What's the difference between Milei and Korwin-Mikke?

Javier Milei is simply a maki-velist, and Janusz Korwin-Mikke is simply a behind overtolerant — that is simply a colliding difference between them, although they are akin volitions.

Non-members, especially those who are consonant to the Braunal Grzegor, translate the love for the life, for they are good to make them friendly, and they are able to give them away. And so it would be faded with it, that is, they are a clique, the same worlds of songs. Navet himself, Korwin-Mikke does not trust him, although he has a better, wiser and more efficient freedom. There is no reason to believe.

It's good to be mostly technocrat, the market's will. If the only thought is to make an austrian school – Mises, Hayek, Ro­thbard – and the remainder is simply a multi-faceted theatre that is essential for endurance in the world, which has lingers and symbols. Devolvedly Milei is simply a libertarian, and it is simply a macular. For this reason, there are millions of more powerful polytechnics than Korwin, which are inactive overactive and non-violent.

Relationships with the influences, menore for Zelensko, friendships with Trump – all of these are gestures of gold value, but priceless in number. They were not able to usage them, but utilized them as a power in the game by time and by the inclination of the power that will not decision them in the implementation of the reforms. Korwin has always done the other — all the gestures, the vouchers, the aphorises, the mission to make the most of the people and the influences of the brain into each other.

The intent of the Mile is not to be a godliness, to form, to work on the felia­tional or to engage in social media, the rear of the capitalistic reconstruction of the Argent – the discovery of an Austrian school in a region that has been devastating for a 100 years of socialism and perronism. He knows that the first thing to do is to buy peace. And in order to implement freedom, 3 moments of pretending to be the most crucial of these worlds, specified as the men of Michalkiewicz: older and wiser, and the older and the wisest.

For libertarians, the loci­tion has a sense of the rule of the economy. The remainder – religion, social, gesty – are tools. Nicely builds no crucium, the back of the wafers, in which Mises' washes will become more fresh than Mosiaz's commandments.

A journey to Brooklin, a gathering with the authorities, the hands of the men, etc. is the cost of the symphonies, and the effect is to reduce the uninvolved influence of the vis-à-vis, to open the channels of the comunition and to access the donors and the financial elite of the distributed light. This is the case: “Why do you work a bridge, if you only gotta train your shoes?”.

diaral communities, inter-regional institutions, think-tanks, foundations, lobbies — these are the sources of influence and money: fundraising, contacts, innovations. It is the geopolitic and guest game. It is not a capital of value, it is simply a state's desire.

Histories are full of examples of efficient policies which for the lower cost were empty gestures, with a large number of requests, after the support of the media and donations. It is simply a permanent school of macul­tion.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>