Have you heard of Ukraine? It's so close to our east border. For any time, the media has not mentioned him much in their major releases. seemingly there's nothing there worth mentioning. And inactive recently, in all the relays, they were fond of inserts consecutive from the Ukrainian propaganda ministry. They described in item the smallest events, almost all projectile fired and all Ukrainian canoe heroically standing against a fleet of warships. Now, as if less, and to learn something, you gotta search the net portals, and there we read:
The transition of Ukraine's Armed Forces to the defensive on most operational directions seems to be planned and the army's ability to carry out defensive activities is inactive significant. On the another hand, the capabilities of the Russian Federation's army are now limited by the large losses incurred during the summertime activities in Zaporozh and Donbasa. The agressor introduces the remaining and recently created reserves, but its aggravating actions are dispersed in many directions.
It does not take much insight to read the fact from behind this propaganda fresh talk supposedly independent journalists selling authoritative narrative. "Planned" transition to the defensive, i.e. the defeat of Ukraine and Russia's advantage "in many directions".
The Ukrainian commander-in-chief of General Deserved admitted that the offensive had failed. Front's stopped. Ukrainians were trapped in Russian minefields and fortifications. Without the giant support of the West, the General argues, there is no way to change the situation. And the losses are increasing. At the same time, the diplomatic salons are talking more and more about ceasefire. Is the West tired of war and forcing Ukraine to make territorial concessions? Is there a ceasefire coming?
That's right, ceasefire, and possibly peace talks. Why weren't they possible before? Why only now in the face of defeat? An interesting background is given here by the interview conducted by Jakub Dymek of Lily Lynch, entitled Realists were right., published in the weekly Review and on substack J. Dymka. What were the realists right about that? So it's said that the efforts of the West were besides small. So the US and NATO should send more, another 100 billion in equipment and ammunition to Ukraine. That's the large realism. Unfortunately, realists do not know how to bring back another 100,000 people. The average age of Ukrainian soldiers is presently 43 years. But possibly individual realistically should note that this war may not have happened, but that for years all the West's actions towards Russia and Ukraine have led to it and what we now have is the natural consequence of this policy. It's a result. Russia's supposedly unprovoked attack on Ukraine was her inevitable defensive consequence to NATO's actions. Independent journalists and another people who have been able to think on their own for a long time warned against specified a possibility, but were ignored and silenced.
This may not have happened, but the Democratic West preferred to support neo-Nazi movements in Ukraine and to exploit and intensify the divisions there. Just before the war, Western media showed neo-Nazis and warned against them. Moments later, it all disappeared, the taboo theme, only Western televisions had problem choosing the right shots of Ukrainian troops so that the swastikas did not get besides close to the eyes.
There may not have been a war. Agreements were to be respected, including the part where the rights of Russian-speaking citizens of east Ukraine were guaranteed. Now Russia no longer believes in assurances, so it guarantees them at the expense of Ukraine's territorial concessions. In order to avoid this, it was adequate to respect the promises made to Gorbachev or at least the Minsk Agreements, but as Angela Merkel admitted, they were made solely to deceive Russia and gain time to arm Ukraine. Did anyone anticipate Russia to proceed to watch idlely, or would it yet respond to the provocations of “unprovoked aggression”? Why do we feel that the United States has the right to fight for their interests armedly at any point in the globe, while Russia cannot do so even at its borders?
Even after the start of the war, there was a chance for peace, on 5 March 2022 the Prime Minister of Israel Naftali Bennett held talkswhich may have led to an agreement. They would be much more beneficial to Ukraine than possible now. However, under force from Britain and the United States, this did not happen. These countries were not curious in the good of Ukraine, but in the war to weaken Russia at all Ukrainian prices. I will not mention here the addresses of all my earlier posts documenting the subject. Sometimes I presented my translations of articles written by people who knew these matters better than I did. Those curious will find everything by searching the list for my home page.
Those who completely and uncritically accepted the authoritative communicative of a peaceful democratic country abruptly and without reason attacked by the empire of evil will not realize the current situation. Those who had previously ignored the fact that the democratically elected president had been overthrown, a civilian war going on for 8 years, during which neo-Nazi troops killed 14 1000 civilians in the east provinces of Ukraine. Who does not believe, let him read, 1 of many examples: Amnesty global — Ukraine: Summary killings during the conflict in east Ukraine: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur50/042/2014/en/
The ignorance and the highest degree of stupidity was illustrated by the gibberish of a writer in Tok FM enjoying the fact that since the outbreak of the war Ukrainians have no longer wanted to talk Russian. This sage did not want to know that it is the native language for many citizens of east Ukraine, and now they do not usage it due to the fact that they fear their Nazi fellows. People are afraid to talk their native language in their own country. Indeed, there is something to rejoice about. Immediately afterwards, the democratic president ordered all Russian-speaking books to be expelled from the libraries. Does that remind you of anything?
In Jakub Dymek's conversation with the realist about Ukraine, there is small about Ukraine itself, but much about the opinions of American wise men and the interior politics of the US. There's nothing about a ruined country, killed, mutilated and deprived of human possessions. Areas unfit for life due to mines assumed by both sides, but besides generously supplied by western cluster ammunition allies and depleted uranium. What matters is the US's interior policy, the interests of politicians and the opinion of experts.
This is what happens erstwhile countries and sometimes only their leaders agree to be a toy in the hands of a abroad power. And it doesn't substance whether it's an American empire, whether it's global billionaires, or whether it's various allegedly good global organizations like the EU, NATO, or WHO.
The U.S. task of Ukraine was to wage a replacement war to weaken Russia at all costs. The price was advanced and Russia came out of the clash reinforced. Similarly, the sanctions hit those who imposed them the most. And now Uncle Sam got bored of the toy and went looking for a fresh one.
Now Ukraine is talking about joining the European Union. The criteria for this accession were never met by Ukraine, being an undemocratic country with an unstable currency and economy and the largest corruption in Europe. Now it's much worse, the country is ruined, and corruption fueled by the arms trade is bigger than always (only 30% of the weapon delivered hits the front). The political opposition and institutions of the democratic state were broken by the regime, and most of the national assets are in the hands of American corporations through oligarchs. spiritual freedom has been abolished, now the state decides which religions can act. Even trade unions and workers' rights ceased to exist. So I think there is something incorrect with this accession to the EU, but how can we small people know what they think and how the large planet decides? Is plebs allowed to justice them?
It is likely that billionaire globalists have recognised that an authoritarianly-managed country with damaged social ties is an excellent field for introducing their latest ideas: digital currency, digital recognition of citizens, 15-minute cities, forced vaccination of everyone for everything and vaccine passports, restrictions on the ability of average citizens to have goods. The list can be extended. I am convinced that shortly there will be funds allegedly to rebuild, and in fact to build the dystopia invented by globalists as if the demolition and misery caused by the war itself were few.
And for us, the past of Ukraine should be a lesson and a warning. The country and its citizens are not built to service abroad interests, thanking global capital, the Union, the USA or the WEF. The choice of political regulation with full mouths of clichés, but in reality serving abroad interests It always ends badly for the country and the people surviving in it.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Sign up for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
