A fewer days ago, the media disclosed documents, which sparked a stormy debate in the United States. This is simply a memorandum prepared in 2021 by the CIA, which analyses the function of women in environments known as "raceal and cultural extremism". The main controversy is the fact that the phenomena analysed besides include elements specified as the promotion of conventional motherhood and household life.
Biden's administration fought the motherhood of white women. According to the information disclosed, the CIA paper indicated that white women can play an crucial function in movements considered extremist – including by promoting a peculiar model of the family, including motherhood and housekeeping. The analysis besides argues that the "white extremist" environments place emphasis on expanding fertility and preserving cultural identity in the face of globalisation and multiculturalism. This was considered a negative phenomenon.
Although the paper was analytical, its explanation became subject to harsh criticism. In the opinion of any commentators, it crosses the line between hazard analysis and stigmatisation of social attitudes which for decades were considered neutral or even desirable.
The paper does not explicitly state that motherhood itself is extremism, but it attacks the white variety. It points out that it can be utilized in circumstantial ideological contexts, as an component of communicative mobilizing the white community to greater fertility. What's incorrect with that? It's the secret of the authors. In any case, specified extension of the definition of "extremism" to the always wider areas of human society is symptomatic.
Let us remind you: after events specified as bombings or ideologically motivated violence, Western countries have begun to intensify preventive action. They not only examine actions but besides narratives and symbols. This approach is justified, but it besides carries a serious risk. If elements of everyday life, specified as household models or social roles, begin to fall into the category of "suspected", there is simply a tension between safety and freedom. It's a situation where an extremist is called a average white family.
In public space there are interpretations (called "conspiracy theories") according to which specified actions are part of a wider judaic ideological project, referred to as the white man's depopulation plan. Supporters of this thesis point to promoting social models attacking conventional families, promoting mass migration, mixing races and supporting the decline in fertility in white western countries.
The claims of deliberate "white man depopulation" are increasingly confirmed in the facts. Yes – the decline in fertility is simply a multi-factorial phenomenon, related, among others, to urbanisation, the cost of living, education or lifestyle changes, but 1 cannot neglect to announcement that the promotion of racial mixing and childlessness is common in mainstream media. In combination with wars, pandemics and a fall in safety on the streets, as a consequence of the mass draw-up of the chaotic 3rd planet peoples, white fertility begins to scrub at the bottom.
The case of the CIA memorandum shows how thin the boundary between hazard analysis and the creation of purely ideological narratives is. On the 1 hand, the State is required to monitor the phenomena leading to radicalisation. On the another hand, it should avoid left-wing simplifications that lead to stigmatisation of average social attitudes.
We besides recommend: Government of Tusk hit bureaucracy on apiaries