Bodnar does not accept the TK's safety patosure on the ban on the cancellation of the neo-presidents of orchards

Justice Minister Adam Bodnar, did not recognise the latest "security" of the illegal Constitutional Court, which, at the request of the neoKRS, prohibited him from dismissing the neo-presidents of the courts from appointing the Ziobra Ministry. Both Adam Bodnar and 1 of the TK judges consider that this safety was issued outside the remit of the politicized TK.

READ ALSO: The illegal TK stands up for the neo-presidents of Ziobry and “infects” Bond with their appeal

It is simply a decision made by a five-man defective composition of the Constitutional Tribunal under the leadership of Bogdan Święczkowski, issued on 24 April. According to this ‘security’, the Minister of Justice allegedly cannot appeal neo-presidents and ‘presidents’ of the courts without the consent of the neo-KRS until an illegal TK judgement has been handed down against the neo-KRS rules governing the procedure for dismissing neo-presidents and ‘presidents’ of the courts. We remind you that the change in the transitions in this area occurred during the times of the Law and Justice. At the time, however, the gangs of neoKRS criminal Pokemons did not disturb this change due to the fact that it could overturn positions with its losers.

According to our findings, the legally flawed ruling on the neoKRS application is expected to stay at the earliest in June.

The ruling composition, in addition to Święczkowski, included erstwhile MPs Krystyna Pawłowicz and Stanisław Piotrowicz, and judges Zbigniew Jędrzejewski and Rafał Wojciechowski. The second expressed a separate opinion, claiming that the TK could not take decisions on the safety in this case. However, the majority of the composition considered that a deficiency of safety could seriously impede or even prevent the execution of a future ruling.

There is no uncertainty that patosecurity is an effort to detain the Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Courts appointed by the Ministry of Ziobra for respective months. The Minister of Justice has already made personnel changes in 22 courts. The decisions on appeals besides included members of the neoKRS: Maciej Nawacki, who led the territory Court in Olsztyn, Mark Jaskulski, who was the “Vicepress” of the Poznań-Grunwald and Jeżyce territory Court and Irena Bochniak, who was the “Vicepress” of the territory Court in Krakow.

Pokemon and a associate of the criminal organization operating under the name of the KRS Maciej Nawacki commented on the decision of the illegal TK on Platform X: “The order of the CCC is common and final. all bodnarist, president of the usurper is obliged to perform. If not, there is no statute of limitations.”

The appeal process for successive courts is inactive ongoing. The latest requests made by Bodnar concern Jarosław Dudzicz, who is the neo-president of the territory Court in Gorzów Wielkopolski, and 2 “Vice-Presidents” of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw, Edyta Dzielińska and Agnieszka Stachniak-Rogalska. At the same time, 3 neoKRS members proceed to service as neo-presidents of the courts: Grzegorz Furmankiewicz in the territory Court in Krosno, Rafał Puchalski in the Appeal Court in Rzeszów and Ewa Łapińska in the territory Court in Sosnowiec.

– The safety shows that the persons appointed by Minister Adam Bodnar as presidents and vice presidents can execute these functions on a temporary basis, as their position may depend on the final judgement that the Constitutional Tribunal will issue in this case – said the spokesperson neoKRS Ewa Łosińska.

Former Vice president of the Poznań Court of Appeals, Przemysław Radzik, is already seeking his restoration. In his entry on the X platform, he announced that he had addressed the persons liable for managing the Poznań Court of Appeals, demanding the immediate execution of the Constitutional Court's order, inter alia by allowing him to resume his duties as Vice-President of the General Court. However, Radzik forgot that the TK does not have the power to issue security, and what it uses is as much worth as toilet paper.

Piotr Schab a associate of the neoKRS criminal besides requested his reinstatement. He sent a letter to the court in which he demanded that access to the information strategy of the court be restored and that the President's office be re-accessed. In addition, it demands that 2 of its deputies be reinstated to court management, which are presently suspended. He threatens that if he fails to comply with his demands, he will study the case to the prosecutor's office, accusing him of having committed a crime of breach of his powers or of failing to fulfil his duties, and besides accused the fresh president, Dorothy Markiewicz, of illegally taking over the office of the president of the Court, calling her "the usurper".

As you can see, a bunch of lunatics from an organized crime group operating under the canopy of a depraved legally depraved Duda don't bother to eat patodocuments. Therefore, it is time to put those legal ones in prison for years to realize their series of crimes on bunks.

Ready with TK for Bodnar

The Minister of Justice does not accept the safety for the same reasons which prompted justice TK, Rafał Wojciechowski, to submit a separate sentence. Wojciechowski recalled that the TK had already applied safety measures on the basis of a code of civilian procedure, including the retention of personnel changes in the National Public Prosecutor's Office and the suspension of president Piotr Schab. The Minister of Justice did not undertake to execute them, arguing that the TK had exceeded its competence.

Judge Wojciechowski stressed that the actions of the Constitutional Tribunal are based mainly on the Act governing the organisation and procedure of proceedings before the Court. Under this law, the Constitutional Tribunal may usage safeguards in the case of constitutional complaints and competency disputes between authorities. In the framework of the security, the Constitutional Tribunal has the option of suspending the execution of judgments and decisions or temporarily settling the matters disputed in the context of a competency dispute. However, the Constitutional Tribunal Act does not supply for the application of safeguards in the case of applications for assessment of compliance with the Constitution of circumstantial provisions. This conclusion was made by the neoKRS. According to Wojciechowski, the Constitutional Tribunal does not have the power to apply any provisions of the Code of civilian Procedure at its own discretion.

It is worth adding here that the composition of this illegal body, which is connected to the PiS party. Thus, in accordance with Article 178(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, the Constitutional Tribunal is deprived of the characteristics of the Tribunal established by the Act erstwhile an unauthorised individual is in its composition. On this basis, it must be concluded at the outset that the ‘order’ issued in a composition established in breach of the basic regulation applicable to the selection of the judges of the Constitutional Court and consequently infringing the essence of the right to a court established by the Act has no legal effect.

Moreover, the safety issued by the Court of the Republic of Poland is not only defective due to its composition, but besides is not legally effective against Minister of Justice, since according to the regulations, specified safety can only be issued by the court to the participants in proceedings.

The Constitutional Tribunal is legally not entitled to issue safety provisions. What has been proven repeatedly to Pokemons from this illegal institution under the leadership of the cook Kaczyński in the resolutions issued on TVP and Barski matters.

To confirm this, it is worth pointing out, for example, the order of the Constitutional Tribunal of 22 February 2006, No K 4/06, issued on the request of the Group of Members to establish the unconstitutionality of the provisions referred to therein. In this application, applicants claimed to issue a safety as a basis for establishing the provisions of the civilian Procedure Code (Article 730 in conjunction with Articles 732 and 755 of the Code of civilian Procedure). The Court did not take into account the application by claiming that the institution of the safety only applies in cases of constitutional actions after the applicant has exhausted the full legal course of action.