Children cannot be liable for their parents' sins – this moral fact has been heard in Poland since 1989. At first glance and reason There's nothing to discuss., from an ethical, legal, logical, humanistic and even Christian standpoint each man is simply a separate being and has free will. If children were to be liable for the sins of their parents, we would gotta apply the unacceptable rule of collective responsibility.
All of this is actual and there would most likely be a fewer more serious arguments for this doctrine, but 1 must always remember the devil and where the devil is. First of all, authors and promoters of this ethical standard of children of erstwhile safety officers from Stalingrad to the end of the Polish People's Republic. Adam Michnik, whose full household was associated with the PRL safety camera, utilized precisely this argument. Monika Olejnik, Andrzej Mrozowski, Jerzy Owsiak, are besides publishers of ethical truths, taken over from parents with many sins on their conscience.
Secondly, an highly crucial criterion is the inheritance of benefits. erstwhile children take advantage of any wickedness or cognition of sinful parents, they besides sin and They should alternatively confess.Not to accuse others. Finally, the attitude of children to the actions of parents, if it is to justify and relativize evil, is besides hard to talk of any ethical norm or moral spine. For years in Poland, not only were cynical careers sanctified in this way, but they closed their mouths to career critics built on the Peerel roots of parents.
In view of all these devilish details, it is not possible to apply rules universally to parents and children. As a rule, everyone should be accounted for for their merits and faults, but there is simply a continuous act and the benefit of the crime. erstwhile assessing behaviour and careers, especially public individuals, specified criteria are not only morally acceptable but besides necessary, which does not mean that they can be applied without restrictions and context.
Today, another scandal broke out around the political matrimony of Kinga Gajewski and Arkadiusz Myrchy, actually around father and brothers of Kinga Gajewski's father. It's an highly nasty crime from many years ago. Kinga Gajewski's uncles raided a chocolate truck and killed a 24-year-old driver, and did so in a gruesome way, buying the victim alive. Gajewski's father was not active in this murder, but he helped the brothers cover their tracks. In the end, Piotr Gajewski suffered no consequences due to the fact that he was affected by abolition. Everything happened almost 40 years ago erstwhile Kingi Gajewska was not yet in the world, and Arkadiusz Myrch was born.
Under these circumstances, it is appropriate to ask a fewer key questions before the final conviction is issued. Did this crime translate into a political career of Kinga Gajewski and Arkadiusz Myrchy? Did they both benefit from the criminal activities of their father and father - in - law and his relatives? Did any of them justify this hideous murder? So far, these questions stay unanswered, and although Kinga Gajewska has repeatedly acted provocatively and aggressively, she has besides placed advanced demands on her opponents, yet it is not adequate to treat her behaviour as much as her uncles' crimes and father's actions.
It is even more incomprehensible to request the resignation of Arkadius Myrchy, who is not related to those active in this crime and may not have seen it. Reasons for resignation of the Deputy Minister of Justice Arkadius Myrchy there is much more, and these are reasons closely related to his individual activity. Mrs Gajewska, however, for her "works", specified as her testimony, or threatening journalists, should besides say goodbye to public activity.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
