BANDERISM — BANDITISM — PARTICIPATION OF LEGAL CERTIFICATION
IN THE BANDEROWISH OUNSIDES – A PAY WITH THE EXCUSEMENT ACT
It is Truism to claim that the Churches are by their nature to be apolitical institutions. Are they?
Viktor Poliszczuk says:
"I will not execute here an analysis of the function of churches in relation to the Volyn murders during their time; I did so in the erstwhile edition of "The Bitter Truth". ("The bitter truth"- the shadow of Bandera over the crime of genocide" — Viktor Poliszczuk 2006).
I will just repeat that they did not halt their believers from murdering the Polish and Ukrainian people, and in any cases Orthodox and Greek Catholic poppies favored them, justified them, and there were besides cases of calls for murders.
Let me just say that if Orthodox and Greek Catholics followed Christ's teachings in the fresh Testament, there would not have been a tragedy in the form of a genocide crime.
Since a number of publications point to the function of “Paster Letters” by Archbishop Andrzej Szeptycki, opposed to mass murders, I will point out that the first specified “List” Don't go down! It dates from 21 November 1942 and concerns the participation of Ukrainian police in the execution of judaic population.
The second “Paster letter” of metropolitan Andrzej Szeptycki dates from 10 August 1943.
In it, the metropolitan asks the elders to halt young people from killings and robberies, and calls on Ukrainian youths to observe God’s commandments.
However, there is not a word in the letter about the CNS as an organizer of mass murders, there is not a word about the Volyn UPA, there is not a word about the murdered Polish population.
Even a brief analysis of this "Letter" allows to conclude that Metropolitan Andrzej Szeptycki did not respond to planned, doctrinal mass murders which were the work of the CNS – UPA in Volyn at the time of writing the letter; the metropolitan did not condemn these murders or their perpetrators.
It is besides worth noting that in 1943 the mass execution took place in Volyn, where there were no Greek Catholic parishes, i.e. the “Letter” of A. Szeptycki, which was to be read after the service in the churches, did not even scope the murdered Polish people in Volyn Greek Catholics – the uppers, the banders, the esbeks, and they were the core
OUN-UPA-SB.
So there was no clear, decisive, clear opposition of the Orthodox Church or the Greek Catholic Church to the execution of the Polish population of Volyn and in 1944 in Halicia. (Galicia).
This sin of indifference to the murders burdens both Orthodox and Greek Catholic Orthodox Churches on Archbishop Andrzej Szeptycki personally.
On the 60th anniversary of the murders of Volyn, the Greek Catholic Church did not condemn their perpetrators, but it took the attitude of a liar of historical fact and it acts not from the position of Christian morality, but from a political position.
At first it is essential to explain that the Orthodox church in Ukraine is not structurally uniform. There are 3 sects of this church: the conventional Orthodox Church now called with the addition of the Moscow Patriarchate in the name, the Ukrainian Autokephal Orthodox Church (uncanonical) and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Kiev Patriarchate (noncanonical).
The Orthodox Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate does not talk about the Volyn massacre, although its hierarchy has no uncertainty that the organizer of these crimes was OUN Bandery, and their contractor was the structures established by it.
The position of Ukrainian Autokephal Orthodox Church should be demonstrated by the fact that the penultimate "patriarch" was a erstwhile UPA participant, Volodymyr flag.
The founder of the weekly “Volyn” by Stepan Skrypnyk, after being ordained by the Germans – “Mstysław” and after his death – of the Moscow Patriarch – “Patriarch” Filaret, the same 1 who participates in all the baner celebrations, specified as the dedication of the monument “Kłym Sawur” to the OUN – UPA academy, etc. organized in honor of the OUN – UPA academy, makes the position of this church clear against the Volyn massacres.
Knowing the rule of ideology of Ukrainian nationalism, it is amazing to observe close relations between the Ukrainian nationalist movement and the Greek Catholic Church and part of the Orthodox Church.
It cannot be said that the Greek Catholic Church, including his hierachia with Archbishop Andrzej Szeptycki at the head, did not know the principles of ideological Ukrainian nationalism. The first edition of D. Doncov's nationalism, which constitutes the formulation of the doctrine, i.e. the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism, was printed in Złoczów in the Bazylian printing house. 1 of the leading leaders of the CNS was Doctor of Theology, Greek Catholic priest Ivan Hrynioch.
But it is adequate to trace the statements of Father Stepan Bandera, the Greek Catholic pop, to see that his and his akin views were amoral, in no place were they consistent with Christian ethics.
There were only a fewer exceptions to this rule in the Greek Catholic Church, there were priests who gave their lives in defence of the lives of Christians and were murdered by banderists.
CERKWI’S OPERATING OPERATORY
In the chapter “The function of the Church in the context of the OUN-UPA activities,” Wiktor Poliszczuk states that “from a theological standpoint Christianity is simply a transnational religion” and that “the Christian Church is called to spread God’s grace.” That is why “the Christian clergy must stand higher than national ideals.”
However: “Anyone who carefully reads into the works of Dmytra Doncov, who has become the cornerstone of Ukrainian nationalism, anyone who digs into the basic papers of the UWO-CNS, must conclude that the ideology and practice of these organizations is in conflict with Christianity,
Therefore, Viktor Poliszczuk writes:
"(...) I claim with full awareness: if a Ukrainian clergyman is simply a Ukrainian nationalist at the same time, he betrays Jesus Christ, he deceives himself...".
And then:
"Ukrainian nationalism was created in Galicia, so where the Greek Catholic Church dominated... The Ukrainians of Galicia were devoted to their church... Here, under these conditions, the UWO is formed and operated — a clearly terrorist Ukrainian organization, the predecessor of the CNS.
Dmytra Doncov's writings were distributed... It is impossible for all of this to happen without the cognition of the Greek Catholic Church.
At Świętajura Góra they had to read Dmytra Doncov's Nationalism, they had to read resolutions of the First legislature of Ukrainian Nationalists, they had to analyse these materials.
And in these books, magazines, resolutions — a complete contradiction with Christian thought... ...The appearance of the "Decalogue" (the 10 commandments of the Ukrainian nationalist) would gotta give emergence to a decisive response, it should have been carried out on a large scale against this document, against its wording.
After all, the nationalist “Decalogue” is an ungodly manifesto in all its essence. There is no word about God in him.
Instead, we are talking about the "Spirit of the eternal element", the component in the sense of the Nietzschean alternatively than Christian.
In the "Decalogue" of Ukrainian nationalism there is simply a call for revenge, for sneaky action, for execution crime".
Another case in Volyn, says Poliszczuk, ... Ukrainian nationalism in Volyn was very slow, alternatively communist ideas were spreading in Volyn and the Orthodox Church was in trouble.”
How, then, do these 2 churches and their clergy work under war?
The Hierarchs of the Greek Catholic Church, headed by Metropolitan Andrzej Szeptycki, approved the activities of the OUN – the banders, welcoming the "winner German army".
The same was done by the leadership of the Orthodox Church in Volyn. The metropolitan of Volynsko-rzytomierski Ołexij Hromadski was killed.
Bishop Manuila was killed by the same CNS.
“So what is there to say about clergymen in agrarian shrines?” asks the question of Poliszczuk.
He replies: “As we see among them were courageous, who in accord with the Christian ideals condemned the crimes of the bander, and there were those who feared for their lives and so kept silent.” But there were others.
"On August 28, 1943, in the village of Sztuń, the municipality of Bereżce, St. Luboml, the Orthodox priest of Pokrowszki in the local church held an act of sacrifice of knives, scythes, axes and sickles as tools of murders and gave them to his parishioners to execution “Lachów”.
Two days after that, the peasants utilized these execution tools to execution Poles from the neighbouring village; on 27 September 1943 in the village of Ivankowicze, village of Malin, state of Dubno the villagers celebrated the celebration of the ordination of a advanced filled grave commemorative to the “liberation of Ukraine”.
The local pop in a sermon on this occasion said that the Ukrainian land must be driven out of the country without the anticipation of returning “Lachów, Mazury, Kryżaków, and shrinks.”
“Lachy” — are Poles, erstwhile residents of western Ukraine. “Mazury” — are Poles who settled in western Ukraine after the First planet War (actual military settlers at that time were no longer in Volyn, they were deported in 1940 Bolsheviks). "Kryżaki" is simply a mixed Ukrainian-Polish marriage. "Shrinks" — are children from mixed marriages".
The author further cites Alexander Korman's book. Korman writes about the participation of Greek Catholic clergy in crimes against the Polish population.
And so Father Pałahyćkyj, parish priest of the church in Monasterych was the head of a terrorist group of OUN-UPA militias, which on 28 February 1944 committed a robbery on the population of the village of Koroschatyn, St.
Father Pałahyćkyj was straight active in a mass murder, in which 78 people were killed, men, women and children, and 5 people were injured.
On 20 March 1945, an OUN-UPA terrorist militia was captured in Koropc in the strength of 350 men, headed by the Unitian priest Palahyćkya. His daughter and a fewer nuns were in the militia.
The priest Romanowskyj was co-organizer of mass execution in the village of Byczkowiec, where 63 Poles were killed.
They'd rob them with axes, stab them with forks, choke them with cords, burn them alive. After a fewer years, any criminals failed to withstand intellectual stress and remorse and committed suicide.
The command of OUN station in the village of Synków (Zaleszczyki, Tarnopolszczyzna) included Father Wasyl Mandziuk, who was active in killing Poles, Jews and loyal Ukrainians.
There are many testimonies that banderists murdered Poles in churches, during services. And so on July 11, 1943, in the Oktawin colony, the OUN militia attacked Poles in the church.
After killing him inside the church, he was set on fire by grenade explosions, and the escapees were fired. On August 30, 1943, priest Stanisław Dobrzański was killed in the village of Ostrówków.
Fr Wacław Szetelnicki in his book “Forgotten Lvov hero Fr Stanisław Franki (1903-1944)” (Rome 1983) cites further facts:
Bavarian Parish (Tarnopol). Priest Charles Procyk 2 leavesopd 1943, the banders stabbed with bayonet.
On 13 February 1944, the Ounists killed priest Władysław Żygiel in Bieniawo (Podhajka).
On 14 March 1944, priest Józef Suszczyński was shot during the bander's robbery into the village of Bobulińce (Buczer).
On 13 November 1943, the banders captured Father Antoni Wierzbowski and local teacher Wróbel in the village of Bybło (Rohatyn) and murdered them close the forest village of Podolance.
In Nyrks' shrine, the flagmen killed 2 nuns in a local monastery.
On the night of April 2, 1944, during the attack on the village of Earthling pow. During the action 65 people died, the village and church were burned,
Fraga Parish. On February 5, 1944, the banders murdered the father of Vitalis Borsuk; on February 19, his father Joachim Szafraniec and the monk Roch Sałek died in martyrdom. The Banders have committed many another akin crimes. And so it is on the 30 pages of this book.
Only in Lviv's archdiocese did the robberies on 128 parishes, killed 48 priests, 4 were lost without news, killed 8 nuns, 7 brothers, burned 6 churches and destroyed 7.
“What is the reason for specified an CNS-UPA animal?” asks Wiktor Poliszczuk.
He replies: “The reason lies in the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism, justified “scientificly” by Dmytra Doncov.”
He adds: "The threat of Bolshevism blinded the church hierarchy of Greek Catholic church".
Finally, the author said: “I cannot realize — why did the Pole of the home of number Alexander Fredra, metropolitan Andrzej Szeptycki, become Ukrainian?
Most importantly, "there are no statements by the Greek Catholic and Orthodox Church about their relation to the crimes of the CNS – UPA during the war in Western Ukraine".
Wojciech Rudny's article “Boundaries of Tolerance” encourages reflection. (Myśli Polska" nr 29-30/ 2000).
"In the beginning of the 20th century many Ukrainian schools were established in the Second Republic. But by the end of that period there were most likely several. What happened? After all, schools of another national minorities existed all the time.
Is Poland discriminating Ukrainians in this way, as any of them explain to this day? Well, no.
The Polish State could not tolerate the fast conversion of Ukrainian schools from national to nationalist, i.e. hostile Poland.
In this situation, while continuing to respect Ukrainians – Polish citizens, nationalists were prevented from raising citizens hostile to the state by setting up strategistic (two-lingual) schools.
Despite this, nationalists managed to instill a large part of Ukrainian youths in the spirit of hatred. The effects of this were experienced between 1939 and 1947, and to this day there is simply a nationalist trend, besides visible in the situation of the current nationalist Ukrainian state with the provocation of the Kiev mayan in the background.
The current Ukrainian government under the leadership of the nationalist anti-Polish and anti-Semitic parties of the Right Sector, or the highly fascist, nationalist, anti-Semitic organization of Swoboda under the direction of Olech Tiahnybok, does not advance reconciliation, while together with Putinian Russia poses a threat to Poland, to its existing borders.
Arbitrary doctrine of Upovian Ukraine: "Our borders are from the east of Chechnya to Przemyśl and Krynica to the west of our "our" state. This current policy of the Ukrainian authorities is supported by Polish politicians headed by the ruling PO.
In order to be in accordance with Article 35 of the Constitution, but besides remembering the experience of the past should enable Ukrainians to learn their language exclusively in Polish-Ukrainian schools, where it would be much easier to prevent nationalistic manifestations.
It is besides a pity that there is no reciprocity between countries in the Constitution. It is said that there are twice as many Poles in Ukraine as there are Ukrainians in Poland, and so far there are only 3 Polish schools there, and teaching Polish in Ukrainian schools encounters difficulties, to say the least.
The article .Boundaries of Tolerance" clearly indicates the threat to the state from the current policy of the authorities. 1 may say that specified a message is an exaggeration, that there are no signs of this danger.
Those who presume the demolition of the Polish state only blur their hands by proceeding specified opinions. And they're getting bolder, which is simply quite a few evidence.
On July 7, 2000, during the burial in Piculica, the remains of UPA bandits, who died, among others, in the unfortunate attack on Bircza by the Polish population, gave a sermon, or alternatively a biased speech by Ukrainian priest Stefan Dziubina, bearing the title mitrata.
In a long, most likely half-hour performance, only the first conviction refers to the words of Christ: “Blessed is the 1 who gives his life for his friends”, but all the next are half-truths and public lies inciting listeners against Poland and Poles.
If 1 does not believe that the Greek Catholic clergy were actively active in the criminal activities of the CNS and UPA, he should be acquainted with the “speak” of the mitrat, who faithfully continues the work of companions under the banner black and red flag.
His message of a erstwhile russian prisoner sentenced to a long-term prison for banditism as part of a nationalist armed formation is to prove that these formations fought for the freedom of Ukraine, and their members are heroes who gave their lives not only for their homeland but besides for their friends.
He does not want to announcement that the name of a bandit is only actual if it is confirmed by the bandit acts of a individual called it.
This besides does not have any similarity between the Polish guerrillas and members of the armed CNS formation. Polish guerrillas, regardless of political subordination, did not mark killing civilians.
That is why they are heroes – combatants, and the CNS – the sheep are criminals, even though they claim that in this way they fought for the freedom of Ukraine.
The talker tries to smuggle the view that UPA and Ukrainians are 1 and the same. Meanwhile, it is known that the CNS and the UPA are a disgruntled, petty part of this nation, which the Ukrainians themselves mention with embarrassment. It is also, even if there is sometimes hatred among us – as a rule, alien to Poles – not to Ukrainians.
It is right to say that the fact leads to the consent of the mitrat should primarily inculcate himself and the Ukrainian nationalists who perceive to his speeches.
After this conviction comes a full series of lies. And the fact that, in order to get free of Ukrainians, they were transported half a million to the USSR, allegedly under duress, that Ukrainian lands were forced to plunder Poland assuming their colonies, that UPA defended defenceless Ukrainians, whose Poles murdered thousands of them, that both nations were killing each other, that Poles did not want to “in God's way, to get along” with the Ukrainians, and so there were so many victims.
In support of his arguments, he quotes the lies of the Ukrainian historian about the alleged appeal for a covenant with Poles.
Hundreds of years of peaceful presence of Poles in the lands of Ukraine, even having to settle in deserted areas after Tatar invasions (population density was up to 2 people per square kilometre) made them ethnically common.
Degrading the notion of cultural Ukrainian lands is simply a lie and abuse which Ukrainian nationalists are eager to use.
In Europe, the majority of border lands are ethnically non-national. Is that why the nations are to slaughter themselves in the way that Ukrainian nationalists use?
It is simply a lie to guarantee that nationalists have fought Germany. Ukrainians fought them, but not the outlaws.
The lie is that during the war Poles murdered full Ukrainian villages in Chełmszczyz and Podlasie.
The papers to which Fr Dziubin calls so zealously say that in this area, as in another places, death sentences were executed by underground, legal Polish authorities on Polish citizens collaborating with Germany in a way that contributes to the death of many people, and after the war on Polish stalkers collaborating with communists (e.g. Wierzchowina).
Giving the names of the localities and the number of mitrats killed in them tends to pass with the fact overdoing the number of killed and not explaining that most of them are members of the criminal UPA, and many of the killed civilians are victims of unintended death, which were found in the line of fire.
He besides skips the most crucial thing, that is the reason for the deliberate killing of civilians, the aggressive party, on the top-down order aimed at killing the full Polish population were Ukrainian nationalists.
Poles had a top-down ban on specified actions, but... But people are just people. In contact with images, no longer animal, but Satan's beastry, any of whom were nervous, and sometimes they returned something similar, seldom the same.
It was always a retaliation to discourage genocide, or it was a preemptive attack or a violent consequence to the attack. It was never premeditation preceded by the preparation of execution weaponry or their ordination.
New elements appear among the clichés and lies preached about the crime of the Vistula action.
Mitrat appears to be a strategist claiming that the action was unnecessary, as UPA was already broken, and in a lie he goes to deny the request to intern suspects for membership of the CNS and UPA in Jaworzno camp.
The conditions of apricot existence there are a sad matter, but it does not burden Poles, but at most people akin to Ukrainian nationalists.
However, Communist authorities besides caught active criminals and issued many convictions, including the death penalty.
This story doesn't talk of it with caution. It is adequate that the president of the communists revealed to them all a monument in Jaworzno.
The tears over the consequences of the “Wisła” action do not lead to only the right conclusion that this was the consequence of the insane implementation of the fascist ideology of Dmytra Doncov in all areas affected by nationalists, i.e. in the areas of the south-eastern provinces of the Second Republic of Poland.
The border imposed on Poland during planet War II did not change the character of the CNS and UPA.
Only a favourable atmosphere of German and russian business disappeared for them.
They remained the same criminal organization destabilizing the lives of both Polish and Ukrainian people.
The effects of its fight besides appeared in the demolition (often by UPA itself), deserted villages.
They besides had to embrace active clergymen, specified as Bishop Kocyłowski mentioned by Mitrat, who are accused of giving instructions for pops throughout the diocese about the sanctification of knives on Lachów.
These are besides the words of the story that UPA did not execution Polish clergymen, did not ruin Polish churches and cemeteries and did not execution small, innocent children and infirm old people in Poland today" - they will attest to the perverse lie of this man, characteristic of all nationalist propaganda.
The ability to preach about specified lying content is evidence of the uncritical self-confidence resulting most likely from the sense of immunity of a spiritual individual and impunity, as well as its zeal in the implementation of the Resolution of the National Provincial of the CNS of 22.06.1990.
Soon it will turn out how this affects the attitude of the unoriented Ukrainian youth fed with akin historical lies. You can already see how far the boundaries of tolerance are in our country.
It is getting worse due to the fact that the current authorities of the 3rd Republic, as if the terrible destiny of the Kresovians prepared by nationalists, officially tolerate the existence and improvement of Ukrainian nationalism, through unworthy resolutions of “the sign of genocide”, or the failure of the Polish Parliament to recognise the Day of the Martyrdom of Kresovians on 11 July.
In conclusion, Poland, with its current borders, threatens in parallel:
– revived Ukrainian nationalism together with anti-Polish putinian Russia and its many years of agentship in Poland.
Shame on Polish politicians who shouted the slogan “The Glory of Ukraine” on the Kiev malice under the banners of Bandera. In consequence to the current slogans of the picketing Ukrainians, e.g. in Lviv in 2014 with the flag shouts:
“The Jews, Lachy, are your vorohi, destruct them”
"Smert Lachom – The Fame of Ukraine"
‘Lachy za San’
‘Lachiw Riase’
‘Ukraine without Lacha’
“Lachiw building of rizatas and hangings”
“We ne budemo tiny Ukraine, but besides Lachy here ne bude”
“Enough Lachya have been on Ukrainian soil, pluck all Pole with roots”
"The most scurry here prijde, scurry only ne proklati Lachy"
"America will pour out the wine, it is the tut bude plebiscite and the budeno have rallied, for toho musymo torizata villages of Lachiw and the toda budemo had Ukraine".
I witnessed on the Lviv streets these manifestations, nationalist, fascist and anti-Semitic organization “Svobody” Oleh Tiahnybok
Marching on the streets of Lviv in 1941, SS-Galizien troops acted likewise carrying a developed banner with the slogan "Smert Lachom".
AVOLUTION AND THE TITUSCHEK ORGANISATOR
De novo On 19 March 2014, “Gazeta Polska” begins “rozhowory”, peculiarly compromising this supposedly centre right-wing writing, non-anti-Semitic and non-philosomic.
The text by ed. Katarzyna Gójska – Hejke "WOLYŃ AND ORGANISATOR TITUSZEK" http://independent.pl/53050-wolyn-i-organizer-titushki (link is external)
attacking in the kind of ed. Jacek Kwieciński on the large Pole Fr Tadeusz Isakowicz – Zaleski.
In this spirit too, I protest against the lies contained in this text, which you will open with the above link.
I'm not gonna prove red. Katarzyna Gójska – Heyke, that I am not a camel, but I can convince her that I am a Lvivian, among others, editor of the “Lviv meetings” and “Cress Information Service”.
I have been in Lviv respective times a year, among others, on my own author's evenings in the editorial board of the “Lwów Meetings” at 9 Rylewa Street (Badenich 9).
Red. Katarzyna Gójska – Heyke abuses social trust by lying in her text "TOLYN AND TITUSZEK ORGANISATOR", as if "...the decisive argument was the appeal of Poles surviving in Ukraine who asked us – the Poles from Matrix" to support Ukraine's aspirations for ...changed in their country today".
“Gazeta Polska” in Ukraine is not to be bought. So what is the appeal, from whom, to whom?
It's a lie that is impertinent and sewn with thick wire to overshadow Poles in Matrix. Poles in Lviv and in the Kresów II of the Republic of Poland do not have any "today homeland of Ukraine", due to the fact that their homeland is Poland, but not Tuskovo – a chamber, to which they cannot return from wanderings from russian exiles and camps of Bolsheviks from Siberia or Kazakhstan.
Ukrainians persecute Poles, hating them, as we have experienced many times with our spouse on the border in Medica, or in Lviv trams through alleged checks and “left” mandates with screams: “you to the tuurma of the Pole”.
Even the Cathedral in Lviv gives oral and written messages only in Ukrainian, donations to Holy Masses (?) are collected in ecclesiastical benches by civilian individuals, not in sacristy, and the Lviv Polish-language press fears Ukrainians as fire.
The text "WOLYŃ AND ORGANISATOR TITUSZEK" is full of hypocritical lies with impudently lying "motivation" not to print the text of priest Tadeusz Isakowicz – Zaleski in "Gazeta Polska", as well as the mocking of his person.
The case with Waldemar Lysiak from 2007, erstwhile he was called anti-Semitic by “Gazeta Polska” and resigned from cooperation.
CONFERENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND IN THE EXCUSEMENT ACT
Pilate asked them, "And what shall I do with Jesus, called Christ?"
Then they all answered, “On the cross with him!”
On the day erstwhile the Polish Church and the Russian Church signed an act of reconciliation, including forgiveness of wrongs, in Moscow a associate of the Pussy Riot group was sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment for an artistic performance in the Moscow Council in which they performed an antiputinian paraphrase of prayer.
This conviction confirms the fact about Putin's totalitarian country's advice with political murders in the background.
The gathering of Putinian agent Cyril I with the president of the Polish Episcopal Conference Archbishop Józef Michalik was not held in any church or Orthodoxy, but in the Royal Castle, that is, in secular spaces.
It was so a political conference, not a spiritual meeting. As such, it could not meet the conditions of religion contained in the Gospel of Christ.
At this point, the question should be raised as to what harm in the political context we were to forgive the Moscow Church and the present Russian Federation.
It was not Poles who murdered in Orthodox churches in the USSR of the faithful and clergy, it was not Poles under the leadership of Comrade Lenin who desecrated the sacred Orthodoxy and relics of this faith, firing firearms at the faithful during the service and destroying the temple monuments, including the graves of the saints.
COOPERATION WITH THE KGB
Cyril (Gundiaev) worked with the KGB as an agent known as ‘Michaelov’.
According to Felix Corley, a investigator in the archives of russian peculiar services, it would not be possible for them to presume advanced dignity in the church hierarchy without cooperation with the KGB. The year 1970 and its first abroad journey (as part of the “Syndesmos hieromnich” organization) are mentioned as a minute of spiritual recruitment. Cyril went with Leningrad metropolitan Nicodemus to Prague (link is external).
After all, it was not Poles who started the Polish-bolshevik war in 1920, which resulted in the Gloria of the Warsaw Battle.
It was not Poles who brutally murdered Polish prisoners of war taken prisoner by Bolsheviks during that war.
It was not Poles who made a pact with Ribbentrop to execution all Poles.
However, it was not the Poles who committed the crime in Katyn, which Putin and Cyril I do not consider genocide, and the “progressive” Russian Federation press reports the guilty Germans (now for the deficiency of the “Nazis”).
However, it was not Poles who threw the “black night” of the business of Poland with the beginning of September 17, 1939.
It was the Russians in agreement with the Polish authorities who assassinated Smolensk on 10 April 2010 during which the Polish president and his wife were murdered.
The Polish Episcopal Conference was not curious in this crime. No 1 from the hierarchy of the Polish Episcopal Conference spoke on this subject, while the Cross of Christ before the Namiestnikowski Palace was not consecrated, named by Michalik “the furniture” and removed with the participation of Komorowski and many “princes of patriots” wandering around it, with the bandit online cook Dominik Taras, under the approval of HGW.
It is the current president of Russia Putin who accuses Poles of killing Bolshevik POWs in 1920, erstwhile it was, of course, the opposite.
It is the Russian agentura that presently governs Poland, with appropriate tools.
It was Russian president Dmitry Anatolievich Medvedev who issued the telephone “act of death” of Lech Kaczyński, on a “ground” which was not in accordance with the Constitution and another legal regulations Bronisław Komorowski became the president of the Republic immediately causing a disturbance under the Presidential Palace connected with the Cross of Christ as a” political image of Law and Justice.
The president of the Polish Episcopal Conference Fr. Archbishop Józef Michalik did not stand up for the Cross, who, at the approval of the president of Warsaw and Prime Minister Donald Tusk, was desecrated for weeks, urine, vulgarisms: "Do you have a penis?", cans of “Lech” beer etc.
Agent Hanna Gronkiewicz Waltz appointed an net bandit Dominic Tarasa by giving him approval for the bandit night-time fraying of the Cross of Christ, the same Cross as today's message Cyril I and Joseph Michalik "Together for the Cross".
Poland, which has been the foreground of Christianity for centuries, abruptly after the dramatic death of president Lech Kaczyński, became a conspiracy of executioners and a foreground of east Asian barbarism.
The Polish Episcopal Conference established fresh “princes of patriots” in Krakowskie Przedmieście, standing in line to approve accidents in Krakowskie Przedmieście.
Michalik besides went to the threat of excommunication for the heroic priest Stanisław Małkowski praying to the Queen of Poland to defend the Cross on which Her boy hung.
During this barbarism at Michalik's Presidential Palace, he said that here the cross is being manipulated and it is not his business, due to the fact that it is hard to set furniture in someone's apartment.
If the cross is simply a furniture, what does it serve” religious” gathering under this “furniture” of the agent of the cherry “Michael” under the spiritual pseudonym” Cyril I with Michalik controlling the flag of “Philozoph” Józef Życiński, b. Primate of Poland Józef Glemp, or contaminated with the import of various slogans of Bishop Tadeusz Pieronek, a rotal lawyer.
When the fight against the Cross in Poland became a fact and in a bandit way the Papal Cross was cut off on Kraków Błonia, in Stalowa Wola – a sign for building a church, in Przemyśl on the Hill of 3 Crosses, or at the top of Poland – Rysach, and the Polish Episcopal Conference did not react, what to think about specified Polish clergymen, spiritual guides of Christian Poland?
It is worth recalling that the predecessors of Cyril I were besides KGB agents, specified as Alexy II “Drodzow” or the bandit metropolitan Moscow Nicholas, a associate of the Burdenko Commission, who, among others, was accompanied by author Alexy Tolstoy and the president of the commission of Nikolay Burdenko a friend of Stalin, a Russian doctor, drug addict, alcoholic and pederast, signed a fundamental Katyn lie called the Burdenko Commission.
Archbishop Michalik may possibly point the way, then possibly go that way, but mostly the roads point no desire, nor even more so. And he compared the cross to a closet or another furniture. Not bad for 1 statement.
Pilate asked them, “And what shall I do with Jesus, called Christ?” Then everyone replied, “On the cross with him!” Pilate saw that it was not helping, and the confusion was increasing. So he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. And he said, “I am not guilty of this blood. This is your case.”
I think that after the “famous” political gathering of “Michael” with Michalik, b. president of the Polish Episcopal Conference Archbishop Józef Michalik will not dare to say publically the words of the Polish witch Adam Mickiewicz:
‘Only under this cross, only under this sign
Poland is Polish and Poland is Polish.’
However, the fight against the Church continues unfortunately without protests of the Polish Episcopal Conference.
This is the voice of Adam Michnik on the Church, Poland, Poles and Polishness:
Poles are like the Roman Catholic Church teaching hypocrisy, lying, conformism and hypocrisy.
//www.youtube.com/embed/QlSsg7QkjrY
(link is external)
Documents, sources, quotations:
//www.youtube.com/embed/QlSsg7QkjrY
Viktor Poliszczuk "A bitter truth- the shadow of Bandera over the crime of genocide" – 2006
Vitali Masłośkyj “Who and against whom were the Ukrainian nationalists fighting during planet War II?” (Wroclaw 2001),
Zbigniew Małyszczycki "OUN-UPA gravestone Fr. mitrat Stefan Dziubyna in action",
Historical-publicist diary “On Outworld” No 49/2001
Wojciech Rudny "Boundaries of Tolerance". (Myśli Polska" nr 29-30/ 2000).
Developd by Aleksander Szumański “The Voice of Poland” Toronto
