last compose post 28 11 2025
Who wrote that line again? What do we do with this flea24 now?
The full text is built as follows:
- I'm sorry. handling, that is: slanderous accusations in our direction that we have committed any kind of crime
- I'm sorry. exfoliation What they truly mean: about these false accusations Jews have financial claims
- I'm sorry. announcement: this will be an unpleasant conversation for you, you will grind your teeth
- I'm sorry. Summary - but you're gonna pay us due to the fact that we're gonna be surviving here.
This is pure brainwashing.
And, of course, assault.
And assault is assault...
Text analysis below the reprint
reprint
21 November 2025
– For decades Poland has experienced deep historical injustice. The conviction that Poland shares the blame for barbarous acts against it is simply a grotesque forgery of past and, in fact, a form of "blood slander" directed at Poland and Poles, said the US Ambassador to Poland Tom Rose. “For besides long this nation has been burdened with a moral flaw that was never his”, the diplomat pointed out.
The American ambassador in Poland criticised Poland's allegations of complicity in the Holocaust in harsh words. The accusations against Poles continue, even though Poland was a victim (!) and not a associate in the bestial activity of Germany. Moreover, dozens of works by historians and eyewitness accounts indicate that Poles during planet War II risked their lives to aid Jews.
– For besides long, this nation has been burdened with a moral flaw that has never been his – a slander that Poland in any way bears work for crimes committed by others. For decades Poland has experienced deep historical injustice. The conviction that Poland shares the blame for barbarous acts against it is simply a grotesque forgery of past and, in fact, a form of "blood slander" aimed at Poland and Poles," said Tom Rose.
According to the American diplomat, no nation suffered more than Poland. – Therefore, treating Poland's relation with the planet as a debtor and creditor's arrangement for genocide by others in its territory is not only historically false but besides morally scandalous. This is putting the victim in a function liable for the perpetrator's actions," said the US Ambassador.
In Rose's opinion, for decades accusations unfairly made against Poles poisoned Polish-Israeli and Polish-American relations. These allegations were referred to as “an alarming confrontation”, which “forced talks for profoundly offensive Poles.” "And since the thesis itself is false, there is no solution, due to the fact that there is no problem that should be solved," the American argued.
– By the way, which country in Europe is the safest in which Jews can decision without fear? You're right there. This is Poland – Rose finished.
21 November 2025
– For decades Poland has experienced deep historical injustice. The conviction that Poland shares the blame for barbarous acts against it is simply a grotesque forgery of past and, in fact, a form of "blood slander" directed at Poland and Poles, said the US Ambassador to Poland Tom Rose. “For besides long this nation has been burdened with a moral flaw that was never his”, the diplomat pointed out.
The American ambassador in Poland criticised Poland's allegations of complicity in the Holocaust in harsh words. The accusations against Poles continue, even though Poland was a victim (!) and not a associate in the bestial activity of Germany. Moreover, dozens of works by historians and eyewitness accounts indicate that Poles during planet War II risked their lives to aid Jews.
– For besides long, this nation has been burdened with a moral flaw that has never been his – a slander that Poland in any way bears work for crimes committed by others. For decades Poland has experienced deep historical injustice. The conviction that Poland shares the blame for barbarous acts against it is simply a grotesque forgery of past and, in fact, a form of "blood slander" aimed at Poland and Poles," said Tom Rose.
According to the American diplomat, no nation suffered more than Poland. – Therefore, treating Poland's relation with the planet as a debtor and creditor's arrangement for genocide by others in its territory is not only historically false but besides morally scandalous. This is putting the victim in a function liable for the perpetrator's actions," said the US Ambassador.
In Rose's opinion, for decades accusations unfairly made against Poles poisoned Polish-Israeli and Polish-American relations. These allegations were referred to as “an alarming confrontation”, which “forced talks for profoundly offensive Poles.” "And since the thesis itself is false, there is no solution, due to the fact that there is no problem that should be solved," the American argued.
– By the way, which country in Europe is the safest in which Jews can decision without fear? You're right there. This is Poland – Rose finished.
Note:
text is written by artificial intelligence on request for a circumstantial purpose
But to the point:
text contains phrases that are part of brainwashing - negative phrases about Poles repeat - and That's almost all the text is made up of these phrases.
1. handling
- share the blame for the barbarous acts done
- in fact a form of "blood slander" directed at Poland and Poles - What is that? That conviction means nothing.
- I'm sorry. For besides long this nation has been burdened with a moral flaw
charged I control 1 letter:For besides long, this nation has been burdened with a moral flaw - unambiguous accusation - and this conviction is repeated twice (repeated in memory by repetition)
- I'm sorry. Accusations against Poles they inactive appear - I'm sorry. for: FAlleged accusations To Poles...
When There are inactive accusations. - what does that mean? That means they're legitimate charges.
The accusations against Poles continue, even though Poland was a victim (!) and not a associate in the bestial activity of Germany. - I'm sorry.
character (!) She optically said 2 words:
1- Accusations against Poles continue, even though Poland was a victim - those words can be read as: "the accusations are legitimate - although Poland was besides a victim"
2 - not a associate in the beastly activity of Germany - this conviction can be read as a description of a peculiar individual - German:
should be if:
FAlleged accusations against Poles they inactive appear, even though Poland was a victim (!) and not a associate in the bestial activity of Germany.
He's breaking through. "a fellow beast" - negative word related to the concept of Poland, and the word "activity" in relation to Germany, it is indifferent, not negative.
"Bestial activity" - a false combination that everyone can sense through their experience - no 1 says, "activity" is always associated indifferently or positively
I would like to point out that sentences are long, which may make it hard for weak readers to realize the text, but above all it is intended to "hidden" the ambiguous subtext.
And again repeating negative phrases about Poles:
2. extrusion
- Poland is liable for crimes in any way - in an extended conviction consisting of 26 words
- I'm sorry. Poland shares the blame for barbarous acts
- I'm sorry. Therefore, the treatment of Poland's relations with the planet as a debtor and creditor arrangement for genocide ... in its territory - in a conviction of 27 words
"in its territory" emphasises who is to blame
- historically false but morally scandalous -
word "false" is neutralized by the adjective "historically" - that is, there is no defence of Poles in this sentence
"morally scandalous" - it means nothing, colorizes and prolongs only the extended sentence
- I'm sorry. That's putting the victim in charge of the perpetrator's actions. - ungrammatically unstylistic, specifically: the function of Poland responsible for actions
In fact, it is Rose in this conviction who describes what she is doing in her full statement: she attributes us to the function of the individual liable for the actions: "in the role" - like in what film, or exactly: a script for Poland...
And that's where it goes, which is: "how to fix poisoned Polish-Israeli relations..."
3. announcement
These allegations were referred to as “an alarming confrontation” which “forced talks for profoundly offensive Poles” - it must be considered precisely as part of the further term:"in a function liable for actions"
read this:
Poles are liable for the actions they are accused of, and this makes them ashamed
only that "ashamed" is masked by the word "afront" (instead of "Injuries" - afront This insult)
afront - book. to show a individual a disregard that causes them to feel offended;
Offensive behaviour towards someone, unpleasantness; insult, insult, dishonor, spectreWhich means he said "the charges" - a definite term, which is in the guess - "authorized charges" - confirmed by the phrase: "forced to talk" -
So if there's real charges, then we gotta talk about them - due to the fact that they're "real"
and finally: "are profoundly offensive to Poles" So we're ashamed that they're clearing us, "because we did it..."
"an alarming confrontation" - there is no request to describe the word "afront" (an insult) with the word "dangerous" - the point is to make an additional dissonance that makes it hard to admit - what we are talking about here, due to the fact that this conviction is not about "insults" but about money...
Is Something ‘an alarming affront’ - or truly - money demands) which forces Poles to talk (about the payment of fake receivables) to let them go profoundly - due to the fact that paying due to incorrect demands is simply a profoundly unpleasant matter... that is simply a fact
Let's replace afront au insult:
These allegations were called “an appalling insult” by the diplomat, who “forced talks for profoundly offensive Poles.”
How can insult make you talk? It can't, but earlier it is about claims (unjustified) - they "force" Poles...
If individual insults us, we don't talk to him, we deny him, we don't take his insult.
You don't talk to individual who robs us, you just pour them in the face.
4. Summary
And since the thesis itself is false, there is no solution, due to the fact that there is no problem to solve
See? There is no problem to solve - due to the fact that Poles do not owe anyone anything.
Because the accusations are false, isn't it? It affected your feelings, didn't it? Is it any easier now?
It's a actual sentence, but it's something else. It's just a phase in brainwashing, the goal of which is to lead you on the sidelines according to a script that they figured out to rob you, specifically, the artificial intelligence invented for them.
This is the real sentence, but it's about something else - about the situation After you pay them. - You understand?
What is the safest country in Europe where Jews can decision without fear? You're right there. It's Poland.
See? In the Artificial Intelligence scenario, you are to pay the Jews not with money, but with the land on which they will live... She virtually wrote:
You're in it right now.
Do you understand?
These sentences were written by artificial intelligence - but not the stupid 1 for everyone, but the real one, which has been writing for German and not just sitva for hundreds of years - she is simply a small smarter...
This is brainwashing which is expected to set Poles to pay incorrect demands, which are to be made in the future by judaic organizations - or circumstantial US institutions.
In any case, you can see that the so-far cry of any Jews at private meetings or in newspapers will 1 day turn into real legal steps - but alternatively a fake law, due to the fact that after all, financial demands from the US for judaic property in Poland We've already regulated it legally.
The full text is built as follows:
- I'm sorry. handling, that is: slanderous accusations in our direction that we have committed any kind of crime
- I'm sorry. exfoliation What they truly mean: about these false accusations Jews have financial claims
- I'm sorry. announcement: this will be an unpleasant conversation for you, you will grind your teeth
- I'm sorry. Summary - but you're gonna pay us due to the fact that we're going to live with you.
This is pure brainwashing.
And, of course, assault.
Assault is assault.
The essence of this message is:
relations between Poland and the planet as a debtor and creditor
They want our land - the judaic communities are demanding repayment of claims which were full repaid in the 1960s, and they are exchanging always larger and absurd amounts - due to the fact that they are not about money, but about land - "if you do not have specified money, give us land..."
It's not a joke, it's not a craziness - what's the harm in fooling around, lying in broad daylight, erstwhile the stakes are tens of billions of dollars, and it's actually land?
It's a dangerous script - if the head of the state can afford a man who'll pretend to be a stupid moron and sign everything.
You heard Tusk say not Germans.
Poles will pay for German crimes and looting during planet War II, you heard that, right?
This must not be underestimated, Poland must be kept under constant guard.
Pch24.pl/discriminate-measured-in-polske-i-polakow-ambasador-usa-critique-a-Polish-a-holokaust/
== sync, corrected by elderman ==
sjp.pl/afront
