Robert Bąkiewicz is simply a celebrated figure on the Polish political phase and not necessarily liked. He's not the only 1 who resents him. Left activists, who call him Nazi and fascist for a change, but besides nationalists accuse him of treason due to the fact that he changed political colors in addition to being PiS colours. The media besides attached to Bąkiewicz a patch, which is always attached to right-wing activists who behaved rather clearly. Whatever evaluation criterion we accept, 1 thing is certain, namely that Bąkiewicz with a machete in the city does not run and does not even have tattoos, at least in a visible place.
Relying on the allegations that whether or not the language of the public debate is on the agenda, but the unusual fact is that "hejter" is always a politician or right-wing activist, while the characters of the left do not "bite in the language." A separate issue is physical aggression, which was completely unjustly accused of Bąkiewicz and even a final judgement was given in this case, 1 of those who should not, if the justice strategy were functioning in Poland. At a time of gigantic smoke, erstwhile "angry uterus" decided to organize a "Streak of Women" and, among another things, unload their aggression by attacking churches, Bąkiewicz organized a counterattack. Thus arose groups to keep order from the churches and to defend against attempts at profanation.
It is known that where people push each other, physical contact is inevitable, but in no way can a violation of immunity be recognized erstwhile the alleged victim manifestly provokes and leads to physical contact. On the steps of the Church of the Holy Cross in Warsaw, she behaved Catherine Augustinek, or Catherine A., who is accused in respective criminal proceedings, more than 1 has already been wrongly convicted for biting and insulting the pro-life activist. The net is filled with vulgar and aggressive behaviours of Augustines, and it was expected to be "beaten", by Bąkiewicz, although in fact it was a typical pushover, which “Grandmother Kasia” had tens, if not hundreds.
Robert Bąkiewicz was sentenced for this non-physical act of violence: a year of restrictions on freedom and 10 1000 allegiances to Augustines. The conviction passed, but a motion for pardon was filed, but the President's Chancellery was stuck for a fewer years. Recently, Bąkiewicz organized another action, this time on the Polish-German border he controlled the flow of "refugees". This dismayed the rulers, and Adam Bodnar so overturned his decision to suspend his execution. president Andrzej Duda responded almost immediately and pardoned Bąkiewicz. Reactions on both sides of the barricade were easy to predict, on the right there was applause, on the left there were the words of outrage and whistles.
The President's decision is by all means right, and in all respect, with the restoration of the sense of justice at the head. Only that this pardon should not be at all, Andrzej Duda did not work for judges guided by political motivation. The courts are not here to flatter social tastes and social pressures, but they cannot act against simple rules of logic and life experience. In any criminal proceedings, the court is required to find the facts as well as all the circumstances in favour of the defendant. meantime The court was blind and deaf to the circumstances that clearly showed that the “injured” was a professional provoker who continued to show vulgar and aggressive behavior. Therefore, pardon can only outrage in the context of the functioning of the "Justice Dimension".
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
