Or a large hit on people's money.
(Text appeared on WPS website 18.07.2022r.)
–
By definition, inflation is simply a process of expanding the price of goods and services. The price increase process itself is not interesting – it is sad, but obvious, but there are interesting reasons behind this process. The economical manuals mention at least a fewer causes of inflation, but the most crucial origin that triggers all the remainder is excessive money in the country economy. Money is put into circulation by the banking strategy in general. But how it happens that there is an increase in the amount of money that controls or does not control the phenomenon, who is liable for it or who is not liable for the consequences Let's take a look at this trial.
If at a given minute the value of all goods and services in the country's economy is A PLN, and after any time, due to the increase in money, the same amount of goods and services is worth n x A PLN (for n>1) i.e. that the value of the monetary unit is lower n times. We request more monetary units to buy the same thing as before, before the amount of money in circulation increases. But why is that a problem? It is simply a banal mathematical and economical operation. If I had bought goods and services before A zł, now I'll buy the same for n x A zł. economical statistic – more counting – and bank staff will have a problem due to the fact that they will gotta bear n twice as many coins and bills.
However, it turns out that the problem is very serious due to the fact that in the economical reality of judaic capitalism, the consumer of goods and services can no longer buy them as much as before, due to the fact that the money from the surplus introduced into the economy did not scope him(?). How do we know that? For example, due to inflation, the IIIRP/Polin authorities introduce alleged shield schemes – protective accessories, control of certain prices, etc., but these are actions and seemingly cover and pretended to care for society, precisely for election turnout(all Western regimes have an identical policy in this respect). This is an crucial conclusion: The rulers know very well that the vast majority of the population has not received the surplus of money introduced to the economy! Why? So who received or took over this surplus? Should it be the responsibility of the rulers who are constitutionally excluded from monetary policy? And if not them, who should be blamed? Are central banks liable for not financing state budget deficits?
Employing successful economists and various advisory bodies of highly paid geniuses, central banks that constitutionally and/or statutoryly (depending on regime) are liable for monetary policy and money issuance (governments do not have the right to implement monetary policy – ? – !!!)So they made a mistake, did they commit a crime? Not only thatThey put besides much money into the economy, they inactive distributed it so that it did not scope the vast majority of consumers (?). Let us explain, then, to whom inflationary money goes.
How do central banks bring money into the country's economy?
Smart textbooks for economical students give answers. I should compose not economics, but the religion of economics, due to the fact that the content of this discipline we accept only on faith, it is impossible to prove it scientifically or to confirm it experimentally. 1 can only describe the effects of applying explanation in the economy of economics, but then it is besides late to repair, you gotta start all over again – in addition, judaic capitalism has removed logic from economics and logically reasoning economists, prefers only economical religion. The same textbook content besides provides Wikipedia, for example: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank central ,https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operations open market, https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papier value (finance).
However, I do not intend to empathize anyone with dubious wisdom and economical terminology, I will only describe the real state with a simple, understandable language.
Statutes of central banks oblige them to regulate (i.e. introduction and control) money supply (i.e. quantities) in circulation. The central bank (the only 1 entitled to issue money) buys, i.e. it pays the issued currency, from the commercial bank "value paper", "certification", etc. (paper sheet in A4 format or entry in the IT strategy !!!). The commercial bank introduces the money obtained in the country's economy in the form of credit. Which means For its intermediation in the economy of the country, the commercial bank obtains not only immense cash for the A4 format, but besides margins and interest on loans granted from this money (repayment to the commercial bank of the debt results in an increase in prices in the economy, as the money has not been in circulation, has returned to the commercial bank, it is already owned). Smart textbooks say that this is how the central bank interacts with the credit policy of commercial banks (?). – At any rate, the question of the amount of money in the economy is so controlled.
However, the money that, for the sale to the central bank of the A4 format, the commercial bank "enters" into the economical circulation besides in the form of alleged non-cash loans and in the form of alleged derivatives, besides securities (derivats – but I will not describe this method due to the fact that it has been expanded to around 1000 different possible operations – cons) – is simply a alleged virtual money creation that increases the amount of money in circulation – but only existing in the IT evidence (hence virtual money). The increase in the amount of virtual money occurs in geometric advancement and is beyond control, and surely beyond the control of central banks. Can you see where the main origin of inflationary money is?
Inflation, or an increase in the price of goods and services, is utilized to remove real money from the economical circulation, i.e. to bargain from the public. After all, no 1 will sale goods and services for virtual money to its owners – political decision-makers, builders of judaic capitalism, or avant-garde of the western capitalist world. Nor should it be amazing that this "avanguard" will defend judaic capitalism as independence—she faces a simple alternate she has sincerely earned: life or death. – How long will criminal judaic capitalism continue? For now it's us, society, if we start to rebel, we can be treated with, for example, covid restrictions. And if we cannot organise ourselves in defence of our fundamental rights and freedoms, which are even enshrined in the Constitution of the IIIRP/Polin, then we will have nothing but the gathering of firewood.
“What is simply a bank break-in to establish a bank? What is murdering a man to hire a man” – wrote in 1928 in ‘Three-cent Opera’Bertold Brecht.
Only do we have time for most of us to yet come to the conclusion that the elimination of criminal, judaic capitalism and political elimination of ruling criminals is ours ‘to be or not to be’ - What?
.
Special Supplement for Defenders and Criminal Officers of judaic Capitalism
“Jews and Births of Capitalism” — Werner Somemart
Werner Sombart (1863-1941), prominent sociologist and economist, prof. of universities in Wrocław and Berlin, alongside Max Weber considered the most crucial investigator of the beginning and improvement of capitalism. His main works include Der moderne Kapitalismus, Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des modernen Kapitalismus, Der Bourgeois, and posthumously published Noo-Soziologie.
In her loudest work, Sombart challenges Weber's well-known thesis, according to which capitalism has a origin in the Protestant ethics, advocacy of hard work, the pursuit of continuous wealth expansion and austerity. Somemart in a superb way shows that all the basic principles of the capitalist economy can be found in Judaism and judaic culture from which Protestant ethics originated. These principles, established over thousands of years of the judaic state (* Oh, my God *), and then the judaic diaspora, are completely different from the strategy of values that prevailed in Europe in ancient times and in the mediate Ages. From a historical point of view, the improvement of capitalism can so be regarded as a consequence of the gradual decline of Latin civilization and the submission of Europe's peoples to principles typical of judaic civilization. – https://www.znak.com.pl/ksiazka/zydzi-i-birth-capitalism-werner-sombart-164456
(* Oh, my God *)There are no reliable historical sources confirming that the judaic state had always existed.
–
Today, this last message should be somewhat modified or enriched with additional content: the religions of judaic Christianity have become a kind of broadcast belt for the spread of judaic capitalism and political dominance may not be so much judaic civilization as the world's judaic (Jewish-Anglossian – due to the sources of spread – Wall Street, London City, Hong Kong – at least until 2047) financier.
Dariusz Kosiur
–
