The results of the first circular of presidential elections and their polling results give quite a few information on how different age, gender, urban and agrarian groups voted.
We know that attendance was evidence (67.31%) and spread reasonably equally between different age groups. This cuts the voices of complainers that young people are not curious in politics and social life. She curious them adequate to go to the election. The largest attendance was in the age group 50–59 and was 74.5 percent and then in the group 18–29, where it was 72.8 percent.
What if the young are highly liberal?
In the 18-29 year group, the best results were obtained Sławomir Mentzen (34.8%) and Adrian Zandberg (18.7%). Young people have bet on young men – young for political conditions. Most voted for a radically conservative Confederate candidate, but a good consequence was made by a non-compromising leftist with Together.
Often we hear young people vote for extremist candidates and then grow out of it. Let us presume now that young Polish and young Poles voted consciously. That it is not like the commentators frequently say that young lives do not know, have no children, do not get sick, so they do not know how crucial public wellness care is. Or how crucial public services are, due to the fact that so far they received everything for free – they lived at their parents' home and had school from the state. That is why young people erstwhile voted for Corwin, and present for Mentzen.
But what about those who chose Zandberg? possibly they already realize that access to housing is important.
The bold presumption that people voted consciously makes them face the fact that any young people have libertarian views, and another part would like modern social democracy. It is clear that people change their perceptions, so young people can change theirs – but they don't have to. The results of 2 candidates outside the PO-PiS duo may show that the old well-known division into social Poland and liberal Poland will have another actors on the political stage.
What if there are anti-Semites among us?
Grzegorz Braun He got 6.34 percent of the votes. "X" by his name placed over 1 million 2 100 1000 people on the card. And we'll most likely hear again that not all of these voters knew precisely what Braun had. They just liked the guy with the fire extinguisher, and they thought he was a talkative political troll.
Let us, however, presume that the electoral and voters of Braun have deliberately voted for anti-Semite, homophobe, xenofoba who despises the European Union and Ukraine. If we presume that, it will tell us something about Poland and Poles. We will find out that there are people among us who consider Jews inferior, gay and lesbian to human rights, and they are not harmed by violence. They consider it possible to enter the historian's lecture to do a bang and smash the mouthpiece, standing that you can enter the infirmary and attack the doctor. There are just quite a few anti-Semites and violent people surviving in Poland.
It is inactive the case that the message "Poles participated in the Holocaust" provokes outrage almost universally. Researchers from the fresh Holocaust past School, specified as Jan Grabowski, Barbara Engelking, Jan Tomasz Gross is Anna Bikont, they are not widely listened to in Poland.
At Campus, Rafał Trzaskowski, I had a gathering with Anna Bikont. Campus is not a conservative event that promotes anti-Semitism, but erstwhile the youth took the level during that meeting, my back gave me the creeps. Young men, due to the fact that only gentlemen spoke, told that Anna Bikont was exaggerating, due to the fact that here I paraphrase: “Poles and Jews lived in perfect harmony, and then Germans came and started killing Jews.” They besides said that Poles saved Jews and the end of the period. specified a campus youth had cognition of history. Their parents and grandparents most likely have a akin one.
What if the flat was bought out, who could?
Rafał Trzaskowski received 31.36 percent of the votes and Karol Nawrocki 29.54 percent. Mr. George's flat case didn't hurt the PiS candidate. possibly we'll hear that the iron electorates vote with an iron consequence, so erstwhile Jarosław Kaczyński says that we gotta vote for Nawrocki, then the Pisan electorate will vote like that.
Now let us presume that people voted for Nawrocki, due to the fact that the affair of the studio doesn't substance at all – neither moral nor legal. Whoever had the chance to buy a municipal flat bought it, and if he had the chance today, he would have bought it too. Who had a chance to get a cheaper apartment, due to the fact that individual he knew knew individual who could aid deal with a senior, most likely took advantage of specified an opportunity. The flat is simply a valuable and increasingly uncommon good, so whoever could or could get it occasionally just does it.
Karol Nawrocki's single is simply a slippery matter, but the latest communicative teaches us that erstwhile the state allows public resources to be privatised, people do so. any of this privatization was pure crime. Part of it was just taking advantage.
What if the parties are mostly from videos?
During the run before the second circular of the presidential election we will most likely hear that voters and voters do not know the candidates' programs, that they voted based on superficial cognition derived from Facebook (older) or tiktok (young).
And what if political parties are not already program parties that have a fixed set of values and convince people? possibly alternatively of programs that nobody reads, the parties are releasing present only simplified messages presented in short videos. And erstwhile they quit programming, they turn on the tendency to walk distant from it.
Little wonder, therefore, that voters and electoral politicians learn from their videos and short posts on social platforms. Those who want to vote consciously search information about candidates and candidates where these politicians present them. So alternatively of talking about uninformed voters, it might be better to presume that they are best informed as possible in the planet of modern politics.
The presumption that Poles and Poles voted consciously makes us look seriously not only at politicians, but at the society in which we live. We may have just learned something very crucial about him.
