Alexander quasniewski, or a carpenter???? who truly is the president of poland??????????????????????? unknown facts from the acidic life – another scandal sld?

Aleksander Kwaśniewski, can you stop??

Who truly Is the president R.P.??????

Unknown Facts from the Quaesque Life – A applicable AFERA SLD?

The publications were based on materials received from the USA from Mr Andrzej Lobrow and papers available online.

http://www.aferyprraw.eu/content/KWasniewski.html

How did Alexander Kwasniewski's professional career advancement indicatively described and documented more than 2 years ago in the article “ DOES JOLANTA KWAŚNIewska HAVE A SPANISH TO BE A president OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES?” and then she truly had a chance and support of almost 70%... not today, but...?

It was undoubtedly 1 of the first authoritative articles criticizing the “first lady”. Alexander besides lost the leading place of a credible politician, so laboriously implemented by his political background for years. No uncertainty he reached the summit, so now it's time to fall off the pedestal... This is besides evidenced by the President's guest list for his birthday in 2002 – it was impressive, as was the event itself. However, his 50th anniversary in 2004 was much more modest, hidden somewhere in the palace in Wisla, and guests were especially chosen.

The fact hidden by A. Kwasniewski from the Polish people is revealed by Leszek Bubel in his book entitled “Polish Holocaust” (issued in 2002 by Goldpol in Warsaw), which includes in the title the question: is Kwasniewski a Stoltzman? From this work we learn about the criminal past of the father of president Zdzisław Kwasniewski.

This book should be read by Poles to realize the fear and escape of A. Kwasniewski from the past, which is besides expressed by his electoral slogan: “Let us abandon the past, let us choose the future”.

The main effect of Kwasniewski's actions, as well as the old organization clique, for known and apparent reasons, is to appeal for the termination of all accounts of the Polish People's Republic of Poland's past and the appointment of a border line which is intended to prevent the settlement of criminals and organization affairs for force on the Polish nation. Of course any criminal and thief would have wanted that too...

Kwasniewski, like all Jews and many politicians of the SLD of Russian upbringing, is simply a kind of man thoroughly immune to specified concepts as Polishness, Polish patriotism, a sense of Polish national interest.

Can you give it to them? Should they live in abundance at the expense of vegetative majority of society? This is what the full nation should talk about by referendum.

It can't be that power to hide its matts itself determines a paragraph acquittal...

Aren't you the president?

So who was Zdzisław Kwasniewski?

It is clear from witness statements that the President's father, Isaac Stoltzman aka Zdzisław Kwasniewski, was a Russian hebrew in the rank of Colonel of the NKVD.

In 1978 A. Kwasniewski was already the head of the Faculty of Culture ZG SZSP. He marries Jolanta Konta – judaic origin, daughter of Colonel Konty – Military Information officer, suspected of criminal activity in the military during the Stalinist period. It moves to Warsaw, where it receives an flat outside the order. He is no longer trying to finish his studies at the University of Gdańsk. The apparent reason for this decision is that KC PZPR assigned it to an yearly survey in Moscow (1979/1980), to a faculty of global journalism at the State Institute of global Relations at the Ministry of abroad Affairs, which ends successfully obtaining a diploma No 1792 of 20 June 1980 (see below). A. Kwaśniewski did not uncover this fact erstwhile he was accused of not having a diploma in graduating from the University of Gdańsk.

This diploma (see below) gives the following assessments: * the past of the Communist organization of the russian Union – aimingly; * technological communism – aimingly; * technological atheism – aimingly; * political economics – aimingly; * global relations – good; * russian economics – aimingly; * russian law – aimingly; * logic – good; * the foundations of journalism – sufficient;

This [MGIMO] university was considered a hatchery of the world's russian agentry.

For all the years of communist dominance in east Europe, this circumstantial school has been educated selected (according to an ideological and political key) – not only future diplomatic and journalistic staff for the current needs of Communist parties and regimes in these countries, but besides agentural expositions abroad, appearing under the name of ‘diplomats’ or ‘corespondents’ of abroad government agencies of these countries and their organization newspapers and magazines.

Science in this semi-secret institute, which is actually a real socialist hatchery of spies, continued depending on the specialty of 5 to 6 years. little than a postgraduate degree. The university was lectured by elder GRU and KGB officers, specified as J. Primakow – erstwhile Head of the KGB and later Prime Minister of Russia.

It is clear that this information caused by storms, especially among patriots – Polish migrants in the United States, due to the fact that this information was published there a fewer years earlier. His opinion in a letter to president Georg W. Bush was expressed, among others, by Mr Andrzej S. Lobrow. His letter sent to president Bush in intervention is published in Polish and below in English.

lobrow_busch.s1.gif (29590 bytes) lobrow_busch.s2.gif (36586 bytes) lobrow_busch.s3.gif (14641 bytes)

lobrow_busch.ans1.gif (36173 bytes) lobrow_busch.ans2.gif (24559 bytes)

Two Eyes

In the weekly “Polar Star” No.7 Vol.88 Saturday, February 17, 1996, on the first page, a comprehensive article by Andrzej Krajewski, entitled “The Children of Earth Recovered” on Alexander acidniewski was published. 3 weeks later, in the same newspaper, No.10, Saturday 9 March 1996, in the section “Lists FROM READERS” Jan Krawiec expressed his feelings after reading this article. The article is entitled “Joint Stolzman”.

Children of the Earth returned.

Written by Andrzej Krajewski.

In his inaugural speech, on December 23, 1995, the fresh Polish president, Aleksander Kwasniewski, introduced himself as a kid of Recovered Earth. He was actually born on 15 November 1954 and lived until his accession to the University of Gdańsk in 1973 in Białogard, West Pomerania, on the land granted to Poland in Yalta, at the expense of Germany in the west, as compensation for the failure in the east to the russian Union.(...) The people of Białogard talk of the president only well. Even a group as peculiar as the Siberians, declares at the end of a half-hour, somewhat chaotic conversation: “We have not voted for him, but we will say nothing wrong”, although individual gets angry: “The 1 who voted on Kwasniewski should go to Siberia again.” But the Kwasniewski family, everyone I talk to, knows perfectly well. The President's father, Zdzisław Kwasniewski, surgeon, manager of the railway clinic, died in 1990. He helped people – I hear from the Sibiaras. – He appreciated education very much, enjoyed all 5 children, at work he praised his daughter's doctorate. – recalls the doctor working with him. The President's mother, Mrs. Aleksandra Kwasniewska, by the profession of nurse, only after her husband's death did she begin to contribute more, receive guests, affect the parish of St. Jadwiga. Pastor Wilk speaks of her with apparent sympathy and admiration: – There was a one-person charity, she helped people, and she hid her wellness problems. Others mention that she was handing out aids, borrowing herself, paying telephone bills for calls made from her flat by her neighbors. She died suddenly, already during her son's election campaign, in September. Aleksander Kwasniewski was at the Holy Mass, celebrated for her in the church at Liberty Square, and was buried like her husband, in Warsaw. According to the parish priest Wilk, the Kwasniewski home was closed: the young Olek, just as his sister Margaret, were consciously isolated by his father... They weren't allowed to have many friends. It was the father who made certain that nothing was missing at home, organizing his full life. Olek and his sister Gretel were to learn first. He went to prof. Komarczewski for additional Latin classes. Did your father dream about Olek's career as a doctor? In the memories of school colleagues, however, young Kwasniewski turns out to be an athlete and a humanist. He did worse with science, he could make even two, especially in mathematics. But he was a lavender. In this he was a master – says weekly “Poznaniak” a colleague from the presidential class, Teresa Chrenowska. This is confirmed by today's Belarusian doctor: He was friendly, but besides liked to stand out. At the end of the interview, editor Salapatek asks me clearly excited: – And you know that he was president once? Where do you mean? Home! They had their own Kwasniewski republic there! Olenka told me all this, but now that she's dead, it's not right to write, and Olek asked me to calm down... The revelations of editor Salapatka confirm the relation with the president's parent in Agata Chroniczka Kwasniewski's book I am: Mrs. Alexandra remembers that Olek from childhood had a intent for politics. There's even a image of her 9 years old pretending to take a presidential oath. And he was actually president at the time due to the fact that the Kwasniewski household had its own country and even an anthem. Of course, the most crucial thing in this country was Olek, and only then the remaining citizens.

Stories of life – or Olo always on top?

During his studies at the University of Gdańsk (1973-77), A. Kwasniewski joins the Socialist Union of Polish Students. The intensive activity leaves him no longer time to defend his master's thesis. In 1977, he joined the PZPR, not due to the household situation or the necessity of life, but for his career. In 1981, he was appointed editor-in-chief of the "ITD" weekly. The following year, he participates in the work of the verification committee and actively contributes to the dismissal of independent journalists.

He works in the councils of Rakowski and Messner – the beginnings of his career at the highest state offices, taking ministerial positions, obtained without any democratic verification.

In 1989, he lost his election to the legislature in the Koskolinski Province.

In the last days of office, as early as 1990, the “one signature” will redeem loans for the staggering amounts of respective 100 million zlotys for communist youth organizations specified as ZSMP and ZSP.

Three months earlier, at the last reunion of the PZPR (First SdRP) he is elected chief.

Aleksander Kwasniewski remains faithful to Stalinist traditions and votes in favour of the statute of limitations on the crimes of the Polish People's Republic.

Despite this, in the 1990s he assured: I was never a Communist!

The entrance to the PZPR Kwasniewski explained that he was attracted to the atmosphere of the organization that wanted to reform. An interesting translation from a individual who entered the PZPR, led by Gierek and Jaroszewicz, in 1977, in a period of utmost stagnation, after brutally breaking up protesters from Radom and Ursus, the celebrated "paths of health" etc.

From his early youth, Olek was able to bet on what accelerated his career. Already in junior advanced school as a 17-1th-century boy he willingly praised the russian Union as a model for Poland. His school chronicles recorded in 1971: A celebration of the 54th anniversary of October was held at our school. This celebration was honored by the russian pedagogue. The events of those glorious days were recalled by Kwasniewski, who at the same time drew attention to the merits of the USSR in the improvement of Polish socialism. (quoted behind the Electoral Gazette of 23 November 1995).

In a alternatively peculiar way, he explained his support for the left: My father listened to “Free Europe” all morning. My leftist views were shaped by the mediocre primitive propaganda of "Free Europe". Her unilaterality made me so tense that it pushed me towards the left. Kwasniewski was upset by the "bad, primitive propaganda of RWE", but seemingly he was attracted to Łukaszewicz-Hungarian propaganda of the 1970s, let alone russian propaganda from the day of late Brezhniev. He was a fast-paced cameraman. In 1977 he was already Vice-President of the Board of Provincial SZSP and joined the PZPR. In 1978 he was already the head of the Faculty of Culture ZG SZSP. He married Jolanta Konta and moved to Warsaw, where he immediately got an apartment. He no longer tried to finish his studies and compose a tedious master's thesis – after all, he had a Moscow diploma, for him and his career more important. Now it was the maximum usage of good systems. The well-known Kwasniewski since 1981 Piotr Gadzinowski recalled: The ability to situate was an crucial feature of the president and Kwasniewski undoubtedly has it. (Cyt. behind Agata Chróścicka: Kwasniewski am..., Kraków 1995, pp. 24, 37 )

In the fall of 1981 Kwasniewski became the editor-in-chief of the "itd". After the temporary closure of the letter during the martial law period from January 1982, he begins a feverish effort in various organization vouchers to launch it. From that time and from the first months after the resumption of the writing, many examples of Kwasniewski's general tendency to miss out on the fact were recorded. Agata Chróśccka described them: Waiting for the suspension of the “itd” everywhere he said that he was unemployed and complained that he had no money, while, as his editors say, he took the wage of the editor-in-chief at all times. He participated in the verification committee of journalists, as Lidia Ostańowska mentioned, but later claimed that he did not participate in the verification of journalists. Although he liked to emphasize the importance of his efforts for journalists, whom he persuaded to cooperate with the ‘itd’ during the verification, he did not appeal to his colleagues. Furthermore, erstwhile any of the negatively verified journalists won cases at the Labour Court, they did not take them back to the editorial board. (A. Chróścicka, op. cit., p. 34)

This attitude, especially the common support of judaic society, was conducive to his accelerated career. In 1984, he became editor-in-chief of the Young Flag, in 1985 minister in the government of Messner, later minister in the government of Rakowski, by which he was greatly favoured. In 1989, at the "round table" he was already 1 of the leading representatives of the party-government side, he competed in the June elections to the legislature from the Koszalin Voivodeship, failing in a clash with no 1 known organist from the list of "Solidamity" from Koszalin. Already friendly with Kwasniewski then, the hebrew Michnik was courting himself in conversation with him on 8 June 1989, saying: Olek, specified a ka-ampania I made you in Gdańsk, and you gave du-ups. “Ross” at the head of Kuron and Michniki do not forget Kwasniewski, seeing him as worthy of the maximum support and advocacy of “European” which can be very useful to them in future in clashes with the national right. Kwasniewski retained the office of president of the Youth and Physical Culture Committee in the rank of Minister. Both in 1989 and 1990, as president of SdRP Kwasniewski, he benefited from the very loud support of Michnik and his Electoral Newspaper. The size of this support and cooperation of Kwasniewski with the “pink” of the “dude” (Kwasniewski's tremendous commitment to maintaining the leadership of the abroad commission in the Sejm by the hebrew Geremek) gave much to think. Like Kwasniewski's consistent presence against ombudsmen of the defence of patriotism and Polishness, his attacks on “hurrapatriotic emotions” and “polononocentism”, and at the same time highly Philosemic stance, a large affluence towards the various demands of the judaic side.

Freedom from master's thesis, which is how to cheat citizens.

An informant from the 2nd word of the Sejm on Kwasniewski gave a higher education; a mgr of ecomomia. Kwaśniewski himself lied publically on 16 October 1995, saying in an interview with Radio 3 that he defended his master's thesis at the University of Gdańsk and had a higher education (according to the Republic of Poland of 11 December 1995). Meanwhile, on 16 November 1995, 3 days before the second circular of elections, B. Synak, the Rector of the University of Gdańsk declared that Aleksander Kwasniewski was deleted on 5 October 1978 from the list of students of the Faculty of Economics and Transport of the University of Gdańsk. On 24 October, the rector of the UG prof. Z. Grzonek confirmed the same, saying that A. Kwasniewski did not postgraduate from the UG, nor is he a postgraduate of the university, nor a master's degree. This did not prevent Kwasniewski from one more time lying in an interview with Frankfurter Rundschau on November 24, that he had finished his studies at the abroad Trade Department, and a different message from the rector of the UG in this case called the "election man". It was not until 2 December 1995 that Kwasniewski already as president-elect admitted in the pages of Politics that he did not make a master's degree. However, he gave an highly grotesque explanation of the matter. erstwhile asked why he did not effort to get all the papers in order, to show more care even in conducting surveys. Kwasniewski replied: (..) I believe that as a individual who passed all the exams, I have completed university studies. However, I feel a certain sin – and I regret that I did not formally close the master's degree. What was that? any kind of nonchalance, a sense that it's not truly important? most likely all together. possibly the deficiency of a degree is lying to opinions about me as a calculating careerer who has planned and directed everything carefully. You scope out to a very hard subject for me and besides to a part of my soul, which is not very discovered – I have felt a terrible request for freedom all my life and somewhere there is this wave of my hand for a diploma. I do not have any problems with my education, which I consider very good (..).

Stanislaw Tym, who commented on this kind of translation: (..) There is no diploma, due to the fact that he is honest (..). Crochet, cheater and liars would pass the master's exam cynically and defend the diploma – due to the fact that that is how cowards, as-securities, calculating careers and slaves of administrative orders behave. A free man waves his hand at specified things. Isn't that beautiful and noble? Is it possible to blame anyone for being a free man (..) It is easy to foretell that this “terrestrial request for freedom will shortly be met by a large number of societies... Since the president can be free, I think any citizen in any situation can feel free.... (As of 10 December 1995)

As a consequence of specified a "terrible request for freedom" – according to Tyma – could not delete tickets, drivers would drive cars without a driver's license, due to the fact that if they considered their driving skills to be very good, why would they request any paper, etc. In this regard, Lech Falandysz, dated December 10, 1995, lamented that the president-elect had twice committed intellectual falsehood, or "falsifications." In his opinion, Poles elected a man to be president, who is already known to be not doing very well in hard situations. Do not know why, besides frequently he went into the dead end of obscure translations or obscured himself with memory. He erstwhile became celebrated for escaping the Sejm in front of reporters on the ladder. I trust that this neat equipment is equipped with the Royal Palace and that it will be kept in excellent condition, always ready for use.

Even the old protector of Kwasniewski, erstwhile Communist Prime Minister Mieczysław F. Rakowski considered Kwasniewski's swindling explanations about his education to be a "unfortunate beginning". He wrote (in the SdRP Tribune of 16 December 1995): (...) Aleksander Kwasniewski acted stupidly, wrongly. He took the case besides lightly. Many of his authentic supporters have given intellectual discomfort (..).

A request for clarification to the head of the URM, Mark Borowski, was tried, but the Bureau of the Sejm rejected the question as a "political manifestation". KPN MPs besides accused Kwasniewski of utilizing his master's title erstwhile he was editor-in-chief, etc., and the Young Flag, writings belonging to the RSW "Press-Book-Move". According to the regulations of this cooperative, editors of the chiefs had to pass a degree in higher education. That is why any Members suggested at the end of November 1995 that the prosecution should be charged with stealing money from the Treasury from Kwasniewski. (according to Warsaw Life of 1 December 1995).

As it is known, there was no adequate social force to explain all these matters. The Verdict of the ultimate Court (at votum separatum close to 1 3rd of the judges) closed the full case conveniently for Kwasniewski, despite confirming that he has no higher education. By decision of 9 December 1995, the ultimate Court stated that false information about Alexander Kwasniewski was given on the electoral list, but nevertheless recognized his election as president of the Republic of Poland.

Why did the ultimate Court adopt a resolution that meant that a man who was corrupted by deceit would accept the highest office in the state? An crucial reason for this decision of the ultimate Court was given by Deputy lawyer General Stefan Sněžko, who said before the ultimate Court on 9 December that the public knew well long before the elections, and it was thanks, among another things, to the media that Kwasniewski provided false data about his education. Hence, the voters, knowing this fact, took it into account by casting their voices. The ultimate Court seemingly accepted this untrue justification of prosecutor Snow White. justice Jan Wasilewski (another Jew?) stated in the justification for the resolution of the ultimate Court on 9 December that those who took part in the vote on 19 November 1995 most frequently had doubts about Kwasniewski's higher education. The president of the SN was completely silent about the fact that any doubts about Kwasniewski's higher education were at all times violently attacked in the media by influential supporters of Kwasniewski (D. Waniek, Z. Siemiątkowski, etc.) and referred to as slanders, and elements of the election game aimed at the leader of the SdRP. The expert for the ultimate Court, Prof. Antoni Sułek, president of the Polish Sociological Society, recalled in a text published in the Republic of Poland on December 12, 1995 that Kwasniewski's staff denied the University's (Gdański) information and presented it as an allegedly unfair electoral stunt. In the context of a very fierce electoral fight, a large part of Kwasniewski's supporters preferred to believe publically proclaimed by "their" public claims in his defence alternatively than to believe in violently denied allegations about his deficiency of education.

Kwaśniewski himself did not think to apologise to the public for his swindling about education. Confirmed by the ultimate Court, he referred to the charges against him as “criticians” and critics of his lies as “frustrations”. He won the presidency per fas et nefas, and from now on, there is no case. However, the president-elect gave his supporters a terrible frog to swallow. Now they had to explain Kwasniewski's lies in pain and make a good face. In this respect, everyone was beaten by the then editor-in-chief of SdRP Trybuna Dariusz Szymczya in the tv Weekly Event of December 9, 1995. By arguing with the terms "swindler" and "unfair" raised at Kwasniewski in connection with his pre-election lies about Szymczy's education, he said that Kwasniewski was only unfair in a certain area. What an first contribution to the explanation of ethics – according to the editor-in-chief of the Tribune, it was possible to be dishonest only in 1 sphere and at the same time to be mostly honest. Let’s say “an honest different”!

As president Kwasniewski, he has frequently shown that ignoring a university diploma is just 1 of the symptoms of its disregard for higher values in culture and discipline or more in public life. On his scale of value, the highest was the gathering with Michael Jackson, due to the fact that he as an idol of any young people could give him additional votes. It meant nothing to him another anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising, for which he did not find time to celebrate. During his stay in the United States, he sought a gathering with boxer Andrzej Gołota, despite the fact that the boxer was then formally pursued by law as a fugitive from Poland. On the another hand, he did not find time to present a advanced discrimination to the well-known author Stanisław Lem (this is where Wanik replaced him). It is crucial in general to what degree the president – a erstwhile SZSP apparatusist, who in his time led the department of culture, omits matters of culture, discipline and education in his speeches and interviews. In this way, the full painful complex of “near master’s degree” reflects.

The apparatusist's profession has trained him with various circumstantial sociotechnical skills at the head with a passion for misappropriation. The unwritten motto of Kwasniewski could be words: I lie, so I am. Despite his maestria in deception, he was publically caught lying. It was about his vote on the bill to prosecute the crimes of PRL. Kwasniewski spoke twice about his vote on this issue and each time said something to the contrary. Gazeta Wyborcza said that he had not taken part in the vote at all. However, erstwhile the Sejm printout was checked and it was clear that Kwasniewski had voted against the bill, a completely different version of his behaviour was heard from him the following day: I spoke to the Deputy Minister of abroad Affairs of the United Kingdom and I only came to the area for the vote. I raised my hand like the individual liable at the club for this case. Kwasniewski successfully uses the sociotechnically tried grip of widespread lying in the kind of "catch the thief". (As we know, the thieves caught in the act red-handed to avoid shouting to passersby "catch the thief" in respect to those who catch them.) Well, the crucial feature of Kwasniewski, the heir to communist totalitarianism along with all his apparatusist SdRP, is to accuse of totalitarianism of all those who want real settlements with the legacy of PRL-communism. Already in Wprost of October 11, 1992, he assured: (...) If so frequently our opponents accuse us of relations with the PZPR, it is in me that they are more likely to be slaves of the old strategy than we are. We, as far as possible, have been critical of the reality of the Polish People's Republic as we are present critical of the examples of the recidivism of bad methods in the 3rd Polish Republic (...) erstwhile the Provincial Office in Warsaw challenged the legal side of the statutes of the Polish Olympic Committee, which was headed by Kwaśniewski, he immediately called the office "bolshevism". In May 1990, he allowed himself to talk as a swordsman of democracy defending her against the alleged threat from the Citizens' Committee, saying: Significantly, the Citizens' Committee is in office in the same Warsaw palace as FJN and PRON. There's a bad spirit there, imposing old ways of acting and thinking.

He was always very consistent in defending people from the erstwhile Polish People's Republic of Poland, as the case of the Seculas testified. SdRP writer Agata Wawrzyniak asked Kwasniewski: Why did you take under your wing a man compromised in the eyes of the public opinion against whom the prosecution in Wrocław was investigating, and your clubmate, then minister of justice, applied for the waiver of immunity? A crucial way of explaining the full case in Kwasniewski's answer was: I voted against depriving him of immunity due to the fact that I had legal doubts. In addition, in this way of my vote, protest is expressed against judging a person, and all media acting as prosecutor and court have done so before the case was dealt with by an independent judicial authority. I would have voted otherwise today. I admit we made a mistake about this.

(Cyt. for I like to play. Conversation by A. Wawrzyniak with A. Kwasniewski, Trybuna on October 19, 1995).

The secue thanks to this alleged mistake avoided responsibility, and due to the fact that it was most convenient to distance itself from the full case.

Gromish attacks and accusations against people who put forward any objections to SdRP and its people became the best method for Kwasniewski to defend the old defender from the PRL. It was accompanied by the assurance repeated at all step: the PRL-bis does not have a title of conversation with Kwasniewski in the Republic of Poland from 13 September 1994. In consequence to a letter of bishops in August 1995 informing the faithful before voting on people who held power during the totalitarian state, Kwasniewski replicated: This does not concern me. I don't feel liable for PRL due to the fact that I'm besides young. In Wprost of 19 September 1993 Kwasniewski said: There is not even a trace of something in our program that could bring to head communism.

Although the SdRP carries along a full array of various comrades-smacks, toughened in battles about strengthening the erstwhile PRL dictatorship, this does not hinder Kwasniewski in arrogant public assurances that there was only 1 case of exposing individual from the old organization apparatus (!!!) among the 402 SLD candidates as MPs and Senators in 1991 – cf. A. Kwasniewski's interview for Politics of 5 October 1991. This was said by the same Kwaśniewski, who consistently put on an old PRL-based camera rejecting cooperation with real organization reformers. erstwhile SdRP co-founder Tomasz Nałęcz, who left Kwasniewski from his party, in which he was initially vice-president, explained in an interview with Gazeta Wyborcza of 20 October 1993 that Kwasniewski chose Miller alternatively than Fiszbach because: (...) he needed the strength of the organization. This organization was the erstwhile PZPR structure that Miller was in control of. We Kwasniewski utilized to say: you can have a drink with you, but do not make politics. He said that erstwhile he asked for something, he knew that it would be done, and with us it would turn out that there was something more important: the kid got sick or the dog started scratching... In the another rows, more and more of the old cameras sat. There were fewer fresh people there....

Kwasniewski's favourite method is to constantly blur work for various evils of PZPR and PRL authorities by creating a sense that everyone was actually active in PRL. This is served by statements specified as: If you wanted to make a reserve for people active in real socialism, you would gotta barrier the full country with barbed wires. We protest against specified a imagination of our “own home”! She successfully exposed the methods of Kwasniewski Agat Chróscicki in a book on his subject, writing: (...) Kwasniewski's reasoning is very close to sociotechnical manipulation, characteristic of totalitarian power. It is easy to say that almost everyone was involved, and so all accounts must be left behind, due to the fact that they would concern the full society. Attacks of people and groups seeking settlement with communism, Kwasniewski dismissed just due to specified a theory. There are no guilty – work rests on all of us. Kwasniewski very much likes to repeat behind the Bible – let the first throw a stone, who is without sin. Then we feel foolish and unreasonable, for who can say of himself that he is without sin? It is simply a good time to think that possibly our sins are not so great, but then Alexander Kwasniewski is already in different regions...

(A. Chróścicka: op. cit. Kraków 1995, pp. 131, 133, 135).

Kwasniewski says: “Let us choose the future”. He does not add that this future will inactive be burdened with the effects of the Polish People's Republic, starting with the payment of Polish People's Republics' debts abroad, will be burdened with the disastrous effects of the Polish People's Republics' economical policy, decades of neglect in the fields of construction, science, education, etc., of being separated in so many spheres of life from Western countries. “Let us choose the future” in Kwasniewski kind means the actual maintenance of the dominance of the old nomenclature, which managed to evidence what was possible before 1989 and later in a time of very beneficial economical transformation. Kwasniewski and his organization very frequently renounced social disparity, lamented the poor, retired, unemployed, the state of Polish housing etc. Indeed, since 1993, governments have been strengthening social disparity, at the same time eagerly pursuing their interests. It is not by accident the only real concrete feature of Kwasniewski's first 100 days of government was the return of the assets of PZPR for SdRP. At the expense of society. In specified matters Kwasniewski never had a shadow of hesitation. As proved by his behaviour at the head of the Committee on Youth, Physical Culture, athletics and Tourism (according to the control of NIK) on the alleged "Interster" etc. (Our Poland has written about it widely in its first issue entitled Autoamnestia, 14 September 1995.) Kwasniewski's attitude on the alleged "Moscow money", consistent defence of I. Secula, etc. proved this.

Cynicism of acidniewski.

The celebrations of independency Day on 11 November 1996 became an chance for president Kwasniewski to address 1 of the brightest political lies. He called: (...) But let us besides remember those representatives of power, people of the left who at various times tried to supply Poland with as much sovereignty as possible in the post-Jaltan conditions (...). So let us remind the representatives of power, the people of the left from decades since 1944. Starting with Bierut, Berman, Zambrowski, Minca, liable for the maximum satelliteization of Poland, submission to specified shameful actions of the russian occupier as the arrest of the 16th in Pruszków, the export of thousands of AK-owts to Siberia, the plundering of Polish lands, especially alleged Earth recovered on a immense scale. For their cruel panic against the most patriotic forces in Poland, for blocking changes even months after Stalin's death, for brutal suppression of the labour uprising in Poznań. It is hard to talk about efforts to guarantee the top sovereignty of Poland besides from the Gomulka team, which rapidly betrayed the trust of the nation. The squad liable for the fast elimination of the majority of Polish October's conquests, cleaning among those advanced ranks of military and naval officers, who showed a peculiarly patriotic attitude in October 1956. A squad that blocked settlement with Stalinists in Poland and blocked writing about crimes of Stalinism in Poland (as opposed to Hungary, where the crimes of Hungarian Stalinism were written). A squad liable for creating another "Dictatorship of the Dark", for expanding repression of the nonconformist part of intellectual environments (after list 34), for blocking economical reforms, for the non-measured fight against the Church. For brutal suppression of student manifestations in March 1968 and for the criminal massacre of Coast Workers in December 1970. Gomulku acted in defence of Polish national interests in relation to Germany. However, he was incapable to defend these interests (even economical ones) towards the USSR, despite the fact that he was expected to do so by a large part of the nation that supported him in 1956. He was afraid of this support due to the fact that he knew that the majority of Poles did not want communism. And it was not by accident that Gomulku was next to Ulbricht and Brezhnev 1 of the hottest spokespersons of intervention in Czechoslovakia. And he was co-responsible for this intervention, for helping overthrow the organization leaders of the Prague Spring, who were actually trying to guarantee their country as much sovereignty as possible in the post-Yaltan conditions.

What the concern for Polish sovereignty looked like in Gierek's time is best evidenced by an amendment to the Polish Constitution voted in 1976, faithful to the USSR.

Finally, another “synerenna” squad led by General W. Jaruzelski, who saved the Kremlin rulers from the dangers arising for Moscow from the increasing independency of Poland by “Solidarity”. By introducing martial law, again tightening the shackles of the Polish dependency. The team, led by General W. Jaruzelski and M.F. Rakowski, frequently performed with texts defaming the Polish people and “Solidarity” outside Poland, with real “donos to Poland”. All of them were first communists and then Poles, they could not match the fewer influential communists in respective another countries who were able to be Hungarians (I. Nagy, I. Maleter or I. Pozsgay) or Slovaks and Czechs (A. Dubcek, Z. Mlynarz, J. Smrkowski) and then communists. The preservation of the leading people of communist power in Poland in post-war decades has inactive confirmed 1 unquestionable fact of our 20th century history, that "the communist has always been anti-national". president Kwaśniewski's attitude to date, his reluctance to actual patriotism and meekness towards various pressures on Poland proved that he was a "right Jew" and the right heir to these demonic anti-national communist groups. As a capable student of Jaruzelski and Rakowski. In Jastrzębie – inactive as a presidential candidate – On 27 June 1995 he described members of “Solidarity” as fascists and anti-Semites, calling out: (...) This is what Solidarity looks like present – Fascism and anti-Semitism...

(Cyt. behind the Life of Warsaw from 13-14 January 1996).

Treatments for support of the judaic lobby

Already in 1989 Kwasniewski was a clear favourite of the pro-Jewish lobby in OKP headed by Adam Michnik and was promoted by them as the main partner of future agreements with the left OKP. Grateful Kwasniewski declared as part of a survey, conducted among politicians, for whom he would like most outside of his party: I would first vote for Adam Michnik, but only if he had founded something of his own... What Michnik thinks and thinks suits me best as a citizen and as a politician(...).

(Gazeta Wyborcza, June 21, 1991.)

Among the views especially close to Michnik we find so powerfully emphasized by Kwasniewski's condemnation of the remnants of national self-centeredism, glacialism, xenophobia and the sense of the past of the mission, slogans of Polish-centric and hurrapatriotic emotions

(from an extended two-column article by A. Kwasniewski in the Electoral paper of July 1, 1996).

As president of the Polish Republic, he acts to accelerate the adoption by the Sejm of the law on the return of spiritual property to judaic communities, which would make the Association of judaic Communities the largest financier in Poland. In July 1996 during a gathering with representatives of judaic organizations in fresh York Kwasniewski promised a fast return of property to Jews.

The pro-Jewish bias of president Kwasniewski caused a sharp protest by the president of the legislature of American Polonia, Edward Moskal, who sent a letter to Kwasniewski on 10 May 1996 criticizing that: deficiency of firmness in the actions of the Polish government, as well as evident errors of government officials, causes Jews to let themselves more and more. Kwasniewski rejected Moskal's critical remarks, supporting judaic rations. Among another things, he maintained his desire to return property for judaic communities as shortly as possible and expressed his apologies to the Jews, who were criticized by the president of Moskal, for the alleged Kielce pogrom, issued by Minister Rosati on behalf of the Polish people. Secretary of State Marek Siwiec, appearing at a press conference on behalf of president Kwasniewski, stated that: Poland and Polish society should apologize for what was wicked in the past of Poles and Jews after planet War II.

Kwasniewski's attitude illustrated his reaction to the massacre of 102 Palestinians in Cana of Galilee by the Israelis. The president of the Republic commented on the barbaric assault in words that it was most likely besides costly to organize relations between 2 countries. That's it. Indeed, a comment worthy of a European.

In 1995, Kwasniewski was 1 of the first Polish politicians to talk with public condemnation of respective sentences by the prelate priest Henryk Jankowski, present as is known by the Wyborcza Newspaper. At the same time, he did not respond with a word to the provocative anti-Polish speech of Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel, a judaic writer, delivered on 7 July this year during authoritative ceremonies in Kielce in the presence of the Prime Minister of Poland, including utmost generalizations of “Polish hatred” (as criticized by Simon Wiesenthal and president of the judaic Forum Stanisław Krajewski). Kwasniewski's stay in the United States became another confirmation of his pro-Jewish bias and consistent treatments for political support of the global judaic lobby. At the same time, erstwhile there was a deficiency of effort to talk to the truly typical representatives of the Polish Republic in the United States, president Kwasniewski paid maximum attention to subsequent meetings with the most influential judaic lobby representatives in the United States. He visited, among others, the “polacvory” of Jewish-dominated newspapers: the fresh York Times and the Washington Post, interviewed the advice of the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. and met with representatives of the 56 largest judaic organizations in the United States. He gained their maximum approval after longer talks “on closed doors”.

As an activist of PZPR and SdRP, and as the president of the Republic of Poland Kwaśniewski did not erstwhile argue anti-Polish persecution from judaic circles. It does not bring praise to today's Poles that the most crucial position in the Polish country is held by Aleksandra Kwasniewski. An undereducated politician, frequently publically absenting himself from the fact and having no deep sense of connection with the best traditions of Polish history. An activist whose place of program and large ideas was replaced by ad hoc instrumentalism and cynically applied social engineering of power.

The survey by Jerzy Robert Nowak was used.

On September 17, 1999, the President, representatives of the Katyń Family, parliamentarians and military paid tribute to 4 and a half 1000 Polish officers murdered in 1940. Everything would be fine if it were not for the fact that – as Katarzyna Piskorska said, associate of the board of the Warsaw Katyń household – the president was under the influence of alcohol. (quoted ‘Rzeczpospolita’ of 22.IX.1999). The Polish Press Agency stated on that day that: journalists pointed out the President's clear indisposition; he was pale, journalists commented among themselves that his participation in the ceremony was a real difficulty. The typical of the Katyn household added that the president was overly exaggerating for these circumstances. The BBC radio specified that the president was somewhat wobbly.

But he acted rather vice versa at the judaic organization in Bełżec.

What about Kwasniewski, the patriotic American Polonia?

In the frames, the Polish version and (below) the English letter of the expatriate, patriot of Polish Mr Andrzej S. Lobrov from the United States, sent to the address of the President's office and to Primate Glemp, who was shocked by the “National Pilgrimage of the President” to Rome and his false glory to Christianity...

lobrow_acid.s1.gif (20411 bytes) lobrow_acid.s2.gif (24405 bytes) lobrow_acid.s3.gif (19799 bytes)

lobrow_acid.ans1.gif (23812 bytes) lobrow_acid.ans2.gif (26712 bytes) lobrow_acid.ans3.gif (7557 bytes)

And another accusation of Alexander Kwasniewski – MP Antoni Macierewicz

During the last fewer decades Aleksander Kwasniewski at least 3 times stated publically that Poles murdered Jews in Jedwabne and were liable for this.

On 2 March this year in an interview with Sewer Plocker, a writer for the Israeli paper "Yediot Ahronot", Kwasniewski said, among others:

– "No substance what the background of this terrible act, 1 must not forget and must not hide: it was a mass execution committed on Jews by Polish citizens".

“The Silky case is pushing us to do an in-depth examination of our conscience. We think with amazement how Poles could have done specified a massacre.”

“Poland did not invent communism and did not start planet War II, and here we are being asked to pay for the harm done to us in the past. Of course, this does not apply to the case of Silk and akin accidents. There the work rests entirely on us Poles.”

5 March this year in an interview with Radio RMF/FM:

“Second – the planet must hear our assessment of that event, I remind you of the savage death of 1,600 Polish citizens – Jews who were murdered by fellow citizens.”

30 March this year, TVN, Period over i:

"Unfortunately, there is no argument to verify specified a view that in Jedwabne, this execution was done with Polish hands, and that it was done during the Second War that, of course, the Germans were accomplices to this, due to the fact that they caused this war, that most likely any of them were watching with acceptance of what was happening there, that is another topic."

***

Thus Aleksander Kwasniewski, speaking publically as president, clearly, without doubt, points to Poles as perpetrators of mass execution on Jews in Jedwabne on 10 July 1941. It should be stressed that Kwaśniewski does not mention in any of these statements the conduct, direction or direct cooperation in the execution of Germans. On the contrary, the possible responsibility of the Germans can be seen at most in the fact that “they have waged war” and in the fact that “probably any of them have watched with acceptance of what is happening there”. According to Kwasniewski, the murderers of 1,600 Jews were Polish residents from Jedwabny and "the work rests entirely on us, Poles".

In saying these words, Aleksander Kwasniewski was aware that in the case he was talking about, there was a trial in the 1940s, in which 12 people were yet convicted of being "... by going to the hand of the German government took part in the inclusion of about 1,200 judaic people, who were burned by the Germans...". Thus no Poles have been accused so far, or even more condemned for “murdering Jews.” On the contrary, the erstwhile court ruling states the actions of the Germans.

Aleksander Kwasniewski besides knew erstwhile he said the words cited above that the Institute of National Memory had undertaken an investigation to clarify all the circumstances of the crime, find the guilty and possibly convict them. This investigation, until today, has not been completed, and no one, and much little no Pole, has been accused of murdering Jews in Jedwabne.

And yet – Aleksander Kwasniewski knew that there were papers containing judicial evidence of eyewitnesses, including Jews who escaped from the burning barn, stating clearly that the execution was carried out by Germany. Kwasniewski besides knew that many prominent Polish and abroad historians, based on in-depth investigation and solid analyses, believe that Germany was the organizers and main perpetrators of this crime. Despite all these circumstances, Aleksander Kwasniewski publically stated that Poles murdered Jews.

Blaming Poles Aleksander Kwasniewski always acted as the president of Poland, representing the full nation and in his name ruling on the guilt of Poles. In this way, he was exerting illegal force on the authorities of the IPN and prosecutors investigating.

The president to uphold the regulation of law (Article 126 of the Constitution) has expressed complete contempt for the law by publically announcing the worst crimes of the savage genocide of people who have not been proven guilty, and it is not even known whether specified an accusation will be made to anyone. This is simply a procedure which has no precedent in civilized, democratic and independent states.

As a Polish citizen, I believe that Aleksander Kwasniewski, unjustly accusing Poles of the crime of genocide by murdering 1,600 Jews in Jedwabne, violated my individual goods as honor, honor and right to a good name as a Pole.

During the Second planet War and then during the russian business and communist dictatorship, the Polish Nation was exposed to the genocidal practices of Nazi and Communist oppressors. Still, he never bowed down and he never soiled himself with racism or genocide. These uncontested facts were confirmed in hundreds of the most serious technological works of Polish and abroad researchers, as well as by celebrating thousands of Poles as those who defended human dignity in times of savagery. The Poles showed peculiar sacrifice by mass saving Jews, which was threatened by death punishment and collective responsibility. No another nation on specified a scale and with specified heroism has shown what a Christian conscience, love of neighbor, dignity of a baptized nation is. Poles, although subjected to cruel extermination, extended a helpful hand to others over injuries and injuries. This was the case during the Nazi business and for the next 50 years. In Poland only Nazi and communist occupiers utilized racism, genocide and national hatred.

Therefore, Aleksander Kwasniewski, who blames the genocide in Jedwabne of Poles, commits slander and settles in my good name as a Pole.

So I request that he publically recant his lies.

ANTONI MACIEREWICZ

Sir!

A note was published in “Our Journal” [noting that on Monday you would file a suit against Alexander Kwasniewski demanding “revocation of the lie, that Poles murdered Jews in Jedwabne” and that the President, in your opinion, violated your “personal good – honor, honor and right to the good name of the Pole”; the full text of the message by Antoni Macierewicz present in GŁOSIE on page 23. – ed.]

I would be honored if you would add me to the list of people who besides believe that Aleksander Kwasniewski violated their individual goods. While not being able to participate in the suit personally, I give you the authority to represent my individual in the prosecution of Alexander Kwasniewski.

I'm sorry.

Ontario, Canada

***

Sir,

I wholeheartedly support your suit which you intend to file against “the president of all Poles” – Aleksandr Kwasniewski.

I am not acquainted with the past and modernity of any another country whose highest authority, alternatively of defending the honor of its country and nation, would immediately stand on the side of any slander and with the usage of pushy, goebbels propaganda media, would force average citizens to cayate for unfulfilled guilt.

As a citizen not Polish, but feeling a part of the Polish nation – I was created by a man whose pedigree reaches the PZPR and whose full work for the words is called anti-Polek and renegade.

It is something disgusting that the nation, which was the only nation to defend the Jews against Nazism, is present the object of revolting attacks from those whom it saved with the hazard of life.

Yours sincerely.

Mr Miroslaw J. Wiechowski

Salt, Sweden

***

An open letter to Mr Alexander Kwasniewski, president of Poland

You have no authority, nor legal, and even more moral, to apologize to the Jews on behalf of the Polish people for allegedly crimes committed on them. What right, then, did you say in an interview with the Israeli paper “Jedijot Ahronot” that you would apologise to the Jews on behalf of Poles for killing in Jedwabne, giving “green light” for further defamation of the Polish nation? In advance, you passed a conviction on Poles, even though the findings of investigations conducted by the Institute of National Memory clearly point to the Germans. Without waiting for the results of the investigation, following the footsteps of your people from years ago, you are trying to put force on prosecutors to delegate this act to Poles alternatively than Germans. However, it should be hoped that the IPN will conduct the investigation reasonably and will not give in to anyone's pressure.

After 1989, many judaic officials serving as a advanced state authoritative in Poland apologized on behalf of the Polish judaic people for judaic crimes. Similarly, it may be in the case of Jedwabny, where Germans were perpetrators, due to the fact that Poles were previously convicted of guilt. As usual, Jews are right, in this case Jan Tomasz Gross, Szmul Wasersztajn and others. The facts are irrelevant.

The Jedwabny case is not your only anti-Polish performance. At 1 time you were lyingly apologizing to the Jews on behalf of the Polish people for the hideous provocation of Kelecka in 1946, in which 40 Jews were murdered. The crime was organized and carried out by the Jewish-communist authorities in cooperation with the russian NKVD. As a consequence of this crime, a Jewish-communist court sentenced respective Poles to death who had nothing to do with the criminal provocation and were not even around the crime scene on that day.

You besides lied about accusing Poles and apologizing to Jews for allegedly forcing 20 1000 of them to leave the Polish People's Republic from 1968 to 1969. You know very well that then there were games in the PZPR authorities. The Jews lost respective 100 intrat positions and took advantage of the chance to leave the PZPR at their own request and voluntarily renounced Polish citizenship. They were leaving with all the accumulated (not always legal) movable assets, and the PRL government paid them a fewer grants. The lie was besides your message that the Polish People's Republic had left 20,000 Jews during this time. Andrzej Pankowicz, who cannot be presumed to be false, mentioned 5,500 Jews in the past manual.

Following global and national Jewry without any inhibitions, you unreasonably spit in our face. Well, not only the Lord, but all post-communists of judaic origin always come with hastily judgments on the full Polish nation and apologize to the Jews on behalf of our nation for the crimes committed on them by the Germans and even by the Jews themselves.

A separate subject is your anti-Polish actions, consisting, among others, in vetoing laws by Parliament, for example, on the lawyer General's Office, misappropriation and reprivatisation. And to think that it was the Lord who swore: “...I will stay faithful to the provisions of the Constitution, I will defender the integrity of the Nation, the independency and the safety of the State, and the welfare of the Homeland and the well-being of the citizens will always be the highest command for me.” The words of the oath are of small importance to you. You dare even repeat all the time that you are the president of all Poles.

It is only appropriate to sympathize with those Poles who supported you in the presidential election by pretending to stay faithful to the oath and defend the Polish state's right.

44 illegible signatures

Boat, April 7, 2001