Vaccinations by Mr Covid-19 were intended to prevent transmission of the virus – on this basis many countries introduced sanitary and vaccine passports, the work to vaccinate certain social groups, the vaccination of children (i.e. the population for which the virus was not a threat), in order to defend Grandma and Grandpa, etc.
Today we know that this claim was a lie. So how is it possible that all drug agencies in Western countries have approved the fact that vaccines against Covid-19 prevent transmission of the virus and let it to be publically announced? Medicines agencies that do not deal with politics, but only wellness issues and whose task is to check the quality of medical devices, their usefulness and safety?
When issuing their opinion on an authorised drug, the agencies are primarily based on data from the manufacturer, the pharmaceutical company. As part of the procedure for obtaining a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product, the pharmaceutical company must apply for a marketing authorisation (MAA) together with a full dossier, including: information on the quality of the product, clinical trial results and data on the safety and efficacy of the product. If a pharmaceutical company claims that its product treats breast cancer, evidence of this must be found in the clinical trials included in the dossier. The company cannot claim that her medicine besides works on prostate cancer unless she has tested for prostate cancer. Therefore, if the agency for medicines issues authorisation for specified a product for the treatment of prostate cancer, it is clear that it is not based in its decision on the data provided by the pharmaceutical company.
This was the case for all vaccines authorised in the European Union (Astra Zeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna and Pfizer). Medicines agencies had no data from pharmaceutical companies confirming the impact of vaccines on viral transmission. In another words, pharmaceutical companies have not submitted a marketing authorisation application for their products underpinned by the claim that they prevent transmission – this issue is not included in the clinical trials at all. The aim of the companies was to produce a vaccine that would defend against death and make a severe form of disease. It was never about stopping the transmission of the virus. This was confirmed by representatives of pharmaceutical companies during the hearings before the peculiar committee in the European Parliament (https://sciencemediacentre.es/en/reactions-pfizer-executives-claim-they-did-not-test-whother-covid-19-vaccines-stopped-transmission). Medicines agencies have never had a paper in their hands that would confirm that the vaccines of p. Covid-19 prevent the spread of the virus. We cannot, therefore, accuse pharmaceutical companies of any fraud on this issue, as from the very beginning their position was clear.
How, then, is it possible that drug agencies have spread information that p. Covid-19 vaccines prevent transmission of the virus? How is it possible that politicians, scientists could distribute specified information by supporting the introduction of all kinds of sanitary and vaccine passports? The fact is this and it will be shocking to many: in fact, sanitary policy is fiction today, and drug agencies, the large invention of the 20th century, have ceased to fulfil their function – worse: patients were safer erstwhile these agencies did not exist. Drug agencies are occupied present by lobbyists and they are the ones moving the actual sanitary policy. To a large extent, renowned scientists trust on heard opinions, investigation of good or dubious quality, and present hypotheses as revealed fact only to appear in the media and gain temporary fame. Why do commissions that effort to analyse the issue of "pandemic" in different countries face many obstacles and proceed unmercifully? due to the fact that the discovery of the truth, that we do NOT have IN THE WEST COUNTRIES REQUIRED wellness PROTECTION would be a immense scandal, the fact that we are dealing with a corruption scandal on a immense scale. That we're dealing with the biggest sanitary scandal in history!
Anna Chrołowska
Source: message by Fabrice Di Vizio, Italian lawyer specialising in public wellness matters (https://www.grands-avocats.com/avocats/fabrice-di-vizio/)
https://x.com/DIVIZIO1/status/1821205016268415289
