Arms

niepoprawni.pl 2 months ago

We request to destruct [1] the guests who have spent decades planting pharmacists about the requirements of the modern battlefield. That there are specified requirements and any stuff doesn't meet them. We had any T-72, T 55, cannons, anti-aircraft kits, etc. Obsolete equipment, al;e after upgrades. And alternatively of storing it, they just erased it. Meanwhile, there was a belief among the laymen that he would be useful if needed. Neosovieck invasion of Ukraine showed that specified equipment could, for example, fight drones, defend the country from hostile diversion, supplement losses. As the dissertations caught on this subject, they explained that Russia is our brothers and sisters, our team, and Putin is our soul, our man in Moscow. So we are safe from Russia.

The second popular subject was the absolute deficiency of decision-making. Here Bronisław Komorowski was distinguished. erstwhile they asked him anything, he answered that he would first go to his allies to ask what to do. He knows nothing and he knows nothing. I did. That's where the thought came from to cut up any expeditionary brigade on a fresh equipment that will operate on missions. And the remainder will work. Hence ideas specified as the Anders Missionary Tank, we are absolutely useless.

There was inactive specified a popular instruction that if we start armoring, Russia will feel offended and insulted, and if we are defenseless, it will not be offended and cool.

A procedure must be developed to expel specified unsuccessful pseudo-experts and introduce experts.

II

The purchases of the PiS bear the mark of modernity combined with the plans of fabrication of the K2 and Haubic K9 tanks. Rather, we were accidentally gaining weight for the United States. In the event of a conflict in the Far East, we would be able to send the South Koreans many spare parts, barrels, ammunition, ready-made machines, etc. And we could negociate with the US. We could say, look, we're crucial due to the fact that we support the key direction of the Far East. What do the Germans support? The button supports. Of course, this is simply a theoretical anticipation due to the fact that PiS ideologically rejects negotiations: you cannot talk to enemies, and you cannot bargain with friends due to the fact that they are friends.

An crucial component of these purchases was the immediateness: the equipment immediately began to come in, allowing fast implementation. If individual wants to get acquainted with the effective and fast way of introducing fresh equipment, let him read an article on Wikipedia about F 16: the first version had weaker radar, etc., but they rapidly introduced it, trained pilots, service, full units on fresh equipment. In the meantime, the mark version entered the prepared units, and the first F 16 were upgraded to the mark standard.

In our case, our manners were that they were waiting first to bring the equipment to perfection, which lasted for years. In the meantime, the concept changes 5 times, there's no funding. Look at the circus that took place on the Crab implementation. To kill Krab Komorowski left with action on Sheremietiewa even. I'm leaving out the fact that they didn't know about the chassis. That they can't do it.

In order to be reliable partners for Americans, we should have:

1. CPK, which is simply a large airport capable of receiving crucial air transport. I don't know.

2. Port Infrastructure, capable of receiving major sea transports, including fuel.

3. The pipelines that fuel the U.S. troops can power.

4. Highways on the north-south line.

Meanwhile, the CPK has collapsed, port dedicated to Germany, etc. Ergo is right to believe that we do not want to defend ourselves against Russians. The existence of a immense Komradorist organization made the writing plans unrealistic. It was likely that it would come to what is now. The Law and Justice didn't even have the arithmetic majority. Never.

The alternate was any German ideas. Super Leopardy. It's just a sick time. Who else remembers that?

It's intellectual like that. Imagine starting production somewhere in 2030. Drink the pieces, for us the first copies 3 years later, too, of 3. Implementation at 2040. Something like that.

III Badger

Who remembers Corvette Gawron? It was expected to be 7 pieces, but they turned it into 1 ORO Slazak who didn't get rockets, so for Russia he was harmless due to the fact that he was defenseless. He put the yard into problem due to the fact that it required investments to be spread out into 7 ships. And so this fixed cost per ship has spread (!), which is not at all. Which means his cost has increased. And someway they forgot on Wikipedia that Tusk was the 1 who canceled the show.

In any case, the order of only 111 Badgers, which are caterpillar Combat Infantry Trucks, looks like an effort to likewise plow the Steel Wola Huta. The cost of starting a series production will be divided into a tiny number of cars that will be expensive. The task will be unprofitable and the maker with debts will be fired. And you can give it to the Germans. Additionally, German Puma is waiting. Puma doesn't swim, Badger swims. Therefore, Puma is better armored and simpler in construction.

Imagine a horse tender for the army. In II Poland, e.g. Studs offer horses and 1 camel guest. And it turns out that the requirements are gradually changed so that the camels abruptly meet the criteria. It may turn out that abruptly swimming is not important, and armor is important. And the request to swim undermines the design, requires hull formation, drive mounting, etc. Badgers adapted to non-floating can so be uncompetitive.

Footnotes:

1 – from the public debate.

Read Entire Article