I was wondering if at all the subject of the possible insanity of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, due to the fact that I am neither a scientist nor even a psychiatrist, so my assessments of psyche and another behaviors are only subjective and their conclusions arise, among others, from individual professional experiences, general cognition and marketing (general psychology – including consumer behaviour psychology, statistic and social engineering, NLP) and information, statements of others and reflection of the reality that is happening. It is all the more possible to accuse me of creating a script and directing a movie or the construction and essence of text of the genre of "conspiracy theory", due to the fact that in most cases I treat my words only in the category of "political fiction", satirical and mocking sarcasm.
I besides gotta explain that sometimes utilized in the text means:
– mocking sarcasm - verbal or non-verbal transmission which is overly beautiful and sophisticated, while being ironic and ridiculed to a individual or group of persons,
– egocentroism - my word - neologism - designed to find the phenomena of simultaneous occurrence: egotism, egocentrism and cynicism engulfed with fog of egotism,
– megalotomy - pathological intellectual disorder characterised at the same time by excessive self-esteem (megalomania) and the compulsive tendency to fabricate and make false stories (mitomania)) to keep an exaggerated self-image,
– Obsessed Hate - a strong, persistent and recurrent feeling of hostility that occupies a person's head for a long time, frequently leading to obsessive reasoning about revenge or harm. A individual with obsessive hatred can constantly reflect on injuries and plan to retaliate, even if years have passed since the incident. It is frequently the basis Pathological Vengeance and may be part of a variety of intellectual disorders specified as personality disorders (e.g. paranoid, obsessive-compulsive) or affective disorders,
– psychological projection – a conscious or subconscious defence mechanics that involves assigning to another people your own accepted or unacceptable thoughts, emotions, desires, flaws or motivations.
Of course, no of these terms straight mention to the behaviour of the Venerable and Beloved Leader, Polish Prime Minister Tusk Donald, and all similarities in this respect are accidental and unintended.
Speaking in a more understandable language, for any even most likely their native language, according to the Google translator, this is more or less:
Für Deutschland – "For Germany" – (return added to the text in remembrance of the celebrated act of servitude to Germany and Germans declared by D. Tusk):
Source: ]]>https://youtu.be/QYfn1To3S0g]]>
Natürlich trifft keine der Genanten Bezeichnungen direkt auf das Verhalten des verehrten und geliebten Führers, des polnischen Premierministers Donald Tusk, zu, und jegliche Ähnlichkeiten in diesel Bereich sind zufällig und unbeabsichtigt.
I have divided the text into parts that are not factually chronological and in my subjective opinion are at least important, which is actually the order of parts is fundamentally irrelevant. Unless, after reading them, it is possible to separate the relation of the causal - effect circumstantial attitudes and behaviours of our Hot Sun Peru.
In general, I gotta say that writing this text was born in "pains of creation" and as for me it lasted besides long, oh... besides long. This was primarily due to the fact that – most likely for the first time in the past of my blogging (since 2008) and despite the fact that the text is simply a mockery of sarcasm and satire – I had to face the necessity of self-censorship. Its basis was to preserve the alleged "trial care", which is essential in a totalitarian or quasi totalitarian state and in circumstances of deficiency or regulation of freedom of speech, or political and ideological censorship, including even preventive.
It was a fresh experience for me and now I realize how much work the opposition artists, scientists, journalists, etc. had to put into their message during the period of execution and rampant censorship of the times of the commune. Only that it was then clear where "evil" is and how it (even legally - passed on 31 July 1981 by the Polish Parliament on the control of publications and performances) looks. Now the rulers can freely admit who their enemy is and who should be persecuted or destroyed in a certain way. And opposition creators and even average people have just started to fear the system, and they frequently usage self-censorship and preventive self-censorship.
--------------------------------------------
Well, that's adequate for a long time, but for me, the essential entry and let's focus on a crucial fact.
Well, something incredible has happened in a large European country that wants to consider itself serious.
This is in front of the cameras, microphones, and people who are expected to be able to read, a public presentation of the conclusions was made with the most likely secret and "enough precise" CIA report, which was to be received from the head of this agency John Ratcliffe our Beloved Prime Minister Donald Tusk. He did it in full seriousness. Words from a paper that, as it turned out, most likely never happened.
There was no briefcase. There were no sides. There was no number, date, stamp, first or even this pathetic photocopies that we utilized to call the first due to the fact that the first “is in the Prime Minister's Chancellery safe”. There was a man, even the Prime Minister of Poland. There were cameras and microphones. It was so dense, you could cut air. And there was a voice that presented for a long time what was most likely never made. And before him, a group of people in the Polish Sejm and, among others, during a gathering with the Heads of State of the Visegrad Group in Bratislava.
"I have received a reasonably precise study in fresh hours straight from the CIA chief regarding possible events in the coming months and as I have already said and warned for many months. Different scenarios are expected and Poland and Europe as a full must be prepared for different scenarios, not only on the Russian-Ukrainian front but besides on the east flank of the EU" - stated our Venerable Prime Minister [1].
Anyway, see and hear this (with comment) with your own eyes and ears...
Source: ]]>https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VgvjCeJVs3I]]>
Minister Marcin Przycz replied to specified a dictum: "There was no “secret CIA report” on the desk. A fabricated lie to electrify public opinion and revel. The naïve media strips were hot for 2 days. No 1 checked, no 1 verified. Who's going to believe him erstwhile something truly happens?" [2].
Tomasz Siemoniak besides referred to increasing doubts, presenting the scenes of the transmission of information from the U.S. capital. As he explained, immediately after an interview in Washington with the head of the U.S. intelligence agency, he gave key findings to the head of the government: "I gave it to the Prime Minister not in the form of a written report, it can simply be called an oral report" – explained Tomasz Siemoniak. In addition, he informed that the same precise information was sent immediately after a fewer days to the president of Poland [3].
Allow me to describe 1 thing at a time, to be precise, since we have just been denied the facts.
First, the Polish Prime Minister said that the paper existed. Then, that in general its content is alternatively classified, so it cannot be shown. Then, that the "invisible report" was already shown — right now, orally — and that whoever did not perceive did not read. Finally, "between the lines" it was added that doubts about the existence of the paper are even an attack on the seriousness of the state and its security. And fanatical supporters of KO or leftist-demoliberal elites of the EU nodded with large seriousness, as if nodding was a form of reading.
I do not know who and why thought that the verbal word "present" replaces paper. I don't know who and why taught any journalists to compose down "washed from the throat" by D. Tusk the content that – with a large amount of probability bordering definitely – nobody always wrote.
But I know 1 thing. From now on, the non-existent paper has its own public life, richer than any existing document. He has interpretations. He has defenders. He has critics who argue over the non-existent comma. It has people who even read it in its entirety, although the full consists of respective sentences spoken to the microphone: that the paper (in the context of Russian imperialism) is very crucial for Polish and European security.
Presenting parts of the study our beloved Prime Minister D. Tusk was very serious, as if he actually believed in the existence of this report.
Or did he truly believe it, or did he invent it himself, or have any delusions or hear voices reading it? Could it besides have been that he did so at the command of his powermen in Berlin or simply out of his own need, due to the fact that he is simply a "pathological liar" and lying feels a circumstantial form of any sick excitement and satisfaction? Or did he do it very cynically, hoping to trigger the psychosis of possible aggression and war with Russia in Poles? possibly he besides addressed those words to the idiotic part of his fanatical electorate, who would believe all nonsense he always said. Or is it an indirect expression of his unfettered and apparent obsession with president Karol Nawrocki, whom he admires and at the same time envyes everything so powerfully that he hates him in everything?
And below we have the "variance" of artificial intelligence about this obsession:
]]>
]]>
Author: AI variation – impersonal "GPT Image" based on my hypothetical and "sardonically smiling" question: "How could the dark obsession of Prime Minister Donald Tusk on the individual of president Karol Nawrocki look?"]]>Each of these reasons is possible and each of them could be discussed in a separate column or analysed all of them to show that the reason for the behaviour of the Prime Minister is actually their "mix", that is, their interdependent team. And the most crucial thing is to find the interior structure of their degree of influence on the decisions and behaviour of our Sun Peru. Nevertheless, each of them is at least dangerous for Poland and Poles, due to the fact that it concerns the individual of the Prime Minister himself and Poland does not deserve to be Prime Minister, perhaps: mentally unbalanced, with a possible inferiority complex or a possible pathological liar and a jealous person.
Well, how do you describe a individual who "continuously rages" tells about non-existent facts, is simply a pathological liar and cynical hypocrite with a powerfully rooted "denial" mechanism, where you frequently see an exuberant ego and at the same time an indeterminate "complex of inferiority" or a super-extant and in full infantile request for power and assessing others "by its own measure"? In addition, she feels a deficiency of empathy, or this empathy is alternatively fake.
Is she an egocentric, megalomitoman, or is she an almost mentally sick individual who designs his ideas of others on the basis of self-images? It's not for me to decide – there are different specialists. I only subjectively and in the "curve mirror"* describe what I see and how it – possibly completely incorrect – I receive and interpret. And to be honest, I'd like to be truly incorrect about that.
A naive man (for example, a journalist), who is now almost a subversive, could ask if he could get a copy of the report. The answer to this is almost always one, and it is expressed with regret that the copy has just been handed to the public. Oral. And that the request for paper is ridiculous, due to the fact that paper can be forged, and seriousness can not. There is no answer to that anymore, due to the fact that the answer would require a paper and there is no document, so any discussion in the name of a paper is closed.
And here we come to a point that should amaze any average person, put him back on his feet and make him reflect seriously.
If there is no document, there is neither what the paper supposedly presents, orders or warns against. There is so no reason for it to be the basis for drawing any conclusions on the basis of it, due to the fact that there is simply no document, and there is only an oral message. And on what basis was this oral message made by the Prime Minister? Based on a paper that's not there? A real "mish you have", any ellipse of absurdity and hypocrisy that closed so tightly that the fact has no way in or out.
In colloquially speaking, we were shown voidness and were told to applaud.
There was a conviction first. Then it became a quote. The quote became a source. The origin became a document. The paper became the basis for creating an atmosphere of fear. And erstwhile individual asks about paper, he hears that he is ignorant due to the fact that “everyone has heard it.” Everyone. So no 1 has to check anymore. It would be a deficiency of trust and an attack on the safety of the state, and the deficiency of specified trust is present the only crime that does not require a document.
I leave in vain a question which is inactive pressing at the mouth: if the paper does not exist, what precisely was presented with specified a vibrating seriousness?
The answer is simple and so will not fall at any press conference. Our readiness to believe has been presented. Nothing more. No pages, no signature, no content. Just get ready. And this readiness — it must be said with all the mocking seriousness that the column can afford — was the only attachment that was truly brought to the area that day.
Finally, I'll tell you what I dreamt...
.. There was a room. Big, official, with water in carafs that no 1 drinks, due to the fact that drinking would look like a disregard for seriousness. There was a briefcase on the table. Fat. With the inscription ‘document’. The presenter opened it with the anointing with which the final things are opened. There were no cards inside. There was a mirror. And anyone who looked, saw not the content, but their own face, already consistent, nodding, already quoting an article that is not there. And the longer he looked, the more certain he had just read. And he began to correct others: that in the highlighted and discussed paragraph of the study it is different, that the annex states explicitly that whoever does not see does not want to see. And the mirror was silent. The mirror is always silent. It's people who add up his voice. And that voice was getting more and more confident, and more and more outraged, and increasingly demanding prosecutorial action against all who dared to claim that there was nothing in the briefcase... until I woke up.
Oh, how good it was just a dream...
Except the Prime Minister's speech wasn't a dream. It was rather real. With a microphone. Seriously. With a paper that wasn't there. And with us, who have almost begun to quote him.
Leave behind the good, love and wisdom... and if you gotta leave a document, leave 1 that can be taken into your hand...
The end of Part I. shortly there will be more. Or do you have any suggestions for the Prime Minister's behaviour that are worth a sarcastic look? due to the fact that today, I guess we're just satires, just like the commune...
[1] ]]>https://news.onet.pl/country/secret-report-z-cia-for-donald-tuska-president-minister- lie/ct2hh29]]>
[2] Ibid.
* Oh, yeah *‘in a curved mirror’ – a phraseological relation that means presenting reality in a deliberately distorted, exaggerated and caricature manner, usually to ridicule, criticize or exposure someone's flaws. In literature, movie and publications, this phrase means the usage of satire, parody or grotesque.
Leave behind the good, love and wisdom...
© Krzysztof Jaworucki (krzysztofjaw)
