This 3rd section presents an analysis of the vebinar conducted by Cardinal Besung on 29 November 2024 for the Catholic Church throughout Africa. The subject was to form the synodic future of the Church in Africa.
Media reports: "Cardinal Besungu questioned conventional views that limit the voice of young people in the presence of elders".
What Besungu is trying to accomplish with thisQuestion? He knows that the older generation is rooted in Christian principles, while the younger generation under the influence of smartphones, especially studies in Europe, recognizes as advancement destructive elements specified as feminization, homosexuality, sex ideology, sex surgery. She herself is poisoned with this and brings spiritual poison to Africa. Besungu does not want to build a protective wall against this amoral infection, so he questions traditional, decent Christian upbringing. The younger people always learned from the elders and respected their natural authority and experience of life. Besungu thus subtly eliminates and authority of parents so that they gradually lose the sense of work for raising their children and leave them at the mercy of the immorality of the spirit of the world, which acts primarily through smartphones.
Like Besung in Africa, Bergoglio in Ireland in 2018 warned parents not to influence their children. The point was that at school, children were systematically manipulated by sex ideology, transsexual experiments were carried out on them, as if they were neither boys nor girls, and they were besides imposed on them the right to homosexual relationships or sex-change operations. Bergoglio demanded that parents not only keep quiet about these crimes, but even support their children in this criminal siege. Transsexuality is part of a task called reducing humanity to 1 golden billion.
There are many church schools in Africa that under the regulation of Bergoglio and Besung will become possible spreaders of amoral infection in the future, according to the program of the synod future of Africa.
Besong quote: “That is why the synod tells us: well, respect for the elders, but to make the elders realize that it is besides a responsibility... This is not just about age, but besides about a model of behaviour for the youngest."
That message is positive. However, Besungu uses manipulative wording to conceal criminal intentions. What are the words: behavior model for the youngest? In Europe, we know what's underneath it. These are alleged kid rights that deny any authority of elders, including parents. The kid has the right to call the hotline and complain about parents or teachers if they do not meet his wishes. Children learn this model of behavior. But the tragic consequence is that social services are stealing children from their parents. The reason is the child's alleged welfare. They are then placed in foster families made up of homosexuals, most of whom are pedophiles. another stolen children are victims of organ traffickers. Stolen children who have been given distant from adoption wander among pseudofamily or are held in social institutions where they are besides mentally and sexually bullied. Many children commit suicide. In Norway alone, 70 to 100 stolen children commit suicide all year.
The alleged child's right besides includes the fact that a kid who has been manipulated under intellectual force in sexual education classes can freely choose to receive hormonal therapy and later sexual shift surgery. This is an irreversible mutilation for life. In this system, parents have no right to defend their children! erstwhile he protects them, again the juvenile justice system, hiding behind alleged social services, steals children from loving parents.
All of this is the fetus of the alleged rights of the child, i.e. ‘preservation model for the youngest’, Besungu cleverly tries to impose Africa.
Besong quote: "What is our view of the weakest people who are born with certain defects? alternatively of seeing it as the work of a wizard or the work of a demon, how do we admit and accept these people as God's creatures?”
Besungu does not mean people who have been physically disabled since birth, e.g. people paralyzed. That phrase promotes homosexuality. He spread to the full planet through this method of awakening compassion. It involves a lie about alleged congenital homosexuality. Yes, homosexuality may be a dark inheritance of the ancestors for sins against the religion and idolatry of the ancestors, as stated in Romans 1:18n, but this does not mean that God created it. Homosexuals are deliberately placed as stigmatized, discriminated against persons whose dignity and rights are violated. In their message to homosexuals, the Cameroonian bishops expressed it precisely:
“...to turn distant from their mentality of the sacrifice, in which they like to view themselves as “victims”, “weak” or oppressed “minorities” and turn to God in the spirit of many admonitions His words. ”
What Besungu expresses in his words is that alternatively of considering the inherent defect as the work of a magician or the work of a demon, it is essential to “Recognise and accept these people as God’s creation?”. He knows well that Africans see that behind homosexuality there is an unclean demon and this consciousness prevents Besung from legalising him. Therefore, Besungu changes their reasoning that they no longer have the courage to claim that there is simply a demon behind homosexuality, but they began to accept this abomination as if it were part of God's creation. This is blasphemy and deliberate deception of Catholics and society as a whole. Creating conditions for the spread of infection is simply a crime. Therefore, the Cameroonian bishops state in their statement:
‘Homosexuality falsifies and distorts human anthropology and trivializes sexuality, matrimony and family, the foundations of society. ... In the past of nations, practicing homosexuality has never led to the improvement of society, but it is simply a clear sign of the collapse of civilization. In fact, homosexuality puts humanity against 1 another and destroys it... Homosexuality is not a human right. It is an alienation that seriously harms mankind due to the fact that it is not based on any value of a natural human being: it is simply a dehumanization of love, a "disgusting thing" (Luke 18:22). Its rejection is in no way discriminatory; it is simply a legitimate protection of humanity's lasting values in the face of an offence which has become the subject of the right to legal designation and present besides the subject of blessing."
+ Elijah
Patriarch of Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate
+ OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
bishops-secretaries
8.12.2024
