Lawyers of Owsiak, or sad performance of Mazurek and Stanowski

I sat in front of the screen last night, tired after a full day, but I thought, okay, I'll see what they gotta say. Mazurek, Stanowski, Wielgucki – the lineup, as you look, can be interesting. WEDP, controversy, strong topics, just in time for a good conversation. I was hoping that something would come of it – any discovery, facts drawn out, something that would let us to look at the substance from another side. But what I saw was a different story.

I had to take this program 3 times, due to the fact that the first time I took it, it couldn't be seen calmly. The bias of the leaders was beating the eyes like neon at the disco. It wasn't an interview, it was a farce. Mazurek and Stanowski utilized to be Owsiak's attorneys, as if they were given power of attorney. all time Wielgucki tried to say something specific, they would go in his words, throw lyrics to make him laugh. You gotta have real steel nerves to last something like that.

I approached this interview with the hope of concrete. I was hoping for facts, a meaningful conversation, in which they will deal with the subject as needed – they will listen, ask questions, draw more. What did I get? 2 leaders who, alternatively of following the facts, jump after the guest, like hounds, clinging to irrelevant details and commas. He talks about specifics, throws data, and they just turn their eyes, look at each other, and do everything to get him off track.

I was looking and thinking, what's going on here? Why did they invitation him? To show how “inquiry” they can be? I think they mistook the investigation for picky. The interview was expected to be about WOŚP. You know, the foundation, about collecting money, about how it works or not. What about them? Half the program's got a intellectual image of the guy like he's the subject of the evening. Really? With all due respect, it wasn't an interview – it was a trial.

And not just any trial. Just like old times, erstwhile a guilty man came up on the way. He tried to translate, he threw facts, and they were like children in the sandbox: “And this? And that? What about this?’ No connection, no order, no composition. It's like they don't want to perceive to him. They want to yell at him.

The mazurek... the same Mazurek, who is usually put on as a model of a cut rippost, here he looked like a student on a test, who did not do his homework, but loves to correct others. And Stanowski? This 1 made a good face for a bad game, trying to be objective, although it was apparent that it was not working out.

And you know what the worst part is? That there's nothing to this conversation. Nothing at all. The Hungarians had courage. He had something to say. But alternatively of talking about it, he had to defend himself. Like he was the suspect, not all the mechanisms he was trying to describe. It's like it's not about the truth, it's about extinguishing it, burying it and closing it.

I don't buy it. Not due to the fact that I'm a large fan or his ideas. due to the fact that that's not the point. The point is that I see 2 journalists – and it is said from the top – do not want to do what they should do. They don't want to ask, they don't want to listen, they don't want to learn.

I just felt sorry. due to the fact that there was a chance out there. A chance to have a real conversation about something important. About how WOŚP works, about money, about trust. But instead, I got a sad show. 2 guys in the pre-arranged thesis and 1 guy trying to say something, but there's no 1 to talk to.

And you know what? From all this, I learned nothing fresh about WOŚP. But I learned a lot about Mazurk and Stanowski. And that, unfortunately, is not good news.