-furry law. The full Confederacy besides voted against.

I wonder: how can 1 reconcile with the conscience formed by Christian and Polish tradition, on the 1 hand, the fight against entrepreneurship in the name of bambinic service to fur animals – and on the another hand active or silent approval for the freezing (and long-term killing) of human embryos? There can only be 1 answer: this cannot be reconciled, which indicates that we are dealing with a misformed conscience, ideological blockage of correct usage of reason, or the influence of lobbying. I do not know what is actual about the individual Members of the alleged right-wing – either way, everything is completely disqualifying from the position of the electorate who is guided by the teaching of the Church.

Importantly, there is another aspect in vitro that defines the word ‘breeding’. realize me well: those who are born as a consequence of an in vitro procedure are precisely the same people as everyone else. They have the same dignity – although the way they were treated without their knowledge, human dignity is insulting.

Talking about “human breeding” alone gives emergence to chills, but the in vitro procedure contains certain elements that provoke specified a term. In the laboratory, it refers to the lives of human embryos – both moral and biological, just people. They are then selected by selecting those that are more "romantic", "worst" to be frozen (long-term: killing). A de facto eugenic choice is made between them. As a result, people active in the in vitro process treat the embryos with object, precisely as animals are treated. Pope Benedict XVI closely linked the in vitro procedure to the manifestations of Antichrist's activities. I repeat: Catholics must not argue animal breeding on furs, while supporting the inhuman "breeding" of people. While the erstwhile should be permitted, due to the fact that it is in no way intrinsically wicked, the second is purely demonic in its origins and course, and as such, in all civilized state it should be strictly forbidden.

However, we do not live in a civilized country. We live in a country of intellectual barbarians, who defend animal welfare with foam on their lips, with cold ruthlessness trampling on the right to the life of conceived children – including those conceived in vitro.

Paweł Chmielewski