Is the FBI manager covering for Epstein's list?
In fresh days it has taken place Hearing manager of the FBI – Kash Patel – before the home of Representatives Judicial Commission in connection with the Epstein case. He was questioned by both Republican organization politicians and the opposition Democratic Party. Senator John Kennedy (a power camp organization politician) asked Patel about the papers on Epstein's case, asking if he had seen them. Patel replied that "I didn't see the full thing personally, but much of it."
Patel was in possession of papers from the case as early as February that year. Senator Kennedy asked, "Would it be fair to say that Mr Epstein traded young women, in any cases minors, to have sex with him?" Patel's reply: "Such allegations were found in the 2018 indictment in the confederate territory of fresh York." The Senator did not give up: “Who else did he supply these women to?”
Patel avoided to answer directly, as can be seen from his message erstwhile he stated that "We return again to 2008. After Mr. Acosta limited the investigation, the search warrants, and the scope of the investigation. The only thing we can talk about in public is that [Epstein] He received assurances of non-racing from Mr. Acosta [Federal prosecutor at the time of George W. Bush administration]. ...
The information we have is limited, I repeat." And this time Senator Kennedy didn't give up. He asked Patel again. ‘[People] They know Epstein was smuggling young women for sexual purposes to himself. We want to know who else, if anyone else, was smuggling them. And that's a very legitimate question." Patel tried to change the subject, which was besides evident: “The act of Epstein’s case existed in the 2 erstwhile administrations — the Obama administration and the Biden administration. [They] They did not make anything available”.
He stressed that the FBI authorities for the current administration are gradually trying to “release what is available”. It is said that their actions are to be restrained by 3 court judgments which restrict their scope strongly, but they are inactive trying to do whatever they can to uncover further papers from the case. In the end, Patel replied that "Based on the information we have available in the case files," he could say that "to no one" Epstein did not make available the victims of human trafficking which he utilized for sexual purposes.
He was expected to be the only 1 who did it. We'll never know from Epstein, due to the fact that he was about to commit suicide on August 10, 2019. The surveillance footage from outside Epstein's cell, of course, is missing.
In turn Democratic organization Senator Ted Lieu, despite respective inquiries, could not learn from the FBI manager whether the name Donald Trump or Prince Andrew appears on Epstein's client list. All he heard was the assurance that the list had been made public. Lieu wrote that "America is simply a immense informing signal — the FBI manager could not answer whether Trump was on Epstein's client list".
In order to give back the full context, it should be recalled that Lieu himself is at least a doubtful figure, as he showed support for the lgbt environments. His raising the issue of Epstein can so consequence from the motivation of the full politicised. Nevertheless, it is worth asking yourself why Kash Patel is incapable to answer the question of Donald Trump's presence on Epstein's list, in a simple way: ‘yes’ or ‘no’.
In his time, Elon Musk himself wrote openly that Epstein's client list was not published precisely due to the fact that it contained Donald Trump, the current president of the United States.
Another Republican organization politician, Thomas Massie, reminded the FBI manager that "According to the evidence of witnesses cooperating with the FBI in this investigation, and these papers are in the possession of the FBI, the list is to contain the names of about 20 men". Patel's answer one more time was to effort to change the subject.
It is worth recalling a associate of the home of Representatives' Justice Committee, Jamie Raskin, who proved the hypocrisy and hypocrisy of Kash Patel, saying, “In just a fewer months, how come you went from fighting for transparency in Epstein to covering her up?
The answer is simple. You said so yourself — due to who is on this list.” In fact, Patel himself said those words shortly before he was appointed manager of the FBI. This recording was played at the Hall, as well as respective others, which confirmed a change of course in the attitude of the FBI manager to this issue.
Interestingly, Donald Trump himself avoids talking about Epstein's list. Recently, on April 25, exactly, a key witness was besides to commit suicide. The loudest victim of Epstein's sexual engagement in human trafficking and his accomplice was Virginia Giuffre (née Roberts). According to the witness' testimony, she was to be forced 3 times to cohabit with Queen Elizabeth II's son, Prince Andrew.
She claimed that erstwhile she was 17 (it was 2001), she was sexually abused respective times. It was Epstein who was expected to introduce her to Prince Andrew, although Ghislaine Maxwell was preparing her for the meeting.
Giuffre yet won respective million dollars in court as part of the compensation program for Jeffrey Epstein's victims, as well as as as a consequence of the settlement made with Prince Andrew (brother of the current usurper on the British throne). A deal with Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein was concluded in 2009. It is crucial that the settlement contained an agreement not to take any legal action against those associated with Epstein. Apparently, any another people were besides active in this.
Besides, just paying individual a fewer million pounds means that individual buys themselves silence. An out-of-court settlement with Prince Andrew Giuffre was concluded in 2022. Prince Andrew was sued for sexual harassment by her. Before the court conflict began, Elizabeth II's boy was stripped of his royal titles and military honors. He besides lost his right to execute public functions. After the settlement with Giuffre, he got out that he “repented his acquaintance with Epstein.”
It's interesting how Giuffre met Epstein first. In mid 2000 Giuffre worked as a receptionist at Donald Trump's luxury club, Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach, Florida. That's where she met Epstein's partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, who led to a gathering with him. Was that erstwhile Donald Trump knew Maxwell? Was she in his hotel by mistake? For example, this 1 case involving Prince Andrew shows that Kash Patel is covering for people from Epstein's list. There's no uncertainty about that.
Written by Michał Murgrabia.
Image by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump.
We besides recommend: Ukrainian cars don't gotta have a review. The Warsaw Government washes its hands
