In 2016, under the left picture, in the text ‘Emergency exit’ I signed: The Prime Minister of Britain, D.Cameron and his wife, the rabbi's grandson, are disputing from the EU, why? Did the judaic empire neglect to conquer Europe? Will Europe be free?
Well, nothing like that. The political Sanhedrin of the judaic capitalism of the West knew what we did not know that there was a war planned against Russia, this time again military – due to the fact that it was the Sanhedrin who planned it, as did the First and Second planet War and the “cold war” (1947-91), and all with the support and blessing of the Roman Curia, of which the Judeo-Catholics do not want to hear or read. If you do not believe in the work of the Sanhedrin, let us examine the increasing share of US dollars in the trading in Europe and between Europe and the remainder of the planet after all subsequent wars. And since it is impossible to foretell the destiny of the war, just in case the London City moved Britain out of the EU – likewise her grown-up, powerful child, the US, pretending not to participate in the war against Russia. In the worst war scenario, the Sanhedrin may lose European colonies, but the parent of judaic capitalism should stay intact.
Is it not amazing that the political parties of the IIIRP/Polin, the largest organization likely to return to power, the PiS and the Confederate MP G.Braun, who can co-organise, are rather openly talking about the withdrawal of the IIIRP/Polin from the EU, to which he chased Poles in 2003, standing already at the grave, spiritual idols of these parties and the large majority of Poles, JPII himself? Do they have no indication of this holy husband today? Could the Holy Judeo-Catholic have strayed so far, or could the Holy Spirit himself have reached out to JPII, or could he have been on the side of the Sanhedrin of judaic capitalism? The judgments of Providence or chance are unexplored – I do not know how to compose it properly.
It is uncontested that membership of the EU from the very point of view of the financial account is totally unprofitable for Poland and Poles, and this can be easy demonstrated by balancing contributions to the EU and the effects of the burden on the state budget and comparing them with the EU funds. Here it is worth remembering that the contribution to the EU for 2004 is average French, which we will never recover. And there are besides immense economical harm resulting from EU orders to restrict or even destruct home production, etc. However, this is not the case due to the fact that the callers to Polexit do not rise economical issues. So, what could be the essence of a possible Polexit – ?
Brexit and Polexit – Similarities and Differences
Similarities:
Brexit and (eventual) Polexit have a direct link to the war of planet Zionism with Russia in Ukraine.
Differences:
Brexit excluded Britain from direct participation in the war against Russia - it is possible that the EU or any of its associate States become participants in the war.
On the another hand, the aim of a possible Polexit is to introduce the IIIRP/Polin into the war against Russia without straight involving the full EU – a colony of judaic capitalism, which the Sanhedrin can throw into the war at last, in any decisive phase.
As shown by Eurobarometer research, the EU agenda:
percentage of people who agree that "our country would better face the future outside the EU" – publication; December 2019
https://www.world-scam.com/archive/27359/570-enslaved-europa/
Example of benefits of EU membership – https://x.com/i/status/1946996919756030303
But it all fits: certain provisions of the Accession Treaty (T.A.) e.g.; We must scrap at our expense 50% of the tonnage of our fishing fleet. for: https://wiernipolsce1.wordpress.com/2018/01/23/tragic-balance-cost-Polish-in-ue/
Dariusz Kosiur
PolExitu strength
Text for:https://chart.neon24.net/post/184096,sila-polexitu#comment 2188517
Nearly 1⁄4 Poles already support PolExit, while in the most active and possibly politically active age group 30-49 this percent varies to nearly 38 percent of respondents.
Close 1⁄4 Poles already support PolExit, In the most active and possibly politically active age group 30-49, this percent varies to nearly 38 percent of respondents. Just watch how the increasingly sober look of our fellow Americans on the European Union will provoke akin lamentations of the alleged elites as insufficient love shown by Poles Ukraine or an increase in support of the movement Grzegorz Braun. Well, obviously, we're not precisely increasing up to our enlightened leaders, and that's most likely why they want to trade us for immigrants, not just those from the Dnieper.
The story of the West
In order to realize the attitude of Poles to the European Union, it is essential to go back to the early 1990s, erstwhile the full systemic transformation took place under the motto "return to EuropeIt’s okay. ” A powerful propaganda apparatus skillfully utilized Polish complexes, the belief that the West betrayed Poland in Yalta by agreeing to russian dominance and that Poland should be compensated for not participating in Marshall's Plan (which was never thought of in Poland as a program of economical dependence of Western Europe on the USA). Poles in the 1990s truly thought that something was due to them from the West and that the payment of this debt was primarily the beginning of borders. After 2004 and the accession of Poland to the European Union, more than 3.5 million Poles left for permanent work in the West, which effectively discharged the problem of unemployment for many years. Politicians could thus pretend that the Polish economy was developing, and the money sent by immigrants allowed to cover holes in home budgets. Returning from emigration they brought money, which naively tried to invest, hoping that something had changed in Poland.
But it's been over 20 years. Although there are signs on all Polish road present “financed by the European Union” but the first defects are already appearing in the surfaces To keep aquaparks built of money that Poles first sent to Brussels, and then got them back, little the cost of EU bureaucracy – simply not adequate money. Poland's Union is getting short of breath in terms of investment, and its costs are becoming increasingly obvious, mainly with those related to the energy market, the transformation towards renewable sources only and a extremist simplification in consumption.
End of complexes
20 years ago, Poles aspirated Europe on the basis of many years of complexes. The current generation knows Europe better, you show little complexes, full knowing the negative effects of both the EU's immigration and climate policy. The seemingly beautiful and yearning EU shows its actual face, proving to be an old whore from which the powder has fallen and more and more Poles see it. The fact that the majority of the political elite of the 3rd Republic ignores this change only means that the earthquake on the Polish political scene is closer than it seems.
The attractiveness of the EU falls in many fields. Labour migration in Germany or the Netherlands may inactive seem attractive, but Poles in the West are increasingly analyzing their situation on a single scale, placing better wages and housing conditions – and on the other, the safety issues, the environment in which their children grow up, as well as the ideological oppression of the state expressed through education. These Polish immigrants who decide to return, apart from household and sentimental considerations, have in many cases raised their economical concerns: "Europe is ending!” “It is frequently heard due to the fact that the slowdown in growth and the increase in the cost of surviving are already common even for the leading economies of the EU. But the almost equally common presumption of return migration is the desire to live among their own, or not to live around strangers, increasingly alien civilization and culturally This group of returnees hits the faster and faster adaptation of the Polish environment to the 1 from which they escaped from the West. The returnees are not, therefore, ambassadors of Europeanism in its current form, but, on the contrary, many return with well-established views which mistakes of the Western EU Poland should not repeat at all. Of course, many in returning Poles of naivety and excessive belief that "Poland has improved“ only due to the fact that the sidewalks are a small bit more equal than erstwhile they left and said even the ladies in the IRS smile. No, in the 3rd Poland it is not as much better as they think, but besides mostly people come back clean of the accompanying complexes "Poland's entry into Europe” 21 years ago. People who have looked closely at contemporary Europeanism and know its black sides are much easier to get up from their knees.
Ukraine enters – Poland exits
However, it is not just Western experience. At least equally crucial for building Polish strength for PolExit is the Ukrainian issue. Even before the formal accession of Ukraine to the EU, funds coming from existing associate States, including Poland, flow to Kiev. Whatever Ukraine will be after the war is to be incorporated into the Union, which means even more spending and spending on adaptation and infrastructure programmes. Ukraine will become the main recipient of the measures for the Common Agricultural Policy. In fact, even those who believe that the EU is giving us something will gotta see that we have become a donor, sending even more money to Kiev than today, only doing so more through Brussels as a criminal associate of the European Union. The clock measuring time for Ukrainian accession is the most crucial argument behind PolExit. Poland must leave the Union before the remainder of Ukraine joins it. It's so simple.
EFTA, which is Poland like Norway and Switzerland?
What's next? If the increasing Polish criticism of the EU were to be translated into a political decision, a mechanics to reduce cognitive dissonance would be necessary. After all, it would be adequate for the 3rd Polish Republic to be outside the region of close centralisation of the Union, organised by Germany and France. This would origin the hysteria of the elite, expressed by slogans of opposition to “Second-speed Europe” and “second category membershipIt’s okay. ” Meanwhile, evading the trap of a Eurocratic German-French superstate would be a good start, after which continuing in the EU would make little sense, for example, erstwhile it could be replaced by a slower but institutionalised cooperation, for example, within the European Free Trade Association, EFTA.
BREXIT Lesson
The loosening of ties with the EU would so should be decisive adequate to avoid the problems experienced by the United Kingdom. Contrary to what the pro-eurocratic media are triumphantly announcing, BREXIT was not a mistake, but the fact that the divorce with the Union was apparent, the British economy is inactive bound by the same regulations as Eurosojusz, and the only applicable consequence of migration policy has been replacing Polish plumbers with African accountants coming to the dishwasher. -EXIT to work – must be full and true, specified a lesson is given us by the UK, and so much smarter can and should be our exit from the Union. The exit to which more and more Poles are convinced and which may become 1 of the main slogans of a real political debate, in addition to the demands of deukrainization of Poland and keeping as far distant from the West-Russia War as possible. Politicians who think in Polish must halt being afraid of PolExit, as something unimaginable, beyond the Polish political perception and so impossible.
On the contrary. PolExit is present the request of Polish realism and the request of Polish national interest.
Konrad Hand
