On the method of analysis
The cybernetic pattern and method of analysis of global control processes (the Kossecki method) for more than 40 years has enabled us to foretell global conflicts correctly, as well as indicating the moments of historical change erstwhile the control capacities of competing countries were equal to each another or erstwhile any of them gained a crucial (at least twice) advantage over the competitor. Our institute has written about the method of analysis itself many times, including in the “Modern National Thought” (No. 1)1 and as part of lectures of the National Information Academy2. This time, on the basis of the method mentioned above and with the aid of simple graphics, we will explain to you the past of the fighting of these systems (states) whose interesting continuations are taking place in our modern times.
England conquers India
Our cycle will start with an English-Indian clash that began at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries, erstwhile it is simply a private English company East India Company3 began colonization of conquered territories of India, moving sometimes – as in 1858, erstwhile the anti-English uprising broke out – to bloody murders and massacres. The activities of the East India Company were initiated by English Queen Elizabeth I, giving her the privilege of a trade monopoly with East India4. In areas colonized by the British, this institution had broad political and administrative powers, far beyond conventional trade. She could keep her own army, make political agreements and alliances, declare war, have the right to own her own currency and collect taxes. “Orcas” from the Thames were besides liable for cruel crimes in the Chinese people5But it's a subject for a separate article.
In 1858 the estates of the East India Company were nationalized and the company itself was dissolved in 1874, at the tallness of the British Empire power. Then, besides – and more specifically in 1877 – Victoria (from the German Hanover dynasty, which additionally by her matrimony was linked to the German home of Koburg) was declared Empress of India.
It is besides worth noting that the Anglo-Saxon method utilized in conquering and managing colonized territories is different from that of Byzantinism. Here the main burden of exploitation rested on private corporations, due to the fact that economical motivations are the ones that dominate the Anglo-Saxon nations – another example than English is the past of the United Fruit Company founded in 1899, whose successor is Chiquita Brands International. This corp – on behalf of SZAP6 – erstwhile ruled immense plantation areas in Latin America (e.g. 80% of Honduras's agricultural land belonged to the UFC), was able to overthrow Washington-independent governments and make marionet banana republics.
Hindu ruler of England
However, in 2022 past turned around and it was the Indian Rishi Sunak who became the most influential individual of the London parliament. It can be said, then, that on October 25, 2022, the Hindu avenged his people, becoming ruler of England. Why did this happen? An explanation of this puzzle at the strategical level is the following graphics (Fig.1), which should be supplemented by Chinese-American relations, but even without it, at specified a advanced level of generality, it can be easy seen that India's controlling overtaking England is what enabled the Hindus to begin the process of humiliating the English.
More words about reading charts and graphics
Figure 1 shows how the control capacities of England (including the full British Empire) and India have changed over the past 320 years. Where these graphs intersect (in 2022) we are dealing with a change in the position of leader in this competition. Below the illustration is the name of the country that dominated the strongest strategy in the planet (e.g. in 1930 it was already SZAP alternatively than England).
Figure 1The graphics in Figure 2 show details of the advantage of 1 strategy over another. For example, in 2000, England had a three-and-a-half-time control over India, and by the end of 2022 fresh Delhi had an advantage over London, which is simply a 1.04-fold advantage.
Figure 2Tomasz Banyś
Cybernetic Institute
Strategic Analysis
www.institut-icas.pl
1 T.Banyś, Strong, stronger, strongest..., Modern National thought No. 1. September 2020, p. 56, https://www.modernmysl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/NMN-nr1-September-2020.pdf.
2 T.Banyś, MAS 06. Analysis of global control processes – Tomasz Banyś, NAI Warszawa 11.05.2019, https://www.youtube.com/embed/zTuy1zu5kQA.
3 Around 1600 the English East India Company is formed in London. It was a corp of English investors, which changed its name to the British East India Company after 1707.
4 The Anglo-Saxon approach to the management of colonized territories is based on private enterprises, due to the fact that economical motivations are the ones that dominate the Anglo-Saxons.
5 The English Wschiodnio-Indian Company began its activity there as early as 1614, assuming its mill in Guangzhou (Canton is simply a name from colonial times).
6 SZAP – United States of North America.
Thank you for your interest in our magazine. We are counting on information support: your comments and polemics with our texts and sending your own articles. We can besides be supported materially.
Transfer data:
Pro Vita Bon investigation Institute
BGŻ BNP PARIBAS, Warsaw
Account No: 79160014621841495000000001
Data for abroad transfers:
PL79160014621841495000000001
SWIFT: PPABPLPK
