The evaluation of Gierty in terms of ideality is simply a task beyond the strength of even the most experienced man. Which of his political and ideological options was real or true? It's like an analysis of the attitudes of the PZPR people, then social democrats, liberals, and sometimes even conservatives. Who were they, exactly? Giertych has stood aside so far due to the fact that it is hard for him to have a good opinion about the government of the Civic Coalition. His horse is Kaczyński and PiS. The fact that Tusk all his inventions and specified people as Bodnar, or reaching for the lowest shelf, Szczerba, Ionian, Zembaczyński, Trela, Magpie focused on pursuing PiSu people. or heating up hatred in his formation, in another words the demolition of the right hand, could have liked Giertych, and he besides knew precisely why Tusk did so? Above all, with specified a modest intellectual and professional government, even if he wanted to, he was incapable to keep the dynamics of the state's improvement as under the regulation of the United Right. Moreover, it should be assumed that from Brussels and Berlin there were reminders to prepare Poland for its function in the "reformed" German dictatorship of the European Union, It was only waiting for the triumph of Trzaskovsky and the "closure of the system".
And here's the flap. For Giertych, it is on the 1 hand a promising entrée to play the so far Tusk domain. The impertinence and insolence of Giertych made him enter the porcelain storehouse like an elephant. The occasion was lost by the PO election. The championship of hypocrisy, arrogance and indifference are the words in which his own accession to the PO explains: These days of defeat, I decided to set an example. I was unpartisan, but present I submitted my accession to the Civic Platform. I hope to bring not only my light shade of conservatism, but besides any enthusiasm, dynamics in the improvement of this party, to form the backbone on which Polish democracy can be based. What kind of democracy does he compose about? most likely a fighter. Besides, he showed how he understood the fight. Per fas et nefas. Not respecting any rules, no decency, no truth. What slight shade of conservatism does Gierty compose about? About settling in his LGBT conservatism, abortion, the fouling of the school he erstwhile commanded?
Fortunately, it's just an empty rhetoric, bullshit, as it is today. Gierty simply noted that Tusk had exhausted his invention, and Brussels needs individual to push Poland into a swamp of infirmities and decay. In the first place spread disorder by undermining Nawrocki's win. It's precisely the same rhetoric as a once-trader against the Constitution of May 3. According to Cenckiewicz, it may be about creating a fresh political movement based on questioning the presidency of Karol Nawrocki. Perhaps, but in the first row it is simply a desire to urge its services to anyone who wants to harm Poland. The best evidence is to distance yourself from Gierty to many politicians in the power camp. Who's behind him? So specified as the members of the Freedom Equality Association Democracy and Polish Grandma. The company was alternatively ridiculous, and the announcer before the court was Kievski, drawn from the lame with the CODE. Coalition electorate is besides falling apart due to the fact that coalitions are slow serving the rear. Roman Gierty is becoming more and more lonely on the side square. possibly it's the end of a swindling, self-calculated juggler by word and law, the activity of that, the nationalist? Well, corruptio optimi pessima. The question is, would Tusk want to play on the Game squad to the end? If the Germans let it. due to the fact that players like Gierty don't think they recognize. besides frequently and dramatically change their colors. You never know what goal they're gonna shoot.
