After the 2023 election and the triumph of the groups led by Donald Tusk, it was time for the next step, which, along with the current Prime Minister, was performed by Minister Adam Bodnar. It is to address the notification to the European Commission and the Council of the European Union of accession to the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO). We can shortly see its possible strength and tragic impact on Poland, thanks to the trap in the Treaty of Lisbon, which may shortly prove that Poles will be put before courts for the alleged “talk of hatred” by EU prosecutors.
The second bottom of the rules establishing the European Public Prosecutor's Office
It seems that the substance of joining the European Public Prosecutor's Office is trivial and, in the average sense, necessary. After all, the Prosecutor's Office will be tasked with conducting investigations, bringing and supporting prosecutions and bringing actions against crimes against the EU budget, specified as fraud, corruption, money laundering and cross-border VAT fraud. Let the average Pole not realize why individual could argue specified crucial tasks of the European Public Prosecutor's Office – he will cut off the propaganda of abroad media power in Poland. Meanwhile, we should all argue the thought of joining the EPPO, because, as is usually the case with the law established by the left, behind the lofty issues there are records that are to tame the Polish indigenous people, who have not yet grown up to the "EU version of Europe". However, if individual raises their head, they must convince Poles that the fight will concern the establishment of a fresh prosecutorial power, which Brussels will make its fresh oligarchy in Poland. This will be in 1 row with media and abroad capital operating in Poland. They will defend external interests and service as panic tools to cut off the heads of those who disagree with Mittelleuropa's project.
What will the conviction for hatred speech look like?
Let us mention a case not far distant concerning the president of the Pro Foundation – Right to Life, Mariusz Dzierżawski, who was convicted of defamation of LGBT activists. How were activists defamed? Informing Poles, among others, about the results of technological investigation on the links between homosexuality and pedophilia. On the foundation website we can read: The court stated that it was on it [M. Dzierżawski – cars.] It is the burden of proving the content presented by the Foundation, after which the justice did not mention at all to written conclusions from serious technological articles which confirmed the thesis voiced during the "Stop Peedophilia" action. Then the court rejected almost all the questions that the defender tried to ask witnesses and refused to appoint a key witness for the Foundation. The evidence in writing was ignored by the court, the witnesses of the prosecution were not allowed to ask questions due to the fact that the court had abrogated them and the appointment of an crucial witness was refused1. The Gdańsk-South territory Court sentenced Mariusz Dzierżawski to a year of restrictions on freedom of 20 hours of social work per month, ordered the apology of the victims, as well as payment of PLN 15 1000 in the Polish Humanitarian Action and the payment of judicial costs. Since present the court convicts the citizen for presenting technological facts on the streets of Polish cities, what awaits us after the changes that the uniocrats are preparing for us utilizing the phrase “talk of hatred”? In fact, this will block the ability to defend the actual European values of the right to life of all man or based on Catholic morality. That's the point!
Lisbon Treaty with a cross-border trap
The Treaty of Lisbon established the alleged European Public Prosecutor's Office in Chapter 4 in Article 69e. The authors of the treaty, knowing how crucial it is for the United States of Europe to establish a European Public Prosecutor's Office and knowing the reality of the opposition of the governments of the associate States, left a evidence in which we can read that in the event of disagreement and where at least 9 associate States want to establish enhanced cooperation on the basis of the draft Regulation concerned, they shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission thereof. In specified a case, the authorisation to undertake enhanced cooperation shall be considered (...)2. This was the way the European Public Prosecutor's Office was established, which did not include Poland, which, despite this, was more successful in the fight against VAT mafia than most associate States reinforced with European prosecutors. In my opinion, however, the effectiveness of the European Public Prosecutor's Office was not the reason for the resignation of an authority that could fight organised crime. The most probable origin was the gateway, which allowed the scope of the European Public Prosecutor's Office to be expanded. Paragraph 4 of that Article gives the European Council the chance to amend paragraph 1. We can read there that The European Council may, at the same time or later, adopt a decision amending paragraph 1 in order to extend the powers of the EPPO to combat serious crime with a cross-border dimension and to amend paragraph 2 accordingly with respect to perpetrators and accomplices of serious crimes affecting more than 1 associate State. The European Council shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament and after consulting the Commission.. What does that mean? First of all, that the designers of this treaty have given themselves time to prepare changes among resilient European countries. Secondly, knowing that the EU is so designed (and in peculiar its electoral system) that it is they that give it direction, and that sooner or later, to change power in the countries that halt integration, they have left themselves a door to grow the competence of the European Public Prosecutor's Office in another countries and then to grow its competence. The likelihood that in any "democratic" associate State the power will for the next decade only be evocative is zero. However, erstwhile this pro-EU, knowingly or not, will bring the European Public Prosecutor's Office to its country. Thirdly, erstwhile specified a country enters the EPPO project, it will be possible to discipline the ecclesiasts by means of EU prosecutorial structures. European prosecutors in Poland will find any flawed settlement of funds, which are common present and are destroying the European market. peculiar political committees granting EU funds will look for reasons not to grant money to companies that support specified pro-European but anti-EU extremists. EU funds have dominated the marketplace so much that without them it is impossible to compete with another companies that usage them. This arrangement creates a marketplace enslaved by the central, centralised economy that will slow destruct the EU utopia as the commune destroyed the USSR. Therefore, we have 1 certainty, only postponed in time, that shortly the European Public Prosecutor's Office will be able to prosecute people in the Union for alleged hatred speech, and this may enable it to say "cross-border crime". Why?
How hatred speech becomes cross-border
The president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has already included information on the extension of EPPO competence in her programme. The European Public Prosecutor's Office should have greater power and powers, should be able to handle and prosecute cross-border terrorism cases – it has communicated to MEPs in the European Parliament. This was inactive a phase erstwhile the European Commission, which it led, tried to extend the competence of the European Public Prosecutor's Office by demonstrating that terrorism is simply a cross-border crime. It should be added that in this way, she has embarked on a brave fight against the mistakes of the EU's multiculti policy, and the consequences of the multicultural utopia of politicians from Brussels are borne by everyone. Raped women, attacked civilians, or victims of assassinations. However, the question should be asked, was it not a sophisticated game that was geared from the beginning to grow the competences of EPPO in European countries? 1 extension of the scope of the cases that the European Prosecutors can deal with will facilitate public openness to another, and the Treaty of Lisbon and its provision on the extension of EPPO competence are proof that specified a plan was from the start.
In September 2021, the European Commission sent a communication to the European Parliament and the European Council entitled: More inclusive and safe Europe: extending the list of EU crimes to incite hatred and hatred crimes. Its author is nobody but the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen. You will not read anything about the European Public Prosecutor's Office in her communication. However, there is much about hatred speech, which has become a problem of the heaviest importance and, most importantly, the cross-border dimension of hatred speech has been discovered there. The cross-border dimension of hatred crimes is straight linked to the cross-border dimension of hatred speech. hatred moves across national borders, leading to a spiral of violence. As in the case of hatred speech, the ideology behind hatred crimes can be developed internationally and spread rapidly online – written Ursula von der Leyen4. Her communication lists anti-Semitism-related behaviours, but not only. We can besides read that the EU will supply a strong consequence under criminal law in peculiar on grounds of sex, sexual orientation, age and disability4. Reading these passages, I had before my eyes the hateful hordes of abortion supporters in the streets of Polish cities in 2020, who threw bottles and stones at people defending churches, but unfortunately I did not find specified examples of hatred in the European Commission document. Although Christians are the most persecuted social group in the planet (also in the EU), I have not found any mention of them in this material. However, the missing link, which will shortly grow the competence of the European Public Prosecutor's Office, has been revealed. This is terrorism and hatred speech become cross-border crimes. Let me just remind you that the European Council in accordance with Article 69e(4) of the Treaty of Lisbon may amend paragraph 1 to extend the powers of the EPPO to combat serious cross-border crime. All that is needed is the unity of the European Council. Seeing that in many cases he is already letting go alone (among another things by the erstwhile Government of Law and Justice) in the fight of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, I fear that this will happen sooner than we think.
Of course, I do not argue here with the message that hatred speech and terrorism are of a cross-border nature, I effort to make it clear that this was a key formulation for further implementation of the plan of the State of Europe, another part of the puzzle which will take distant the anticipation of real countering the effort to destruct Poland.
Delayed ignition bomb
In Poland everything happens in an undetected way. In December 2023, the government accepted the Minister of Justice's request to join the European Public Prosecutor's Office, and in January this year sent formal notification of accession to the European Commission and the European Council. The same period in Luxembourg, representatives of the European Public Prosecutor's Office met with the acting National Prosecutor Jacek Bilewicz and Deputy Minister of Justice Arkadiusz Myrch, and the European Prosecutor Laura Kövesi arrived in Poland at the end of January. In no communication has anyone informed about the European Commission's plans to grow the competence of the European Public Prosecutor's Office, nor has anyone said what cross-border offences are, which could extend the competences of the EPPO. In fact, it is no surprise that Minister Bodnar is pursuing the nonsubjective of joining the European Public Prosecutor's Office. Knowing his views, I am alternatively amazed by many political environments that they do not make this a major social topic. We all know him from the blind defence of LGBT environments, which he believed were persecuted in Poland. Strange, due to the fact that so far I have not personally known any of the people who have been fired from work by their homosexual tendencies, but I know a fewer people who have lost their jobs due to the fact that they have defended the values that have built a strong Europe.
Another way to extend the powers of the EPPO
The European Union's transition to an increasingly centralised state existence leads to 2 ways: authoritative and unexplored. I have written about this second method above, called it in the Union through the transfer of competences. It is nothing more than the usage of EU law and bodies for permanent changes in the EU's rules of operation through its interior regulations. The first, official, concerns changes to the alleged Treaties of the European Union, which are global agreements on the organisational order, the legal order of the European Union and indicate its alleged values. The current changes voted in November 2023 by the European Parliament, which require, inter alia, the approval of the European Council, are called by their authors and supporters the constitution of the United States of Europe. Any similarity with the United States of North America must be rejected. Whoever examines these 2 lives will shortly announcement how different the ideas for statehood are. We should besides pay attention to the religious, cultural and historical differences in these 2 areas. The faith, culture and past of Europe make talking about the State of Europe a specified utopia that will lead to tragedy. But I'll compose about it another time. I'll go back to the authoritative road. It has many drawbacks, 1 of which is its time-consumingness. The founding fathers of the European Union have seen this, who have not lived to see the plans they have made. However, we can see how, step by step, the treaty after the treaty, brings about results and their dream, in which they dreamt false peace for Europe. The continuationrs of their plan work and step by step accomplish its next objectives, even if this would mean enslavement for millions of Europeans!
It is worth stopping for a while and indicating what integration is and how peace is seen by the German elite. The peace was mentioned in the context of the Mitteleuropa task by Paul Anton de Lagarde, who stated that: Peace in Europe will prevail erstwhile Germany reaches from Ems to the mouth of the Danube, from the Sound to Trieste, from Metz to Bug, erstwhile united German forces defeat France and Russia. due to the fact that the full planet wants peace, it must accept Germany within specified limits5. In 1951, we besides learned how Germany understood integration. Then the Minister of Commerce in Konrad Adenauer's government asked Dr Seebolm Does Free Europe want to join Germany. He spoke of Germany as The heart of Europe and that it is the body that should adapt to the heart, not the another way around6. In the same year, Adenauer was to consider the creation of a strong Europe economically and politically strong as the only way leading to the recovery of east territories by Germany6. Poles must realize that the knowing of the meanings of individual words by the German elite differs from ours, and they must always be analysed by the prism of the German interest. It is amazing that in the light of hard and bloody historical Polish-German relations it is inactive essential to remind about this.
Let us now look at the proposed changes in the treaties. I have already mentioned the current article in the Treaty of Lisbon, which requires the unanimity of the European Council to extend the powers of the EPPO. It will be replaced entirely by an amendment which gives the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations, in accordance with the average legislative procedure, to lay down the rules on the functioning of the EPPO. Another way of changing the functioning of EPPO will so be. Europe will stay voluntary in this regard. Looking at the remaining changes that will take distant the unanimity rule from the associate States, this will in practice mean that Euro MPs from France, Italy, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany, who are the EU's leadership group from the outset, will be able to impose the principles of action of the European Public Prosecutor's Office. That is not all, due to the fact that in the same way they will be able to decide on many another matters related to neocolonia Poland.
With the European Parliament's vote on the amendments to the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, many provisions have besides been amended to strengthen the direction of European eco-security. Despite the mediocre economical performance of the EU, eco-ideology will become a valid legal doctrine. another amendments make the European Union an economical and ideological community. An example is another amendment voted by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, where Article 3 adds point 2a as follows: Everyone has the right to individual autonomy, to free, informed, full and universal access to wellness and sexual and reproductive rights and to all related non-discriminatory healthcare services, including access to safe and legal abortion7. A large fresh world! If these changes are accepted in the further legislative process, freedom of expression will be limited, and in fact, depending on the explanation of the rules by prosecutors and courts, even prohibited. Publicists, politicians, social activists, as long as they offend 1 of the EU's favoured groups, will be publically accused and convicted, as mentioned in this material, president Mariusz Dzierżawski. erstwhile again: this law is being prepared for a designated group of people who identify with the natural law and the actual values of Europe. The ideological tyranny will be a common doctrine in Europe, and the strategy will be based on a closed caste: judges and politicians, who, as the father of public relations Edward Bernays wrote, will in many cases not even be aware of the existence of their control groups themselves, due to the fact that an crucial feature of democratic society is the conscious and intelligent control of the behaviour and opinions of the crowd. Those who manipulate these processes in society make an invisible government with real power over the country8. Are those with real power over the government of souls in Poland Poles? Or do Poles only service (among another things through the erstwhile Government of Law and Justice) by creating an oligarchical strategy of power over neocolonia? I leave the answer to my readers. It is worth reminding who in Poland contributed to the further legislative way of these scandalous amendments. It was voted by Euro MPs elected in Poland specified as Łukasz Kohut, Róża Thun, Sylwia Spurek, Marek Balt, Marek Belka, Robert Biedron, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Bogusław Liberadzki and Leszek Miller. Let us remember these names – although I do not know if individual will interpret my words as hatred speech.
A fresh large Man
The European Union, which was expected to take care of the economical dimension of the European countries, has abruptly become a moral oversight body that wants to discipline all those who usage hatred speech. The problem is that the hard setting of facts can besides be considered specified a speech. All those who do not want to be “cool” in the EU, but want to defend the fact by showing the facts, and who besides do not want to realize that the Catholic religion and its principles should be on the dump of history, will gotta admit that Europe is no place for them. Unless they dream of a European prison! Tough and legal and actual nonsubjective arguments can hurt. On the another hand, if a Catholic is hurt, he desecrates places of worship, they are not yet acts of hatred, due to the fact that courts acquitted people who commit various kinds of profanations. Strangely, the most common perpetrators are people associated with the LGBT community. Then how do you realize the speech of hatred? Where can we find a definition that will make all social group right through discussion to search the truth? Unfortunately, it's not about the truth. It's about power that can be gained by utilizing number groups. The cost is the suffering of children utilized by homosexual pedophiles, and approval to do so is possible even with the hands of conviction courts for presenting technological data on pedophilia crimes in these environments. Children will become “right” victims, and a utopian imagination of the integration of “founding fathers” – the State of Europe – will be realized in their suffering. fewer people know that for the emergence of the United States of Europe, as Martin Schultz called the project, a fresh man is needed. Prof. Jerzy Chodorowski wrote: The main nonsubjective of European integration constructors was to transform Europeans' national awareness into pan-European awareness and thus form a fresh man for the coming era of globalisation. At the same time, he recognized that people were needed to carry out the utopia and then to proceed it, and that the utopia was connected with the request to rise a fresh man. It must be a fresh man who would approve the negation of certain natural laws, which is at the heart of the Utopian doctrine program9. That is why the Church and the Catholic national state are on a collision course with the United States of Europe, and all man who believes in the actual values of Europe, speaking of them, will be accused of the alleged “talk of hatred”. Can we inactive fight for a change of direction in which we are united around the utopian task Europe?
Source:
1 Pro Foundation – Right to Life, The trial of Mariusz Dzierżawski before the court in Gdańsk, 2024.01.18
2 The European Union legal acts database, The Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community signed at Lisbon on 13 December 2007
Database of European Union legal acts, The Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community signed at Lisbon on 13 December 2007
4 Ursula von der Leyen, More inclusive and safe Europe: extending the list of EU crimes to incite hatred and hatred crimes, 2021.12.21
5 A. Wolff-Powęska, E. Schulz, Space and Politics in German Political Thought, pp. 34–35.
6 Michael, Adenauer has always thought about the integration of Europe through the interests of Germany
8 Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda, Vectors Publishing, 2020, p. 19
9 Jerzy Chodorowski, The European Union's Ideo pedigree, Issue I, Publishing home “Ostaja”, 2005, p. 12
