As long as there's a law that makes people hell. As long as men are humiliated, women are abused and children are appalled. As long as there is darkness on this earth, poorness and evil. Until we gotta talk about it.
Motto. LESSON 1862. Viktor Marie Hugo, 1802 – 1885.
In our country POLAND there are basic principles of conduct.
A. HOLY CHARGE.
B. COMPLICATIONS.
C. CANALIE RECORD.
These are based on 2 unwritten legal standards.
1. Power is right.
2. For doubtful cases see 1.
Why, then, European Convention on Human Rights and Constitution III RP/PRL BIS (NRPAre they Talmudic? I quote for MAREK TOMASZ KROGOROWSKI (born 21-08-1958) book Beast p. 263.
Who Can't Hear RABINE
A RESERVE TO LAUGH
FIRST PROOF
A wonderful proof is the office Ombudsman for Human Rights III RP/PRL BIS. On the stool of this office sits Ob. MARCIN WIEK Born 28-03-1982. It's unusual that on the authoritative website RPO could not find statements by officials that office and OB itself. M. SWEETHEART.

Article 80. Constitution III RP/PRL BIS. RIGHT to address the Ombudsman (RPO). Everyone has the right, under the rules laid down in the Act, to request the Ombudsman to aid defend their freedoms or rights violated by public authorities.
From time immemorial to RPO you could compose to the address @brpo.gov.pl. We presently receive information after sending an email to this address in English [Google translation]]: Your message to the address of the clerk@brpo.gov.pl could not be delivered.
Custom rule message flow created by the admin at brpogovpl.onmicrosoft.com blocked. And in Polish. TThere's a message. Your message has not been delivered to the RPO Bureau. delight contact us via the form available at https://forme.brpo.gov.pl/. There is besides more information in the table
Office 365 brpo.gov.pl
Sender [Speaking Spanish] Actin Requred [action required]
Blocked by message flow rule [blocked by message flow rule]
How to Fix It
An email admin at brpogovpl.onmicrosoft.com has created a customized message flow regulation that blocks messages that meet certain conditions, and it appears that your message has met 1 or more of these conditions.
Check the text above for a customized message from the email admin that may aid explain why your message was blocked and how you might be able to fix it. For example, removing proven words from the message or sending the message from a different email account may be successful to remove your message.
If you’ve tried and you’re inactive not able to fix the problem, consult the email admin at brpogovpl.onmicrosoft.com to discretion what to do. While they’re improbable to remove or relax the rule, if you have a legion needed to remove your message they may offer guidance for how to do so. There's a further part of the message but that's adequate due to the fact that it doesn't change the essence of things.
Google Translation
How to Fix It
The email admin at brpogovpl.onmicrosoft.com created a customized regulation for the flow of mail, which blocks messages gathering certain conditions. Looks like your message fulfills 1 or more of them.
Check the above text to find a customized message from the email admin that can aid explain why your message has been blocked and how you can fix it. For example, removing prohibited words from a message or sending a message from another email account may suffice to supply it.
If you have tried and inactive can't solve the problem, consider contacting the email admin at brpogovpl.onmicrosoft.com to discuss what to do. Although it is improbable that the admin will remove or mitigate the rule, if you have a legitimate request to supply a message, he may give you instructions on how to do so.
This is clear proof of the application of the 3 Talmudic principles. Another information is for indigenous people and another for strangers. And 1 more thing. Ob. M. VIEW He's mocking the law POLANDConstitution of Article 27. authoritative language in III RP/RPL BIS. In the Republic of Poland the authoritative language is Polish.
I utilized the form and applied to the RPO for aid in protecting my freedoms. And what did that do? Nothing. I didn't get feedback on any writing. Foreshadowed this action, I made the right copy. That was over a period ago. In addition, Code of Administrative Procedure In Article 35Time limits for dealing with cases by the authorities of III RP/PRL BIS.§ 1. Public administrations are obliged to handle matters without undue delay. § 2. Cases which may be dealt with on the basis of evidence submitted by the party, together with the request to initiate proceedings, or on the basis of facts and evidence commonly known or known to the authority before which the proceedings are taking place, or can be established on the basis of the data which the authority is providing. § 3.An investigation should take place no later than 1 month, and a peculiarly complicated case, no later than 2 months after the date of initiation of the procedure and within 1 period of receipt of the appeal. § 3a. The case in the simplified procedure should be resolved immediately, no later than 1 period after the date of initiation of the procedure.

And that's elegant proof. Sending applications to the RPO means as much as writing on the Berdyche, a city in Ukraine.
TWO PROOFS
The Ministry of Digitisation is besides a large proof. He directs the work of this office. Ob. Krzysztof Kamil Gawkovski Born 11-04-1980. At the same time, he sits on the stool of Deputy Prime Minister III RP/PRL BIS. This official's property message is widely available. Just put it in the search engine. his name and his message of property.

There's a sign on the Internet. The Ministry of Digital Affairs is liable for the improvement and implementation of state policy in the field of computerisation, telecommunications and cybersecurity. It conducts digitalisation of public administration, supervises ICT systems and supports investments in digital technologies. I'm trying. to simplify the interaction between the state, citizens and entrepreneurs.
Recently, I've sent respective e-mails to this ministry about not numbering the files of 1 case. In response, I received a letter by manager Ob. SEBASTIAN GRAVE. net I didn't find the property statement. It's Ob.

I received the letter together with the GDPR clause via the net from the address: == sync, corrected by elderman ==
Good morning,
You receive correspondence from the electronic documentation management system. Information on the case from which the letter was sent:
Case symbol: BBKN.WN.055.291.2025
Subject: Correspondence incomprehensible (Order Agreement from 1-05-2025 + Z-47 + Z-48 + Z-54) – Mr Zbigniew Grabowski [my writings from the day 15-05, 20-05, 5-06]
Cell Name: Supervisory Division
Person handling the case: Two-Yews Iwona.

Remind me.The bill requires an answer within a month. It's only been six months. This is the power of the law.
When I fathered my answer I sent it to the address == sync, corrected by elderman ==From which I received this opinion. In response, the following came.
This is the message strategy on the mail.cba.pl server. I regret to inform you that your message could not be delivered to 1 or more recipients. I attach it below. Postal system
[185.41.95.143] replied: 554 5.7.1 Access denied (in consequence to RCPT TO) Diagnostic code: smtp; 554 5.7.1 Access denied.
Therefore, my answer Z-120to the Minister of Digitisation I sent it to the address @cyfra.gov.pl. I won't quote the full thing.
Explanation
SUBJECT MATTER PROCEDURES Article 69 of the NRP.
Constitutional rights shall apply without negotiation and regulation of the Article. 2 and 7 and 8 and 30 and 32 and 38 KRP. DELICT on the subject is simply a peculiar perfidy .
Where and product, conunction of sentences.
As persecuted since 1954, I have the absolute right to usage all the activities and methods to explain a thing inactive for my life, due to the fact that I am surviving in a state of higher necessity. For my life is inevitably coming to an end. I'm here on my own behalf. and in its case, and as injured, and as a publicist – blogger battery.pI – Articles 49 and 54 of the NRP.
I'm sorry. From 1-06-2002 I request that one case had 1 file with the numbered page of the file and access to specified file to authorised persons. In all courts, offices, prosecutors, there is no specified simple rule. Only authoritative entities are multiplied, making virtually impossible to explain. That's what happened with my dad's execution in 1954.. (Veteran of planet War II and repatriant from behind Buga) in the village of Bielanka the territory of Lviv Śląski and deprive us of his 4 sons of the right to inherit a horticultural farm. The case was multiplied by dozens of signatures.
I would like to stress that all my actions are motivated by a deep conviction of the request for protection universal values: human rights and social justice. My position stems from the concern for the future of the offspring, in which all citizen should be guaranteed equal treatment and the anticipation of effective access to their rights in a transparent and effective way.
Transparency and full access to information are of crucial importance not only to me, but besides to another persons whose rights and surviving conditions may be straight or indirectly affected by decisions taken. I anticipate you all The substance will be dealt with professionally and in full respect of the principles of justice, the highest legal and ethical standards. The final resolution of the case will aid to strengthen citizens' assurance in authorities.
In this state of affairs, the submission of this and the action taken is absolutely necessary.
Three proofs after Christmas.
cdn


















