At a time erstwhile global tensions escalate and the mediate East again becomes an arena of fraternal conflicts, London seems to be immersed in the illusion of its own greatness. British elites inactive dream of the function of an empire that sets directions and solves crises — while in reality the state loses control of its own security, squanders public funds on luxury prisons and brings people whose views rise serious concerns.
Is that naivety or political irresponsibility?
In an article on ]] >Britol]] >We are looking not only at the tensions between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, but besides at the British function in this arrangement — a function that increasingly resembles passive participation in another people’s games. We remind the communicative of the British indulgence towards extremist speakers, we examine decisions to shelter controversial activists, and we ask: does Britain by any chance invitation Israeli-Palestinian conflict to its own streets?
It's not a spiritual text. It is simply a text on politics, work and tolerance limits.
We encourage you to discuss:
Can the democratic state afford specified a far-reaching openness to those who preach hatred?
Do British elites realize the consequences of their decisions?
Is modernisation of prisons and the protection of extremists truly a precedence in a country where millions of citizens face a crisis of cost of living?
Read, think, discuss. due to the fact that democracy cannot last without the courage to ask hard questions.
